slca-20211231
false2021FY0001524741P1Yhttp://www.ussilica.com/20211231#LeaseRightOfUseAssetshttp://www.ussilica.com/20211231#LeaseRightOfUseAssetsP1Y00015247412021-01-012021-12-3100015247412021-06-30iso4217:USD00015247412022-02-18xbrli:shares00015247412021-12-3100015247412020-12-31iso4217:USDxbrli:shares0001524741us-gaap:ProductMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ProductMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:ProductMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:ServiceMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ServiceMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:ServiceMember2019-01-012019-12-3100015247412020-01-012020-12-3100015247412019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:CommonStockMember2018-12-310001524741us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2018-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2018-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2018-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2018-12-310001524741us-gaap:ParentMember2018-12-310001524741us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2018-12-3100015247412018-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:ParentMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:ParentMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2019-12-3100015247412019-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:ParentMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:ParentMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ParentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ParentMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2021-12-31slca:Segment0001524741us-gaap:BuildingMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:LandImprovementsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:MinimumMemberus-gaap:MachineryAndEquipmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:MaximumMemberus-gaap:MachineryAndEquipmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:IntellectualPropertyMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:CustomerRelationshipsMembersrt:MinimumMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:CustomerRelationshipsMembersrt:MaximumMember2021-01-012021-12-31xbrli:pure0001524741srt:MinimumMemberus-gaap:LongTermContractWithCustomerMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:MaximumMemberus-gaap:LongTermContractWithCustomerMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:MinimumMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:MaximumMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandRestrictedStockUnitsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:PerformanceSharesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:EmployeesMemberus-gaap:PerformanceSharesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:PotentiallyDilutiveSharesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:PotentiallyDilutiveSharesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:PotentiallyDilutiveSharesMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandPerformanceSharesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandPerformanceSharesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandPerformanceSharesMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedDefinedBenefitPlansAdjustmentMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedDefinedBenefitPlansAdjustmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccumulatedDefinedBenefitPlansAdjustmentMember2021-12-310001524741slca:SandBoxLogisticsMemberslca:ArrowsUpLLCMember2020-01-012020-03-310001524741slca:SandBoxLogisticsMemberslca:ArrowsUpLLCMember2020-03-310001524741slca:SandBoxLogisticsMemberslca:ArrowsUpLLCMember2021-01-012021-03-310001524741slca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2020-12-310001524741slca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2020-12-310001524741slca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2021-12-310001524741slca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerMemberslca:TenLargestCustomersMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerMemberslca:TenLargestCustomersMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerMemberslca:TenLargestCustomersMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberslca:CustomerOneMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:AccountsReceivableMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberslca:CustomerOneMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:MiningPropertyAndMineDevelopmentMember2021-12-310001524741slca:MiningPropertyAndMineDevelopmentMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AssetRetirementObligationCostsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AssetRetirementObligationCostsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:LandMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:LandMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:LandImprovementsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:LandImprovementsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:BuildingMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:BuildingMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:MachineryAndEquipmentMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:MachineryAndEquipmentMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:LandMemberus-gaap:PrepaidExpensesAndOtherCurrentAssetsMemberus-gaap:DisposalGroupHeldforsaleNotDiscontinuedOperationsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:LandMemberus-gaap:DisposalGroupHeldforsaleNotDiscontinuedOperationsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DisposalGroupDisposedOfBySaleNotDiscontinuedOperationsMemberus-gaap:LandMember2020-10-012020-12-310001524741slca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2019-12-310001524741slca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2019-12-310001524741slca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:EPMineralHoldingsInc.Memberslca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:EPMineralHoldingsInc.Memberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:EPMineralHoldingsInc.Member2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:EPMineralHoldingsInc.Memberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2020-01-012020-03-310001524741slca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:IntellectualPropertyMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:IntellectualPropertyMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:CustomerRelationshipsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:CustomerRelationshipsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:TradeNamesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:TradeNamesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:OtherIntangibleAssetsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:OtherIntangibleAssetsMember2020-12-310001524741slca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2020-04-012020-06-300001524741slca:RevolverMemberus-gaap:RevolvingCreditFacilityMember2021-12-310001524741slca:RevolverMemberus-gaap:RevolvingCreditFacilityMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:SecuredDebtMemberslca:SeniorSecuredCreditFacilityMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:SecuredDebtMemberslca:SeniorSecuredCreditFacilityMember2020-12-310001524741slca:InsuranceFinancingNotesPayableMemberus-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMember2021-12-310001524741slca:InsuranceFinancingNotesPayableMemberus-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:SecuredDebtMember2018-05-010001524741us-gaap:SecuredDebtMemberslca:SeniorSecuredCreditFacilityMember2018-05-010001524741us-gaap:SecuredDebtMemberslca:RevolverMemberus-gaap:RevolvingCreditFacilityMember2018-05-010001524741us-gaap:SecuredDebtMemberslca:SeniorSecuredCreditFacilityMember2018-05-010001524741us-gaap:SecuredDebtMemberslca:RevolverMember2018-05-012018-05-010001524741us-gaap:LetterOfCreditMemberslca:RevolverMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMemberslca:NotePayableSecuredbyRoyaltyInterestMember2020-12-31slca:payment0001524741us-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMemberslca:NotePayableSecuredbyRoyaltyInterestMember2020-10-012020-12-310001524741slca:InsuranceFinancingNotesPayableMemberus-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMember2021-09-300001524741slca:InsuranceFinancingNotesPayableMemberus-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMember2021-07-012021-09-300001524741slca:IncentiveCompensationPlan2011Member2021-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandRestrictedStockUnitsMember2020-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandRestrictedStockUnitsMember2021-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandRestrictedStockUnitsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandRestrictedStockUnitsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandRestrictedStockUnitsToBeSettledInCashMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandRestrictedStockUnitsToBeSettledInCashMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:RestrictedStockandRestrictedStockUnitsToBeSettledInCashMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:PerformanceSharesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:PerformanceSharesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:PerformanceSharesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:PerformanceSharesMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741slca:PerformanceSharesToBeSettledInCashMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:PerformanceSharesToBeSettledInCashMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:PerformanceSharesToBeSettledInCashMember2021-12-3100015247412017-05-172017-05-170001524741us-gaap:PendingLitigationMember2021-01-012021-12-31slca:claim0001524741us-gaap:PendingLitigationMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:PendingLitigationMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:PendingLitigationMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:OtherNoncurrentAssetsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:OtherNoncurrentAssetsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:OtherNoncurrentLiabilitiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:OtherNoncurrentLiabilitiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:SuretyBondMember2021-12-310001524741slca:ReclamationBondsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMemberslca:OtherPostretirementBenefitPlansBeforeMedicareSubsidyMember2021-12-310001524741slca:OtherDefinedBenefitPlanAfterMedicareSubsidyMemberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2021-12-310001524741srt:MinimumMemberus-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2020-12-310001524741slca:PriorToAge65Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2021-12-310001524741slca:PriorToAge65Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2020-12-310001524741slca:PostAge65Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMemberus-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMemberus-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMemberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMemberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecurityMemberus-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecurityMemberus-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecurityMemberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecurityMemberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMemberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMemberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashMemberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashMemberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPostretirementHealthCoverageMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesDiversifiedEmergingMarketsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesDiversifiedEmergingMarketsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesDiversifiedEmergingMarketsMember2021-12-310001524741slca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesDiversifiedEmergingMarketsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesNonUSLargeCapBlendMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesNonUSLargeCapBlendMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesNonUSLargeCapBlendMember2021-12-310001524741slca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesNonUSLargeCapBlendMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesLargeCapMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesLargeCapMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesLargeCapMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesLargeCapMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMidCapMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMidCapMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMidCapMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMidCapMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanRealEstateMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanRealEstateMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanRealEstateMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanRealEstateMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecuritiesCorporateNotesAndBondsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecuritiesCorporateNotesAndBondsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecuritiesCorporateNotesAndBondsMember2021-12-310001524741slca:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecuritiesCorporateNotesAndBondsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:MortgageBackedSecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:MortgageBackedSecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:MortgageBackedSecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:MortgageBackedSecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:AssetBackedSecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:AssetBackedSecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AssetBackedSecuritiesMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AssetBackedSecuritiesMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberslca:RealAssetsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberslca:RealAssetsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberslca:RealAssetsMember2021-12-310001524741slca:RealAssetsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesDiversifiedEmergingMarketsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesDiversifiedEmergingMarketsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesDiversifiedEmergingMarketsMember2020-12-310001524741slca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesDiversifiedEmergingMarketsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesNonUSLargeCapBlendMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesNonUSLargeCapBlendMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesNonUSLargeCapBlendMember2020-12-310001524741slca:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesNonUSLargeCapBlendMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesLargeCapMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesLargeCapMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesLargeCapMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesLargeCapMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMidCapMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMidCapMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMidCapMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanEquitySecuritiesMidCapMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanRealEstateMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanRealEstateMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanRealEstateMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanRealEstateMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecuritiesCorporateNotesAndBondsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecuritiesCorporateNotesAndBondsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberslca:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecuritiesCorporateNotesAndBondsMember2020-12-310001524741slca:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecuritiesCorporateNotesAndBondsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:MortgageBackedSecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:MortgageBackedSecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:MortgageBackedSecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:MortgageBackedSecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:AssetBackedSecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:AssetBackedSecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AssetBackedSecuritiesMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AssetBackedSecuritiesMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member2020-12-31slca:plan0001524741slca:LiunaMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:LiunaMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:LiunaMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741slca:IuoeMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:IuoeMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:IuoeMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741slca:CsssMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:CsssMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:CsssMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741slca:CentralStatesSoutheastAndSouthwestAreasPensionPlanMember2021-12-310001524741slca:CentralStatesSoutheastAndSouthwestAreasPensionPlanMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:EmployeeGroup1Member2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:EmployeeGroup2Member2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:COVID19PandemicMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:CostofGoodsandServicesSoldExcludingDepreciationDepletionandAmortizationMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:CostofGoodsandServicesSoldExcludingDepreciationDepletionandAmortizationMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpensesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpensesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:AssetImpairmentChargesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:AssetImpairmentChargesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:COVID19PandemicMember2020-12-310001524741slca:COVID19PandemicMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ProductMemberslca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ProductMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ProductMemberslca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:ProductMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:ServiceMemberslca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ServiceMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:ServiceMemberslca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:ServiceMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2020-01-012020-12-3100015247412021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:SupplyCommitmentMemberslca:CustomerOneMember2021-04-012021-06-300001524741us-gaap:NonUsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:NonUsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:NonUsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:NonUsMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:NonUsMember2019-12-310001524741slca:TransportationBrokerageAndLogisticsServicesVendorMembersrt:OfficerMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741slca:TransportationBrokerageAndLogisticsServicesVendorMembersrt:OfficerMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741slca:TransportationBrokerageAndLogisticsServicesVendorMembersrt:OfficerMember2020-01-012020-12-31slca:Product0001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberslca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberslca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberslca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:MaterialReconcilingItemsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:MaterialReconcilingItemsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:MaterialReconcilingItemsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberslca:OilAndGasProppantsMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMember2021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMember2020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2018-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2018-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2018-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2018-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2018-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:ParentMember2018-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2018-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMember2018-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:ParentMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-01-012019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:ParentMember2019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2019-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMember2019-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:ParentMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:ParentMember2020-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2020-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:ParentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-01-012021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMembersrt:ParentCompanyMember2021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:ParentMember2021-12-310001524741srt:ParentCompanyMemberus-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember2021-12-310001524741us-gaap:TradeNamesMemberslca:GoodwillAndOtherAssetsImpairmentsMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741slca:GoodwillAndOtherAssetsImpairmentsMemberus-gaap:IntellectualPropertyMemberslca:IndustrialAndSpecialtyProductsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001524741srt:ScenarioForecastMemberus-gaap:SubsequentEventMember2022-01-310001524741us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember2022-02-25

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 001-35416
 https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-slca-20211231_g1.jpg
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware 26-3718801
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
24275 Katy Freeway, Suite 600
Katy, Texas 77494
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(281) 258-2170
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Act:
Title of each class:Trading Symbol:Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per shareSLCANew York Stock Exchange
 
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Act: None
 
 

Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ  Accelerated filer 
Non-accelerated filer ¨  Smaller reporting company 
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes      No  þ

The aggregate market value of the outstanding common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2021, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $814,478,897 based on the closing price of $11.56 per share, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, on such date.
As of February 18, 2022, 75,028,013 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant were outstanding.
 
 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain sections of the Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders for U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “2022 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated.




U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
  Page
S-1

1


Forward Looking Statements
    This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “can have,” “likely” and other words and terms of similar meaning.

For example, all statements we make relating to our estimated and projected costs and cost reduction programs; reserve and finished products estimates; demand for our products; the strategies of our customers; anticipated expenditures, cash flows, growth rates and financial results; our plans and objectives for future operations, growth or initiatives; strategies and their anticipated effect on our performance and liquidity; and the expected outcome or impact of pending or threatened litigation are forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expect. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in Part I, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").

We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and forecasts, which are based on many detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. As a result, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements we make.

If one or more of the risks described above or other risks or uncertainties materialize (or the consequences of any such development changes), or should our underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those reflected in our forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made only as of the date hereof. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update publicly or revise such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements as well as other cautionary statements that are made from time to time in our other filings with the SEC, and our other public communications.

PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS
    Unless we state otherwise, or the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “U.S. Silica,” “the Company,” “our business,” and “our company” refer to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries as a combined entity.
Our Company
Business Overview
    We are a global performance materials company and a leading producer of commercial silica used in the oil and gas industry and in a wide range of industrial applications. In addition, through our subsidiary EP Minerals, LLC ("EPM") we are an industry leader in the production of industrial minerals, including diatomaceous earth, clay (calcium bentonite and calcium montmorillonite) and perlite.
    During our 122-year history, we have developed core competencies in mining, processing, logistics and materials science that enable us to produce and cost-effectively deliver over 600 diversified product types to customers across our end markets. As of December 31, 2021, we operated 24 production facilities across the United States. We control 487 million tons
2


of reserves of commercial silica, which can be processed to make 194 million tons of finished products that meet American Petroleum Institute ("API") frac sand specifications, and 82 million tons of reserves of diatomaceous earth, perlite, and clays.
    Our operations are organized into two reportable segments based on end markets served and the manner in which we analyze our operating and financial performance: (1) Oil & Gas Proppants and (2) Industrial & Specialty Products. We believe our segments are complementary because our ability to sell to a wide range of customers across end markets in these segments allows us to maximize recovery rates in our mining operations and optimize our asset utilization.
For a description of our key business acquisitions during the past three years, see the discussion under Note E - Business Combinations to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our Business Strategy and Strengths
We attribute our success to the following strengths:
Large-scale producer with a diverse and high-quality reserve base. We believe our large-scale production, logistics capabilities and long reserve life make us a preferred supplier to our customers. Our consistent, reliable supply of reserves gives our customers the security to customize their production processes around our products. Furthermore, our relatively large scale and wide product portfolio provide us earnings diversification and the ability to reach broader market segments.
Geographically advantaged footprint with intrinsic transportation advantages. We believe the strategic location of our facilities and our logistics capabilities contribute to our customer retention rates and our ability to reach broader market segments. We continue to strategically position our supply chain in order to deliver sand according to our customers' needs, whether at a plant, a transload, or the wellhead. In our Oil & Gas Proppants segment, our network of frac sand production facilities with access to barge and Class I rail, either onsite or by truck, combined with the strategic locations of our transloads, enable us to serve every major U.S. shale basin. Additionally, our SandBox Logistics service ("SandBox") extends our delivery capability directly to our customers' wellhead locations and provides a lower cost logistics solution. We believe we are one of the few frac sand producers capable of cost-effectively delivering API grade frac sand to most of the major U.S. shale basins by on-site rail.
Additionally, due to the high weight-to-value ratio of many silica products in our Industrial & Specialty Products segment, the proximity of our facilities to our customers’ facilities often results in us being their sole supplier. This advantage has enabled us to enjoy strong customer retention in this segment, with our top five Industrial & Specialty Products segment customers purchasing from us for an average of over 50 years.
Diatomaceous earth, clay, and perlite facilities are located near major highways and export corridors to optimize the cost of operations and shipment. Products can be shipped via bulk truck, rail or packaged. We utilize experienced in-house international logistics operations using a broad base of partners to enable efficient and cost-effective exports to approximately 100 countries.
Low-cost operating structure. We focus on building and operating facilities with low delivered costs to enable us to better manage market downturns. We believe the combination of the following factors contributes to our goal of having a low-cost structure and high margins:
our ownership of the vast majority of our reserves, resulting in mineral royalty expense that was less than 0.6% of our sales in 2021;
the optimal positioning of our mines and their respective processing plants, enabling cost-efficient and highly automated production processes;
the active management of our product mix at each of our plants as we seek to maximize our profit margins which requires us to use our expertise in balancing key variables such as mine geology, processing capacity, transportation availability, customer requirements, and pricing;
our integrated logistics management expertise and geographically advantaged facility network, which enables us to reliably ship products by the most cost-effective method available, whether domestic or overseas; we transport products by truck, rail or barge to meet the needs of our customers, including at in-basin transload locations and directly at wellhead locations via our SandBox operations;
our large customer base across numerous end markets, which allows us to maximize our mining recovery rate and asset utilization; and
our large overall and plant-level operating scale.
3


Focus on safety and positive relationships with the communities in which we operate. We focus on the safety of our employees and maintain safe and responsible operations. We also believe we are known in the communities in which we operate as a preferred employer and a responsible corporate citizen, which generally serves us well in hiring new employees and securing difficult to obtain permits for expansions and new facilities.
Strong reputation with our customers. We believe we have built a strong reputation during our 122-year operating history. We have a long track record of timely delivery of our products according to customer specifications, which we believe contributes to a reputation for dependability. We also have an extensive network of technical resources, including materials science and petroleum engineering expertise, which enables us to collaborate with our customers to develop products to improve the performance of their existing applications.
Commitment to innovation. Our research and development teams work to enhance our existing products and develop new, patentable products. We expect this will increase our presence and market share in certain specialty products end markets and allow us to enter new markets. We manage a robust pipeline of new products in various stages of development.
Experienced management team. The members of our senior management team bring significant experience to the dynamic environment in which we operate. Their expertise covers a range of disciplines, including industry-specific operating and technical knowledge. We believe we have assembled a flexible, creative and responsive team that can quickly adapt to changing market conditions.
Maintain financial strength and flexibility. We intend to maintain financial strength and flexibility to enable us to better manage through industry downturns and pursue acquisitions and new growth opportunities as they arise. In connection with the EPM acquisition, on May 1, 2018, we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with BNP Paribas, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein. The Credit Agreement increased our then existing senior debt by establishing a new $1.380 billion senior secured credit facility, consisting of a $1.280 billion term loan (the “Term Loan”) and a $100 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”) (collectively the "Credit Facility") that may also be used for swingline loans or letters of credit, and we may elect to increase the term loan in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. For more information on the Credit Agreement see Note K - Debt to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As of December 31, 2021, we had $239.4 million of cash on hand and $77.8 million of availability under the Revolver with the consent of our lenders.
Our Products and Services
In order to serve a broad range of end markets, we produce and sell a variety of commercial silica, diatomaceous earth, clay and perlite products. We also offer services including transportation, equipment rental and contract labor.
Whole Grain Silica Products—We sell whole grain commercial silica products in a range of shapes, sizes and purity levels. We sell whole grain silica that has a round shape and high crush strength to be used as frac sand in connection with oil and natural gas recovery. We also sell whole grain silica products in a range of size distributions, grain shapes and chemical purity levels to our customers involved in the manufacturing of glass products, including a low-iron whole grain product sold to manufacturers of architectural and solar glass applications. In addition, we sell several grades of whole grain round silica to the foundry industry and provide whole grain commercial silica to the building products industry.
Performance Material Products—We sell engineered performance materials made from diatomaceous earth (DE), clay and perlite. DE is used in filtration for foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals and swimming pools. DE is also used as a functional additive for paint and coatings, plastics and rubber, and agriculture. Perlite (hydrated volcanic glass) is used mainly for filtration. Calcium bentonite clay is used for bleaching, catalysis and adsorption in edible oil processing, aromatics purification, and industrial and chemical applications.
Services—We offer services through the provision of transportation, equipment rental and contract labor services, primarily through SandBox, to companies in the oil and gas industry.
Additionally, we sell ground silica and industrial minerals products for use in a wide variety of products.
Our Industry and Primary End Markets
The commercial silica industry consists of businesses that are involved in the mining, processing and distribution of commercial silica. Commercial silica, also referred to as “silica,” “industrial sand and gravel,” “sand,” “silica sand” and “quartz sand,” is a term applied to sands and gravels containing a high percentage of silica (silicon dioxide, SiO2) in the form of quartz. Commercial silica deposits occur throughout the United States, but mines and processing facilities are typically located near end markets and in areas with access to transportation infrastructure. Other factors affecting the feasibility of commercial silica
4


production include deposit composition, product quality specifications, land-use and environmental regulation, including permitting requirements, access to electricity, natural gas and water and a producer’s expertise and know-how. New entrants face hurdles to establish their operations, including the capital investment required to develop a mine and build a plant, a lack of industry-specific mining knowledge and experience, the difficulty of obtaining operating permits, and the difficulty of assembling a diverse portfolio of customers to optimize operations.
The special properties of commercial silica such as chemistry, purity, grain size, color, inertness, hardness and resistance to high temperatures make it critical to a variety of industries. Commercial silica is a key input in the well completion process, specifically, in the hydraulic fracturing techniques used in unconventional oil and natural gas wells. In the Industrial and Specialty Products end markets, stringent quality requirements must be met when commercial silica is used as an ingredient to produce thousands of everyday products, including glass, building and foundry products and metal castings, as well as certain specialty applications such as high-performance glass, specialty coatings, polymer additives and geothermal energy systems (such as solar panels). Due to the unique properties of commercial silica, we believe it is an economically irreplaceable raw material in a wide range of industrial applications.
EPM's DE, perlite, montmorillonite clay and bentonite clay products are sold globally, where they are used in hundreds of applications. High quality DE possesses superior characteristics for filtration, functional additives, absorbents and adsorbents. The largest industries for these products include food and beverage, wine, beer, paint and coatings, biofuel, pharmaceuticals, chemical, oil and gas, plastics and rubber, automotive and agriculture. The perlite (hydrated volcanic glass) is used for filtration, lightweight construction, horticulture, and insulation. The calcium bentonite clay from Mississippi and calcium montmorillonite clay from Tennessee are thermally processed to produce powder and granular products for bleaching clays, absorbents, catalysis, and adsorbents.
Commercial silica deposits are formed from a variety of sedimentary processes and have distinct characteristics that range from hard sandstone rock to loose, unconsolidated dune sands. While the specific extraction method utilized depends primarily on the deposit composition, most silica is mined using conventional open-pit bench extraction methods and begins after clearing the deposit of any overlaying soil and organic matter. The silica deposit composition and chemical purity also dictate the processing methods and equipment utilized.
We conduct only surface mining operations and do not operate any underground mines, although we do lease underground reserves at our Festus, Missouri operation, which are being mined underground by a contractor. Mining methods at our facilities include conventional hard rock mining, hydraulic mining, surface or open-pit mining of loosely consolidated silica deposits and dredge mining. Silica mining and processing typically has less of an environmental impact than the mining and processing of other minerals, in part because it uses fewer chemicals.
We maintain quality standards in all of our mining and processing facilities, some of which include International Organization for Standardization ("ISO") 9001-registered quality systems. We use automated process control systems that efficiently manage the majority of the mining and processing functions, and we monitor the quality and consistency of our products by conducting hourly tests throughout the production process to detect variances. All of our major facilities operate a testing laboratory to evaluate and ensure the quality of our products and services. We also provide customers with documentation verifying that all products shipped meet customer specifications. These quality assurance functions are designed to ensure that we deliver quality products to our customers and maintain customer trust and loyalty.
Our Customers
We sell our products to a variety of end markets. Our customers in the oil and gas proppants end market include major oilfield services companies and exploration and production companies that are engaged in hydraulic fracturing. Sales to the oil and gas proppants end market comprised approximately 56%, 49%, and 69% of our total sales in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
During most of our 122-year history, our primary markets have been core industrial end markets with customers engaged in the production of building and construction products, fillers and extenders, glass, foundry products, chemicals, and sports and recreation products. Our diverse customer base drives high recovery rates across our production. We also benefit from strong and long-standing relationships with our customers in each of the industrial and specialty products end markets we serve. Through EPM, we also serve a variety of industrial mineral markets including pool filtration, paints and plastics, absorbents and food and beverage. Sales to our Industrial and Specialty Products end markets comprised approximately 44%, 51%, and 31% of our total sales in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Competition
Both of our reportable segments operate in highly competitive markets that are characterized by a small number of large, national producers and a larger number of small, regional or local producers. According to a January 2022 publication by the United States Geological Survey, in 2021, there were 167 producers of commercial silica with a combined 248 active
5


operations in 33 states within the United States. Competition for both of our reportable segments is based on price, consistency and quality of product, site location, distribution capability, customer service, reliability of supply, breadth of product offering and technical support. Because transportation costs can be a significant portion of the total cost to customers of commercial silica, the commercial silica market is typically local, and competition from beyond the local area is limited. Notable exceptions to this are the frac sand and fillers and extenders markets, where certain product characteristics are not available in all deposits and not all plants have the requisite processing capabilities, necessitating that some products be shipped for extended distances. For more information regarding competition, see Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 
Seasonality
Our business is affected to some extent by seasonal fluctuations in weather that impact our production levels and our customers' business needs. For example, during the second and third quarters we typically sell more commercial silica to our customers in the building products and recreation end markets due to increased construction activity resulting from more favorable weather. In the first and fourth quarters, we generally experience lower sales, and sometimes production levels, largely from adverse weather hampering logistical capabilities and general decreased customer activity levels.
Intellectual Property
Other than operating licenses for our mining and processing facilities, there are no third-party patents, patent licenses or franchises material to our business. Our intellectual property primarily consists of trade secrets, know-how and trademarks, including our name US SILICA® and products with trademarked names such as MIN-U-SIL®, Mystic White II®, Q-ROK®, SIL-CO-SIL®, White Armor®, EP Minerals®, Transcend®, and SANDBOX® among others. We own patents and have patent applications pending related to SandBox, our "last mile" logistics solution. Most of the issued patents have expiration dates ranging from 2027-2040. With respect to our other products, we principally rely on trade secrets, rather than patents, to protect our proprietary processes, methods, documentation and other technologies, as well as certain other business information. Although we do seek patents from time to time, for example for our ultra-high reflectance cool roofing granules, patent protection for other industrial and specialty products requires a costly federal registration process with an uncertain outcome that would place our confidential information in the public domain. As a result, we typically utilize trade secrets to protect the formulations and processes we use to manufacture our products and to safeguard our proprietary formulations and methods. We strive to protect our trade secrets indefinitely through the use of confidentiality agreements and other security measures, understanding that these efforts may prove to be ineffective. See Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
Condition of Physical Assets and Insurance
Our business is capital intensive and requires ongoing capital investment for the replacement, modernization and/or expansion of equipment and facilities. For more information, see Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We maintain insurance policies against property loss and business interruption and insure against other risks that are typical in the operation of our business, in amounts that we believe to be reasonable. Such insurance, however, contains exclusions and limitations on coverage, particularly with respect to environmental liability and political risk. There can be no assurance that claims would be paid under such insurance policies in connection with a particular event. See Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
 Employees
As of December 31, 2021, we employed a workforce of approximately 1,863 employees, the majority of whom are hourly wage plant workers living in the areas surrounding our mining facilities. Approximately 29% of our hourly employees are represented by labor unions that include the Teamsters Union; United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union; Laborers International Union of North America; Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers International Union; Cement, Lime, Gypsum and Allied Workers’ Division of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers; and International Union of Operating Engineers A.F.L. - C.I.O. We believe that we maintain good relations with our workers and their respective unions and have not experienced any material strikes or work stoppages since 1987.

Human Capital Management
Our Board of Directors believes that our long-term success depends on the talents of our employees, and we work to attract, retain and motivate the highest quality workforce. The Chief Human Resources Officer ("CHRO") is responsible for developing and executing our human capital strategy. This includes talent attraction, acquisition, development and engagement,
6


as well as the design of employee compensation and benefits programs. The CHRO is also responsible for developing and implementing our diversity and inclusion framework. Management regularly updates our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee on human capital trends and efforts to improve diversity. The Board of Directors in particular has requested updates on the following topics:

Health and Safety: Our health and safety programs are industry leading and resulted in several company records in 2021. We require each of our locations to perform regular safety audits to ensure proper safety policies, program procedures, analyses and trainings are in place. In addition, we receive regular visits from inspectors on behalf of the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA") and the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act ("OSHA"). We utilize a mixture of leading and lagging indicators to assess the health and safety performance of our operations. Lagging indicators include the OSHA Total Recordable Incident Rate ("TRIR") and the Lost Time (or Lost Workday) Incident Rate ("LTIR") based upon the number of incidents per 200,000 work hours. Leading indicators include reporting and closure of all near miss events and Environmental, Health and Safety ("EHS") coaching and engagement conversations. In 2021, we had a TRIR of 0.67, a LTIR of 0.10 and zero work-related fatalities.

COVID-19 Response: Beginning in 2020, our Board of Directors requested regular updates on our response to the COVID-19 pandemic. During 2020, we instituted a number of protective measures in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, including eliminating all but essential third-party access to our facilities, encouraging employees to work from home to the extent their job function enables them to do so, encouraging the use of virtual employee meetings, implementing social distancing measures for those employees associated with our mining operations, and implementing other procedures in an effort to reduce the need for our truck drivers to exit their vehicles. These protective measures continued throughout 2021. This resulted in confirmed cases of COVID-19 at U.S. Silica remaining below the national average, and none of the confirmed cases among our employees in 2021 were attributed to transmission at work.

Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging: We believe that a culture of inclusion, diversity, and belonging enables us to create, develop and fully leverage the strengths of our workforce. Current key initiatives include mandatory unconscious bias training for all employees, partnerships with diversity organizations, improving purchasing from Minority and Women Owned Businesses, utilizing an employee driven resource group, and diverse talent acquisition practices. We have implemented several measures that focus on ensuring accountabilities exist for making progress in diversity, and our senior leaders will have diversity and inclusion objectives embedded in their annual performance goals.

Training and Talent Development: We are committed to the continued development of our people. Strategic talent reviews and succession planning occur annually and across all business areas. The Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and CHRO convene meetings with senior company leadership and the Board of Directors to review top enterprise talent. We also provide free training courses through LinkedIn Learning to all salaried employees, along with key development programs.

Regulation and Legislation
Mining and Workplace Safety
Federal Regulation
The U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) is the primary regulatory organization governing the commercial silica industry. Accordingly, MSHA regulates quarries, surface mines, underground mines and the industrial mineral processing facilities associated with quarries and mines. The mission of MSHA is to administer the provisions of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the "Mine Act") and to enforce compliance with mandatory safety and health standards. MSHA works closely with the Industrial Minerals Association, a trade association in which we have a significant leadership role, in pursuing this mission. As part of MSHA’s oversight, representatives perform at least two unannounced inspections annually for each above-ground facility. For additional information regarding mining and workplace safety, including MSHA safety and health violations and assessments in 2021, see Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We also are subject to the requirements of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”) and comparable state statutes that regulate the protection of the health and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard requires that information be maintained about hazardous materials used or produced in operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and the public. OSHA regulates the customers and users of commercial silica and provides detailed regulations requiring employers to protect employees from overexposure to silica bearing dust through the enforcement of permissible exposure limits and the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard.
7


Internal Controls
We adhere to a strict occupational health program aimed at controlling exposure to silica bearing dust, which includes dust sampling, a respiratory protection program, medical surveillance, training and other components. Our safety program is designed to ensure compliance with the standards of our Occupational Health and Safety Manual and MSHA regulations. For both health and safety issues, extensive training is provided to employees. We have safety committees at our plants made up of salaried and hourly employees. We perform annual internal health and safety audits and conduct annual crisis management drills to test our plants’ abilities to respond to various situations. Health and safety programs are administered by our corporate health and safety department with the assistance of plant Environmental, Health and Safety Coordinators.
Motor Carrier Regulation
Our trucking services are regulated by the U.S. Department of Transportation ("DOT"), the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ("FMCSA") and by various state agencies. These regulatory authorities have broad powers, generally governing matters such as authority to engage in motor carrier operations, as well as motor carrier registration, driver hours of service, safety and fitness of transportation equipment and drivers, transportation of hazardous materials and periodic financial reporting. The transportation industry is subject to possible other regulatory and legislative changes (such as the possibility of more stringent environmental, climate change, security and/or occupational safety and health regulations, limits on vehicle weight and size and a mandate to implement electronic logging devices) that may affect the economics of our trucking services by requiring changes in operating practices or by changing the demand for motor carrier services or the cost of providing truckload or other transportation or logistics services.
Environmental Matters
We and the commercial silica industry in general are subject to extensive governmental regulations on, among other things, matters such as permitting and licensing requirements, plant and wildlife protection, hazardous materials, air and water emissions and environmental contamination and reclamation. A variety of state, local and federal agencies enforce these regulations.
Federal Regulation
At the federal level, we may be required to obtain permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands and streams, in connection with our operations. We also may be required to obtain permits under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) (or the relevant state environmental agency in states where the permit program has been delegated to the state) for discharges of pollutants into waters of the United States, including discharges of wastewater or storm water runoff associated with construction activities. Failure to obtain these required permits or to comply with their terms could subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties as well as injunctive relief.
The federal Safe Drinking Water Act (the “SDWA”) regulates the underground injection of substances through the Underground Injection Control Program (the “UIC Program”). Hydraulic fracturing generally has been exempt from federal regulation under the UIC Program, and the hydraulic fracturing process has been typically regulated by state or local governmental authorities. The EPA, however, has taken the position that certain aspects of hydraulic fracturing with fluids containing diesel fuel may be subject to regulation under the UIC Program, specifically as “Class II” UIC wells. In February 2014, the EPA released an interpretive memorandum to clarify UIC Program requirements under the SDWA for underground injection of diesel fuels in hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas extraction and issued technical guidance containing recommendations for EPA permit writers to consider in implementing these UIC “Class II” requirements. Among other things, the memorandum and technical guidance clarified that any owner or operator who injects diesel fuels in hydraulic fracturing for oil or gas extraction must obtain a UIC “Class II” permit before injection.
The U.S. Clean Air Act and comparable state laws regulate emissions of various air pollutants through air emissions permitting programs and the imposition of other requirements. These regulatory programs may require us to install expensive emissions abatement equipment, modify our operational practices and obtain permits for our existing operations, and before commencing construction on a new or modified source of air emissions, such laws may require us to reduce emissions at existing facilities. As a result, we may be required to incur increased capital and operating costs because of these regulations. We could be subject to administrative, civil and criminal penalties as well as injunctive relief for noncompliance with air permits or other requirements of the U.S. Clean Air Act and comparable state laws and regulations.
As part of our operations, we utilize or store petroleum products and other substances such as diesel fuel, lubricating oils and hydraulic fluid. We are subject to applicable requirements regarding the storage, use, transportation and disposal of these substances, including the relevant Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure requirements that the EPA imposes on us.
8


Spills or releases may occur in the course of our operations, and we could incur substantial costs and liabilities as a result of such spills or releases, including those relating to claims for damage or injury to property and persons.
Additionally, some of our operations are located on properties that historically have been used in ways that resulted in the release of contaminants, including hazardous substances, into the environment, and we could be held liable for the remediation of such historical contamination. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), also known as the Superfund law, and comparable state laws impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or legality of conduct, on classes of persons who are considered to be responsible for the release of hazardous substances into the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of the site where the release occurred and anyone who disposed or arranged for the disposal of a hazardous substance released at the site. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances, for damages to natural resources, and for the costs of certain health studies. In addition, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment.
In addition, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state statutes regulate the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal and cleanup of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. Under the auspices of the EPA, the individual states administer some or all of the provisions of RCRA, sometimes in conjunction with their own, more stringent requirements. In the course of our operations, we generate industrial solid wastes that may be regulated as hazardous wastes.
Our operations may also be subject to broad environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). NEPA requires federal agencies to evaluate the environmental impact of all “major federal actions” significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. The granting of a federal permit for a major development project, such as a mining operation, may be considered a “major federal action” that requires review under NEPA. Therefore, our projects may require review and evaluation under NEPA.
Federal agencies granting permits for our operations must also consider impacts to endangered and threatened species and their habitat under the Endangered Species Act. We also must comply with and are subject to liability under the Endangered Species Act, which prohibits and imposes stringent penalties for the harming of endangered or threatened species and their habitat. Federal agencies must also consider a project’s impacts on historic or archaeological resources under the National Historic Preservation Act, and we may be required to conduct archaeological surveys of project sites and to avoid or preserve historical areas or artifacts.
State and Local Regulation
Because our operations are located in numerous states, we are also subject to a variety of different state and local environmental review and permitting requirements. Some states in which our projects are located or are being developed have state laws similar to NEPA; thus, our development of new sites or the expansion of existing sites may be subject to comprehensive state environmental reviews even if they are not subject to NEPA. In some cases, the state environmental review may be more stringent than the federal review. Our operations may require state law based permits in addition to federal permits, requiring state agencies to consider a range of issues, many the same as federal agencies, including, among other things, a project’s impact on wildlife and their habitats, historic and archaeological sites, aesthetics, agricultural operations and scenic areas. Some states also have specific permitting and review processes for commercial silica mining operations, and states may impose different or additional monitoring or mitigation requirements than federal agencies. The development of new sites and our existing operations also are subject to a variety of local environmental and regulatory requirements, including land use, zoning, building and transportation requirements.
As demand for frac sand in the oil and natural gas industry has driven a significant increase in current and expected future production of commercial silica, some local communities have expressed concern regarding silica sand mining operations. These concerns have generally included exposure to ambient silica sand dust, truck traffic, water usage and blasting. In response, certain state and local communities have developed or are in the process of developing regulations or zoning restrictions intended to minimize dust from getting airborne, control the flow of truck traffic, significantly curtail the amount of practicable area for mining activities, provide compensation to local residents for potential impacts of mining activities and, in some cases, ban issuance of new permits for mining activities. To date, we have not experienced any material impact or disruption to our existing mining operations or planned capacity expansions as a result of these types of concerns.
We have a long history of positive engagement with the communities that surround our existing mining operations. We believe our relatively stable workforce and strong relationship with our employees help foster good relations with the communities in which we operate. Although additional regulatory requirements could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations, we believe our existing operations may be less likely to be negatively impacted by virtue of our good community relations.
9


Planned expansion of our mining and production capacity in new communities could be more significantly impacted by increased regulatory activity. Difficulty or delays in obtaining or inability to obtain new mining permits or increased costs of compliance with future state and local regulatory requirements could have a material negative impact on our ability to grow our business. In an effort to minimize these risks, we continue to be engaged with local communities in order to grow and maintain strong relationships with residents and regulators.
Costs of Compliance
We may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of environmental, health and safety requirements applicable to our activities. Failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of investigatory, cleanup and site restoration costs and liens, the denial or revocation of permits or other authorizations and the issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations. Compliance with these laws and regulations may also increase the cost of the development, construction and operation of our projects and may prevent or delay the commencement or continuance of a given project. In addition, claims for damages to persons or property may result from environmental and other impacts of our activities.
The process for performing environmental impact studies and reviews for federal, state and local permits for our operations involves a significant investment of time and monetary resources. We cannot control the permit approval process. We cannot predict whether all permits required for a given project will be granted or whether such permits will be the subject of significant opposition. The denial of a permit essential to a project or the imposition of conditions with which it is not practicable or feasible to comply could impair or prevent our ability to develop a project. Significant opposition and delay in the environmental review and permitting process also could impair or delay our ability to develop a project. Additionally, the passage of more stringent environmental laws could impair our ability to develop new operations and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations We do not expect any material capital expenditures due to current regulatory compliance obligations.
Availability of Reports; Website Access; Other Information
Our Internet address is http://www.ussilica.com. Through “Investors” — “Financial Information” on our home page, we make available free of charge our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our proxy statements, our current reports on Form 8-K, SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5 and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our reports filed with the SEC are also available on its website at http://www.sec.gov.
Stockholders may also request a free copy of these documents from: U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc., attn.: Investor Relations, 24275 Katy Freeway, Suite 600, Katy, Texas 77494.
Information about our Executive Officers

Bryan A. Shinn, age 60, has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board since January 2012. He also served as our President from March 2011 to January 2020. Prior to assuming this position, Mr. Shinn was our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing from October 2009 to February 2011. Before joining us, Mr. Shinn was employed by the E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company from 1983 to September 2009, where he held a variety of key leadership roles in operations, sales, marketing and business management, including Global Business Director and Global Sales Director. Mr. Shinn earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Delaware.

Donald A. Merril, age 57, has served as an Executive Vice President since July 2016 and as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2013. He had previously served as our Vice President of Finance from October 2012 until his appointment as Chief Financial Officer. Previously, Mr. Merril had served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Myers Industries Inc. from January 2006 through August 2012. Prior to serving at Myers Industries, Mr. Merril held the role of Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Rubbermaid Home Products Division at Newell Rubbermaid Inc. from 2003 through 2005. Mr. Merril earned a B.S. in Accounting from Miami University.

Michael L. Winkler, age 57, has served as an Executive Vice President since July 2016 and as our Chief Operating Officer since December 2013. He served as a Vice President from June 2011 until July 2016 and as our Vice President of Operations from June 2011 until December 2013. Before joining us, Mr. Winkler was Vice President of Operations for Campbell Soup Company from August 2007 to June 2011 and held various positions with Mars Inc. from 1996 to August 2007, including Plant Manager-Columbus Plant and Director of Industrial Engineering. Mr. Winkler earned a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Platteville and an M.B.A. from the University of North Texas.

10


John P. Blanchard, age 48, has served as our Senior Vice President and President, Industrial & Specialty Products since July 2016, having served as Vice President and General Manager, Industrial & Specialty Products from September 2011 until July 2016. Mr. Blanchard possesses over 20 years’ experience in a variety of industries, including nonwovens, composites, building materials and pharmaceuticals. Prior to joining us, Mr. Blanchard held various positions of increasing responsibility with Johns Manville from 2005 to September 2011, including Global Business Director from December 2010 to September 2011 and Global Business Manager from February 2008 to December 2010. Mr. Blanchard earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Michigan Technological University and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan.

Zach Carusona, age 35, has served as our Senior Vice President and President, Specialty Minerals since December 2018. He served as a Vice President for Business Development of SandBox Logistics from August 2016 until December 2018, as the Director, Strategic Planning from June 2015 to August 2016, and in various roles in our strategy group from 2011 through 2015. Mr. Carusona earned an MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

J. Derek Ussery, age 37, was appointed as our Senior Vice President and President, Oil and Gas in November 2019. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Ussery was the Chief Operating Officer of SandBox Logistics from January 2019 to November 2019. He previously served as Vice President, North America ESG at Tetra Technologies, from May 2018 to December 2018. From April 2013 to May 2018, he served in roles of increasing responsibility with Key Energy Services, culminating in his position as Vice President for the Eastern Region. Mr. Ussery earned a B.B.A. from Texas A&M University.

D. Lynnette Crowder, age 42, was appointed U.S. Silica’s Senior Vice President, and Chief Human Resources Officer in November 2019. Ms. Crowder previously served in roles of increasing responsibility with WestRock Company, from July 2015 until October 2019, and with MeadWestVaco Corporation from March 2010 until the company became part of WestRock Company in July 2015. Most recently she served as the Division Leader of Human Resources for Westrock Company. Ms. Crowder earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech and an M.B.A. from the University of Virginia.

Stacy Russell, age 51, was appointed U.S. Silica’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in January 2020. Prior to her appointment, Ms. Russell was the General Counsel for our Oil and Gas Proppants segment. She was previously Of Counsel at Boyar Millar from July 2018 to May 2019. From October 2010 to January 2018, she served as the Managing Counsel for the Litigation and HSE law groups at Halliburton Company. Ms. Russell earned B.A. in Government from the University of Texas and her J.D. from the University of Houston.


ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below as well as the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in connection with evaluating our business and our securities. The categorization of risks set forth below is meant to help you better understand the risks facing our business and is not intended to limit consideration of the possible effects of these risks to the listed categories, nor is it meant to imply that one category of risks is more material than another. Any adverse effects related to the risks discussed below may, and likely will, adversely affect many aspects of our business.

Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our stock price, business, results of operations or financial condition. Certain statements in these risk factors are forward-looking statements.
Risks Related to Market, Competition, & Sales

Our results of operations continue to be adversely affected by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Public health crises, pandemics and epidemics, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, have adversely impacted and are expected to continue to adversely impact our operations, the operations of our customers and the global economy, including the worldwide demand for oil and natural gas and the level of demand for our services, particularly in our Oil and Gas Proppants segment. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic, including the outbreak of recent variants, has caused governmental
11


authorities to impose mandatory closures, seek voluntary closures and impose restrictions on, or advisories with respect to, travel, business operations and public gatherings or interactions.

In 2021, we continued a number of protective measures we had put in place in respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, including encouraging employees to work from home to the extent their job function enables them to do so, encouraging the use of virtual employee meetings, implementing social distancing measures for those employees associated with our mining operations and implementing other procedures in an effort to reduce the need for truck drivers to exit their vehicles. A further extended period of remote work arrangements could strain our business continuity plans, introduce operational risk and impair our ability to manage our business. Our operations could be delayed or suspended at any time in the event of changes to applicable government orders or the interpretation of existing orders. In addition, the Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") issued an Emergency Temporary Standard requiring that all employers with at least 100 employees ensure that their employees are fully vaccinated for COVID-19 or obtain a negative COVID-19 test. On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States blocked the Biden administration from enforcing its vaccine or test requirements for large companies. Any requirement to mandate COVID-19 vaccination of our workforce or require our unvaccinated employees to be tested could result in incremental costs, employee attrition and difficulty securing future labor needs.

The recent outbreak of the variants of COVID-19 may significantly worsen during the upcoming months, which may cause governmental authorities to consider additional or new restrictions on business and social activities. The impact of the Delta, Omicron or any future variants cannot be predicted at this time and could depend on numerous factors, including vaccination rates, the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines, and any new measures that may be introduced by governments or other parties.

The ultimate extent of the impact of COVID-19 on our business, financial condition and results of operations will depend largely on future developments, including the duration and spread of COVID-19 within the United States, including any current and future variants, and the related impact on the oil and gas industry, the impact of governmental actions designed to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and the development and availability of effective treatments and vaccines, all of which cannot be predicted with certainty at this time.

Our frac sand mining and logistics operations depend on the level of activity in the oil and natural gas industries, which experience substantial volatility.

Our operations that produce and transport frac sand are materially dependent on the levels of activity in natural gas and oil exploration, development and production. More specifically, the demand for the frac sand we produce is closely related to the number of natural gas and oil wells completed in geological formations where sand-based proppants are used in fracture treatments. These activity levels are affected by both short- and long-term trends in natural gas and oil prices. In recent years, natural gas and oil prices and, therefore, the level of exploration, development and production activity, have experienced significant volatility. 

When oil and natural gas prices decrease exploration and production, companies may reduce their exploration, development, production and well completion activities. During such periods, demand for our products and services which supply oil and natural gas wells, including our transportation and logistics solutions, may decline, leading to a decline in the market price of frac sand due to an oversupply of frac sand. When demand for frac sand increases, there may not be a corresponding increase in the prices for our products or our customers may not increase use of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Worldwide economic, political and military events, including war, terrorist activity, events in the Middle East and initiatives by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”), have contributed, and are likely to continue to contribute, to oil and natural gas price volatility. Additionally, warmer than normal winters in North America and other weather patterns may adversely impact the short-term demand for natural gas and, therefore, demand for our products. Reduction in demand for natural gas to generate electricity could also adversely impact the demand for frac sand. In addition, any future decrease in the rate at which oil and natural gas reserves are discovered or developed, whether due to increased governmental regulation, limitations on exploration and drilling activity, technological innovations that result in new processes for oil and gas production that do not require proppants, or other factors, could adversely affect the demand for our products, even in a stronger natural gas and oil price environment. The continued or future occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

12


Our industrial materials operations are subject to the cyclical nature of our customers’ businesses.

The majority of our industrial products customers are engaged in industries that have historically been cyclical, such as glassmaking, building products, foundry products, and paint. During periods of economic slowdown in one or more of the industries or geographic regions we serve or in the worldwide economy, our customers often reduce their production and capital expenditures by deferring or canceling pending projects, even if such customers are not experiencing financial difficulties. These developments can have an adverse effect on sales of our products and our results of operations.

Demand in many of the end markets for our industrial products is driven by cyclical industries, such as construction and automotive. For example, the flat glass market depends on the automotive and commercial and residential construction and remodeling markets; the market for commercial silica used to manufacture building products is driven primarily by demand in the construction markets; the market for foundry silica depends on the rate of automobile, light truck and heavy equipment production as well as construction; and the market for diatomaceous earth, perlite, clay and cellulose is driven by agricultural, food and beverage, chemical industries, filtration, catalyst and absorbent applications. When demand from one of these cyclical industries decreases, demand for the products we sell to customers in that industry may also decrease. When demand from one of these cyclical industries increases, however, there may not be a corresponding increase in the prices for our products or our customers may not increase the use of our products due to factors such as the use of recycled glass in glass production; substitution of our products for other materials; changes in residential and commercial construction demands, driven in part by fluctuating interest rates and demographic shifts; prices, availability and other factors relating to our products; competitors both locally and internationally; and other factors.

Weakness in the industries we serve has had, and may have in the future, an adverse effect on sales and our results of operations. A continued or renewed economic downturn in one or more of the industries or geographic regions that we serve, or in the worldwide economy, could cause actual results of operations to differ materially from historical and expected results.
Our sales, profitability and operations could be materially affected by weather conditions, seasonality and other factors.

Our sales and profitability from period to period are affected by a variety of factors, including weather conditions and seasonal periods. As a result, our results of operations may fluctuate on a quarterly basis and relative to corresponding periods in prior years. For example, we sell more of our products in the second and third quarters in the building products and recreation end markets due to the seasonal rise in construction driven by more favorable weather conditions. Conversely, we sell fewer of our products in the first and fourth quarters in these end markets due to reduced construction and recreational activity largely as a result of adverse weather conditions. These fluctuations in our operating results may render period-to-period comparisons less meaningful, and investors in our securities should not rely on the results of any one period as an indicator of performance in any other period.

In addition, severe seasonal or weather conditions may impact our operations by causing weather-related damage to our facilities and equipment or preventing us from delivering equipment, personnel or products to job sites, any of which could force us to delay or curtail services and potentially breach our contractual obligations or result in a loss of productivity, an increase in operating costs or other losses that may not be covered by applicable insurance policies. Severe weather conditions may also interfere with our customers’ operations, which could reduce our customers’ demand for our products. If any of these risks were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Moreover, changing weather patterns, due to climate-warming trends and other effects of climate change or other causes, may lead to the increased frequency, severity or unpredictability of extreme weather events, which could intensify these risks.

A significant portion of our sales is generated at six of our plants. Any adverse developments at any of those plants or in the end markets those plants serve could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
A significant portion of our sales are generated at our plants located in Ottawa, Illinois; Lamesa, Texas; Lovelock, Nevada; Pacific, Missouri; Festus, Missouri, and Vale, Oregon. These plants represented a combined 36% of our total sales in 2021. Any adverse development at these plants or in the end markets these plants serve, including adverse developments due to catastrophic events or weather, decreased demand for commercial silica products, or a decrease in the availability of transportation services or adverse developments affecting our customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

13


We may be adversely affected by decreased demand for frac sand or the development of effective alternative proppants or new processes to replace hydraulic fracturing.

Frac sand is a proppant used in the completion and re-completion of natural gas and oil wells through hydraulic fracturing. Frac sand is the most commonly used proppant and is less expensive than ceramic proppant, which is also used in hydraulic fracturing to stimulate and maintain oil and natural gas production. A significant shift in demand from frac sand to other proppants, such as ceramic proppants, the development and use of other effective alternative proppants, or the development of new alternative energy processes to replace hydraulic fracturing altogether, could cause a decline in demand for the frac sand we produce and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our future performance will depend on our ability to succeed in competitive markets, and on our ability to appropriately react to potential fluctuations in demand for and supply of our products.

We operate in a highly competitive market that is characterized by a small number of large, national producers and a larger number of small, regional or local producers. Competition in the industry is based on price, consistency and quality of product, site location, distribution capability, customer service, reliability of supply, breadth of product offering and technical support. Because transportation costs are a significant portion of the total cost to customers of commercial silica (in many instances transportation costs can represent more than 50% of delivered cost), the commercial silica market is typically local, and competition from beyond the local area is limited. Notable exceptions to this are the frac sand and fillers and extenders markets, where certain product characteristics are not available in all deposits and not all plants have the requisite processing capabilities, necessitating that some products be shipped for extended distances.

Because the markets for our products are typically local, we also compete with smaller, regional or local producers in addition to the other national producers. There typically is an increasing number of small producers servicing the frac sand market when there is increased demand for hydraulic fracturing services. If demand for hydraulic fracturing services decreases and the supply of frac sand available in the market increases, prices in the frac sand market could continue to materially decrease as less-efficient producers exit the market, selling frac sand at below market prices. Furthermore, our competitors may choose to consolidate, which could provide them with greater financial and other resources than us and negatively impact demand for our frac sand products. In addition, oil and natural gas exploration and production companies and other providers of hydraulic fracturing services may acquire their own frac sand reserves, expand their existing frac sand production capacity or otherwise fulfill their own proppant requirements, and existing or new frac sand producers could add to or expand their frac sand production capacity, which would negatively impact demand for our frac sand products.

With regards to our international sales and operations, our performance is also subject to currency exchange fluctuations. In addition, our ability to sell and deliver our products to, and collect payment from, our international customers depends on fund transfer and trade restrictions and import/export duties, the ability to import and export goods, and fluctuating policies on tariffs on a number of goods that could impact our operations. These factors and uncertainties may cause our international customers to seek out producers who are not located in the United States to fulfill their commercial silica requirements or may otherwise make it more difficult for us to compete with international producers.

If our customers delay or fail to pay a significant amount of our outstanding receivables, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.

We bill our customers for our products in arrears and are, therefore, subject to credit risks if our customers delay or fail to pay our invoices. In weak economic environments, we have experienced increased delays or failures due to, among other reasons, a reduction in our customers’ cash flow from operations and ability to access the credit markets. In addition, some of our customers have experienced financial difficulties, including insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings, in which cases we have not been able to collect sums owed to us or have received significantly less than expected, and we may be required to refund pre-petition amounts paid to us during a specified period prior to the bankruptcy filing. Furthermore, we may experience longer collection cycles with our international customers due to foreign fund transfer restrictions, and we may have difficulty enforcing agreements and collecting accounts receivable from our international customers through a foreign country’s legal system. If our customers delay or fail to pay us a significant amount of our outstanding receivables, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity financial condition, and results of operations.

A large portion of our sales is generated by our top ten customers, and the loss of or a significant reduction in purchases by our largest customers could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 40%, 34% and 43% of total sales during the years ended
14


December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As a result of market conditions, competition or other factors, these customers may not continue to purchase the same levels of our products in the future, if at all. Substantial reductions in purchase volumes across these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Operational Risks

Our operations are subject to risks and dangers inherent to mining, some of which are beyond our control, and some of which may not be covered by insurance.

Our mining, processing and production facilities are subject to risks normally encountered in the commercial silica and earth minerals industries, many of which are not in our control. In addition to the other risks described in these risk factors, these risks include:
unanticipated ground, grade or water conditions;
unusual or unexpected geological formations or pressures;
pit wall failures, underground roof falls or surface rock falls;
environmental hazards;
physical plant security breaches;
inability to acquire or maintain necessary permits or mining or water rights;
failure to maintain dust controls and meet restrictions on respirable crystalline silica dust;
restrictions on blasting operations;
failures in quality control systems or training programs;
technical difficulties or key equipment failures;
inability to obtain necessary mining or production equipment or replacement parts;
fires, explosions or industrial accidents or other accidents; and
facility shutdowns in response to environmental regulatory actions.

Any of these risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, our mining properties or production facilities, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in mining or processing, losses or possible legal liability. Any prolonged downtime or shutdowns at our mining properties or production facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Not all of these risks are reasonably insurable, and our insurance coverage contains limits, deductibles, exclusions and endorsements. Our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to meet our needs in the event of loss and any such loss may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Diminished access to water may adversely affect our operations.

The mining and processing activities in which we engage at a number of our facilities require significant amounts of water, and some of our facilities are located in areas that are water-constrained. We may not be able obtain water rights sufficient to service our current activities or to service any properties we may develop or acquire in the future. Moreover, the amount of water we are entitled to use pursuant to our water rights must be determined by the appropriate regulatory authorities, and these authorities may amend the regulations affecting our water rights, increase the cost of maintaining our water rights or reduce or eliminate our existing water rights, in which case we may be unable to retain these rights. Furthermore, our existing water rights could be disputed. Any such changes in laws, regulations or government policy and related interpretations pertaining to water rights or any successful claim that we lack appropriate water rights may alter our operating costs or the environment in which we do business, which may negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Increasing costs, a lack of dependability or availability of transportation services, transload network access or infrastructure or an oversupply of transportation services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Because of the relatively low cost of producing commercial silica, transportation and related costs, including freight charges, fuel surcharges, transloading fees, switching fees, railcar lease costs, demurrage costs and storage fees, tend to be a significant component of the total delivered cost of sales. The high relative cost of transportation related expense tends to favor manufacturers located in close proximity to the customer. As a result, if we expand our commercial silica production to new geographic markets, we could need increased transportation services and transload network access and would be subject to higher overall costs for these services. We contract with truck, rail and barge services to move commercial silica from our
15


production facilities to transload sites and our customers, and increased costs under these contracts could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, we bear the risk of non-delivery under our contracts. Labor disputes, derailments, adverse weather conditions or other environmental events, shortages in the railcar leasing market or changes to rail freight systems could interrupt or limit available transportation services. A significant increase in transportation service rates, a reduction in the dependability or availability of transportation or transload services, or relocation of our customers’ businesses to areas farther from our plants or transloads could impair our ability to deliver our products economically to our customers and to expand to new markets. Further, reduced demand for commercial silica sometimes results in railcar over-capacity, requiring us to pay railcar storage fees while, at the same time, continuing to make lease payments for those railcars in storage, which can have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our operations consume large amounts of natural gas, electricity and diesel fuel. An increase in the price or a significant interruption in the supply of these or any other energy sources could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Energy costs, primarily natural gas and electricity, represented approximately 5%, 4% and 4% of our total sales in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Natural gas is the primary fuel source used for drying in the commercial silica production process. In addition, our operations are dependent on earthmoving equipment, railcars and tractor trailers, and diesel fuel costs are a significant component of the operating expense of these vehicles. To the extent that we perform these services with equipment that we own, we are responsible for buying and supplying the diesel fuel needed to operate these vehicles, which currently represents less than 1% of total cost of sales. To the extent that these services are provided by independent contractors, we may be subject to fuel surcharges that attempt to recoup increased diesel fuel expenses. Our profitability is impacted by the price and availability of these energy sources. The price and supply of diesel fuel and natural gas are unpredictable and can fluctuate significantly based on international political and economic circumstances, as well as other events outside our control, such as changes in supply and demand due to weather conditions, actions by OPEC and other oil and natural gas producers, regional production patterns and environmental concerns. In addition, potential climate change regulations or carbon or emissions taxes could result in higher production costs for energy, which may be passed on to us in whole or in part or could reduce supply. In the past, the price of natural gas has been extremely volatile, and we believe this volatility may continue. In order to manage this risk, we may hedge natural gas prices through the use of derivative financial instruments, such as forwards, swaps and futures. However, these measures carry different risks (including nonperformance by counterparties) and do not in any event entirely eliminate the risk of decreased margins as a result of energy price increases. A significant increase in the price of energy that is not recovered through an increase in the price of our products or covered through our hedging arrangements or an interruption in the supply of the energy sources we use could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Certain of our contracts contain provisions requiring us to deliver products that meet certain specifications. Noncompliance with these contractual obligations may result in penalties or termination of the agreements.
In certain instances, we commit to deliver products under penalty of nonperformance. These obligations can require that we deliver products or services that meet certain specifications that a customer may designate. Our inability to meet these contract requirements may permit the counterparty to terminate the agreements, return products that fail to meet a customer’s quality specifications, or require us to pay a fee equal to the difference between the amount contracted for and the amount delivered. Further, we may not be able to sell some of our products developed for one customer to a different customer because the products may be customized to meet specific customer quality specifications, and even if we are able to sell these products to another customer, our margin on these products may be reduced. Moreover, any inability to deliver products or services that meet customer requirements could harm our relationships with these customers and our reputation generally. In such events, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Inaccuracies in our estimates of mineral reserves and resource deposits, or deficiencies in our title to those deposits, could result in our inability to mine the deposits or require us to pay higher than expected costs.

We base our mineral reserve and resource estimates on engineering, economic and geological data assembled and analyzed by our mining engineers, which are reviewed periodically by outside firms. However, commercial silica reserve estimates are necessarily imprecise and depend to some extent on statistical inferences drawn from available drilling data, which may prove unreliable. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities and qualities of commercial silica reserves and non-reserve commercial silica deposits and costs to mine recoverable reserves, many of which are beyond our control and any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. These uncertainties include:

geological and mining conditions and/or effects from prior mining that may not be fully identified by available data or that may differ from experience;
16


assumptions regarding the effectiveness of our mining, quality control and training programs;
assumptions concerning future prices of commercial silica products, operating costs, mining technology improvements, development costs and reclamation costs; and
assumptions concerning future effects of regulation, including the issuance of required permits and taxes by governmental agencies.

    In addition, title to, and the area of, mineral properties and water rights may also be disputed. Mineral properties sometimes contain claims or transfer histories that examiners cannot verify. A successful claim that we do not have title to one or more of our properties or lack appropriate water rights could cause us to lose any rights to explore, develop and extract any minerals on that property, without compensation for our prior expenditures relating to such property. Any inaccuracy in our estimates related to our mineral reserves and non-reserve mineral deposits, or our title to such deposits, could result in our inability to mine the deposits or require us to pay higher than expected costs.

Our business and operations could suffer in the event of cybersecurity breaches, information technology system failures, or network disruptions.

We rely on our information technology systems to process transactions, summarize our operating results and manage our business. Our information technology systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages; computer and telecommunications failures; computer viruses; cyberattack or other security breaches; catastrophic events, such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, acts of war or terrorism; and usage errors by our employees. If our information technology systems are damaged or cease to function properly, we may need to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and we may suffer loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in our operations.

We have been the target of cyberattacks, and while to date none of these incidents has had a material impact on us, we expect to continue to be targeted in the future. Our management team updates our Board of Directors quarterly on material cybersecurity risks which might impact us. Our risk and exposure to these matters remains heightened because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats, the current global economic and political environment, the outsourcing of some of our business operations, the ongoing shortage of qualified cybersecurity professionals, and the interconnectivity and interdependence of third parties to our systems.

The systems we employ to detect and prevent cyberattacks may be insufficient to protect us from an incident or to allow us to minimize the magnitude and effects of such incident for a significant period of time. The occurrence of a cyberattack, breach, unauthorized access, misuse, computer virus or other cybersecurity event could jeopardize our systems or result in the unauthorized disclosure, gathering, monitoring, misuse, corruption, loss or destruction of confidential and other information that belongs to us, our customers, our counterparties, third-party service providers or borrowers that is processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks. Any such event could result in significant losses, loss of customers and business opportunities, reputational damage, litigation, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Mine closures entail substantial costs, and if we close one or more of our mines sooner than anticipated, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

We base our assumptions regarding the life of our mines on detailed studies that we perform from time to time, but our studies and assumptions do not always prove to be accurate. If we close any of our mines sooner than expected, sales will decline unless we are able to increase production at any of our other mines, which may not be possible. The closure of an open pit mine may also involve significant fixed closure costs, including accelerated employment legacy costs, severance-related obligations, reclamation and other environmental costs and the costs of terminating long-term obligations, including energy contracts and equipment leases. We accrue for the costs of reclaiming open pits, stockpiles, tailings ponds, roads and other mining support areas over the estimated mining life of our properties. If we were to reduce the estimated life of any of our mines, the fixed mine closure costs could be applied to a shorter period of production, which would increase production costs per ton produced and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Applicable statutes and regulations require that mining property be reclaimed following a mine closure in accordance with specified standards and an approved reclamation plan. The plan addresses matters such as removal of facilities and equipment, re-grading, prevention of erosion and other forms of water pollution, re-vegetation and post-mining land use. Complying with these plans has had, and will continue to have, a significant effect on our business. Some environmental laws impose substantial penalties for noncompliance with a reclamation plan, and others, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), impose strict, retroactive and joint and several liability for the remediation of releases of hazardous substances. We may be required to post a surety bond or other form of financial assurance
17


equal to the anticipated cost of reclamation as set forth in the approved reclamation plan. The inability to acquire, maintain or renew such financial assurances could subject us to fines or the revocation of our operating permits. The establishment of the final mine closure reclamation liability is based on permit requirements and requires various estimates and assumptions, principally associated with reclamation costs and production levels. If our accruals for expected reclamation and other costs associated with mine closures for which we will be responsible were later determined to be insufficient, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Legal & Compliance Risks

We are subject to numerous environmental regulations that impose significant costs and liabilities, which could increase under potential future regulations or more stringent enforcement of existing regulations.

We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations affecting the mining and mineral processing industry, including, among others, those relating to environmental permitting and licensing, plant and wildlife protection, wetlands protection, air and water emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, water pollution, waste management, remediation of soil and groundwater contamination, land use, reclamation and restoration of properties, hazardous materials and natural resources. These laws and regulations have had, and will continue to have, a significant effect on our business. Some environmental laws impose substantial penalties for noncompliance, and others, such as CERCLA, impose strict, retroactive and joint and several liability for the remediation of releases of hazardous substances.

The denial of a permit essential to our operations or the imposition of conditions with which it is not practicable or feasible to comply could have a material adverse effect on our business. Significant opposition to a permit by neighboring property owners, members of the public or other third parties or delay in the environmental review and permitting process also could impair or delay our operations.

Moreover, environmental requirements, and the interpretation and enforcement of these requirements, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. Future environmental laws and regulations could restrict our ability to expand our facilities or extract our mineral deposits or could require us to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant expenses in connection with our business. The costs associated with complying with such requirements, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

For example, greenhouse gas emission regulation is becoming more rigorous, and concerns about climate change could cause this trend to continue or intensify. We expect to be required to report annual greenhouse gas emissions from our operations to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and additional greenhouse gas emission-related requirements are in various stages of development at the international, federal, state, regional and local levels. The U.S. Congress has considered, and may adopt in the future, various legislative proposals to address climate change, including a nationwide limit on greenhouse gas emissions. Any regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, including, for example, through a cap-and-trade system, technology mandate, emissions tax, reporting requirement, new permit requirement or other program, could curtail our operations, significantly increase our operating costs, impair demand for our products or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, reputation, and performance.

Additionally, various state, local and foreign governments have implemented, or are considering, increased regulatory oversight of hydraulic fracturing through additional permitting requirements, operational restrictions, disclosure requirements and temporary or permanent bans on hydraulic fracturing. A significant portion of our business supplies frac sand to hydraulic fracturing operators in the oil and natural gas industry. Although we do not directly engage in hydraulic fracturing activities, our customers purchase our frac sand for use in their hydraulic fracturing operations. There is significant federal oversight of these operations by the EPA, Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), and Department of Energy (“DOE”). A number of local municipalities across the United States have also instituted measures resulting in temporary or permanent bans on or otherwise limiting or delaying hydraulic fracturing in their jurisdictions. Additionally, a number of states have enacted legislation or issued regulations that impose various disclosure requirements on hydraulic fracturing operators. Such moratoriums, bans, disclosure obligations, and other regulatory actions could make it more difficult to conduct hydraulic fracturing operations and increase our customers’ cost of doing business, which could negatively impact demand for our frac sand products. In addition, heightened political, regulatory and public scrutiny of hydraulic fracturing practices could potentially expose us or our customers to increased legal and regulatory proceedings, and any such proceedings could be time-consuming, costly or result in substantial legal liability or significant reputational harm. Any such developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, whether directly or indirectly.

18


If we or our customers are not able to obtain and maintain necessary permits, our results of operations could suffer.

We hold numerous governmental, environmental, mining and other permits and approvals authorizing operations at each of our facilities. Our future success depends on, among other things, our ability, and the ability of our customers, to obtain and maintain the necessary permits and licenses required to conduct operations. In order to obtain permits and renewals of permits in the future, we may be required to prepare and present data to governmental authorities pertaining to the impact that any proposed exploration or production activities may have on the environment. Compliance with these regulatory requirements is expensive and significantly lengthens the time needed to conduct operations. Additionally, obtaining or renewing required permits is sometimes delayed, conditioned or prevented due to community opposition, opposition from other parties, the location of existing or proposed third-party operations, or other factors beyond our control. The denial of a new or renewed permit essential to our operations, delays in obtaining such a permit or the imposition of conditions in order to acquire the permit could impair our ability to continue operations at the affected facilities, delay those operations, or involve significant unplanned costs, any of which could adversely affect our business, performance and financial condition.

We are subject to regulations that impose stringent health and safety standards on numerous aspects of our operations.

Multiple aspects of our operations are subject to health and safety standards, including our mining operations, our trucking operations, and employee exposure to crystalline silica.

Our mining operations are subject to the Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (“Mine Act”), as amended by the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006, which imposes stringent health and safety standards on numerous aspects of mineral extraction and processing operations, including the training of personnel, operating procedures, operating equipment and other matters. Our operating locations are regularly inspected by the Mine Safety & Health Administration (“MSHA”) for compliance with the Mine Act.

The Department of Transportation (“DOT”) and various state agencies exercise broad powers over our trucking services, generally governing matters including authorization to engage in motor carrier service, equipment operation, safety, and financial reporting. In addition, our operations must comply with the Fair Labor Standard Act, which governs such matters as wages and overtime, and which is administered by the Department of Labor (“DOL”). We may be audited periodically by the DOT or the DOL to ensure that we are in compliance with these safety, hours-of-service, wage and other rules and regulations.

We are also subject to laws and regulations relating to human exposure to crystalline silica. Several federal and state regulatory authorities, including MSHA and OSHA, may continue to propose changes to their regulations regarding workplace exposure to crystalline silica, such as permissible exposure limits, required controls and personal protective equipment. Our failure to comply with existing or new health and safety standards, or changes in such standards or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, could require us or our customers to modify operations or equipment, shut down some or all operating locations, impose significant restrictions on our ability to conduct operations or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Silica-related health issues and litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and results of operations.

The inhalation of respirable crystalline silica is associated with the lung disease silicosis. There is evidence of an association between crystalline silica exposure or silicosis and lung cancer and possible association with other diseases, including immune system disorders such as scleroderma. These health risks have been, and may continue to be, a significant issue confronting the commercial silica industry. Concerns over silicosis and other potential adverse health effects, as well as concerns regarding potential liability from the use of silica, may have the effect of discouraging our customers’ use of our silica products. The actual or perceived health risks of mining, processing and handling silica could materially and adversely affect silica producers, including us, through reduced use of silica products, the threat of product liability or employee lawsuits, increased scrutiny by federal, state and local regulatory authorities of us and our customers or reduced financing sources available to the commercial silica industry.

Since at least 1975, we and/or our predecessors have been named as a defendant, usually among many defendants, in numerous product liability lawsuits brought by or on behalf of current or former employees of our customers alleging damages caused by silica exposure. Almost all of the claims pending against us arise out of the alleged use of our silica products in foundries or as an abrasive blast media, involve various other defendants and have been filed in the States of Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, although some cases have been brought in many other jurisdictions over the years. For further information about material pending proceedings, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The silica-related litigation brought against us to date and associated litigation costs, settlements and verdicts have not resulted in a material
19


liability to us to date, and we presently maintain insurance policies where available. However, we continue to have silica exposure claims filed against us, including claims that allege silica exposure for periods or in areas not covered by insurance, and the costs, outcome and impact to us of any pending or future claims is not certain. Any such pending or future claims or inadequacies of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, and results of operations.

Due to the international nature of parts of our business, we are subject to both U.S. and foreign regulations that could negatively impact our business.

In addition to U.S. laws and regulations, we are also subject to regulation in non-U.S. jurisdictions in which we conduct business, including with respect to environmental, employee and other matters. The requirements for compliance with these laws and regulations may be unclear or indeterminate and may involve significant costs, including additional capital expenditures or increased operating expenses, or require changes in business practice, in each case that could result in reduced profitability for our business. Our need to comply with these foreign laws and regulations may provide an advantage to competitors who are not subject to comparable restrictions or may restrict our ability to take advantage of growth opportunities. In addition, because the laws and regulations in different jurisdictions can vary substantially, we may be required to undertake different steps or otherwise experience increased costs or other challenges in order to comply with the laws and regulations in each of the multiple jurisdictions in which we operate.

In addition, the United States regulates our international operations through various statutes, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). The FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit U.S.-based companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We operate in parts of the world that experience government corruption to some degree, and, in certain circumstances, compliance with anti-corruption laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Although we maintain policies, procedures and controls and deliver training designed to ensure compliance with anti-corruption laws, such efforts may not be sufficient to protect us from liability under these laws.

If we are found to be liable for regulatory violations related to our international operations, we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Strategic & General Business Risks
We must effectively manage our production capacity so that we can appropriately react to fluctuations in demand for our products.

To meet rapidly changing demand in the markets we serve, we must effectively manage our resources and production capacity. During periods of decreasing demand we must be able to appropriately align our cost structure with prevailing market conditions and effectively manage our mining operations. Our ability to rapidly and effectively reduce our cost structure in response to such downturns is limited by the fixed nature of many of our expenses in the near term and by our need to continue to invest in maintaining reserves and production capabilities. Conversely, when upturns occur in the markets we serve, we may have difficulty rapidly and effectively increasing our production capacity or incur substantial costs related to restarting idled facilities or executing other expansion plans. A failure to timely and appropriately adapt our resources, costs and production capacity to changes in our business environment could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

If we cannot successfully complete acquisitions or integrate acquired businesses, our growth may be limited, and our financial condition may be adversely affected.

Our business strategy includes supplementing internal growth by pursuing acquisitions of complementary businesses. Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other things:
the validity of our assumptions about mineral reserves, future production, sales, capital expenditures, operating expenses and costs, including synergies;
an inability to successfully integrate the businesses we acquire;
the use of a significant portion of our available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions and the subsequent decrease in our liquidity, or the use of equity securities to fund an acquisition and the resulting dilution to our existing stockholders;
a significant increase in our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions;
20


the assumption of unknown liabilities, losses or costs for which we are not indemnified or for which our indemnity is inadequate;
the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;
an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage and operate any growth in our business and assets;
the incurrence of other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges;
unforeseen difficulties encountered in operating in new geographic areas or other new markets;
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses; and
the accuracy of data obtained from production reports and engineering studies, geophysical and geological analyses and other information used when deciding to acquire a property, the results of which are often inconclusive and subject to various interpretations.

If we cannot successfully complete acquisitions or integrate acquired businesses, our growth may be limited, and our financial condition may be adversely affected.

We may need to recognize impairment charges related to goodwill, identifiable intangible assets, and fixed assets, in which case our net earnings and net worth could be materially adversely affected.

Under the acquisition method of accounting, net assets acquired are recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date, with any excess purchase price allocated to goodwill. Our acquisitions have resulted in significant balances of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. There is significant judgment required in the analysis of a potential impairment of goodwill, identified intangible assets and fixed assets. If, as a result of a general economic slowdown, deterioration in one or more of the markets in which we operate, impairment in our financial performance and/or future outlook or decline in our market capitalization due to other factors, the estimated fair value of our long-lived assets or goodwill decreases, we may determine that one or more of our long-lived assets or our goodwill is impaired. Any such impairment charge would be determined based on the estimated fair value of the assets and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, and results of operations.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights may undermine our competitive position, and protecting our rights or defending against third-party allegations of infringement may be costly.

Our commercial success depends on our proprietary information and technologies, know-how and other intellectual property. Because of the technical nature of our business, we rely primarily on patents, trade secrets, trademarks and contractual restrictions to protect our intellectual property rights. The measures we take to protect our patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights may be insufficient. In addition, certain non-U.S. jurisdictions where we operate offer limited intellectual property protections relative to the United States. Failure to protect, monitor and control the use of our existing intellectual property rights could cause us to lose our competitive advantage and incur significant expenses. It is possible that our competitors or others could independently develop the same or similar technologies or otherwise obtain access to our unpatented technologies. In such case, our patents and trade secrets would not prevent third parties from competing with us. Furthermore, third parties or employees may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary technologies or other intellectual property rights. Policing unauthorized use of intellectual property rights can be difficult and expensive, and adequate remedies may not be available.

In addition, third parties may claim that our products infringe or otherwise violate their patents or other proprietary rights and seek corresponding damages or injunctive relief. Defending ourselves against such claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming and result in costly litigation. An adverse outcome in any such litigation could subject us to significant liability to third parties (potentially including treble damages) or temporary or permanent injunctions prohibiting the manufacture or sale of our products, the use of our technologies or the conduct of our business. Any adverse outcome could also require us to seek licenses from third parties (which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all) or to make substantial one-time or ongoing royalty payments. Protracted litigation could also result in our customers or potential customers deferring or limiting their purchase or use of our products until resolution of such litigation. In addition, we may not have insurance coverage in connection with such litigation and may have to bear all costs arising from any such litigation to the extent we are unable to recover them from other parties. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
21


Capital Resources & Stock Ownership Risks

We will need substantial additional capital to maintain, develop and increase our asset base, and the inability to obtain needed capital or financing, on satisfactory terms, or at all, whether due to restrictions in our Credit Agreement or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on our growth and profitability.

Our business plan requires a significant amount of capital expenditures to maintain and grow our production levels over the long term. Although we currently use a significant amount of our cash reserves and cash generated from our operations to fund the maintenance and development of our existing mineral reserves and our acquisitions of new mineral reserves, we may need to depend on external sources of capital to fund future capital expenditures if commercial silica prices were to decline for an extended period of time, if the costs of our acquisition and development operations were to increase substantially or if other events were to occur that reduce our sales or increase our costs. Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets for future equity or debt offerings may be limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing or offering, adverse market conditions or other contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. Our failure to obtain the funds necessary to maintain, develop and increase our asset base could adversely impact our growth and profitability.

In addition, our existing Credit Agreement contains, and any future financing agreements we may enter into could also contain, operating and financial restrictions and covenants that may limit our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in, expand or pursue our business activities.

Our ability to comply with these restrictions and covenants is uncertain and will be affected by the levels of cash flow from our operations and events and circumstances beyond our control. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, our ability to comply with these covenants may be impaired. If we violate any of the restrictions, covenants, ratios or tests in our Credit Agreement, a significant portion of our indebtedness may become immediately due and payable and our lenders’ commitment to make further loans to us may terminate. We might not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, our obligations under our Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of our assets, and if we are unable to repay our indebtedness or satisfy our other obligations under our Credit Agreement, the lenders could seek to foreclose on our assets.

Even if we are able to obtain financing or access the capital markets, incurring additional debt may significantly increase the risks associated with our existing indebtedness, as discussed elsewhere in these risk factors. In addition, the issuance of additional common stock in an equity offering may result in significant stockholder dilution. Further, we may incur substantial costs in pursuing any capital-raising transactions, including investment banking, legal and accounting fees, which may not be adequately offset by the proceeds from the transaction.
Our substantial indebtedness and pension obligations could adversely affect our financial flexibility and our competitive position.
We have, and we expect to maintain in the near term, a significant amount of indebtedness. On May 1, 2018, we entered into the Credit Agreement, which consists of a $1.280 billion Term Loan and a $100 million Revolver that may also be used for swingline loans or letters of credit.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $1.222 billion of outstanding indebtedness under the Term Loan and we were using $22.2 million for outstanding letters of credit, leaving $77.8 million of borrowing availability under the Revolver with the consent of our lenders.
In addition to our indebtedness, we also have, and will continue to have, significant pension obligations. The substantial level of these obligations increases the risk that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay amounts owed under these obligations when due. In such a case, we may be forced to reduce or delay business activities, acquisitions, investments and/or capital expenditures; sell assets; restructure or refinance our indebtedness; or seek additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection, and we may not be able to affect any of these remedies when necessary, on satisfactory terms or at all. Our level of indebtedness and pension obligations could also have important consequences to you and significant effects on our business, including:
increasing our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions;
requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make payments on our indebtedness and pension obligations, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes, including dividend payments;
restricting us from exploiting business opportunities;
making it more difficult to satisfy our financial obligations, including payments on our indebtedness;
disadvantaging us when compared to our competitors that have less debt and pension obligations; and
22


increasing our borrowing costs or otherwise limiting our ability to borrow additional funds for the execution of our business strategy.

In addition, the amounts owed under the Credit Agreement use LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing the rate at which interest accrues. LIBOR is the subject of recent national, international and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. After December 31, 2021, the ICE Benchmark Administration ("IBA") ceased publication of the one-week and two-month U.S. dollar LIBOR settings and will cease the publication of the remaining U.S dollar LIBOR settings immediately following its June 2023 publication. These reforms and other pressures may cause LIBOR to disappear entirely or to perform differently than in the past. The consequences of these developments cannot be entirely predicted but could include an increase in the cost to us of this indebtedness.
We may have to utilize significant cash to meet our unfunded pension obligations and post-retirement health care liabilities and these obligations are subject to increase.
Many of our employees participate in our defined benefit pension plans. In 2021, we made contribution payments totaling $2.8 million toward reducing the unfunded liability of our defined benefit pension plans. Declines in interest rates or the market values of the securities held by the plans or other adverse changes could materially increase the underfunded status of our plans and affect the level and timing of required cash contributions. To the extent we continue to use cash to reduce these unfunded liabilities, the amount of cash available for our working capital needs would be reduced. In addition, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) has the authority to institute proceedings to terminate a pension plan in certain circumstances. In the event our tax-qualified pension plans are terminated by the PBGC, we could be liable to the PBGC for the underfunded amount, which could trigger default provisions in our Credit Agreement.

We also have a post-retirement health and life insurance plan for many of our employees and former employees. The post-retirement benefit plan is unfunded, and retiree health benefits are generally paid as covered expenses are incurred. We derive post-retirement benefit expense from an actuarial calculation based on the provisions of the plan and a number of assumptions provided by us. Although we previously maintained a trust to partially fund health care benefits for future retirees, the trust terminated in 2017 upon depletion of its assets in accordance with trust terms. As a result, our satisfaction of our obligations under our post-retirement benefit plan increases our expenses and reduces our cash available for other uses.

See Note P - Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits in our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about these plans.

Our stock price and trading volume has been and could continue to be volatile, and you may not be able to resell shares of your common stock when desired, at or above the price you paid, or at all.

The stock market has experienced and continues to experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the underlying businesses. In 2021, our stock closed at a high of $14.91 per share and a low of $7.38 per share. In 2020, market volatility was especially high due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition to the other risks described in this section, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which we cannot control, including inaccurate or unfavorable research or ratings published by industry analysts about our business, or a cessation of coverage of us by industry analysts; quarterly variations in our operating results compared to market expectations; announcements by others in or affecting our industry or our customers; actions by competitors; our acquisition of, investment in or disposition of other businesses; and other global or regional economic, political, legal and regulatory factors that may not be directly related to our performance.

Volatility in the market price or trading volume of our common stock may make it difficult or impossible for you to sell your common stock at or above the price at which you purchased the stock. As a result, you may suffer a loss on your investment. Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the overall market and in the market price of a company’s securities. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs, reduce our profits, divert our management’s attention and resources and harm our business.

Holders of our common stock may not receive dividends on our common stock.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive only such dividends as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. Our Board of Directors elected to suspend the dividend after paying a dividend in March 2020, and we have yet to resume paying a dividend. Applicable Delaware law provides that we may pay dividends only
23


out of a surplus, as determined under Delaware law, or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend was declared and for the preceding fiscal year if certain specified conditions are met. Any determination to pay dividends and other distributions in cash, stock or property by us in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent on then-existing conditions, including business conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital requirements, the ability of our subsidiaries to pay us dividends or make other distributions to us, contractual restrictions (including restrictive covenants contained in the Credit Agreement or other debt agreements) and any other factors our board of directors deems relevant. We are not required to declare future cash dividends on our common stock, and our Board of Directors may determine not to do so at any time.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that you might consider favorable.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions:
authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of our common stock;
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;
provide that our Board of Directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our bylaws;
establish advance notice requirements for nominations of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; and
prevent us from engaging in a business combination with a person who acquires at least 15% of our common stock for a period of three years from the date such person acquired such common stock, unless Board or stockholder approval is obtained prior to the acquisition.

These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions you desire.
Labor & Employment Risks

Our business may suffer if we are unable to attract and retain members of our workforce.

We depend to a large extent on the services of our senior management team and other key personnel. These employees have extensive experience and expertise in evaluating and analyzing industrial mineral properties, maximizing production from such properties, marketing industrial mineral production and developing and executing financing and hedging strategies.

Competition for management and key personnel is intense, and the pool of qualified candidates is limited. The loss of any of these individuals or the failure to attract additional personnel as needed could have a material adverse effect on our operations and could lead to higher labor costs or the use of less-qualified personnel. In addition, if any of our executives or other key employees were to join a competitor or form a competing company, we could lose customers, suppliers, know-how and other personnel. Our operations also rely on skilled laborers using modern techniques and equipment to mine efficiently. We may be unable to train or attract the necessary number of skilled laborers to maintain our operating costs.

With respect to our trucking services, the industry periodically experiences a shortage of qualified drivers, particularly during periods of economic expansion, in which alternative employment opportunities are more plentiful and freight demand increases, or during periods of economic downturns, in which unemployment benefits might be extended and financing is limited for independent contractors who seek to purchase equipment or for students who seek financial aid for driving school. Our independent contractors are responsible for paying for their own equipment, fuel, and other operating costs, and significant increases in these costs could cause them to seek higher compensation from us or seek other opportunities within or outside the trucking industry. The trucking industry suffers from a high driver turnover rate, which requires us to continually recruit a substantial number of drivers to operate our equipment and could negatively affect our operations and expenses if we are unable to do so. Our success will be dependent on our ability to continue to attract, employ and retain highly skilled personnel at all levels of our operations.

24


Our profitability could be negatively affected if we fail to maintain satisfactory labor relations.

As of December 31, 2021, various labor unions represented approximately 29% of our hourly employees. If we are unable to renegotiate acceptable collective bargaining agreements with these labor unions in the future, we could experience, among other things, strikes, work stoppages or other slowdowns by our workers and increased operating costs as a result of higher wages, health care costs or benefits paid to our employees. An inability to maintain good relations with our workforce could cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None. 

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
Our Properties and Logistics Network
Our corporate headquarters is located in Katy, Texas. We also maintain a corporate support center and sales office in Reno, Nevada. Additionally, we operate corporate laboratories located in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia and Reno, Nevada. These locations provide critical technical expertise, analytical testing resources and application development to promote product value and cost savings. We generally own our principal production properties, although some land is leased. Substantially all of our owned assets are pledged as security under the Credit Agreement; for additional information regarding our indebtedness see Note K - Debt to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Corporate offices, including sales locations are leased. In general, we consider our facilities, taken as a whole, to be suitable and adequate for our current operations.
We continue to strategically position our supply chain in order to deliver sand according to our customers' needs, whether at a plant, a transload, or at the wellhead. We believe that our supply chain network and logistics capabilities are a competitive advantage that enables us to provide superior service for our customers and positions us to take advantage of opportunistic spot market sales. As of December 31, 2021, we had 27 transload facilities strategically located near all the major shale basins in the United States. All of our transloads are operated by third-party transload service providers via service agreements, which include both longer term contracts (generally 2 to 5 years) and month-to-month arrangements.
We lease a significant number of railcars for shipping purposes and for short-term storage of our products, particularly our frac sand products. As of December 31, 2021, we had a leased fleet of 5,300 railcars.
Our acquisition of SandBox extended our delivery capability directly to our customers' wellhead locations. SandBox provides last mile logistics to companies in the oil and gas industry, which increases efficiency and provides a lower cost logistics solution for our customers. SandBox has operations in the major United States oil and gas producing regions, including the Permian Basin, Eagle Ford Shale, Mid-Con, Rocky Mountains and the Marcellus/Utica Shale, where its largest customers are located. We expect we will continue to make strategic investments and develop partnerships with transload operators and transportation providers that will enhance our portfolio of supply chain services that we can provide to customers.
25


The map below shows the location of our production facilities, transload facilities, SandBox operation sites and Corporate offices:
https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-slca-20211231_g2.jpg

Summary Overview of Mining Operations
Information concerning our material mining properties in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K, which first became applicable to us for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms "mineral resource", "mineral reserve", "proven mineral reserve" and "probable mineral reserve" are defined and used in accordance with subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K.
The information that follows related to the Lamesa site, the Ottawa site and the Colado site is derived, for the most part from, and in some instances is an extract from, the technical report summaries ("TRSs") related to such properties prepared in compliance with the Item 601(b)(96) and subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K. Portions of the following information are based on assumptions, qualifications and procedures that are not fully described herein. Reference should be made to the full text of the TRSs, filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on 10-K.





26





The following map shows the locations of our mining properties with material mining operations, as of December 31, 2021:
https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-slca-20211231_g3.jpg
As of December 31, 2021, we had three properties with material mining operations, as summarized in the table below:
LocationSegmentMarket ServedStage
United States
   Lamesa, TXOil & Gas ProppantsOil and gas proppantsProduction
   Ottawa, ILOil & Gas Proppants, Industrial & Specialty ProductsOil and gas proppants, glass, chemicals, foundryProduction
   Colado Mine - Lovelock, NVIndustrial & Specialty ProductsFiltration for brewing wine, swimming pools, sweeteners; additives for coatings, LDPE filmProduction
27


The Lamesa site is a silica sand production facility in the West Texas Permian Oil Basin region. The Lamesa site is comprised of a large, mechanized surface mining operation that supplies raw ore to a fully automated, state-of-the-art processing plant. The Ottawa site is our largest blended operation, supplying various grades of silica sand to both the Oil and Gas and the Industrial and Specialty markets. The Colado complex in Lovelock, Nevada is a diatomaceous earth ("DE") processing operation owned and operated by EP Minerals, LLC, an indirect subsidiary of ours.
We are the operator of each of our mining properties and we own all of the ownership interests in our mining operations. With respect to the Lamesa and Ottawa properties, we own the land, surface and mineral rights. For the Colado mine, we hold a land lease for 3,719 acres. The lease is based on a royalty-type structure that considers the tons of product sold during the lease period and how material used for the product tons sold was mined from each lease area. The lease also includes a minimum annual amount. Additionally, we hold 176 mineral claims in Bureau of Land Management Land. We believe that all of our leases were entered into at market terms.
We hold numerous environmental and mineral extraction permits, water rights and other permits, licenses and approvals from governmental authorities authorizing operations at each of our facilities. With respect to each facility, licenses and approvals are obtained as needed in the normal course of business based on our mine plans and federal, state, and local regulatory provisions regarding mine permitting and licensing. As of December     31, 2021, all required permits for the Ottawa and Lamesa properties had been approved. Aside from the numerous permits required to mine, a major modification application for the Colado site's reclamation permit had been developed and was submitted to the appropriate agencies for review during 2021. We expect final approval during 2022. Based on our historical permitting experience, we expect to be able to continue to obtain necessary mining permits and approvals to support historical rates of production.
The nature of the Lamesa sand deposits favors surface mining by conventional methods. A contractor is employed to mine the sand using front-end loaders and articulating haul trucks. The contractor's haul trucks deliver the mined sand to one of two large surge piles of raw sand, where it is available for processing through the Lamesa plant. The plant uses wet and dry processing methods to produce oil and gas silica sand products.
At the Ottawa property, the St. Peter Sandstone is mined by conventional surface mining methods. Blasted St. Peter Sandstone is mined mechanically and then hauled to a location in the pit where it is further processed by hydraulic methods and mixed with water to produce a slurry product that is pumped to the processing plant. The processing plant receives a silica sand slurry pumped from the mine. The plant uses wet and dry processing methods to produce oil and gas products and specialty minerals products. Finished goods are either whole grain silica products or ground silica products.
The Colado mine utilizes conventional open pit mining methods. The raw ore is delivered by truck to a processing plant northeast of Lovelock, NV approximately 19 miles away. There the ore is sized and processed according to final product specifications.
Our current estimated mining capacity of approximately 9.0 million tons of silica sand and 0.6 million cubic yards of DE per year. The following table shows the full annual mine production capacity of silica sand and DE mined at each of our owned or leased processing locations as of December 31, 2021:
Summary of Material Properties
Location
Annual Mine Production Capacity (tons)(1)
Product Type
North America
   Lamesa, TX5.0 millionSilica Sand
   Ottawa, IL4.0 millionSilica Sand
   Colado Mine - Lovelock, NV0.6 million cubic yardsDiatomaceous Earth
(1)Annual mine production capacity is our estimate of the tons that could be mined based on design capacity, assuming optimization of our operations, including our facilities, equipment and workforce. Incremental equipment, labor or other costs may be required to achieve these mine production capacity estimates. As we continue our efforts to optimize and refine our mining methods, we will update our estimates if necessary.
Actual annual silica sand and DE mine production volume levels may vary from the annual mine production capacity shown in the table above due to a number of factors, including variations in demand for our products, the quality of the reserves and the nature of the geologic formation that we are mining at a particular time, unplanned downtime due to safety concerns, incidents and mechanical failures, and other operating conditions.
28




The table below shows annual mined volumes (in thousands) of silica sand and DE at our sites for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019:
Mine/LocationProduct Type2021 Tons Mined2020 Tons Mined2019 Tons Mined
Lamesa, TXSilica Sand4,6923,2714,774
Ottawa, ILSilica Sand2,9671,9533,720
Colado Mine - Lovelock, NVDiatomaceous Earth166151144
Summary of Mineral Reserves
Based on information provided, collected and reviewed, the deposits at all three properties are properly classified as reserves. Therefore, resource information is not provided.
The estimates of proven and probable reserves at our mines in this Annual Report have been prepared by the qualified persons referred to herein, and in accordance with the technical definitions established by the SEC under subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K:

Proven mineral reserves are the economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource and can only result from conversion of a measured mineral resource.
Probable mineral reserves are the economically mineable part of an indicated and, in some cases, a measured mineral resource.

Our mineral reserve estimates were prepared by our employees and have a basis in geologic block modeling conducted in-house using our SURPACTM mine design software. Our mineral reserve estimates and Westward Environmental, Inc.’s (“Westward”) reserve audit studies are based on many factors, but most importantly, all recoverable ore must have a mining plan and the mining area must be covered by a valid operating permit. Other site specific mine design criteria such as geotechnical slope stabilities in rock or unconsolidated overburden; waste-to-ore stripping ratios; safety catch bench designs; pit haul road access; pit dewatering sumps and ultimate pit floor elevations; tailings ponds and waste rock dump designs; infrastructure set-backs (roads, electrical lines, gas lines, property boundaries, etc.); reclamation plans; and any buffers needed to protect environmental features such as navigable waters or wetlands. For a description of risks relating to our estimates of mineral reserves, see Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.













29




Summaries of our mineral resources and reserves for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 are set forth below. Certain figures in the tables, discussions and notes have been rounded.
Summary Mineral Reserves for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
Proven Mineral Reserves (tons)(1)
Probable Mineral Reserves (tons)(1)
Total Mineral Reserves (tons)(1)
Silica Sand
United States
   Lamesa, TX(2)(3)
85,678,000 6,800,000 92,478,000 
   Ottawa, IL(4)(5)
66,926,671 33,002,024 99,928,695 
Total Silica Sand152,604,671 39,802,024 192,406,695 
Diatomaceous Earth(6)
United States
   Colado Mine - Lovelock, NV(7)
1,100,000 3,361,000 4,461,000 
Total Diatomaceous Earth1,100,000 3,361,000 4,461,000 
(1) Ore reserves are stated as "mineable" reserves (after mining losses) and prior to plant processing recovery and sales.
(2) Pricing data based on 2021 sales data for silica sand of $15.30 per ton. Sales prices are projected to increase at 2% per annum thereafter for the life of mine.
(3) Based on the lateral geologic continuity of Lamesa's sand dune deposits, Proven Ore is defined within 1/4-mile radius of a drill hole, Probable Ore extends out to 1/2-mile radius from a drill hole. No P+P ore is considered outside the "dune line" where dunes are absent.
(4) Pricing data based on 2021 sales data for whole grain silica of $29.50 per ton. Sales prices are projected to increase at 2% per annum thereafter for the life of the mine.
(5) The St. Peter Sandstone occurs as a massive, thick sandstone stratum that is well defined geologically and well understood from historical mining. As such, "reasonable" drill hole spacing in conjunction with mine exposures are used to define Proven Ore. Probable Ore has a more widely spaced drill pattern in the same geologically continuous strata but absent of any mine development exposure.
(6) Pricing data based on 2021 sales data for DE of $554.00 per ton. Sales prices are projected to increase at 2% per annum thereafter for the life of the mine.
(7) The DE ore occurs as layered, basin-controlled, lacustrine sedimentary deposits interbedded with volcanic ash deposits. As such, tighter drill hole spacings are required to delineate ore reserves. Proven Ore is defined by drill hole spacings of less than 200-ft. and containing at least 5-ore intercepts. Probable Ore is defined by drill hole spacing of less than 400-ft. and containing at least 3-ore intercepts.
Lamesa, TX
We purchased approximately 3,500 acres of ranch land in July 2017, on which the Lamesa site was built and became operational during the third quarter of 2018. The site primarily produces a range of API/ISO certified silica sand grades. In 2017, we purchased both the land and mineral rights to the Lamesa site. As such, there are no leases, no royalties or other associated payments specific to the mine.
The Lamesa site is a fully-automated, state-of-the-art facility with a wet plant, intermediate stockpile, dry plant, screening plant, and loadout. The facility uses natural gas and electricity to produce whole grain silica through surface mining methods. The reserves at Lamesa contain windblown dune sand lying above ancient dunes of clayey sand, all quaternary in age. The facility is located in Dawson County, approximately 312 miles west of Dallas, Texas, 57 miles north of Midland, Texas, 56 miles south of Lubbock, Texas, approximately 95 miles from our Crane plant site and approximately 11 miles northwest of Lamesa. U.S. Route 87 runs through Lamesa and directly leads north to Lubbock and south to Midland. The front gate entrance to the mine is located at coordinates 32.806256, -102.126062.

30



The following image is a general location map of the Lamesa site:
https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-slca-20211231_g4.jpg

31


The following image is a location map of the Lamesa site:
https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-slca-20211231_g5.jpg
The site is accessible by roads maintained as private roads as well as by county and state roads. The Lamesa site is connected to the local electrical and natural gas distribution systems. Lamesa has four on-site water wells and contracts in place with third parties which cover the life of the mine and provide for adequate access to processing water. The site has offices holding administrative, engineering, and operations staff. Additionally, there are several buildings that house the plant maintenance and support facilities.
32


At Lamesa, we mine silica sand from a deposit that is made up of two identifiable units. The first is classified as "Eolian dune sands" (13 to 46 ft. thick) and the second is a "Clayey Cover Sand" (0 to 25 ft. thick). They are part of a large regional geologic unit covering northwest Texas and northeast New Mexico. Eolian dune sand is a known source of silica sands, which are recognized geologic units not only in Texas but also in Utah, along the shore of Lake Michigan, the shores of British Columbia, and the Northwest Territories.
The ore deposit at the Lamesa site sits at the surface, making it very amenable to open pit, mechanized mining methods utilizing heavy mobile mining equipment. At the mine, the unconsolidated sand is extracted directly from the open pit wall / mining face by front-end loader or by excavator and loaded into 40-ton or 60-ton articulated haul trucks. A fleet of haul trucks then delivers the mined sand ore to the processing plant. Raw sand is fed into the wet processing plant where it is cleaned, and some preliminary sizing is accomplished. From the wet plant the sand is moved to the dry plant after the water has had a chance to drain to below 10% moisture content. In the dry plant, the sand is dried in rotary dryers and then sized for sale as finished goods.
Since purchasing the Lamesa property in 2017, we have invested funds to increase the efficiency and expand the capacity of the Lamesa site. All buildings were constructed in 2018. We contract for the loading and hauling portion of the operations at Lamesa. No U.S. Silica equipment is currently dedicated to the mine operations. Similarly, we primarily use leased mobile equipment in the processing plant. We believe that the Lamesa site and its operating equipment are maintained in good working condition. The total net book value of the Lamesa site's real property and fixed assets as of December 31, 2021 was $164.0 million.
Due to the presence of pre-existing oil production infrastructure on the property, the land is subject to easements for roads, storage areas, pipelines, power lines and pump jack stations. A 100-ft. wide, "no mining" buffer is in place around the property boundary and there are several "no mining" buffer zones around pump jacks, pipelines and power lines on the property. The sand that lies within these buffer zones and "no mining" pillars was excluded from the Lamesa ore reserve calculation.
The Lamesa site is primarily environmentally regulated by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (the "TCEQ"). However, the State of Texas does not require a mining permit to extract material. The Lamesa site has secured and is operating in compliance with all required licenses, registrations, and permits.
A summary of Lamesa's silica sand mineral reserves as of December 31, 2021 is shown below. For more information on our reserve calculations, please refer to Section 12.0 of the Lamesa TRS.
Lamesa, TX - Summary of Mineral Reserves
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Reserve Area
Amount(1)(2)(3)
Amount(1)(2)
Amount Change 2021 vs. 2020Percent Change 2021 vs. 2020
Proven Reserves
   Total Proven Reserves85,678,000 88,750,000 (3,072,000)(3)%
Probable Reserves
   Total Probable Reserves6,800,000 6,800,000 — — %
Total Reserves
   Total Reserves(4)
92,478,000 95,550,000 (3,072,000)(3)%
(1) Ore reserves are stated as "mineable" reserves (after mining losses) and prior to plant processing recovery and sales.
(2) Only one commodity (silica sand) is mined, processed and sold. The end use can result in multiple products based on customer need. Silica sand is sold by the ton, regardless of product type and no "average grade" applies to the mineable reserve.
(3) Pricing data based on 2021 sales data for silica sand of $15.30 per ton. Sales prices are projected to increase at 2% per annum thereafter for the life of mine.
(4) Based on the lateral geologic continuity of Lamesa's sand dune deposits, Proven Ore is defined within 1/4-mile radius of a drill hole. Probable ore extends out to 1/2-mile radius from a drill hole. No P+P ore is considered outside the "dune line" where dunes are absent.
33


The decrease from 2021 to 2020 is attributed to depletion by mining of approximately 4.7 million tons and some net positive adjustments due to block model changes and ore reserve re-calculations at December 31, 2021.
Key assumptions and parameters relating to the mineral reserves at the Lamesa site are discussed in Sections 11.0 and 12.0, respectively, of the Lamesa TRS. Only material that can be economically, safely, and legally extracted is contained in these ore reserve estimates. Other key assumptions include the lateral geologic continuity of the mineable dune sand ore strata; ore block model construction criteria; mine design elements (stable pit slope geometries, mining bench height, pit floor limitations, pit dewatering, etc.); infrastructure setbacks (from property boundaries, power, natural gas, and water utility lines, oil well infrastructure; and ore quality.
Ottawa, IL
Our surface mines in Ottawa produce a variety of silica products through different mining methods, including hard rock mining, mechanical mining and hydraulic mining. The reserves belong to the St. Peter Sandstone Formation that stretches north-south from Minnesota to Missouri and east-west from Illinois to Nebraska and South Dakota. The Ottawa site is in LaSalle County, approximately 75 miles southwest of Chicago, IL and approximately 60 miles northeast of Peoria, IL. The site is accessible by major highways including U.S. Interstate 80. The plant entrance is located at coordinates 41.346512, -88.865274.
The following image is a location map of the Ottawa site:
https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-slca-20211231_g6.jpg
The Ottawa site includes approximately 2,100 acres that we own outright. The North Ottawa site and former mine site covers 890 acres, the South Ottawa mine includes 900 acres, and the former Mississippi Sands tract is 310 acres. We purchased both the land and mineral rights at Ottawa. As such, there are no leases, no royalties or other associated payments specific to the mine.
The site is accessible by roads maintained by the city, county and state as well as by two railroads. Our Ottawa site has an extensive rail-car loading, storage, and handling facility. Additionally, we have access to a privately-owned barge terminal that leases property from us. The Ottawa site is connected to the local electrical and natural gas distribution systems. Potable water is provided to the plant location by the City of Ottawa's public water system. Additionally, we have a private well at the mine site. The site has offices holding administrative, engineering, and operations staff. In addition, there are several buildings that house the processing facilities plant maintenance and support facilities.
34


We acquired the Ottawa site in 1987 by merger with the Ottawa Silica Company, which historically used the property to produce whole grain and ground silica for customers in industrial and specialty products end markets. Since acquiring the facility, we renovated and upgraded its production capabilities to enable it to produce multiple products through various processing methods, including washing, hydraulic sizing, grinding, screening and blending. These production techniques allow the Ottawa site to meet a wide variety of focused specifications on product composition from customers. As such, the Ottawa site services multiple end markets, such as glass, building products, foundry, fillers and extenders, chemicals and oil and gas proppants. In November 2009, we expanded the silica sand capacity by 500,000 tons. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we completed a follow-on expansion project that added an additional 900,000 tons of silica sand capacity. The total net book value of the Ottawa facility's real property and fixed assets as of December 31, 2021 was $77.5 million.
We mine silica sand from an open pit located approximately two and one-half miles southeast of the processing facility. The mineable material comes exclusively from the St. Peter Sandstone Formation. The current mineable property, the South Ottawa Pit, is situated south of the Illinois River. We use a hybrid combination of mechanical and hydraulic mining methods.
Once the sandstone is drilled and blasted, it is hauled to a location in the pit where it is further processed by hydraulic mining and mixed with water to produce a slurry product for pumping to the processing plant. The processing plant receives the silica sand slurry pumped from the mine. The plant has a maximum daily production capacity of 10,200 tons and operates 24 hours per day. The plant uses wet and dry methods to produce oil and gas products and specialty minerals products. Finished goods are a variety of ground silica products.
The land is subject to easements for roads. A minimum of a 100-ft. wide, "no mining" buffer was designed to be left in place around both sides of a county road that separates the South Ottawa properties. The sand that lies within these areas was excluded from the Ottawa ore reserve calculation.
To operate active mining operations on the property, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Department of Mines and Minerals required an approved Land Reclamation Plan. Additional restrictions on the use of lands are included in other permits that are required by various Illinois State agencies to operate the mine and plant. The Ottawa site has secured necessary permits and is operating in compliance with all required licenses, registrations, and permits.
A summary of Ottawa's silica sand mineral reserves as of December 31, 2021 is shown below. For more information on our reserve calculations, please refer to Section 12.0 of the Ottawa TRS.
Ottawa, IL - Summary of Mineral Reserves
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Reserve Area
Amount(1)(2)(3)
Amount(1)(2)
Amount Change 2021 vs. 2020Percent Change 2021 vs. 2020
Proven Reserves
Total Proven Reserves66,926,671 91,172,000 (24,245,329)(27)%
Probable Reserves
Total Probable Reserves33,002,024 26,932,000 6,070,024 23 %
Total Reserves
   Total Reserves(4)
99,928,695 118,104,000 (18,175,305)(15)%
(1) Ore reserves are stated as "mineable" reserves (after mining losses) and prior to plant processing recovery and sales.
(2) Only one commodity (silica sand) is mined, processed and sold. The end use can result in multiple products based on customer need. Silica sand is sold by the ton, regardless of product type and no "average grade" applies to the mineable reserve.
(3) Pricing data based on 2021 sales data for silica sand of $29.50 per ton. Sales prices are projected to increase at 2% per annum thereafter for the life of mine.
(4) The St. Peter Sandstone occurs as a massive, thick sandstone stratum that is well defined geologically and well understood from historical mining. As such, "reasonable" drill hole spacing in conjunction with mine exposures are used to define Proven Ore. Probable Ore has a more widely spaced drill pattern in the same geologically continuous strata but absent of any mine development exposure.
35


The decrease from 2021 to 2020 is attributed to depletion by mining of approximately 3.0 million tons and a verified, material downward adjustment of approximately 15.2 million tons resulting from changes in the resource model indicated by Westward's independent re-calculations of the Proven and Probable reserves based on our methods.
Key assumptions and parameters relating to the mineral reserves at the Ottawa site are discussed in Sections 11.0 and 12.0, respectively, of the Ottawa TRS. Only material that can be economically, safely, and legally extracted is contained in these ore reserve estimates. Other key assumptions include the lateral geologic continuity of the ubiquitous St. Peter Sandstone ore strata; ore block model construction criteria; mine design elements (stable pit slope geometries, mining bench height, ground control, pit dewatering, etc.); infrastructure setbacks (from property boundaries, power, natural gas, and other utility lines); and ore quality.
Lovelock, NV - Colado Mine
The Colado site northeast of Lovelock, Nevada is a DE processing operation owned and operated by EP Minerals, LLC, our indirect subsidiary. The site uses DE ore from the open pit Colado mine, soda ash, natural gas, and electricity to manufacture multiple products used as filtration media across many industries including brewing, corn wet milling, oil and gas, wineries, potable water swimming pools and petrochemicals. The Colado Mine Complex is currently in the production phase although there is concurrent exploration in order to replace and expand the reserve base.
The Colado site is located about 19 miles northwest of the town of Lovelock, NV, in west central Pershing County. The mine is accessible by a paved road, the 7 Troughs Rd. (CR 399). Due to the mine site's remote location, there is no official address associated with it. The front entrance to Colado is located at coordinates 40.274948, -118.727916.
The following image is a location map of the Colado site:
36


https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-slca-20211231_g7.jpg
37


The following image is a location map of the Colado site relative to the processing plant in Lovelock, NV:
https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-slca-20211231_g8.jpg
The Colado site consists of approximately 10,798+/- acres that is a combination of private, state and federal lands as follows: approximately 3,773 acres of owned private land and private leased land, and approximately 7,025 acres of leased Federal land (administered in tandem by the Bureau of Land Management in Winnemucca, NV and Nevada Division of Environmental Protection in Carson City, NV).
We hold land leases with the Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation and the United States Federal Government. The land lease with Franco-Nevada is for 3,719 acres and is renewed annually. Additionally, we hold 176 mineral claims on federal, Bureau of Land Management land. Of the 176 mineral claims, 146 are active and classified as placer claims. Mineral claims are renewed on an annual basis. The Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation leases are based on a royalty-type structure that considers the tons of product sold during the lease period and how material used for the product tons sold was mined from each lease area. The leases also include a minimum annual amount to ensure a minimum annual payment to the landowners. The royalty unit values are adjusted based on the Consumer Price Index, a statistical index that is calculated and published annually by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. As for the Federal land lease, the Bureau of Land Management publishes a mining claim fees schedule on an annual basis.
The Colado site is remote with few improved roads and installed mine-related infrastructure. The site is accessible by roads maintained as private roads and by state roads. Energy is provided primarily by diesel powered equipment. Water requirements are primarily for dust suppression which is supplied by a municipal water source that is trucked by tanker to the Colado site. The only onsite buildings are a maintenance shelter used to service the mine equipment and a small portable office. The existing infrastructure is adequate for current production levels and for the ramp-up of operations to full capacity.
The Colado site was initially commissioned in 1959. We acquired the Colado site in connection with the completion of the acquisition of EP Minerals, LLC in May 2018. Significant exploration had been undertaken by EPM (and affiliates) prior to our acquisition of the property in 2018. We believe that the Colado site’s facility and its operating equipment are maintained in good working condition. The total net book value of the Colado site's real property and fixed assets as of December 31, 2021 was $25.3 million. The total net book value for this site excludes the reserves because during purchase accounting we did not allocate the reserves by site and they are included at the corporate level.
38


The Colado mine utilizes conventional open pit mining methods averaging approximately 600,000 cubic yards of stockpiled DE production yearly. The quantities of overburden and interburden waste are backfilled into the pit as a part of the mine reclamation plan. The raw ore is delivered by truck to our processing plant northeast of Lovelock approximately 19 miles away. There, the ore is sized and processed according to final product specifications.
No significant encumbrances exist at the mine site. State and federal permits are required to mine the DE. Surface disturbance is permitted as needed in accordance with state regulations. Major modifications to the permit are made as needed. We submitted a major modification application during 2021 to address unpermitted disturbance, reclamation of erosion areas, and proposed expansions for continued DE mining operations. We expect final approval of this application during 2022, however, its pending status does not negatively impact current mine operations.
A summary of Colado's DE mineral reserves as of December 31, 2021 is shown below. For more information on our reserve calculations, please refer to Section 12.0 of the Colado TRS.
Colado Mine, NV - Summary of Mineral Reserves
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Reserve Area
Amount(1)(2)(3)
Amount(1)(2)
Amount Change 2021 vs. 2020Percent Change 2021 vs. 2020
Proven Reserves
Total Proven Reserves1,100,000 2,396,000 (1,296,000)(54)%
Probable Reserves
Total Probable Reserves(4)
3,361,000 2,298,000 1,063,000 46 %
Total Reserves
Total Reserves(5)
4,461,000 4,694,000 (233,000)(5)%
(1) Ore reserves are stated as "mineable" reserves (after mining losses) and prior to plant processing recovery and sales.
(2) Only one commodity ((diatomaceous earth ("DE")) is mined, processed and sold. The end use can result in multiple products based on customer need. DE is sold by the ton, regardless of product type and no "average grade" applies to the mineable reserve due to the distinctive chemical and physical characteristics needed in each product.
(3) Pricing data based on 2021 sales data for DE is $554.00 per ton. Sales prices are projected to increase at 2% per annum thereafter for the life of mine.
(4) The DE ore at Colado occurs as layered, basin-controlled, lacustrine sedimentary deposits interbedded with volcanic ash deposits. As such, tighter drill hole spacings are required to delineate ore reserves. Proven Ore is defined by drill hole spacings of less than 200-ft. and containing at least 5-ore intercepts. Probable Ore is defined by drill hole spacing of less than 400-ft. and containing at least 3-ore intercepts.
(5) Only ore blocks with P+P reserves greater than 100,000 tons were considered material and are contained in this reserve estimate. P+P reserve blocks not meeting this tonnage threshold are not included in this estimate.
The decrease from 2021 to 2020 is primarily attributed to the exclusion of all small (less than 100,000 tons) non-material Proven and Probable ore blocks.
Key assumptions and parameters relating to the mineral reserves at the Colado site are discussed in Sections 11.0 and 12.0, respectively, of the Colado TRS. Among them are assumptions with respect to geologic continuity of the ore; specific chemical and physical characteristics of the DE deposits; mine design criteria defining safe, efficient and "mineable" geometries (stable pit designs, mining bench height, ground control, economic overburden stripping ratios, haul road design, pit floor design, waste mining and backfill requirements; and ore stockpile management).
39


Internal Controls Disclosure
The modeling and analysis of our reserves has been developed by our personnel, audited by Westward and reviewed by several levels of internal management. This section summarizes the internal control considerations for our development of estimations, including assumptions, used in resource and reserve analysis and modeling.

When determining resources and reserves, as well as the differences between resources and reserves, management developed specific criteria, each of which must be met to qualify as a resource or reserve, respectively. These criteria, such as demonstration of economic viability, repeatable geologic continuity, and meeting generally accepted quality specifications, are specific and attainable. Westward and our management agree on the reasonableness of the criteria for the purposes of estimating resources and reserves. Calculations using these criteria are reviewed by Westward. For all these sites, Westward's team took a 2-step approach to validate our reserve calculation process: 1) Data Verification - whereby all available exploration, geology and assay data inputs to the block model were independently verified, and 2) Process Verification - whereby an independent geological block model was created using only the verified inputs, standard design criteria, and mining method assumptions to verify the total reserve. All calculations were conducted independently by Westward, then compared to our internal numbers and found to be within acceptable variance.

Estimations and assumptions were developed independently for each material mineral location. All estimates require a combination of historical data, key assumptions and parameters. When possible, resources and data from generally accepted industry sources, such as governmental resource agencies, were used to develop these estimations.

Geographical modeling and mine planning efforts serve as a base assumption for reserve estimates at each location. These outputs have been prepared by both our personnel and third-party consultants, and the methodology is compared to industry best practices. Mine planning decisions, such as mining bench height, execution of mining processes and ground control, are determined and agreed upon by our management. Management adjusts forward-looking models by reference to historic mining results, including reviewing performance versus predicted levels of production from the mineral deposit, and if necessary, re-evaluating mining methodologies if production outcomes were not realized as predicted. Ongoing mining and interrogation of the mineral deposit, coupled with product quality validation pursuant to industry best practices and customer expectations, provides further empirical evidence as to the homogeneity, continuity and characteristics of the mineral resource. Ongoing quality validation of production also provides a means to monitor for any potential changes in ore-body quality.

Management also assesses risks inherent in mineral resource and reserve estimates, such as the accuracy of geological data that is used to support mine planning, identify hazards and inform operations of the presence of mineable deposits. Also, management is aware of risks associated with potential gaps in assessing the completeness of mineral extraction licenses, entitlements or rights, or changes in laws or regulations that could directly impact the ability to assess mineral resources and reserves or impact production levels. Risks inherent in overestimated reserves can impact financial performance when revealed, such as changes in amortization that are based on life of mine estimates. Quarterly, and as part of our SOX compliance guidelines, a review meeting is held with senior leadership from operations, finance, mine planning, and environmental to review the overall ore reserve changes and any potential impacts to our site asset retirement obligations or site financial metrics.

A detailed description of the methodology used to calculate mineral reserves is provided in the TSRs filed as exhibits to this Annual Report.
                


40


ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
    In addition to the matters described below, we are subject to various legal proceedings, claims, and governmental inspections, audits or investigations incidental to our business, which can cover general commercial, governmental regulations, antitrust and trade regulations, product liability, environmental, intellectual property, employment and other matters. Although the outcomes of these ordinary routine claims cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
    Prolonged inhalation of excessive levels of respirable crystalline silica dust can result in silicosis, a disease of the lungs. Breathing large amounts of respirable silica dust over time may injure a person’s lungs by causing scar tissue to form. Crystalline silica in the form of quartz is a basic component of soil, sand, granite and most other types of rock. Cutting, breaking, crushing, drilling, grinding and abrasive blasting of or with crystalline silica containing materials can produce fine silica dust, the inhalation of which may cause silicosis, lung cancer and possibly other diseases including immune system disorders such as scleroderma. Sources of exposure to respirable crystalline silica dust include sandblasting, foundry manufacturing, crushing and drilling of rock, masonry and concrete work, mining and tunneling, and cement and asphalt pavement manufacturing.
    Since at least 1975, we and/or our predecessors have been named as a defendant, usually among many defendants, in numerous lawsuits brought by or on behalf of current or former employees of our customers alleging damages caused by silica exposure. Prior to 2001, the number of silicosis lawsuits filed annually against the commercial silica industry remained relatively stable and was generally below 100, but between 2001 and 2004 the number of silicosis lawsuits filed against the commercial silica industry substantially increased. This increase led to greater scrutiny of the nature of the claims filed, and in June 2005 the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued an opinion in the former federal silica multi-district litigation remanding almost all of the 10,000 cases then pending in the multi-district litigation back to the state courts from which they originated for further review and medical qualification, leading to a number of silicosis case dismissals across the United States. In conjunction with this and other favorable court rulings establishing “sophisticated user” and “no duty to warn” defenses for silica producers, several states, including Texas, Ohio and Florida, have passed medical criteria legislation that requires proof of actual impairment before a lawsuit can be filed.
    As a result of the above developments, the filing rate of new claims against us over the past few years has decreased to below pre-2001 levels, and we were named as a defendant in two, one, and one new silicosis cases filed in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, there were 44 active silica-related product liability claims pending in which U.S. Silica is a defendant. Almost all of the claims pending against us arise out of the alleged use of our silica products in foundries or as an abrasive blast media and involve various other defendants. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2012, we had insurance policies for our predecessors that cover certain claims for alleged silica exposure for periods prior to certain dates in 1985 and 1986 (with respect to certain insurance). As a result of a settlement with a former owner and its insurers in the fourth quarter of 2012, some of these policies are no longer available to us and we will not seek reimbursement for any defense costs or claim payments from these policies. Other insurance policies, however, continue to remain available to us and will continue to make such payments on our behalf.
    The silica-related litigation brought against us to date has not resulted in material liability to us. However, we continue to have silica-related product liability claims filed against us, including claims that allege silica exposure for periods for which we do not have insurance coverage. Although the outcomes of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, it is not reasonably possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations that exceeds the accrual amounts. For more information regarding silica-related litigation, see Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note O - Commitments and Contingencies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Safety is one of our core values and we strive to achieve a workplace free of injuries and occupational illnesses. Our health and safety leadership team has developed comprehensive safety policies and standards, which include detailed standards and procedures for safe production and address topics such as employee training, risk management, workplace inspection, emergency response, accident investigation and program auditing. We place special emphasis on the importance of continuous improvement in occupational health, personal injury avoidance and prevention, emergency preparedness, and property damage elimination. In addition to strong leadership and involvement from all levels of the organization, these programs and procedures form the cornerstone of our safety initiatives and are intended as a means to reduce workplace accidents, incidents and losses, comply with all mining-related regulations and provide support for both regulators and the industry to improve mine safety.
41


While we want to have productive operations in full regulatory compliance, we know it is equally essential that we motivate and train our people to think, practice and feel a personal responsibility for health and safety on and off the job.
All of our production facilities, with the exception of our Blair, Nebraska, facility, are classified as mines and are subject to regulation by MSHA under the Mine Act. MSHA inspects our mines on a regular basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.104) is included in Exhibit 95.1 to this Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.

PART II.
 
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Shares of our common stock, traded under the symbol “SLCA”, have been listed and publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange since February 1, 2012.
Holders of Record
On February 18, 2022, there were 75,028,013 shares of our common stock outstanding, which were held by approximately 26 stockholders of record. Because many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of beneficial owners, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders. For additional information related to ownership of our stock by certain beneficial owners and management, refer to Part III, Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer
From time to time, we repurchase our common stock in the open market pursuant to programs approved by our Board of Directors. We may repurchase our common stock for a variety of reasons, such as to offset dilution related to equity-based incentives and to optimize our capital structure.
We consider several factors in determining when to make share repurchases including, among other things, our cash needs, the availability of funding, our future business plans and the market price of our stock. We expect that cash provided by future operating activities, as well as available liquidity, will be the sources of funding for our share repurchase program.
The following table presents the total number of shares of our common stock that we purchased during the fourth quarter of 2021, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that we repurchased as part of our share repurchase program, and the approximate dollar value of shares that still could have been repurchased at the end of the applicable fiscal period pursuant to our share repurchase program:
Period
Total Number of
Shares Withheld or Forfeited (2)
Average Price
Paid Per
Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Program(1)
Maximum Dollar Value of
Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Program(1)
October 1, 2021 - October 31, 2021102 $9.53 — $126,540,060 
November 1, 2021 - November 30, 20216,563 $9.86 — $126,540,060 
December 1, 2021 - December 31, 2021300,302 $9.14 — $126,540,060 
Total306,967 $9.16 — 
(1)
In May 2018, our Board of Directors authorized and announced the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. Stock repurchases, if any, will be funded using our available liquidity. The timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including the market conditions as well as corporate and regulatory considerations. As of December 31, 2021, we have repurchased a total of 5,036,139 shares of our common stock at an average price of $14.59.
(2)
Represents shares withheld by U.S. Silica to pay taxes due upon the vesting of employee restricted stock and restricted stock units for the months ended October 31, November 30 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

42


    We did not repurchase any shares of common stock under our share repurchase program during the three months ended December 31, 2021.
 
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. Comparative Stock Performance Graph
The information contained in this U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. Comparative Stock Performance Graph section shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or "filed" or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock to the cumulative total return on the Russell 3000 index and the Standard and Poor’s SmallCap 600 Energy Sector index, in each case assuming $100 was invested on December 31, 2016 and the reinvestment of all dividends. We elected to include the Standard and Poor’s SmallCap 600 Energy Sector index because this index is used in relative total shareholder return performance share units that we have granted to employees.
https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-slca-20211231_g9.jpg


Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

43


ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
[Reserved]
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

    The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with Item 6. Selected Financial Data, the description of the business appearing in Item 1. Business and the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

    This discussion contains forward-looking statements, as discussed under "Forward-Looking Statements". These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in or implied by forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly under "Forward-Looking Statements" and in Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

    Adjusted EBITDA and segment contribution margin as used herein are non-GAAP measures. For a detailed description of Adjusted EBITDA and segment contribution margin and reconciliations to their most comparable GAAP measures, please see the discussion below under “How We Evaluate Our Business.”
Overview
    We are a global performance materials company and a leading producer of commercial silica used in the oil and gas industry and in a wide range of industrial applications. In addition, through our subsidiary EP Minerals, LLC ("EPM") we are an industry leader in the production of industrial minerals, including diatomaceous earth, clay (calcium bentonite and calcium montmorillonite), and perlite.
    During our 122-year history, we have developed core competencies in mining, processing, logistics and materials science that enable us to produce and cost-effectively deliver over 600 diversified product types to customers across our end markets. As of December 31, 2021, we operated 24 production facilities across the United States. We control 487 million tons of reserves of commercial silica, which can be processed to make 194 million tons of finished products that meet API frac sand specifications, and 82 million tons of reserves of diatomaceous earth, perlite, and clays.
    Our operations are organized into two reportable segments based on end markets served and the manner in which we analyze our operating and financial performance: (1) Oil & Gas Proppants and (2) Industrial & Specialty Products. We believe our segments are complementary because our ability to sell to a wide range of customers across end markets in these segments allows us to maximize recovery rates in our mining operations and optimize our asset utilization.
Acquisitions    
    For a description of our key business acquisitions during the past three years, see the discussion under Note E - Business Combinations to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Recent Trends and Outlook
Oil and gas proppants end market trends
During 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic repercussions coupled with an inadequate supply response and exacerbated by the lack of global storage capacity, resulted in a precipitous decline in crude oil prices. In response to the effects of the pandemic on our Oil & Gas Proppants segment, we took a number of steps to reduce our costs of operations. We dramatically reduced all discretionary spending, reduced officer salaries for several months, lowered headcount, and closed or idled facilities as appropriate.
These events negatively affected, and could continue to negatively affect, our Oil & Gas Proppants segment in the future. The extent to which our business will continue to be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic will depend on various factors and consequences beyond our control, including the possibility of a resurgence in cases or new variants to the virus, the rate and effectiveness of vaccinations, additional actions by businesses and governments in response to the pandemic, and consumer sentiment and its effect on oil prices on the global economy generally. In addition, our operations and those of our customers have been negatively affected by global logistical and supply chain constraints related to the pandemic. While we believe these conditions are temporary, prolonged constraints or increased costs related to the transportation of goods could have a material
44


effect on our results of operations. These factors could also aggravate the risk factors identified in Part I, Item IA. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. However, vaccinations have become more prevalent and businesses are continuing to re-open.
During the three months ended December 31, 2021, frac sand demand, average selling price and tons sold increased sequentially compared to the three months ended September 30, 2021, as summarized below. Sales decreased by 27% or $51.5 million in our Oil & Gas Proppants segment during the three months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2021 primarily due to shortfall fees recognized in the second quarter which did not recur. Sales increased by 59% or $71.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021 primarily due to approximately $49.0 million of shortfall fees recognized.
in thousands, except per ton dataThree Months EndedPercentage Change for the Three Months Ended
Oil & Gas ProppantsDecember 31, 
 2021
September 30, 2021June 30, 2021March 31, 2021December 31, 2021 vs. September 30, 2021September 30, 2021 vs. June 30, 2021June 30, 2021 vs. March 31, 2021
Sales$158,606 $141,848 $193,298 $121,697 12 %(27)%59 %
Tons Sold3,096 2,912 3,024 2,577 %(4)%17 %
Average Selling Price per Ton$51.23 $48.71 $63.92 $47.22 %(24)%35 %

If oil and gas drilling and completion activity does not grow, or if frac sand supply remains greater than demand, then we may sell fewer tons, sell tons at lower prices, or both. If we sell less frac sand or sell frac sand at lower prices, our revenue, net income, cash generated from operating activities, and liquidity would be adversely affected, and we could incur material asset impairments. If these events occur, we may evaluate actions to reduce costs and improve liquidity.
Industrial and specialty products end market trends
Demand in the industrial and specialty products end markets has been relatively stable in recent years and is primarily influenced by key macroeconomic drivers such as housing starts, population growth, light vehicle sales, beer and wine production, repair and remodel activity and industrial production. The primary end markets served by our Industrial & Specialty Products segment are building and construction products, fillers and extenders, filtration, glassmaking, absorbents, foundry, and sports and recreation. We have been increasing our value-added product offerings in the industrial and specialty products end markets organically as well as through acquisitions, such as White Armor and EPM. Additionally, we have increased our focus on the alternative energy markets and products necessary for the supply chains of solar panels, green diesel and wind turbines. Sales of these new higher margin products have increased our Industrial & Specialty Products segment's profitability.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused severe economic, market and other disruptions worldwide, which began to affect our Industrial & Specialty Products segment in the second quarter of 2020. After the COVID-19 pandemic has subsided, we may continue to experience adverse impacts in this segment as a result of any long-term impacts resulting from the pandemic in the relevant markets.
Review of Strategic Alternatives
On October 6, 2021, we announced that we had initiated a review of strategic alternatives for our Industrial & Specialty Products ("ISP") segment to maximize value for shareholders and other stakeholders. We stated that a "range of options are under consideration, including a potential sale or separation of the ISP segment." There can be no assurance the review of strategic alternatives will result in any transaction, and the process of exploring strategic alternatives will involve the dedication of significant resources and the incurrence of significant costs and expenses.
Our Business Strategy
The key drivers of our strategy include:
increasing our presence and product offerings in specialty products end markets;
optimizing our product mix and further developing value-added capabilities to maximize margins;
effectively positioning our Oil & Gas Proppants facilities to optimally serve our customers;
45


optimizing our supply chain network and leveraging our logistics capabilities to meet our customers’ needs;
evaluating both Greenfield and Brownfield expansion opportunities and other acquisitions;
maintaining financial strength and flexibility; and
pursuing strategic alternatives including, but not limited to, a sale or separation of the ISP business.
For additional information about our key business strategies, see the discussion under “Our Company-Our Business Strategy” in Item 1. Business of this Annual Report on Form 10-K..
How We Generate Our Sales
    Products
    We derive our product sales by mining and processing minerals that our customers purchase for various uses. Our product sales are primarily a function of the price per ton and the number of tons sold. We primarily sell our products through individual purchase orders executed under short-term price agreements or at prevailing market rates. The amount invoiced reflects the price of the product, transportation, surcharges, and additional handling services as applicable, such as storage, transloading the product from railcars to trucks and last mile logistics to the customer site. We invoice most of our product customers on a per shipment basis, although for some larger customers, we consolidate invoices weekly or monthly. Standard collection terms are net 30 days, although extended terms are offered in competitive situations.
    Services
    We derive our service sales primarily through the provision of transportation, equipment rental, and contract labor services to companies in the oil and gas industry. Transportation services typically consist of transporting customer proppant from storage facilities to proximal well-sites and are contracted through work orders executed under established pricing agreements. The amount invoiced reflects transportation services rendered. Equipment rental services provide customers with use of either dedicated or nonspecific wellhead proppant delivery equipment solutions for contractual periods defined either through formal lease agreements or executed work orders under established pricing agreements. The amounts invoiced reflect the length of time the equipment set was utilized in the billing period. Contract labor services provide customers with proppant delivery equipment operators through work orders executed under established pricing agreements. The amounts invoiced reflect the amount of time our labor services were utilized in the billing period. We typically invoice our customers on a weekly or monthly basis; however, some customers receive invoices upon well-site operation completion. Standard collection terms are net 30 days, although extended terms are offered in competitive situations.
    Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 40%, 34% and 43% of total sales during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our total sales during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Sales to one of our customers accounted for 11% of our total sales during the year ended December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2021, none of our customers' accounts receivable represented 10% or more of our total trade accounts receivable. At December 31, 2020, one of our customer's accounts receivable represented 24% of our total trade accounts receivable.
    For a limited number of customers, we sell under long-term, minimum purchase supply agreements. These agreements define, among other commitments, the volume of product that our customers must purchase, the volume of product that we must provide, and the price that we will charge and that our customers will pay for each product. Prices under these agreements are generally fixed and subject to certain contractual adjustments. Sometimes these agreements may undergo negotiations regarding pricing and volume requirements, particularly in volatile market conditions. When these negotiations occur, we may deliver sand at prices or at volumes below the requirements in our existing supply agreements. We do not consider these agreements solely representative of contracts with customers. An executed order specifying the type and quantity of product to be delivered, in combination with the noted agreements, comprise our contracts in these arrangements. Selling more tons under supply contracts enables us to be more efficient from a production, supply chain, and logistics standpoint. As discussed in Part I, Item 1A., Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, these customers may not continue to purchase the same levels of product in the future due to a variety of reasons, contract requirements notwithstanding.
    As of December 31, 2021, we have eight minimum purchase supply agreements in the Oil & Gas Proppants segment with initial terms expiring between 2022 and 2034. As of December 31, 2020, we had 11 minimum purchase supply agreements in the Oil & Gas Proppants segment with initial terms expiring between 2021 and 2034. Collectively, sales to customers with minimum purchase supply agreements accounted for 38% and 61% of Oil & Gas Proppants segment sales during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
    In the industrial and specialty products end markets we have not historically entered into long-term minimum purchase supply agreements with our customers because of the high cost to our customers of switching providers. We may periodically
46


do so when capital or other investment is required to meet customer needs. Instead, we often enter into supply agreements with our customers with targeted volumes and terms of one to five years. Prices under these agreements are generally fixed and subject to annual increases.
The Costs of Conducting Our Business
    The principal expenses involved in conducting our business are transportation costs, labor costs, electricity and drying fuel costs, and maintenance and repair costs for our mining and processing equipment and facilities. Transportation and related costs include freight charges, fuel surcharges, transloading fees, switching fees, railcar lease costs, demurrage costs, storage fees and labor costs. Our operating costs can vary significantly based on the volume of product produced and current economic conditions. We benefit from owning the majority of the mineral deposits that we mine and having long-term mineral rights leases or supply agreements for our other primary sources of raw material, which limits royalty payments.
    Additionally, we incur expenses related to our corporate operations, including costs for sales and marketing; research and development; and the finance, legal, human resources, information technology, and environmental, health and safety functions of our organization. These costs are principally driven by personnel expenses.
How We Evaluate Our Business
    Our management team evaluates our business using a variety of financial and operating metrics. We evaluate the performance of our two segments based on their tons sold, average selling price and contribution margin earned. Additionally, we consider a number of factors in evaluating the performance of our business as a whole, including total tons sold, average selling price, total segment contribution margin, and Adjusted EBITDA. We view these metrics as important factors in evaluating our profitability and review these measurements frequently to analyze trends and make decisions, and we believe the presentation of these metrics provides useful information to our investors regarding our financial condition and results of operations for the same reasons.
Segment Contribution Margin
    Segment contribution margin, a non-GAAP measure, is a key metric that management uses to evaluate our operating performance and to determine resource allocation between segments. Segment contribution margin excludes selling, general, and administrative costs, corporate costs, plant capacity expansion expenses, and facility closure costs.
    Segment contribution margin is not a measure of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered an alternative measure or superior to measures derived in accordance with GAAP. Our measure of segment contribution margin is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation. For more information about segment contribution margin, including a reconciliation of this measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, net income (loss), see Note U - Segment Reporting to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Adjusted EBITDA
    Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, is included in this report because it is a key metric used by management to assess our operating performance and by our lenders to evaluate our covenant compliance. Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain income and/or costs, the removal of which improves comparability of operating results across reporting periods. Our target performance goals under our incentive compensation plan are tied, in part, to our Adjusted EBITDA.
    Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of our financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative or superior to net income (loss) as a measure of operating performance, cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash requirements such as interest payments, tax payments and debt service requirements. Adjusted EBITDA contains certain other limitations, including the failure to reflect our cash expenditures, cash requirements for working capital needs and cash costs to replace assets being depreciated and amortized, and excludes certain charges that may recur in the future. Management compensates for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and by using Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. Our measure of Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation.
47


    The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net (loss) income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to Adjusted EBITDA.
(amounts in thousands)Year ended December 31,
 202120202019
Net loss attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.$(33,761)$(114,094)$(329,082)
Total interest expense, net of interest income69,173 79,148 92,063 
Provision for taxes(2,755)(60,025)(99,151)
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses161,131 155,568 179,444 
EBITDA193,788 60,597 (156,726)
Non-cash incentive compensation (1)
19,692 15,827 15,906 
Post-employment expenses (excluding service costs) (2)
(1,920)1,729 1,735 
Merger and acquisition related expenses (3)
2,961 1,423 32,021 
Plant capacity expansion expenses (4)
928 6,149 17,576 
Contract termination expenses (5)
— — 1,882 
Goodwill and other asset impairments (6)
202 110,688 363,847 
Business optimization projects (7)
105 67 55 
Facility closure costs (8)
1,347 7,093 12,718 
Gain on valuation change of royalty note payable (9)
— (8,263)(16,854)
Other adjustments allowable under the Credit Agreement (10)
6,372 8,612 14,165 
Adjusted EBITDA$223,475 $203,922 $286,325 

48


(1)
Reflects equity-based, non-cash compensation expense.
(2)
Includes net pension cost and net post-retirement cost relating to pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations during the applicable period, but in each case excluding the service cost relating to benefits earned during such period. Non-service net periodic benefit costs are not considered reflective of our operating performance because these costs do not exclusively originate from employee services during the applicable period and may experience periodic fluctuations as a result of changes in non-operating factors, including changes in discount rates, changes in expected returns on benefit plan assets, and other demographic actuarial assumptions. See Note P - Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.

(3)
Merger and acquisition related expenses include legal fees, consulting fees, bank fees, severance costs, purchase-related costs such as the amortization of inventory fair value step-up, information technology integration costs and similar charges. While these costs are not operational in nature and are not expected to continue for any singular transaction on an ongoing basis, similar types of costs, expenses and charges have occurred in prior periods and may recur in the future as we continue to integrate prior acquisitions and pursue any future acquisitions.

(4)
Plant capacity expansion expenses include expenses that are not inventoriable or capitalizable as related to plant expansion projects greater than $5 million in capital expenditures or plant start up projects. While these expenses are not operational in nature and are not expected to continue for any singular project on an ongoing basis, similar types of expenses have occurred in prior periods and may recur in the future.
(5)
Reflects contract termination expenses related to strategically exiting service contracts. While these expenses are not operational in nature and are not expected to continue for any singular event on an ongoing basis, similar types of expenses have occurred in prior periods and may recur in the future as we continue to strategically evaluate our contracts.
(6)
See Note W - Impairments to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. While these expenses are not operational in nature and are not expected to continue for any singular event on an ongoing basis, similar types of expenses have occurred in prior periods and may recur in the future.

(7)
Reflects costs incurred related to business optimization projects mainly within our corporate center, which aim to measure and improve the efficiency, productivity and performance of our organization. While these costs are not operational in nature and are not expected to continue for any singular project on an ongoing basis, similar types of expenses may recur in the future.
(8)
Reflects costs incurred mainly related to idled sand facilities and closed corporate offices, including severance costs and remaining contracted costs such as office lease costs, and common area maintenance fees. While these costs are not operational in nature and are not expected to continue for any singular event on an ongoing basis, similar types of expenses may recur in the future.
(9)
Gains on valuation change of royalty note payable due to a change in estimate of future tonnages and sales related to the sand shipped from our Tyler, Texas facility. These gains are not operational in nature and are not expected to continue for any singular event on an ongoing basis. See Note K - Debt to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
(10)
Reflects miscellaneous adjustments permitted under the Credit Agreement. For 2021, included $3.4 million of transload shortfall and exit fees, $2.1 million related to expenses incurred with severe winter storms during the first quarter, $0.7 million of costs related to a power interruption at a plant location, partially offset by $0.1 million for a measurement period adjustment related to the Arrows Up bargain purchase. For 2020, included $1.6 million in transload shortfalls and exit fees, $4.6 million in inventory adjustments, $6.0 million in severance costs, and $11.8 million in legal expense due to the unsuccessful defense of a small number of our patents, offset by $15.2 million related to the gain attributable to the bargain purchase of Arrows Up. For 2019, included $6.2 million of loss contingencies reserve as well as restructuring costs for actions that will provide future savings, storm damage costs, recruiting fees, relocation costs and a loss on sale of assets, partially offset by insurance proceeds of $2.2 million.
    





49



    Adjusted EBITDA-Trailing Twelve Months
    Our Revolver contains a covenant that we maintain a consolidated total net leverage ratio of no more than 3.75:1.00 that, unless we have the consent of our lenders, we must meet as of the last day of any fiscal quarter whenever usage of the Revolver (other than certain undrawn letters of credit) exceeds 30% of the Revolver commitment. This ratio is calculated based on our Adjusted EBITDA for the trailing twelve months. Noncompliance with this financial ratio covenant could result in the acceleration of our obligations to repay all amounts outstanding under the Revolver and the term loan (the "Term Loan") (collectively the "Credit Facility"). Moreover, the Revolver and the Term Loan contain covenants that restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability to make permitted acquisitions, incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments (including dividends) and retain excess cash flow based, in some cases, on our ability to meet leverage ratios calculated based on our Adjusted EBITDA for the trailing twelve months.
    See the description under “Adjusted EBITDA” above for certain important information about Adjusted EBITDA-trailing twelve months, including certain limitations and management’s use of this metric in light of its status as a non-GAAP measure.
    As of December 31, 2021, we are in compliance with all covenants under our Credit Facility, and our Revolver usage was zero (other than certain undrawn letters of credit). Since the Revolver usage did not exceed 30% of the Revolver commitment, the consolidated leverage ratio covenant did not apply. Based on our consolidated leverage ratio of 5.41:1.00 as of December 31, 2021, we may draw up to $30.0 million without the consent of our lenders. With the consent of our lenders, we have access to the full availability of the Revolver. The calculation of the consolidated leverage ratio incorporates the Adjusted EBITDA-trailing twelve months as follows:

(All amounts in thousands)December 31, 2021
Total debt $1,207,874 
Finance leases3,546 
Total consolidated debt$1,211,420 
Adjusted EBITDA-trailing twelve months$223,475 
Pro forma Adjusted EBITDA including impact of acquisitions (1)
— 
Other adjustments for covenant calculation (2)
253 
Total Adjusted EBITDA-trailing twelve months for covenant calculation$223,728 
Consolidated leverage ratio(3)
5.41 

(1)
Covenant calculation allows for the Adjusted EBITDA-trailing twelve months to include the impact of acquisitions on a pro forma basis.
(2)
Covenant calculation excludes activity at legal entities above the operating company, which is mainly interest income offset by public company operating expenses.
(3)

Calculated by dividing Total consolidated debt by Total Adjusted EBITDA-trailing twelve months for covenant calculation.


50



Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2021 and 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020. Discussions of 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Sales
(In thousands except per ton data)Year ended December 31,Percent Change
 202120202021 vs. 2020
Sales:
Oil & Gas Proppants$615,448 $414,897 48 %
Industrial & Specialty Products488,431 430,988 13 %
Total sales$1,103,879 $845,885 30 %
Tons:
Oil & Gas Proppants11,610 7,496 55 %
Industrial & Specialty Products4,227 3,634 16 %
Total Tons15,837 11,130 42 %
Average Selling Price per Ton:
Oil & Gas Proppants$53.01 $55.35 (4)%
Industrial & Specialty Products115.55 118.60 (3)%
         Overall Average Selling Price per Ton$69.70 $76.00 (8)%
    Total sales increased 30% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, driven by a 42% increase in total tons sold, partially offset by an 8% decrease in overall average selling price.
    The increase in total sales was mainly driven by Oil & Gas Proppants sales, which increased 48% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. Oil & Gas Proppants average selling price decreased 4% and tons sold increased 55%. This overall increase is due to overall improved economic conditions in addition to recognition of approximately $49.0 million of shortfall fees during the second quarter.
    The increase in total sales was also partially driven by Industrial & Specialty Products sales, which increased 13% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. Industrial & Specialty Products average selling price decreased 3% and tons sold increased 16%. The overall increase is due to overall improved economic conditions.
    Cost of Sales (excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization)
    Cost of sales increased by $219.9 million, or 38%, to $795.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $575.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. These changes result from the main components of cost of sales as discussed below. As a percentage of sales, cost of sales represented 72% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 68% for the same period in 2020.
    We incurred $351.6 million and $191.0 million of transportation and related costs for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase was mainly due to increased volumes, increased carrier costs for SandBox and increased rail car and barge rates. As a percentage of sales, transportation and related costs increased to 32% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 23% for the same period in 2020.
    We incurred $148.0 million and $117.3 million of operating labor costs for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The $30.7 million increase in labor costs incurred was mainly due to increased headcount to support increased production and cost of living and merit increases. As a percentage of sales, operating labor costs represented 13% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 14% for the same period in 2020.
    We incurred $56.2 million and $33.6 million of electricity and drying fuel (principally natural gas) costs for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The $22.6 million increase in electricity and drying fuel costs incurred was
51


mainly due to increased volumes produced and increased natural gas prices. As a percentage of sales, electricity and drying fuel costs represented 5% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 4% for the same period in 2020.
    We incurred $66.0 million and $46.3 million of maintenance and repair costs for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in maintenance and repair costs incurred was mainly due to an increase in maintenance projects as production increased. As a percentage of sales, maintenance and repair costs represented 6% for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 5% for the same period in 2020.
    Segment Contribution Margin
    Oil & Gas Proppants contribution margin increased by $18.1 million to $160.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $142.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, driven by a $200.6 million increase in sales, partially offset by $182.5 million in increased cost of sales. The increase in segment contribution margin was mainly driven by increased production, overall improved economic conditions, and recognition of shortfall fees.
    Industrial & Specialty Products contribution margin increased by $9.3 million, or 6%, to $168.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $159.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, driven by a $57.4 million increase in revenue, partially offset by $48.1 million in increased cost of sales. The increase in segment contribution margin was due to overall improved economic conditions.    
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
    Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $4.6 million, or 4%, to $119.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $124.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to $11.8 million of capitalized legal fees expensed during 2020, which did not recur during 2021, partially offset by increased stock compensation and other legal fees. In total, our selling, general and administrative expenses represented approximately 11% and 15% of our sales for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
    Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased by $5.5 million, or 4%, to $161.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $155.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was mainly driven by accelerated depreciation of certain assets offset by reduced capital spending. Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense represented approximately 15% and 18% of our sales for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Goodwill and Other Asset Impairments
    During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded $0.2 million in asset impairments. During 2020, we recorded $110.7 million, which primarily related to our Oil & Gas Proppants segment due to an unprecedented drop in global demand combined with the breakdown of the OPEC+ agreement to restrict oil production that led to one of the largest annual crude builds in history, which also led to a sharp reduction in global crude oil prices. Additionally, containment measures and other economic, travel, and business disruptions caused by COVID-19 also affected refinery activity and future demand for crude oil, and consequently, the services and products of our Oil & Gas Proppants segment.
Operating Income (Loss)
    Operating income was $27.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to an operating loss of $119.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was driven by a 30% increase in total sales, a 4% decrease in selling, general and administrative expense, and a 100% decrease in asset impairments, offset by a 4% increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and a 38% increase in cost of sales.
    Interest Expense
    Interest expense decreased by $8.7 million, or 11%, to $71.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $79.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, mainly due to expiration of the derivatives and a decrease in interest expense due to payoff of the Revolver balance.
    Other Income (Expense), net, including interest income
    Other income decreased by $18.3 million to $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $24.4 million in other income for the year ended December 31, 2020. The year ended December 31, 2020 included a gain attributable
52


to the bargain purchase of a business of $15.2 million and a gain on the valuation change of a royalty note payable of $8.3 million which did not recur in 2021, offset by an adjustment in non-service pension costs in 2021.
    Provision for Income Taxes    
    Our income tax benefits decreased by $57.2 million to $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $60.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease was mainly due to the decreased loss before income tax during the year ended December 31, 2021. The effective tax rates were 7% and 34% for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. See Note R - Income Taxes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Annual report on Form 10-K for more information.
    Historically, our actual effective tax rates have differed from the statutory effective rate primarily due to the benefit received from statutory percentage depletion allowances. The deduction for statutory percentage depletion does not necessarily change proportionately to changes in income before income taxes. However, for the year ended 2020, we recorded a permanent tax benefit of $22.3 million related to tax legislation enacted during 2020, which represents the largest permanent item in computing our effective tax rate for 2020.
Net (loss) income
    Net losses attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc., were $33.8 million and $114.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The year over year changes were due to the factors noted above.
53


Liquidity and Capital Resources

This section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses 2021 and 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020. Discussions of 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Overview
    Our principal liquidity requirements have historically been to service our debt, to meet our working capital, capital expenditure and mine development expenditure needs, to return cash to our stockholders, and to pay for acquisitions. We have historically met our liquidity and capital investment needs with funds generated through operations. We have historically funded our acquisitions through cash on hand, borrowings under our credit facilities, or equity issuances. Our working capital is the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities and is a measure of our ability to pay our liabilities as they become due. As of December 31, 2021, our working capital was $370.0 million and we had $77.8 million of availability under the Revolver. Based on our consolidated leverage ratio of 5.41:1.00 as of December 31, 2021, we may draw up to $30.0 million without the consent of our lenders. With the consent of our lenders, we have access to the full availability of the Revolver. Additionally, as of December 31, 2021, other receivables included $21.5 million of refunds related to NOL carryback claims filed for various tax years in accordance with certain provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act ("CARES" Act), which we expect to receive during 2022.
     In connection with the EPM acquisition, on May 1, 2018, we entered into the Credit Agreement with BNP Paribas, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein. The Credit Agreement increased our existing senior debt by creating a new $1.380 billion senior secured Credit Facility, consisting of a $1.280 billion Term Loan and a $100 million Revolver that may also be used for swingline loans or letters of credit, and we may elect to increase the Term Loan in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. The amounts owed under the Credit Agreement use LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing the rate at which interest accrues. LIBOR is the subject of recent national, international and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms and other pressures may cause LIBOR to disappear entirely or to perform differently than in the past. The consequences of these developments cannot be entirely predicted but could include an increase in the cost to us of this indebtedness.
    Management and our Board remain committed to evaluating additional ways of creating shareholder value. Any determination to pay dividends or other distributions in cash, stock, or property in the future or otherwise return capital to our stockholders, including decisions about existing or new share repurchase programs, will be at the discretion of our Board and will be dependent on then-existing conditions, including industry and market conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital requirements, contractual restrictions including restrictive covenants contained in debt agreements, and other factors. Additionally, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock may be limited by restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions to us, including restrictions under the terms of the agreements governing our indebtedness. During 2020, our Board of Directors determined that it was not in the best interest of our shareholders to issue a dividend subsequent to the second quarter and for the remainder of the year. We do not have plans to resume issuing dividends in the near term.
Net Debt (non-GAAP measure)
Net debt is a non-GAAP measure and is included in this report because we believe net debt is meaningful to investors as we consider net debt and its components to be important indicators of liquidity and financial position. Net debt may not be computed the same as similarly titled measures used by other companies. We define net debt as total debt less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt should not be considered as an alternative or superior to other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP. The following table provides net debt (in thousands):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Total Debt$1,211,420 $1,239,702 
Less:
   Cash and cash equivalents239,425 150,920 
Net Debt$971,995 $1,088,782 
54


Total Debt:
Total debt was $1.21 billion and $1.24 billion as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the payoff of the Revolver balance and principal payments of the Term Loan, offset partially by increases in insurance financing notes payable and finance leases.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents were $239.4 million and $150.9 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase was primarily due to receipt of $90 million during the second and third quarters of 2021 related to the settlement of a customer dispute.
Cash Flow Analysis
    A summary of operating, investing and financing activities (in thousands) is shown in the following table:
 Year ended December 31,
 202120202019
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities$169,347 $(3,403)$147,809 
Investing activities(29,856)(27,564)(120,393)
Financing activities(50,986)(3,853)(44,174)
    Net Cash Provided by / Used in Operating Activities
    Operating activities consist primarily of net income adjusted for certain non-cash and working capital items. Adjustments to net income for non-cash items include depreciation, depletion and amortization, deferred revenue, deferred income taxes, equity-based compensation and allowance for credit losses. In addition, operating cash flows include the effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities, principally accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets, income taxes payable and receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses.
    Net cash provided by operating activities was $169.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. This was mainly due to a $34.3 million net loss adjusted for non-cash items, including $161.1 million in depreciation, depletion and amortization, $0.2 million in goodwill and other asset impairments, $7.5 million in deferred income taxes, $18.8 million in equity-based compensation, $18.2 million in deferred revenue, $0.1 million related to the gain on sales of property, plant and equipment, and $34.3 million in other miscellaneous non-cash items. Also contributing to the change was a $5.0 million decrease in accounts receivable, an $11.0 million increase in inventories, a $12.4 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $1.8 million decrease in income taxes, a $48.7 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a $24.5 million increase in operating lease liabilities, and $17.4 million in other operating assets and liabilities.
    Net Cash Used in / Provided by Investing Activities
    Investing activities consist primarily of cash consideration paid to acquire businesses and capital expenditures for growth and maintenance.
    Net cash used in investing activities was $29.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. This was mainly due to capital expenditures of $30.3 million and capitalized intellectual property costs of $0.2 million, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment of $0.7 million. Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2021 were primarily related to improvements and expansions at our industrial facility in Millen, Georgia, equipment associated with new aggregate production, facility improvement and maintenance projects, and other environmental and health and safety projects.
    Subject to our continuing evaluation of market conditions, we anticipate that our capital expenditures in 2022 will be in the range of approximately $40 million to $60 million, which is primarily associated with maintenance, cost improvement capital projects and various growth projects. We expect to fund our capital expenditures through cash on our balance sheet, cash generated from our operations and cash generated from financing activities.
    Net Cash Used in / Provided by Financing Activities
    Financing activities consist primarily of equity issuances, dividend payments, share repurchases, borrowings and repayments related to the Revolver and Term Loan, as well as fees and expenses paid in connection with our credit facilities.
55


    Net cash used in financing activities was $51.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. This was mainly due to a $25.0 million payoff of our Revolver, $12.8 million of long-term debt payments, $6.4 million of short term debt payments, $5.0 million of tax payments related to shares withheld for vested restricted stock and stock units, and a $1.1 million distribution to a non-controlling interest.
Share Repurchase Program
We did not make any repurchases of our common stock under our stock repurchase program in 2021. See Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer in Part II, Item 5. to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information related to our share repurchase program.
Credit Facilities
See Note K - Debt to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information related to our credit facilities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
    We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have a current material effect or are reasonably likely to have a future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, sales, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

56


Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2021, the total of our future contractual cash commitments, including the repayment of our debt obligations under the Term Loan, is summarized as follows:
TotalLess than
1 year
1-3 years3-5 yearsMore than
5 years
 (amounts in thousands)
Principal payments on long-term debt(1)
$1,222,000 $12,800 $25,600 $1,183,600 $— 
Estimated interest payments on long-term debt(4)
231,592 61,829 140,553 29,210 — 
Retirement plans98,955 10,745 21,107 20,399 46,704 
Finance lease obligations (5)
3,848 1,209 1,963 676 — 
Operating lease obligations(5)
111,235 20,128 36,330 24,135 30,642 
Minimum purchase obligations(2)
45,202 15,065 15,783 5,066 9,288 
Total Contractual Cash Obligations(3):
$1,712,832 $121,776 $241,336 $1,263,086 $86,634 

(1)Excludes the unamortized debt issuance costs and original issue discount.
(2)Includes estimated future minimum purchase obligations related to transload service agreements and transportation service agreements. As of December 31, 2021, we accrued $0.5 million in shortfall fees under these service agreements.
(3)The above table excludes discounted asset retirement obligations in the amount of $32.0 million at December 31, 2021, the majority of which have a settlement date beyond 2026, as well as indemnification for surety bonds issued on our behalf discussed in Note O - Commitments and Contingencies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)Estimated interest payment amounts are computed using forecasted three-month LIBOR rates as of December 31, 2021.
(5)Includes interest and other operating costs. See Note Q - Leases to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on interest costs.
Environmental Matters
    We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, hazardous materials, air and water emissions, environmental contamination and reclamation and the protection of the environment and natural resources. We have made, and expect to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but we cannot estimate or predict the full amount of such future expenditures. As of December 31, 2021, we had $32.0 million accrued for future reclamation costs, as compared to $24.7 million as of December 31, 2020.
    We discuss certain environmental matters relating to our various production and other facilities, certain regulatory requirements relating to human exposure to crystalline silica and our mining activity and how such matters may affect our business in the future under Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 3. Legal Proceedings of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and base our estimates on historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities as well as identifying and assessing the accounting treatment with respect to commitments and contingencies. Our actual results may materially differ from these estimates.
A summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Note B - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables us to provide the users of the Consolidated Financial Statements with useful and reliable information about our operating results and financial condition.
57


Described below are the accounting policies we believe are critical to our financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the estimates or assumptions involved, and that we believe are critical to the understanding of our operations and our performance.
Revenue Recognition
Products
We derive our product sales by mining and processing minerals that our customers purchase for various uses. Our product sales are primarily a function of the price per ton and the number of tons sold. We primarily sell our products through individual purchase orders executed under short-term price agreements or at prevailing market rates. The amount invoiced reflects product, transportation and additional handling services as applicable, such as storage, transloading the product from railcars to trucks and last mile logistics to the customer site. We invoice most of our product customers on a per shipment basis, although for some larger customers, we consolidate invoices weekly or monthly. Standard collection terms are net 30 days, although extended terms are offered in competitive situations.
We recognize revenue for products and materials at a point in time following the transfer of control of such items to the customer, which typically occurs upon shipment or delivery depending on the terms of the underlying contracts. We account for shipping and handling activities related to product and material sales contracts with customers as costs to fulfill our promise to transfer the associated products pursuant to the accounting policy election allowed under ASC 606-10-25-10b. Accordingly, we record amounts billed for shipping and handling costs as a component of net sales and accrue and classify related costs as a component of cost of sales at the time revenue is recognized.
For a limited number of customers, we sell under long-term, minimum purchase supply agreements. These agreements define, among other commitments, the volume of product that our customers must purchase, the volume of product that we must provide and the price that we will charge and that our customers will pay for each product. Prices under these agreements are generally fixed and subject to certain contractual adjustments. Sometimes these agreements may undergo negotiations regarding pricing and volume requirements, which may often occur in volatile market conditions. While these negotiations continue, we may deliver sand at prices or at volumes below the requirements in our existing supply agreements. An executed order specifying the type and quantity of product to be delivered, in combination with the noted agreements, comprise our contracts in these arrangements.
Service
We derive our service revenues primarily through the provision of transportation, equipment rental, and contract labor services to companies in the oil and gas industry. Transportation services typically consist of transporting customer proppant from storage facilities to proximal well-sites and are contracted through work orders executed under established pricing agreements. The amount invoiced reflects the transportation services rendered. Equipment rental services provide customers with use of either dedicated or nonspecific wellhead proppant delivery equipment solutions for contractual periods defined either through formal lease agreements or executed work orders under established pricing agreements. The amounts invoiced reflect the length of time the equipment set was utilized in the billing period. Contract labor services provide customers with proppant delivery equipment operators through work orders executed under established pricing agreements. The amounts invoiced reflect the amount of time our labor services were utilized in the billing period.
We typically invoice our customers on a weekly or monthly basis; however, some customers receive invoices upon well-site operation completion. Standard collection terms are net 30 days, although extended terms are offered in competitive situations. We typically recognize revenue for specific, dedicated equipment set rental arrangements under ASC 842, Leases. For the remaining components of service revenue, we have applied the practical expedient allowed under ASC 606-10-55-18 to recognize transportation revenues in proportion to the amount we have the right to invoice.
Contracts with Multiple Performance Obligations
From time to time, we may enter into contracts that contain multiple performance obligations, such as work orders containing a combination of product, transportation, equipment rentals, and contract labor services. For these arrangements, we allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation identified in the contract based on relative standalone selling prices, or estimates of such prices, and recognize the related revenue as control of each individual product or service is transferred to the customer, in satisfaction of the corresponding performance obligations. We typically invoice our customers on a weekly or monthly basis; however, some customers receive invoices upon well-site operation completion. Standard collection terms are net 30 days, although extended terms are offered in competitive situations.
58


Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities 
We exclude from our measurement of transaction prices all taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are both (i) imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and (ii) collected from customers. Accordingly, such tax amounts are not included as a component of net sales or cost of sales.
Deferred Revenues
For a limited number of customers, we enter into supply agreements which give customers the right to make advanced payments toward the purchase of certain products at specified volumes over an average initial period of one to fifteen years. These payments represent consideration that is unconditional and for which we have yet to transfer the related product. These payments are recorded as contract liabilities referred to as “deferred revenues” upon receipt and recognized as revenue upon delivery of the related product.

Unbilled Receivables
Revenues recognized in advance of invoice issuance create assets referred to as “unbilled receivables.” Any portion of our unbilled receivables for which our right to consideration is conditional on a factor other than the passage of time is considered a contract asset. These assets are presented on a combined basis with accounts receivable and are converted to accounts receivable once billed.
Impairment or Disposal of Property, Plant and Mine Development
We periodically evaluate whether current events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment assets may not be recoverable. If circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, we estimate future undiscounted net cash flows using estimates of proven and probable sand reserves, estimated future sales prices (considering historical and current prices, price trends and related factors) and operating costs and anticipated capital expenditures. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the assets.
The recoverability of the carrying value of our mineral properties is dependent upon the successful development, start-up and commercial production of our mineral deposit and the related processing facilities. Our evaluation of mineral properties for potential impairment primarily includes assessing the existence or availability of required permits and evaluating changes in our mineral reserves, or the underlying estimates and assumptions, including estimated production costs. Assessing the economic feasibility requires certain estimates including the prices of products to be produced and processing recovery rates, as well as operating and capital costs.
Gains on the sale of property, plant and mine development are included in income when the assets are disposed of provided there is more than reasonable certainty of the collectability of the sales price and any future activities required to be performed by us relating to the disposal of the assets are complete or insignificant. Upon retirement or disposal of assets all costs and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are written-off.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Related Impairment
Our intangible assets consist of goodwill, which is not amortized, indefinite-lived intangibles, which consist of certain trade names that are not subject to amortization, intellectual property and customer relationships.
Intellectual property mainly consists of patents and technology, and it is amortized on a straight-line basis over an average useful life of 15 years. Customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful life of 13 - 20 years.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of business combinations over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill and trade names are reviewed for impairment annually as of October 31, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist. An impairment exists if the fair value of a reporting unit to which goodwill has been allocated, or the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, is less than their respective carrying values. Prior to conducting a formal impairment test we have an option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that is more likely than not (more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Such qualitative factors may include the following: macroeconomic conditions; industry and market considerations; cost factors; overall financial performance; and other relevant entity-specific events. If the qualitative assessment determines that an impairment is more likely than not, or if we choose to bypass the qualitative assessment, we perform a quantitative assessment
59


by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
A trade name is a legally protected trade or similar mark. Acquired trade names are valued using an income method approach, generally the relief-from-royalty valuation method. The method uses a royalty rate based on comparable marketplace royalty agreements for similar types of trade names and applies it to the after-tax discounted free cash flow attributed to the trade name. The discount rate used is based on an estimated weighted average cost of capital and the anticipated risk for intangible assets. The valued trade names have an indefinite life based on our plans and expectations for the trade names going forward and are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist.
Intellectual property and technology (“IP”) is a design, work or invention that is the result of creativity to which one has ownership rights that may be protected through a patent, copyright, trademark or service mark. IP is valued using the relief-from-royalty valuation method. The method uses a royalty rate based on comparable marketplace royalty agreements for similar types of IP and applies it to the after-tax discounted free cash flow attributed to the IP. The discount rate used is based on an estimated weighted average cost of capital and the anticipated risk for intangible assets. The IP is amortized following the pattern in which the expected benefits will be consumed or otherwise used up over each component’s useful life, based on our plans and expectations for the IP going forward, which is generally the underlying IP’s legal expiration dates. IP is reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist.
Customer relationships are intangible assets that consist of historical and factual information about customers and contacts collected from repeat transactions with customers, with or without any underlying contracts. The information is generally organized as customer lists or customer databases. We have the expectation of repeat patronage from these customers based on the customers’ historical purchase activity, which creates the intrinsic value over a finite period of time and translates into the expectation of future revenue, income, and cash flow. Customer relationships are valued using projected operating income, adjusted for estimated future existing customer growth less estimated future customer attrition, net of charges for net tangible assets, IP charge, trade name charge and work force. The concluded value is the after-tax discounted free cash flow. Customer relationships are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are recognized on the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. This approach requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the expenses are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
We recognize a tax benefit associated with an uncertain tax position when, in management’s judgment, it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority. For a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we initially and subsequently measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that we judge to have a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. The liability associated with unrecognized tax benefits is adjusted periodically due to changing circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law developments and new or emerging legislation. Such adjustments are recognized entirely in the period in which they are identified. The effective tax rate includes the net impact of changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and subsequent adjustments as considered appropriate by management.
Generally, the largest permanent item in computing both our effective tax rate and taxable income is the deduction allowed for statutory depletion. The deduction for statutory depletion does not necessarily change proportionately to changes in income before income taxes. However, for the year ended 2020, we recorded a permanent tax benefit related to tax legislation enacted during 2020, which represents the largest permanent item in computing our effective tax rate for 2020.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
New accounting guidance that has been recently issued is described in Note B - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

60


ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
We are exposed to certain market risks, which exist as a part of our ongoing business operations. Such risks arise from adverse changes in market rates, prices and conditions. We address such market risks in “Recent Trends and Outlook” and "How We Generate Our Sales" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Annual Report on Form 10-K of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk arising from adverse changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2021, we had $1.222 billion of debt outstanding under the Credit Agreement. Assuming LIBOR is greater than the 1.0% minimum base rate on the Term Loan, a hypothetical increase in interest rates by 1.0% would have changed our interest expense by $12.2 million per year.
LIBOR is expected to be discontinued after 2021 and there can be no assurance as to what alternative base rate may replace LIBOR in the event it is discontinued, or whether such base rate will be more or less favorable to us. We intend to monitor the developments with respect to LIBOR and work with our lenders, to ensure any transition away from LIBOR will have a minimal impact on our financial condition, but can provide no assurances regarding the impact of the discontinuation of LIBOR.
Credit Risk
We are subject to risks of loss resulting from nonpayment or nonperformance by our customers. We examine the creditworthiness of third-party customers to whom we extend credit and manage our exposure to credit risk through credit analysis, credit approval, credit limits and monitoring procedures, and for certain transactions, we may request letters of credit, prepayments or guarantees, although collateral is generally not required.
Despite enhancing our examination of our customers' creditworthiness, we may still experience delays or failures in customer payments. Some of our customers have reported experiencing financial difficulties. With respect to customers that may file for bankruptcy protection, we may not be able to collect sums owed to us by these customers and we also may be required to refund pre-petition amounts paid to us during the preference period (typically 90 days) prior to the bankruptcy filing.
61


ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The following Consolidated Financial Statements are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.

62



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.

Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of U.S. Silica Holdings Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated February 25, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matters
Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgements. We determined that there are no critical audit matters.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2004.
Houston, Texas
February 25, 2022

63


U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
December 31,
20212020
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$239,425 $150,920 
Accounts receivable, net202,759 206,934 
Inventories, net115,713 104,684 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets18,018 23,147 
Income tax deposits 628 
Total current assets575,915 486,313 
Property, plant and mine development, net1,258,646 1,368,092 
Lease right-of-use assets42,241 37,469 
Goodwill185,649 185,649 
Intangible assets, net150,054 159,582 
Other assets7,095 9,842 
Total assets$2,219,600 $2,246,947 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$167,670 $121,920 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities14,469 17,388 
Current portion of long-term debt18,285 42,042 
Current portion of deferred revenue4,247 13,545 
Income tax payable1,200  
Total current liabilities205,871 194,895 
Long-term debt, net1,193,135 1,197,660 
Deferred revenue16,494 20,147 
Liability for pension and other post-retirement benefits32,935 48,169 
Deferred income taxes, net44,774 49,386 
Operating lease liabilities75,130 76,361 
Other long-term obligations37,178 33,538 
Total liabilities1,605,517 1,620,156 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note O)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; zero issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020
  
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 84,746,194 issued and 75,033,352 outstanding at December 31, 2021; 83,143,176 issued and 73,986,566 outstanding at December 31, 2020
845 827 
Additional paid-in capital1,218,575 1,200,023 
Retained deficit(429,260)(395,496)
Treasury stock, at cost, 9,712,842 and 9,156,610 shares at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively
(186,294)(181,615)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)349 (8,479)
Total U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. stockholders’ equity604,215 615,260 
Non-controlling interest9,868 11,531 
Total stockholders' equity614,083 626,791 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$2,219,600 $2,246,947 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
64


U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 Year Ended 
 December 31,
 202120202019
Sales:
Product$896,203 $732,187 $1,168,472 
Service207,676 113,698 306,005 
Total sales1,103,879 845,885 1,474,477 
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization):
Product633,857 486,982 900,091 
Service161,126 88,088 233,202 
Total cost of sales (excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization)794,983 575,070 1,133,293 
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative119,628 124,171 150,848 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization161,131 155,568 179,444 
Goodwill and other asset impairments202 110,688 363,847 
Total operating expenses280,961 390,427 694,139 
Operating income (loss)27,935 (119,612)(352,955)
Other (expense) income:
Interest expense(71,157)(79,885)(95,472)
Other income, net, including interest income6,146 24,350 19,519 
Total other expense(65,011)(55,535)(75,953)
Loss before income taxes(37,076)(175,147)(428,908)
Income tax benefit2,755 60,025 99,151 
Net loss$(34,321)$(115,122)$(329,757)
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest(560)(1,028)(675)
Net loss attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. $(33,761)$(114,094)$(329,082)
Loss per share attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.:
Basic$(0.45)$(1.55)$(4.49)
Diluted$(0.45)$(1.55)$(4.49)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic74,350 73,634 73,253 
Diluted74,350 73,634 73,253 
Dividends declared per share$ $0.02 $0.25 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
65



U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
 Year Ended 
 December 31,
 202120202019
Net loss$(34,321)$(115,122)$(329,757)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (net of tax of $, $973, and $(456) for 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively)
 3,053 (1,432)
Foreign currency translation adjustment (net of tax of $(309), $444, and $(60) for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively)
(1,000)1,391 (188)
Pension and other post-retirement benefits liability adjustments (net of tax of $3,131, $2,207, and $(1,024) for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively)
9,828 6,931 (3,214)
Comprehensive loss$(25,493)$(103,747)$(334,591)
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest(560)(1,028)(675)
Comprehensive loss attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.$(24,933)$(102,719)$(333,916)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
66



U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Common
Stock
Treasury
Stock
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Retained
Earnings (Deficit)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Total U.S. Silica Holdings Inc., Stockholders’
Equity
Non-controlling InterestTotal
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance at January 1, 2019$818 $(178,215)$1,169,383 $67,854 $(15,020)$1,044,820 $7,484 $1,052,304 
Net loss— — — (329,082)— (329,082)(675)(329,757)
Unrealized loss on derivatives— — — — (1,432)(1,432)— (1,432)
Foreign currency translation adjustment— — — — (188)(188)— (188)
Pension and post-retirement liability— — — — (3,214)(3,214)— (3,214)
Cash dividend declared ($0.25 per share)
— — — (18,728)— (18,728)— (18,728)
Contributions from non-controlling interest— — — — — — 4,554 4,554 
Common stock-based compensation plans activity:
Equity-based compensation— — 15,906 — — 15,906 — 15,906 
Proceeds from options exercised— 296 (168)— — 128 — 128 
Shares withheld for tax payments related to vested restricted stock and stock units5 (2,993)(5)— — (2,993)— (2,993)
Balance at December 31, 2019823 (180,912)1,185,116 (279,956)(19,854)705,217 11,363 716,580 
Net loss— — — (114,094)— (114,094)(1,028)(115,122)
Unrealized gain on derivatives— — — — 3,053 3,053 — 3,053 
Foreign currency translation adjustment— — — — 1,391 1,391 — 1,391 
Pension and post-retirement liability— — — — 6,931 6,931 — 6,931 
Cash dividend declared ($0.02 per share)
— — — (1,446)— (1,446)— (1,446)
Contributions from non-controlling interest— — — — — — 1,196 1,196 
Common stock-based compensation plans activity:
Equity-based compensation— — 14,911 — — 14,911 — 14,911 
Shares withheld for tax payments related to vested restricted stock and stock units4 (703)(4)— — (703)— (703)
Balance at December 31, 2020827 (181,615)1,200,023 (395,496)(8,479)615,260 11,531 626,791 
Net loss— — — (33,761)— (33,761)(560)(34,321)
Foreign currency translation adjustment— — — — (1,000)(1,000)— (1,000)
Pension and post-retirement liability— — — — 9,828 9,828 — 9,828 
67



Cash dividends— — — (3)— (3)— (3)
Distributions to non-controlling interest— — — — — — (1,103)(1,103)
Common stock-based compensation plans activity:
Equity-based compensation— — 18,809 — — 18,809 — 18,809 
Proceeds from options exercised— 344 (239)— — 105 — 105 
Shares withheld for tax payments related to vested restricted stock and stock units18 (5,023)(18)— — (5,023)— (5,023)
Balance at December 31, 2021$845 $(186,294)$1,218,575 $(429,260)$349 $604,215 $9,868 $614,083 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
68



U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
 Year Ended 
 December 31,
 202120202019
Operating activities:
Net loss$(34,321)$(115,122)$(329,757)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization161,131 155,568 179,444 
Goodwill and other asset impairments202 110,688 363,847 
Debt issuance amortization5,059 5,131 5,597 
Original issue discount amortization1,026 1,036 1,053 
Gain on valuation change of royalty note payable (8,263)(16,854)
Inventory step-up adjustments  22,373 
Deferred income taxes(7,493)(61,805)(101,682)
Deferred revenue(18,158)(23,569)(74,910)
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment(131)(2,597)1,573 
Equity-based compensation18,809 14,911 15,906 
Allowance for credit losses, net of recoveries(455)1,510 3,466 
Gain on remeasurement of leases (24,056) 
Other28,632 23,146 (12,042)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable5,026 48,441 33,837 
Inventories(11,029)15,245 11,182 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets12,371 980 12,310 
Income taxes1,828 (153)1,725 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses48,709 (86,734)21,024 
Short-term and long-term obligations-vendor incentives  4,021 
Operating lease liabilities(24,451)(62,140)(75,352)
Liability for pension and other post-retirement benefits(15,341)(11,941)2,734 
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities(2,067)16,321 78,314 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities169,347 (3,403)147,809 
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures(30,307)(34,461)(118,357)
Capitalized intellectual property costs(210)(456)(3,932)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment661 7,353 1,896 
Net cash used in investing activities(29,856)(27,564)(120,393)
Financing activities:
Dividends paid(26)(6,185)(18,592)
Proceeds from options exercised105  128 
Tax payments related to shares withheld for vested restricted stock and stock units(5,023)(703)(2,993)
(Payments on) proceeds from draw down on the Revolver(25,000)25,000  
Payments on short-term debt(6,398)(7,131)(3,763)
Payments on long-term debt(12,800)(15,985)(23,449)
(Distributions to) contributions from non-controlling interest(1,103)1,196 4,554 
Principal payments on finance lease obligations(741)(45)(59)
Net cash used in financing activities(50,986)(3,853)(44,174)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents88,505 (34,820)(16,758)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period150,920 185,740 202,498 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$239,425 $150,920 $185,740 
69



Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest$64,650 $73,695 $87,286 
Taxes, net of refunds$(12,994)$(39,908)$(14,741)
Non-cash Items:
Net assets assumed in business acquisition$68 $8,241 $ 
Accrued capital expenditures$1,196 $26,136 $27,646 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
70



U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE A—ORGANIZATION
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings,” and together with its subsidiaries “we,” “us” or the “Company”) is a global performance materials company and a leading producer of commercial silica used in the oil and gas industry and in a wide range of industrial applications. In addition, through our subsidiary EP Minerals, LLC ("EPM") we are an industry leader in the production of industrial minerals, including diatomaceous earth, clay (calcium bentonite and calcium montmorillonite) and perlite. During our 122-year history, we have developed core competencies in mining, processing, logistics and materials science that enable us to produce and cost-effectively deliver products to customers across our end markets. Our operations are organized into two reportable segments based on end markets served: (1) Oil & Gas Proppants and (2) Industrial & Specialty Products. See Note U - Segment Reporting for more information on our reportable segments.

NOTE B—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements have been included. Such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature.
Throughout this report we refer to (i) our Consolidated Balance Sheets as our “Balance Sheets,” (ii) our Consolidated Statements of Operations as our “Income Statements,” and (iii) our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as our “Cash Flows.”
Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Holdings and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of prior period presentations have been made to conform to the current period presentation.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to the purchase price allocation for businesses acquired; mineral reserves that are the basis for future cash flow estimates utilized in impairment calculations and units-of-production amortization calculations; environmental, reclamation and closure obligations; estimates of recoverable minerals; estimates of allowance for credit losses; estimates of fair value for certain reporting units and asset impairments (including impairments of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets); write-downs of inventory to net realizable value; equity-based compensation expense; post-employment, post-retirement and other employee benefit liabilities; valuation allowances for deferred tax assets; contingent considerations; reserves for contingencies and litigation and the fair value and accounting treatment of financial instruments. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Because of the short maturity of these investments, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value. Cash and cash equivalents are invested primarily in money market securities held by financial institutions with high credit ratings. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Cash balances at times may exceed federally-insured
71



limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.
Accounts Receivable
The majority of our accounts receivable are due from companies in the oil and natural gas drilling, building and construction products, filler and extenders, filtration, glass, absorbents, sports and recreation, foundry and other major industries. Credit is extended based on evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers net of allowance for credit losses. Accounts outstanding longer than the payment terms are considered past due. We determine our allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, our previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to us and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. Ongoing credit evaluations are performed. We write-off accounts receivable when they are deemed uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for credit losses. See Note F - Accounts Receivable and Note S - Revenue.
Inventories
Inventories include raw stockpiles, in-process product and finished product available for shipment, as well as spare parts and supplies for routine facility maintenance. We value inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out and average cost methods. Our inventoriable costs include production costs and transportation and additional service costs as applicable. See Note G - Inventories.
Property, Plant and Mine Development
Plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Interest incurred during construction of facilities is capitalized and depreciated over the life of the asset. Costs for normal repairs and maintenance that do not extend economic life or improve service potential are expensed as incurred. Costs of improvements that extend economic life or improve service potential are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated remaining useful life.
Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives as follows: buildings (15 years); land improvements (10 years); machinery and equipment, including computer equipment and software (3-10 years); furniture and fixtures (8 years). Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the asset life or lease term. Construction-in-progress is primarily comprised of machinery and equipment which have not yet been placed in service.
Mining property and development
Mining property and development includes mineral deposits and mine exploration and development. Mineral deposits are initially recognized at cost, which approximates the estimated fair value on the date of purchase. Mine exploration and development costs include engineering and mineral studies, drilling and other related costs to delineate an ore body, and the removal of overburden to initially expose an ore body for production. Costs incurred before mineralization are classified as proven and probable reserves are expensed and classified as exploration or advanced projects, research and development expense. Capitalization of mine development project costs, which meet the definition of an asset, begins once mineralization is classified as proven and probable reserves.
The cost of removing overburden and waste materials to access the ore body at an open pit mine prior to the production phase are referred to as “pre-stripping costs.” Pre-stripping costs are capitalized during the development of an open pit mine. The production phase of an open pit mine commences when saleable minerals, beyond a de minimis amount, are produced. Stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine are variable production costs that are included as a component of inventory to be recognized in costs applicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory.
Depletion and amortization of mineral deposits and mine development costs are recorded as the minerals are extracted, based on units of production and engineering estimates of mineable reserves. The impact of revisions to reserve estimates is recognized on a prospective basis.
See Note H - Property, Plant and Mine Development.
Mine reclamation costs and asset retirement obligations
We recognize the fair value of any liability for conditional asset retirement obligations, if sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate the fair value of the liability. These obligations include environmental remediation liabilities when
72



incurred, which is generally upon acquisition, construction or development and/or through the normal operation of the asset. These obligations also generally include the estimated net future costs of dismantling, restoring and reclaiming operating mines and related mine sites in accordance with federal, state, local regulatory and land lease agreement requirements. The liability is accreted over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, the asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the asset’s carrying value and amortized over the life of the related asset. Reclamation costs are periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the estimated present value resulting from the passage of time and revisions to the estimates of either the timing or amount of the reclamation and abandonment costs. The reclamation obligation is based on when spending for an existing environmental disturbance will occur. If the asset retirement obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, a gain or loss is recognized on settlement. We review, on an annual basis, unless otherwise deemed necessary, the reclamation obligation at each mine site in accordance with ASC guidance for accounting for reclamation obligations.
See Note L - Asset Retirement Obligations.
Impairment or Disposal of Property, Plant and Mine Development
We periodically evaluate whether current events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment assets may not be recoverable. If circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, we estimate future undiscounted net cash flows using estimates of proven and probable sand reserves, estimated future sales prices (considering historical and current prices, price trends and related factors) and operating costs and anticipated capital expenditures. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the assets.
The recoverability of the carrying value of our mineral properties is dependent upon the successful development, start-up and commercial production of our mineral deposit and the related processing facilities. Our evaluation of mineral properties for potential impairment primarily includes assessing the existence or availability of required permits and evaluating changes in our mineral reserves, or the underlying estimates and assumptions, including estimated production costs. Assessing the economic feasibility requires certain estimates including the prices of products to be produced and processing recovery rates, as well as operating and capital costs.
Gains on the sale of property, plant and mine development are included in income when the assets are disposed of provided there is more than reasonable certainty of the collectability of the sales price and any future activities required to be performed by us relating to the disposal of the assets are complete or insignificant. Upon retirement or disposal of assets, all costs and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are written-off.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Related Impairment
Our intangible assets consist of goodwill, which is not amortized, indefinite-lived intangibles, which consist of certain trade names that are not subject to amortization, intellectual property and customer relationships. Intellectual property mainly consists of patents and technology, and it is amortized on a straight-line basis over an average useful life of 15 years. Customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful life of 13 - 20 years. Intangible assets that are amortized are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of business combinations over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill and trade names are reviewed for impairment annually as of October 31, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist. An impairment exists if the fair value of a reporting unit to which goodwill has been allocated, or the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, is less than their respective carrying values. Prior to conducting a formal impairment test we have an option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that is more likely than not (more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Such qualitative factors may include the following: macroeconomic conditions; industry and market considerations; cost factors; overall financial performance; and other relevant entity-specific events. If the qualitative assessment determines that an impairment is more likely than not, or if we choose to bypass the qualitative assessment, we perform a quantitative assessment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
73



A trade name is a legally protected trade or similar mark. Acquired trade names are valued using an income method approach, generally the relief-from-royalty valuation method. The method uses a royalty rate based on comparable marketplace royalty agreements for similar types of trade names and applies it to the after-tax discounted free cash flow attributed to the trade name. The discount rate used is based on an estimated weighted average cost of capital and the anticipated risk for intangible assets. The valued trade names have an indefinite life based on our plans and expectations for the trade names going forward and are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist.
Intellectual property and technology (“IP”) is a design, work or invention that is the result of creativity to which one has ownership rights that may be protected through a patent, copyright, trademark or service mark. IP is valued using the relief-from-royalty valuation method. The method uses a royalty rate based on comparable marketplace royalty agreements for similar types of IP and applies it to the after-tax discounted free cash flow attributed to the IP. The discount rate used is based on an estimated weighted average cost of capital and the anticipated risk for intangible assets. The IP is amortized following the pattern in which the expected benefits will be consumed or otherwise used up over each component’s useful life, based on our plans and expectations for the IP going forward, which is generally the underlying IP’s legal expiration dates. IP is reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist.
Customer relationships are intangible assets that consist of historical and factual information about customers and contacts collected from repeat transactions with customers, with or without any underlying contracts. The information is generally organized as customer lists or customer databases. We have the expectation of repeat patronage from these customers based on the customers’ historical purchase activity, which creates the intrinsic value over a finite period of time and translates into the expectation of future revenue, income, and cash flow. Customer relationships are valued using projected operating income, adjusted for estimated future existing customer growth less estimated future customer attrition, net of charges for net tangible assets, IP charge, trade name charge and work force. The concluded value is the after-tax discounted free cash flow. Customer relationships are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist.
See Note I - Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

Leases

We lease railroad cars, office space, mining property, mining/processing equipment, and transportation and other equipment. Operating leases are included in lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, current portion of operating lease liabilities, and operating lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in lease right-of-use assets, current portion of long-term debt, and long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheets. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date of the lease based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The ROU assets also include any lease payments made at or before the commencement date of the lease and excludes lease incentives. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, the latter of which are generally accounted for separately. See Note Q - Leases.
We periodically evaluate whether current events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our ROU assets exceeds fair value. If circumstances indicate an impairment exists, we estimate fair value primarily utilizing internally developed cash flow models and quoted market prices, discounted at an appropriate weighted average cost of capital. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Revenue Recognition
Products
We derive our product sales by mining and processing minerals that our customers purchase for various uses. Our product sales are primarily a function of the price per ton and the number of tons sold. We primarily sell our products through individual purchase orders executed under short-term price agreements or at prevailing market rates. The amount invoiced reflects product, transportation and additional handling services as applicable, such as storage, transloading the product from railcars to trucks and last mile logistics to the customer site. We invoice most of our product customers on a per shipment basis, although for some larger customers, we consolidate invoices weekly or monthly. Standard collection terms are net 30 days, although extended terms are offered in competitive situations.
74



We recognize revenue for products and materials at a point in time following the transfer of control of such items to the customer, which typically occurs upon shipment or delivery depending on the terms of the underlying contracts. We account for shipping and handling activities related to product and material sales contracts with customers as costs to fulfill our promise to transfer the associated products pursuant to the accounting policy election allowed under ASC 606-10-25-18b. Accordingly, we record amounts billed for shipping and handling costs as a component of net sales and accrue and classify related costs as a component of cost of sales at the time revenue is recognized.
For a limited number of customers, we sell under long-term, minimum purchase supply agreements. These agreements define, among other commitments, the volume of product that our customers must purchase, the volume of product that we must provide and the price that we will charge and that our customers will pay for each product. Prices under these agreements are generally fixed and subject to certain contractual adjustments. Sometimes these agreements may undergo negotiations regarding pricing and volume requirements, which may often occur in volatile market conditions. While these negotiations continue, we may deliver product at prices or at volumes below the requirements in our existing supply agreements. An executed order specifying the type and quantity of product to be delivered, in combination with the noted agreements, comprise our contracts in these arrangements.
Service
We derive our service revenues primarily through the provision of transportation, equipment rental, and contract labor services to companies in the oil and gas industry. Transportation services typically consist of transporting customer proppant from storage facilities to proximal well-sites and are contracted through work orders executed under established pricing agreements. The amount invoiced reflects the transportation services rendered. Equipment rental services provide customers with use of either dedicated or nonspecific wellhead proppant delivery equipment solutions for contractual periods defined either through formal lease agreements or executed work orders under established pricing agreements. The amounts invoiced reflect the length of time the equipment set was utilized in the billing period. Contract labor services provide customers with proppant delivery equipment operators through work orders executed under established pricing agreements. The amounts invoiced reflect the amount of time our labor services were utilized in the billing period.
We typically invoice our customers on a weekly or monthly basis; however, some customers receive invoices upon well-site operation completion. Standard collection terms are net 30 days, although extended terms are offered in competitive situations. We typically recognize revenue for specific, dedicated equipment set rental arrangements under ASC 842, Leases. For the remaining components of service revenue, we have applied the practical expedient allowed under ASC 606-10-55-18 to recognize transportation revenues in proportion to the amount we have the right to invoice.
Contracts with Multiple Performance Obligations
From time to time, we may enter into contracts that contain multiple performance obligations, such as work orders containing a combination of product, transportation, equipment rentals, and contract labor services. For these arrangements, we allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation identified in the contract based on relative standalone selling prices, or estimates of such prices, and recognize the related revenue as control of each individual product or service is transferred to the customer, in satisfaction of the corresponding performance obligations. We typically invoice our customers on a weekly or monthly basis; however, some customers receive invoices upon well-site operation completion. Standard collection terms are net 30 days, although extended terms are offered in competitive situations.
Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities. 
We exclude from our measurement of transaction prices all taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are both (i) imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and (ii) collected from customers. Accordingly, such tax amounts are not included as a component of net sales or cost of sales.
See Note S - Revenue.
Deferred Revenues
For a limited number of customers, we enter into supply agreements which give customers the right to make advanced payments toward the purchase of certain products at specified volumes over an average initial period of one to fifteen years. These payments represent consideration that is unconditional and for which we have yet to transfer the related product. These payments are recorded as contract liabilities referred to as “deferred revenues” upon receipt and recognized as revenue upon delivery of the related product.

75



Unbilled Receivables
Revenues recognized in advance of invoice issuance create assets referred to as “unbilled receivables.” Any portion of our unbilled receivables for which our right to consideration is conditional on a factor other than the passage of time is considered a contract asset. These assets are presented on a combined basis with accounts receivable and are converted to accounts receivable once billed.
Debt Issuance Costs
We defer costs directly associated with acquiring third-party financing, primarily loan origination costs and related professional expenses. Debt issuance costs are deferred and amortized using the effective interest rate method over the term of our senior secured Term Loan facility and the straight-line method for our Revolver facility. Debt issuance costs related to long-term debt are reflected as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt. Amortization included in interest expense was $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, and $5.1 million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. See Note K - Debt.
Employee Benefit Plans
We provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees, including pensions and post-retirement healthcare and life insurance benefits. We record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by generally accepted accounting principles, which include various actuarial assumptions, including discount rates, assumed rates of returns, compensation increases, turnover rates, mortality tables, and healthcare cost trend rates. We review the actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so. As required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the effect of the modifications is generally recorded or amortized over future periods. We believe that the assumptions utilized in recording our obligations under the plans are reasonable based on advice from our actuaries and information as to assumptions used by other employers. See Note P - Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits.
Environmental Costs
Environmental costs, other than qualifying capital expenditures, are accrued at the time the exposure becomes known and costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs are accrued based upon management’s estimates of all direct costs, after taking into account expected reimbursement by third parties (primarily the sellers of acquired businesses) and are reviewed by outside consultants. Environmental costs are charged to expense unless a settlement with an indemnifying party has been reached.
Self-Insurance
We are self-insured for various levels of employee health insurance coverage, workers’ compensation and third-party product liability claims alleging occupational disease. We purchase insurance coverage for claim amounts which exceed our self-insured retentions. Depending on the type of insurance, these self-insured retentions range from $0.1 million to $0.5 million per occurrence. Our insurance reserves are accrued based on estimates of the ultimate cost of claims expected to occur during the covered period. These estimates are prepared with the assistance of outside actuaries and consultants. Our actuaries periodically review the volume and amount of claims activity, and based upon their findings, we adjust our insurance reserves accordingly. The ultimate cost of claims for a covered period may differ from our original estimates. The current portion of our self-insurance reserves is included in accrued liabilities and the non-current portion is included in other long-term obligations in our Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, our self-insurance reserves totaled $5.8 million and $6.2 million, respectively, of which $2.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, were classified as current.
Research and Development Costs
We may incur immaterial internal research and development (“R&D”) expenditures, and research and development conducted for others, all of which are expensed as incurred, and included in selling, general and administrative expense. R&D costs may include, but are not limited to, research and administrative salaries, contractor fees, building costs, utilities, administrative expenses, and allocations of corporate costs.
Advertising Costs
We recognize advertising expense when incurred as selling, general and administrative expense. Advertising costs have not been a significant component of expense for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, or 2019.
76



Equity-based Compensation
We grant stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance share units to certain of our employees and directors under the Amended and Restated U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan. We recognize the cost of employee services rendered in exchange for awards of equity instruments.
Vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units is based on the individual continuing to render service over a pre-defined vesting schedule, generally three years. Cash dividend equivalents are accrued and paid to the holders of time-based restricted stock units and restricted stock. The fair value of the restricted stock awards is equal to the market price of our stock at date of grant. The restricted award-related compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
We grant performance share units to certain employees in which the number of shares of common stock ultimately received is determined based on achievement of certain performance thresholds over a specified performance period (generally three years) in accordance with the stock award agreement. Cash dividend equivalents are not accrued or paid on performance share units. We recognize expense based on the estimated vesting of our performance share units granted and the grant date market price. The estimated vesting of the performance share units is principally based on the probability of achieving certain financial performance levels during the vesting periods. In the period it becomes probable that the minimum performance criteria specified in the award agreement will be achieved, we recognize expense for the proportionate share of the total fair value of the award related to the vesting period that has already lapsed. The remaining fair value of the award is expensed on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting period.
We grant certain employees performance share units, the vesting of which is based on our total shareholder return (“TSR”) ranking among a peer group over a three-year period. The number of units that will vest will depend on the percentage ranking of our TSR compared to the TSRs for each of the companies in the peer group over the performance period. For these awards subject to market conditions, a binomial-lattice model (i.e., Monte Carlo simulation model) is used to fair value these awards at grant date. The related compensation expense is recognized, on a straight-line basis, over the vesting period.
See Note N - Equity-based Compensation.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are recognized on the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. This approach requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the expenses are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
We recognize a tax benefit associated with an uncertain tax position when, in management’s judgment, it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority. For a tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold, we initially and subsequently measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that we judge to have a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. The liability associated with unrecognized tax benefits is adjusted periodically due to changing circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law developments and new or emerging legislation. Such adjustments are recognized entirely in the period in which they are identified. The effective tax rate includes the net impact of changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and subsequent adjustments as considered appropriate by management.
Generally, the largest permanent item in computing both our effective tax rate and taxable income is the deduction allowed for statutory depletion. The deduction for statutory depletion does not necessarily change proportionately to changes in income before income taxes. However, for the year ended 2020, we recorded a permanent tax benefit related to tax legislation enacted during 2020, which represents the largest permanent item in computing our effective tax rate for 2020. See Note R - Income Taxes.
Foreign Currency Translation
For our operations in countries where the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, balance sheet amounts are translated using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Income statement amounts are translated monthly using the average exchange rate for the respective month. The gains and losses resulting from the changes in exchange rates from
77



year-to-year are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss as currency translation adjustments, net of tax. Any gains or losses on transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in other income (expense), net, including interest income.
Comprehensive Income (loss)
In addition to net income (loss), comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity during a period, such as adjustments to minimum pension liabilities.
Business Combinations
We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. Under this method, acquired assets, including separately identifiable intangible assets and any assumed liabilities, are recorded at their acquisition date estimated fair value. The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. See Note E - Business Combinations.    
New Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted
In December 2019, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The amendments in this Update simplified the accounting for income taxes by removing several exceptions and also simplified the accounting for income taxes by requiring that an entity recognize a franchise tax (or similar tax) that is partially based on income as an income-based tax and account for any incremental amount incurred as a non-income-based tax, requiring that an entity evaluate when a step up in the tax basis of goodwill should be considered part of the business combination in which the book goodwill was originally recognized and when it should be considered a separate transaction, specifying that an entity is not required to allocate the consolidated amount of current and deferred tax expense to a legal entity that is not subject to tax in its separate financial statements (however, an entity may elect to do so on an entity-by-entity basis) for a legal entity that is both not subject to tax and disregarded by the taxing authority, requiring that an entity reflect the effect of an enacted change in tax laws or rates in the annual effective tax rate computation in the interim period that includes the enactment date, and making minor codification improvements for income taxes related to employee stock ownership plans and investments in qualified affordable housing projects accounted for using the equity method. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter of 2021 and it did not have a material impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting followed by ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope, issued in January 2021, to provide clarifying guidance regarding the scope of Topic 848. ASU 2020-04 was issued to provide optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. Generally, the guidance is to be applied as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the date that the financial statements are available to be issued. ASU 2020-04 and ASU 2021-01 are effective for all entities through December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2021, we have not elected to use the optional guidance and continue to evaluate the options provided by ASU 2020-04 and ASU 2021-01. See Note K - Debt for discussion of the use of the adjusted LIBOR rate in connection with borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility.


NOTE C—EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed similarly to basic earnings per common share except that the weighted average number of common shares outstanding is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued.
78



The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
In thousands, except per share amounts
Year ended December 31,
 202120202019
Numerator:
Net loss attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.$(33,761)$(114,094)$(329,082)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding74,350 73,634 73,253 
Diluted effect of stock awards   
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution74,350 73,634 73,253 
Loss per share attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.:
Basic loss per share$(0.45)$(1.55)$(4.49)
Diluted loss per share$(0.45)$(1.55)$(4.49)
Potentially dilutive shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding and diluted earnings per share because we were in a loss position. Certain stock options, restricted stock awards and performance share units were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Such potentially dilutive shares and stock awards (in thousands) excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per common share were as follows:
 Year ended December 31,
 202120202019
Potentially dilutive shares excluded1,714 238 68 
Stock options excluded667 826 711 
Restricted stock and performance share units awards excluded66 3,435 1,298 

NOTE D—ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of fair value adjustments associated with accumulated adjustments for net experience gains or losses and prior service cost related to employee benefit plans and foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax. The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component (in thousands):
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
 Foreign currency translation adjustmentsPension and other post-retirement benefits liabilityTotal
Beginning Balance$583 $(9,062)$(8,479)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(1,000)9,035 8,035 
Amounts reclassed from accumulated other comprehensive income 793 793 
Ending Balance$(417)$766 $349 
Any amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to pension and other post-retirement benefits are included in the computation of net periodic benefit costs at their pre-tax amounts.
79




NOTE E—BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

During the first quarter of 2020, we settled multiple intellectual property and contractual lawsuits involving our SandBox Logistics unit and Arrows Up, LLC. As part of the settlement, SandBox Logistics took control of Arrows Up's existing business, including all equipment and sand logistics contracts, while also receiving a cash payment.

We accounted for the acquisition of Arrows Up, LLC under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. Estimates of fair value included in the Consolidated Financial Statements represented our best estimates and valuations. In accordance with the acquisition method of accounting, the fair values were subject to adjustment until we completed our analysis, which was during the first quarter of 2021. This business combination resulted in a bargain purchase pursuant to ASC 805-30-25 because no consideration was paid for the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The fair value of assets acquired, which included cash, accounts receivable, inventories, lease right-of-use assets, and property plant, and equipment, was $20.1 million. The fair value of liabilities assumed, which included lease liabilities and other long-term liabilities, was $2.5 million. A gain on bargain purchase of $17.6 million was recorded in "Other income, net, including interest income" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

During the first quarter of 2021, we recorded a $0.1 million increase to accounts receivable, which was our final adjustment to the purchase price. The total adjustments during the measurement period of $2.4 million were recorded as a net decrease to the initial gain on bargain purchase and recorded in "Other (expense) income, net, including interest income" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.












80



NOTE F—ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable (in thousands) consisted of the following:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Trade receivables$182,992 $171,230 
Less: Allowance for credit losses(5,248)(6,604)
Net trade receivables177,744 164,626 
Other receivables(1)
25,015 42,308 
Total accounts receivable$202,759 $206,934 
(1)At December 31, 2021 and 2020, other receivables included $21.5 million and $37.4 million of refunds related to NOL carryback claims filed for various tax years in accordance with certain provisions of the CARES Act.
We classify our trade receivables into the following portfolio segments: Oil & Gas Proppants and Industrial & Specialty Products, which also aligns with our reporting segments. We estimate the allowance for credit losses based on historical collection trends, the age of outstanding receivables, risks attributable to specific customers, such as credit history, bankruptcy or other going concern issues, and current economic and industry conditions. If events or circumstances indicate that specific receivable balances may be impaired, further consideration is given to the collectability of those balances and the allowance is adjusted accordingly. Past due balances are written off when we have exhausted our internal and external collection efforts and have been unsuccessful in collecting the amount due.
The following table reflects the change of the allowance for credit losses (in thousands) disaggregated by portfolio segments:
Oil & Gas ProppantsIndustrial & Specialty ProductsTotal
Beginning balance, December 31, 2020$5,684 $920 $6,604 
Allowance for credit losses(1,000)545 (455)
Write-offs(59)(842)(901)
Ending balance, December 31, 2021$4,625 $623 $5,248 
Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 40%, 34% and 43% of total sales during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our total sales during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Sales to one of our customers accounted for 11% of our total sales during the year ended December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2021, none of our customers' accounts receivable represented 10% or more of our total trade accounts receivable. At December 31, 2020, one of our customer's accounts receivable represented 24% of our total trade accounts receivable.
NOTE G—INVENTORIES
Inventories (in thousands) consisted of the following:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Supplies$45,605 $42,329 
Raw materials and work in process36,529 33,723 
Finished goods33,579 28,632 
Total inventories$115,713 $104,684 

See Note W - Impairments for additional information related to impairments during 2020.
81



NOTE H—PROPERTY, PLANT AND MINE DEVELOPMENT
Property, plant and mine development (in thousands) consisted of the following:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Mining property and mine development$789,122 $788,287 
Asset retirement cost22,283 15,985 
Land55,541 54,710 
Land improvements76,248 76,002 
Buildings72,207 69,841 
Machinery and equipment1,189,548 1,171,382 
Furniture and fixtures3,932 4,071 
Construction-in-progress35,060 27,216 
2,243,941 2,207,494 
Accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment charges(985,295)(839,402)
Total property, plant and mine development, net$1,258,646 $1,368,092 
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense related to property, plant and mine development for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $149.6 million and $143.8 million, respectively.
During the years ended 2020 and 2019, impairment charges were recorded mainly related to facilities that have reduced capacity or have been idled, including Tyler, Texas, Sparta, Wisconsin, Utica, Illinois, and Kosse, Texas. These charges relate to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment and are recorded in "Goodwill and other asset impairments" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note W - Impairments for additional information.
During the year ended 2020, management approved the disposal of certain non-operating parcels of land. The assets, which had a combined carrying value of approximately $3.2 million were classified as assets held for sale and were presented within Prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The proceeds of the disposals were expected to equal or exceed the net carrying value of the assets and, accordingly, no impairment loss was recognized on these assets held for sale. The assets were previously classified as Land, therefore, no adjustments were needed for depreciation. We disposed of these assets within one year of the balance sheet date. During the fourth quarter of 2020, we sold these assets at a gain of $0.3 million which was recorded in Other income, net, including interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.



NOTE I—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (in thousands) by business segment consisted of the following:
 Oil & Gas Proppants SegmentIndustrial & Specialty Products SegmentTotal
Balance at December 31, 2019$86,100 $187,424 $273,524 
Impairment losses(86,100) (86,100)
EPMH acquisition adjustment (1)
 (1,775)(1,775)
Balance at December 31, 2020 185,649 185,649 
Impairment losses   
Balance at December 31, 2021$ $185,649 $185,649 
(1) During the first quarter of 2020, an adjustment was made in accordance with ASC 250 to correct an immaterial error to acquisition accounting. We reclassified $1.8 million between goodwill and deferred tax liabilities. There was no impact to the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

82



Goodwill and trade names are evaluated for impairment annually as of October 31, or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist. We evaluated events and circumstances since the date of our last qualitative assessment, including macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, and our overall financial performance.

As a result of triggering events identified during the year ended 2020, we performed a quantitative analysis. The fair value of our reporting units was determined using a combination of the discounted cash flow method and the market multiples approach. As a result of this analysis we determined that goodwill was impaired. We recognized goodwill impairment charges of $86.1 million. This impairment charge related to our Oil & Gas Proppants segment and was recorded in the "Goodwill and other asset impairments" caption of our Consolidated Statements of Operations. No impairment charges were recorded related to goodwill during the years ended 2019 or 2021. See Note W - Impairments for additional information.
The changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets (in thousands) consisted of the following:
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
 Gross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationImpairmentsNetGross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationImpairmentsNet
Technology and intellectual property$71,209 $(25,069)$(38)$46,102 $71,052 $(18,854)$(1,373)$50,825 
Customer relationships66,999 (27,987) 39,012 66,999 (23,182) 43,817 
 Total definite-lived intangible assets:$138,208 $(53,056)$(38)$85,114 $138,051 $(42,036)$(1,373)$94,642 
Trade names64,240 —  64,240 65,390 — (1,150)64,240 
Other700 —  700 700 —  700 
Total intangible assets:$203,148 $(53,056)$(38)$150,054 $204,141 $(42,036)$(2,523)$159,582 

During the year ended 2020, we recorded impairments related to trade names and technology and intellectual property. See Note W - Impairments for additional information.

Estimated useful life of technology and intellectual property is 15 years. Estimated useful life of customer relationships is a range of 13 - 20 years.

During the second quarter of 2020, we expensed $11.8 million of capitalized legal fees related to the unsuccessful defense of a small number of our patents. These charges related to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment and were recorded in Selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Amortization expense was $9.7 million, $10.3 million and $10.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

At December 31, 2021, the estimated amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible assets (in thousands) for the five succeeding years is as follows:
2022$9,674 
2023$9,669 
2024$9,670 
2025$9,669 
2026$9,669 


83



NOTE J—ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (in thousands) consisted of the following:
 December 31,
 20212020
Trade payables$134,494 $90,564 
Accrued salaries and wages11,347 7,432 
Accrued vacation liability2,847 2,499 
Current portion of liability for pension and post-retirement benefits1,227 1,338 
Accrued healthcare liability1,619 1,886 
Accrued property taxes and sales taxes4,625 5,136 
Vendor incentives 4,782 
Other accrued liabilities11,511 8,283 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$167,670 $121,920 
Other accrued liabilities consist of employer related expenses, royalties payable, accrued interest payable, and other items.

84



NOTE K—DEBT
Debt (in thousands) consisted of the following:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Senior secured credit facility:
Revolver expiring May 1, 2023 (4.13% at December 31, 2021 and 4.19% at December 31, 2020)
$ $25,000 
Term Loan facility—final maturity May 1, 2025 (5.00% at December 31, 2021 and 5.00% December 31, 2020)
1,222,000 1,234,800 
Less: Unamortized original issue discount(3,350)(4,376)
Less: Unamortized debt issuance cost(15,200)(20,259)
Insurance financing notes payable4,424 4,187 
Finance leases3,546 350 
Total debt1,211,420 1,239,702 
Less: current portion(18,285)(42,042)
Total long-term portion of debt$1,193,135 $1,197,660 
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On May 1, 2018, we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement"), which increased our existing senior debt by entering into a new $1.380 billion senior secured Credit Facility, consisting of a $1.280 billion term loan (the "Term Loan") and a $100 million revolving credit facility (the "Revolver") (collectively the "Credit Facility") that may also be used for swingline loans or letters of credit, and we may elect to increase the term loan in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at variable rates as determined at our election, at LIBOR or a base rate, in each case, plus an applicable margin. In addition, under the Credit Agreement, we are required to pay a per annum facility fee and fees for letters of credit. The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of our assets and of our domestic subsidiaries' assets and a pledge of the equity interests in such entities. The Term Loan matures on May 1, 2025, and the Revolver expires on May 1, 2023. We capitalized $38.7 million in debt issuance costs and original issue discount as a result of the new Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement contains covenants that, among other things, limit our ability, and certain of our subsidiaries' abilities, to create, incur or assume indebtedness and liens, to make acquisitions or investments, to sell assets and to pay dividends. The Credit Agreement also requires us to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of no more than 3.75:1.00 as of the last day of any fiscal quarter whenever usage of the Revolver (other than certain undrawn letters of credit) exceeds 30% of the Revolver commitment. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. The Credit Agreement includes events of default and other affirmative and negative covenants that are usual for facilities and transactions of this type. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we were in compliance with all covenants in accordance with our senior secured Credit Facility.
Term Loan
At December 31, 2021, contractual maturities of our senior secured Credit Facility (in thousands) are as follows:
2022$12,800 
202312,800 
202412,800 
20251,183,600 
2026 
Thereafter 
Total$1,222,000 

85



Revolving Line-of-Credit
We have a $100.0 million Revolver with zero drawn and $22.2 million allocated for letters of credit as of December 31, 2021, leaving $77.8 million available under the Revolver.
Based on our consolidated leverage ratio of 5.41:1.00 as of December 31, 2021, we may draw up to $30.0 million without the consent of our lenders. With the consent of our lenders, we have access to the full availability of the Revolver.
Note Payable Secured by Royalty Interest
In conjunction with the acquisition of New Birmingham, Inc. in August 2016, we assumed a note payable secured by a royalty interest. During the fourth quarter of 2020, we executed an amendment to the note payable which settled the outstanding balance in its entirety in exchange for a one-time payment of $2.55 million. Future royalties may be owed under this amended agreement if we resume production at our Tyler facility, however, we have no plans to resume production. Therefore, no amounts have been accrued. The settlement of the note payable resulted in a gain of $8.3 million which was recorded in Other income, net, including interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Insurance Financing Notes Payable
During the third quarter of 2021, we renewed our insurance policies and financed the payments through notes payable with a stated interest rate of 2.9%. These payments will be made in installments throughout a nine-month period and, as such, were classified as current debt. As of December 31, 2021, the notes payable had a balance of $4.4 million.
NOTE L—ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Mine reclamation or future remediation costs for inactive mines are accrued based on management’s best estimate at the end of each period of the costs expected to be incurred at a site. Such cost estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care, maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates at inactive mines are reflected in earnings in the period an estimate is revised. Liabilities related to our asset retirement obligations are recorded in other long-term liabilities on our balance sheets. Changes in the asset retirement obligations (in thousands) are as follows:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Beginning balance$24,717 $25,825 
Accretion1,450 1,434 
Additions and revisions of estimates5,882 (2,542)
Ending balance$32,049 $24,717 
The increase in liability is primarily attributable to revisions of estimates of reclamation costs.
NOTE M—FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:
    Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
    Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
    Level 3—Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Cash Equivalents
Due to the short-term maturity, we believe our cash equivalent instruments at December 31, 2021 and 2020, approximate their reported carrying values.
86



Long-Term Debt, Including Current Maturities
We believe that the fair values of our long-term debt, including current maturities, approximate their carrying values based on their effective interest rates compared to current market rates.
    
NOTE N—EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION
In July 2011, we adopted the U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2011 Plan”), which was amended and restated in May 2015, amended and restated effective February 1, 2020, and amended and restated effective May 13, 2021. The 2011 Plan provides for grants of stock options, restricted stock, performance share units and other incentive-based awards. We believe our 2011 Plan aligns the interests of our employees and directors with those of our common stockholders. At December 31, 2021, we had 3,852,762 shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2011 Plan. We use a combination of treasury stock and new shares if necessary to satisfy option exercises or vesting of restricted awards and performance share units.
Stock Options

The following table summarizes the status of, and changes in, our stock option awards:
Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Aggregate Intrinsic ValueWeighted
Average
Remaining Contractual Term in Years
Outstanding at December 31, 2020826,215 $29.05 $ 3.1 years
Granted $ $— 
Exercised(10,164)$10.33 $44 
Forfeited (113,333)$24.76 $— 
Expired(36,000)$14.58 $— 
Outstanding at December 31, 2021666,718 $30.84 $ 2.4 years
Exercisable at December 31, 2021666,718 $30.84 $ 2.4 years

There were no grants of stock options during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
There were 10,164, zero and 10,000 stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $44 thousand, zero and $12 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Cash received from stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was $105 thousand, zero and $128 thousand, respectively. The tax benefits realized from stock option exercises were $11 thousand, zero and $3 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
As of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to these options. We account for forfeitures as they occur.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The following table summarizes the status of, and changes in, our unvested restricted stock awards:
Number of SharesGrant Date Weighted
Average Fair Value
Unvested, December 31, 20201,779,826 $6.22 
Granted881,261 $9.82 
Vested(1,491,222)$6.44 
Forfeited(25,555)$11.63 
Unvested, December 31, 20211,144,310 $8.37 
We granted 881,261, 1,590,170 and 814,387 restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The fair value of the awards was based on the market price of our stock at date of grant.
87



We recognized $7.3 million, $8.1 million and $8.2 million of equity-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, there was $7.5 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to these restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
We also granted cash awards during the year ended December 31, 2020. These awards will vest over a period of three years and will be settled in cash. As such, these awards have been classified as liability instruments. We recognized $0.9 million and $0.6 million of expense related to these awards for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. The liability for these awards is included in accounts payable and other accrued expenses on our balance sheets. These awards will be remeasured at fair value each reporting period with resulting changes reflected in our income statements. Estimated unrecognized expense related to these awards is $0.8 million over a period of 1.1 years.
Performance Share Unit Awards
The following table summarizes the status of, and changes in, our performance share unit awards:
Number of SharesGrant Date Weighted
Average Fair Value
Unvested, December 31, 20201,513,648 $12.36 
Granted886,091 $12.04 
Vested(292,241)$17.48 
Forfeited/Cancelled(192,909)$29.10 
Unvested, December 31, 20211,914,589 $9.77 
We granted 886,091, 1,020,161 and 607,130 of performance share unit awards during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. A portion of these awards was measured against total shareholder return ("TSR"), and a portion was measured against adjusted free cash flow ("ACF") targets. The grant date weighted average fair value of these awards was estimated to be $12.04, $6.57 and $15.58 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The number of TSR measured units that will vest will depend on the percentage ranking of our TSR compared to the TSR for each of the companies in the peer group over the three year period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023 for the 2021 grant, from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 for the 2020 grant, and January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021 for the 2019 grant. The number of ACF measured units that will vest will be based on ACF achievement versus target. The ACF targets are set annually and are approved by the Board of Directors. The related compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The grant date fair value for the TSR awards was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The Monte Carlo simulation model requires the use of highly subjective assumptions. Our key assumptions in the model included the price and the expected volatility of our common stock and our self-determined peer group companies’ stock, risk-free rate of interest, dividend yields and cross-correlations between our common stock and our self-determined peer group companies' stock.
We recognized $11.5 million, $6.8 million and $7.7 million of compensation expense related to performance share unit awards during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, there was $10.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to these performance share unit awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
We also granted cash awards during the year ended December 31, 2020. These awards will vest over a period of three years and will be settled in cash. As such, these awards have been classified as liability instruments. We recognized $0.7 million and $0.9 million of expense related to these awards for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. The liability for these awards is included in accounts payable and other accrued expenses on our balance sheets. These awards will be remeasured at fair value each reporting period with resulting changes reflected in our income statements. Estimated unrecognized expense related to these awards is $0.6 million over a period of 1.1 years.

88



NOTE O—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Future Minimum Annual Commitments (in thousands):
Year ending December 31,Minimum Purchase Commitments
2022$15,065 
202310,386 
20245,397 
20252,886 
20262,180 
Thereafter9,288 
Total future purchase commitments$45,202 
Minimum Purchase Commitments
We enter into service agreements with our transload and transportation service providers. Some of these agreements require us to purchase a minimum amount of services over a specific period of time. Any inability to meet these minimum contract requirements requires us to pay a shortfall fee, which is based on the difference between the minimum amount contracted for and the actual amount purchased.
Contingent Liability on Royalty Agreement
On May 17, 2017, we purchased reserves in Crane County, Texas, for $94.4 million cash plus contingent consideration. The contingent consideration is a royalty that is based on the tonnage shipped to third-parties. Because the contingent consideration is dependent on future tonnage sold, the amounts of which are uncertain, it is not currently possible to estimate the fair value of these future payments. The contingent consideration will be capitalized at the time a payment is probable and reasonably estimable, and the related depletion expense will be adjusted prospectively.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
Our operating subsidiary, U.S. Silica Company (“U.S. Silica”), has been named as a defendant in various product liability claims alleging silica exposure causing silicosis. During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, two, one and one claims, respectively, were brought against U.S. Silica. As of December 31, 2021, there were 44 active silica-related products liability claims pending in which U.S. Silica is a defendant. Although the outcomes of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, it is not reasonably possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations that exceeds the accrual amounts.
We have recorded estimated liabilities for these claims in other long-term obligations as well as estimated recoveries under the indemnity agreement and an estimate of future recoveries under insurance in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. As of both December 31, 2021 and 2020, other non-current assets included zero for insurance for third-party products liability claims, and other long-term obligations included $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for third-party products liability claims.
Obligations Under Guarantees
    We have indemnified our insurers against any loss they may incur in the event that holders of surety bonds, issued on our behalf, execute the bonds. As of December 31, 2021, there were $40.6 million in bonds outstanding. The majority of these bonds, $36.7 million, relate to reclamation requirements issued by various government authorities. Reclamation bonds remain outstanding until the mining area is reclaimed and the authority issues a formal release. The remaining bonds relate to licenses, permits, and tax collections.
89



NOTE P— PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
We maintain a single-employer noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering certain employees. The plan is frozen to all new employees. The plan provides benefits based on each covered employee’s years of qualifying service. Our funding policy is to contribute amounts within the range of the minimum required and maximum deductible contributions for the plan consistent with a goal of appropriate minimization of the unfunded projected benefit obligations. The pension plan uses a benefit level per year of service for covered hourly employees and a final average pay method for covered salaried employees. The plan uses the projected unit credit cost method to determine the actuarial valuation.
We employ a total rate of return investment approach whereby a mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan funded status, and corporate financial condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed-income investments. Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks, as well as growth, value and small and large capitalizations. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements, and periodic asset/liability studies.
We employ a building block approach in determining the long-term rate of return for plan assets. Historical markets are studied and long-term historical relationships between equities and fixed-income are preserved consistent with the widely accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long run. Current market factors such as inflation and interest rates are evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. The long-term portfolio return is established via a building block approach with proper consideration of diversification and rebalancing. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed to check for reasonability and appropriateness.
In addition, we provide defined benefit post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits to some employees. Covered employees become eligible for these benefits at retirement after meeting minimum age and service requirements. The projected future cost of providing post-retirement benefits, such as healthcare and life insurance, is recognized as an expense as employees render services. In general, retiree health benefits are paid as covered expenses are incurred.
Net pension benefit cost (in thousands) consisted of the following:
 Year Ended 
 
December 31,
 202120202019
Service cost$2,855 $2,253 $1,304 
Interest cost2,619 4,037 5,375 
Expected return on plan assets(5,688)(6,019)(6,171)
Net amortization and deferral3,212 3,127 1,648 
Net pension benefit costs$2,998 $3,398 $2,156 
Net post-retirement benefit cost (in thousands) consisted of the following:
 Year Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Service cost$24 $70 $88 
Interest cost141 584 789 
Unrecognized net (gain)/loss(2,204) (29)
Net post-retirement benefit costs$(2,039)$654 $848 

90



The changes in benefit obligations and plan assets (in thousands), as well as the funded status (in thousands) of our pension and post-retirement plans were as follows:
 Pension BenefitsPost-retirement Benefits
 2021202020212020
Benefit obligation at January 1,$157,198 $148,491 $11,318 $22,054 
Service cost2,855 2,253 24 70 
Interest cost2,619 4,037 141 584 
Actuarial (gain) loss(6,637)11,119 (3,193)1,329 
Benefits paid(9,551)(8,649)(680)(1,751)
Other(2,233)(53)1,781 (10,968)
Benefit obligation at December 31,$144,251 $157,198 $9,391 $11,318 
Fair value of plan assets at January 1,$120,563 $110,431 $ $ 
Actual return on plan assets7,099 13,306   
Employer contributions2,800 5,475 579 1,335 
Benefits paid(9,551)(8,649)(680)(1,751)
Other  101 416 
Fair value of plan assets at December 31,$120,911 $120,563 $ $ 
Plan assets less than benefit obligations at December 31 recognized as liability for pension and other post-retirement benefits$(23,340)$(36,635)$(9,391)$(11,318)
The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plans, which excludes the assumption of future salary increases, totaled $144.3 million and $157.2 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
We also sponsor unfunded, nonqualified pension plans. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for these plans were $1.5 million, $1.5 million and zero, respectively, at December 31, 2021 and $1.6 million, $1.6 million and zero, respectively, at December 31, 2020.
Future estimated annual benefit payments (in thousands) for pension and post-retirement benefit obligations were as follows:
 Benefits
  Post-retirement
 PensionBefore
Medicare
Subsidy
After
Medicare
Subsidy
2022$9,526 $1,104 $1,104 
20239,446 983 983 
20249,539 911 911 
20259,367 795 795 
20269,271 742 742 
2027-203143,405 2,775 2,775 
Our best estimate of expected contributions to the pension and post-retirement medical benefit plans for the 2022 fiscal year are zero and $1.1 million, respectively.
91



The total amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to net actuarial loss for the pension and post-retirement plans were $10.2 million and $24.7 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The total amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to prior service cost for the pension and post-retirement plans, were gains of $7.8 million and $9.4 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The actuarial losses in 2021 and 2020 were primarily driven by the change in discount rates on the U.S. qualified plan and postretirement medical plans. The impact of the discount rate change was partially offset by the actual return on plan assets exceeding the expected return on plan assets. Additionally, the Society of Actuaries released an updated mortality table projection scale for measurement of retirement program obligations in both 2021 and 2020. The impact of the mortality table changes provided a partial offset of the impact of the discount rate change.
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine our obligations under the plans:
 Pension BenefitsPost-retirement Benefits
 2021202020212020
Discount rate2.8 %2.5 %2.6 %2.1 %
Long-term rate of compensation increase
N/A
3.0%
N/AN/A
Long-term rate of return on plan assets5.8 %
6.3%
N/AN/A
Health care cost trend rate:
Pre-65 initial rate/ultimate rateN/AN/A
6.2%/4.5%
6.5%/4.5%
Pre-65 ultimate yearN/AN/A20282028
Post-65 initial rate/ultimate rateN/AN/A
N/A/N/A
7.0%/4.5%
Post-65 ultimate yearN/AN/AN/A2028
The weighted average discount rates used to determine the projected pension and post-retirement obligations were updated to reflect the expected long-term rates of return with maturities comparable to payments for the plan obligations utilizing Aon Hewitt's AA Above Medium Curve.
Mortality tables used for pension benefits and post-retirement benefits plans were the following:
 Pension and Post-retirement Benefits
 20212020
Healthy LivesPri-2012 base mortality tables with generational mortality improvements using Scale MP-2021
Pri-2012 base mortality tables with generational mortality improvements using Scale MP-2020
Disabled LivesPri-2012 base mortality tables with generational mortality improvements using Scale MP-2021

Pri-2012 base mortality tables with generational mortality improvements using Scale MP-2020
The major investment categories and their relative percentage of the fair value of total plan assets as invested were as follows:
 Pension Benefits
Post-retirement Benefits(1)
 2021202020212020
Equity securities51.6 %57.9 % % %
Debt securities46.1 %41.3 % % %
Cash2.3 %0.8 % % %
(1)Retiree health benefits are paid by the Company as covered expenses are incurred.

92



The fair values of the pension plan assets (in thousands) at December 31, 2021, by asset category, were as follows:
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Cash and cash equivalents$ $2,743 $ $2,743 
Mutual funds:
Diversified emerging markets6,375   6,375 
Foreign large blend21,719   21,719 
Large-cap blend22,907   22,907 
Mid-cap blend11,411   11,411 
Real estate    
Fixed income securities:
Corporate notes and bonds35,365   35,365 
U.S. Treasuries6,915   6,915 
Mortgage-backed securities 2,242  2,242 
Asset-backed securities 1,739  1,739 
       Real Assets 9,495  9,495 
Net asset$104,692 $16,219 $ $120,911 
The fair values of the pension plan assets (in thousands) at December 31, 2020, by asset category, were as follows:
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Cash and cash equivalents$ $1,020 $ $1,020 
Mutual funds:
Diversified emerging markets7,064   7,064 
Foreign large blend22,638   22,638 
Large-cap blend22,272   22,272 
Mid-cap blend12,972   12,972 
Real estate4,822   4,822 
Fixed income securities:
Corporate notes and bonds38,983   38,983 
U.S. Treasuries8,582   8,582 
Mortgage-backed securities 1,780  1,780 
Asset-backed securities 430  430 
Net asset$117,333 $3,230 $ $120,563 
We contribute to three multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under the terms of collective-bargaining agreements for union-represented employees. A multiemployer plan is subject to collective bargaining for employees of two or more unrelated companies. These plans allow multiple employers to pool their pension resources and realize efficiencies associated with the daily administration of the plan. Multiemployer plans are generally governed by a board of trustees composed of management and labor representatives and are funded through employer contributions. However, in most cases, management is not directly represented.
The risks of participating in multiemployer plans differ from single employer plans as follows: 1) assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers, 2) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers, and 3) if we cease to have an obligation to contribute to one or more of the multiemployer plans to which we contribute, we may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.
93



A summary of each multiemployer pension plan for which we participate is presented below:
Pension
Fund
EIN/ Pension
Plan No.
Pension Protection Act
Zone Status(1)
FIP/RP  Status
Pending/
Implemented
Company
Contributions
(in thousands)
Surcharge
Imposed
Expiration
Date of
CBA
20212020202120202019
LIUNA52-6074345/001GreenGreenNo$378 $361 $385 No6/4/2022
IUOE36-6052390/001GreenGreenNo328 256 310 No7/31/2022
CSSS(2)
36-6044243/001RedRedYes51 51 51 NANA
 
(1)The Pension Protection Act of 2006 defines the zone status as follows: green—healthy, yellow—endangered, orange—seriously endangered and red—critical.
(2)In 2011, we withdrew from the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan. The withdrawal liability of $1.0 million will be paid in monthly installments of $4,000 until 2031.
Our contributions to individual multiemployer pension funds did not exceed 5% of the fund’s total contributions for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. Additionally, our contributions to multiemployer post-retirement benefit plans were immaterial for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
We also sponsor a defined contribution plan covering certain employees. We contribute to the plan in two ways. For certain employees not covered by the defined benefit plan, we make a contribution equal to 4% of their salary. For all other eligible employees, we make a contribution of up to 6% of eligible earnings. Contributions were $5.9 million, $4.4 million and $7.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
NOTE Q— LEASES
We lease railroad cars, office space, mining property, mining/processing equipment, and transportation and other equipment. The majority of our leases have remaining lease terms of approximately one year to 20 years. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, the latter of which are generally accounted for separately.
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases (in thousands except for term and rate information) was as follows:
LeasesClassificationDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Assets
OperatingLease right-of-use assets$38,793 $37,130 
FinanceLease right-of-use assets3,448 339 
     Total leased assets$42,241 $37,469 
Liabilities
Current
OperatingCurrent portion of operating lease liabilities$14,469 $17,388 
FinanceCurrent portion of long-term debt1,061 55 
Non-Current
OperatingOperating lease liabilities75,130 76,361 
FinanceLong-term debt, net2,485 295 
     Total lease liabilities$93,145 $94,099 

During 2020, we recorded impairment charges related to railcar leases, various equipment leases and an office building lease. These charges relate to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment and are recorded in "Goodwill and other asset impairments" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note W - Impairments for additional information.

During the year ended 2020, we received lease concessions from certain lessors. Based on accounting elections provided by the FASB and in accordance with ASC 842-10, we have not accounted for these concessions as lease modifications. Based on remeasurement of the amended leases, for the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a decrease to the ROU assets of
$1.0 million and a decrease to the liability of $25.0 million. A gain of $24.0 million was recognized as operating income through cost of goods sold in our consolidated income statement for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Operating lease liabilities are based on the net present value of the remaining lease payments over the remaining lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, in determining the lease liability and the present value of lease payments, we used our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date. The weighted average remaining lease term and discount rate related to leases were as follows:
Lease Term and Discount RateDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Weighted average remaining lease term:
     Operating leases6.9 years6.9 years
     Finance leases3.6 years2.9 years
Weighted average discount rate:
     Operating leases5.7 %5.8 %
     Finance leases5.1 %5.0 %
The components of lease expense included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows:
Lease CostsClassificationYear Ended 
 
December 31, 2021
Year Ended 
 
December 31, 2020
Operating lease costs (1)
Cost of Sales$33,185 $26,548 
Operating lease costs (2)
Selling, general, and administrative1,880 1,808 
Right-of-use asset impairmentGoodwill and other asset impairments 3,406 
Total (3)
$35,065 $31,762 
(1) Includes short-term operating lease costs of $17.9 million and $9.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(2) Includes short-term operating lease costs of $0.4 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(3) Does not include expense of $0.8 million and $12 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 for finance leases.
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
     Operating cash flows for operating leases$24,451 $62,140 
     Operating cash flows for finance leases$759 $12 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities:
     Operating leases$17,350 $10,747 
     Finance leases$3,815 $359 
Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2021:
Maturities of lease liabilitiesOperating leasesFinance leases
2022$20,128 $1,209 
202319,889 1,199 
202416,441 764 
202513,019 605 
202611,116 71 
Thereafter30,642  
     Total lease payments$111,235 $3,848 
Less: Interest17,939 302 
Less: Other operating expenses3,697  
     Total$89,599 $3,546 

NOTE R— INCOME TAXES
We evaluate our deferred tax assets periodically to determine if valuation allowances are required. Ultimately, the realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generation of future taxable income during those periods in which temporary differences become deductible and/or credits can be utilized. To this end, management considers the level of historical taxable income, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax-planning strategies and projected future taxable income. Based on these considerations, and the carry-forward availability of a portion of the deferred tax assets, management believes it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets.
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES" Act) was enacted and signed into law in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, permitted NOL carryovers and carrybacks to offset 100% of taxable income for taxable years beginning after 2017 and before 2021. In addition, the CARES Act allowed NOLs generated after 2017 and before 2021 to be carried back to each of the five preceding taxable years to generate a refund of previously paid income taxes. As a result, during 2020, we carried the NOL generated in 2019 back to offset the taxable income in the 2014 tax year generating a refund of $36.6 million. This refund was received during the second quarter of 2020. We also amended our 2018 tax return to generate an NOL by electing bonus depreciation. We then carried the NOL generated in 2018 back to offset the taxable income in prior years generating a refund of $26.3 million, of which $4.9 million was received during the fourth quarter of 2020. At December 31, 2021, the remaining $21.5 million of this refund was included in accounts receivable in our balance sheets. The deferred tax assets related to the NOLs generated in 2018 and 2019 were recorded at the statutory income tax rate for 2018 and 2019, which was 21% for both years. As a result of the carry back of these NOLs to prior years, the NOLs will be utilized at the statutory income tax rate for pre-2018, which was 35%. This increase in the tax rate at which the 2018 and 2019 NOLs will be utilized results in a deferred tax benefit. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a deferred tax benefit of $22.3 million.
Income (loss) before income taxes (in thousands) consisted of the following:
Year ended December 31,
202120202019
United States$(48,328)$(183,656)$(435,918)
Foreign11,252 8,509 7,010 
Total$(37,076)$(175,147)$(428,908)

94



Income tax benefit (in thousands) consisted of the following:
 Year ended December 31,
 202120202019
Current:
Federal$ $ $ 
State(3,353)(307)(1,188)
Foreign(1,385)(1,473)(1,343)
(4,738)(1,780)(2,531)
Deferred:
Federal7,589 57,214 90,457 
State(96)4,591 11,225 
Foreign   
7,493 61,805 101,682 
Income tax benefit$2,755 $60,025 $99,151 
Income tax benefit (in thousands) differed from the amount that would be provided by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate due to the following:
Year ended December 31,
 202120202019
Income tax benefit computed at U.S. federal statutory rate$7,786 $36,781 $90,070 
Decrease (increase) resulting from:
Statutory depletion2,012 1,230 4,679 
Prior year tax return reconciliation(2,490)(2,084)3,121 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit445 5,013 9,486 
Unrecognized tax benefits(1,302)  
Adjustment to deferred taxes from the CARES Act 22,318  
Equity compensation(627)(1,477)(6,440)
Executive compensation(2,092)(579)(722)
Other, net(977)(1,177)(1,043)
Income tax benefit$2,755 $60,025 $99,151 
Generally, the largest permanent item in computing both our effective tax rate and taxable income is the deduction allowed for statutory depletion. The deduction for statutory depletion does not necessarily change proportionately to changes in income before income taxes. However, for the year ended 2020, we recorded a permanent tax benefit related to the CARES Act, which represents the largest permanent item in computing our effective tax rate for 2020.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax effects, based on enacted tax laws, of temporary differences between the values of assets and liabilities recorded for financial reporting and for tax purposes and of net operating loss and other carryforwards.
95



The tax effects of the types of temporary differences and carry forwards that gave rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities (in thousands) consisted of the following:
 December 31,
 20212020
Gross deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forward and state tax credits $77,327 $90,087 
Pension and post-retirement benefit costs7,318 11,146 
Property, plant and equipment8,619 6,866 
Accrued expenses14,930 12,397 
Inventories1,200 121 
Federal tax credits4,188 4,188 
Stock-based compensation expense4,359 4,307 
Interest expense limitation16,921 14,127 
Intangibles7,876 11,304 
Lease obligation liability13,297 14,154 
Other4,399 5,286 
Total deferred tax assets160,434 173,983 
Gross deferred tax liabilities:
Land and mineral property basis difference(121,211)(122,265)
Fixed assets and depreciation(83,708)(100,640)
Other(289)(464)
Total deferred tax liabilities(205,208)(223,369)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(44,774)$(49,386)
We have federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $317.1 million at December 31, 2021. A portion of those losses are subject to an annual limitation under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, but are expected to be fully realized. NOL deductions generated in tax years after December 31, 2017 can offset 100% of taxable income for periods prior to 2021 but only 80% of taxable income after 2020. The CARES Act also prohibits NOL carrybacks on NOLs generated after December 31, 2020 but allows indefinite carryforwards. As of December 31, 2021, we have general business credits of approximately $4.2 million, which will expire beginning in 2033. These credits are expected to be fully realized.
The CARES Act also accelerated the ability of companies to receive refunds of alternative minimum tax ("AMT") credits related to tax years beginning in 2018 and 2019. AMT credits were presented as a receivable or a deferred tax asset in the prior period balance sheets. The presentation of refundable AMT credits in the balance sheet was reclassified during 2020 from deferred tax asset to accounts receivable to reflect the timing of when the credits were expected to be monetized. AMT credits in the amount of $16.0 million were included in accounts receivable on our balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, and were received in full during the first quarter of 2021.
The following table is a reconciliation of our unrecognized tax benefits:
Year ended December 31,
202120202019
Balance as of January 1$ $ $ 
Additions for tax positions of prior years856   
       Balance as of December 31$856 $ $ 
If the unrecognized tax benefits of $0.9 million are realized, this would negatively impact the effective tax rate. As of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we had approximately $0.4 million, zero, and zero, respectively, of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. During 2021, 2020 and 2019, we accrued and recognized estimated interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions of approximately $0.4 million, zero and zero, respectively. We include potential interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax (expense)/benefit line item in our consolidated statements of operations. We do not expect a significant change to the unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months. Tax returns filed with the IRS for the years 2018 through 2020 along with tax returns filed with numerous state entities remain subject to examination.
96




NOTE S— REVENUE
We consider sales disaggregated at the product and service level by business segment to depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flow are impacted by changes in economic factors. The following table reflects our sales disaggregated by major source (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2020
CategoryOil & Gas ProppantsIndustrial & Specialty ProductsTotal SalesOil & Gas ProppantsIndustrial & Specialty ProductsTotal Sales
Product$407,772 $488,431 $896,203 $301,199 $430,988 $732,187 
Service207,676  207,676 113,698  113,698 
Total Sales$615,448 $488,431 $1,103,879 $414,897 $430,988 $845,885 
The following tables reflect the changes in our contract assets, which we classify as unbilled receivables and our contract liabilities, which we classify as deferred revenues (in thousands):
Unbilled Receivables
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Beginning Balance$47,982 $20,144 
Reclassifications to billed receivables(105,305)(10,330)
Revenues recognized in excess of period billings59,280 38,168 
Ending Balance$1,957 $47,982 
We enter into certain customer supply agreements which give the customers the right to purchase certain products for a discounted price at certain volumes over an average initial contract term of one to fifteen years. The advance payments represent future purchases and are recorded as deferred revenue, recognized as revenue over the contract term of each supply agreement.
Deferred Revenue
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Beginning Balance$33,692 $50,634 
Revenues recognized from balances held at the beginning of the period (13,172)(19,704)
Revenues deferred from period collections on unfulfilled performance obligations5,207 6,627 
Revenues recognized from period collections (4,986)(3,865)
Ending Balance$20,741 $33,692 
We have elected to use the practical expedients allowed under ASC 606-10-50-14, pursuant to which we have excluded disclosures of transaction prices allocated to remaining performance obligations and when we expect to recognize such revenue. The majority of our remaining performance obligations are primarily comprised of unfulfilled product, transportation service, and labor service orders, all of which hold a remaining duration of less than one year. The long term portion of deferred revenue primarily represents a combination of refundable and nonrefundable customer prepayments for which related current performance obligations do not yet exist, but are expected to arise, before the expiration of the contract. Our residual unfulfilled performance obligations are comprised primarily of long-term equipment rental arrangements in which we recognize revenues equal to what we have a right to invoice. Generally, no variable consideration exists related to our remaining performance obligations and no consideration is excluded from the associated transaction prices. However, the decrease in the current year deferred revenue balance is partially attributable to revenue recognized as variable consideration from shortfall fees assessed to multiple customers according to contract terms as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recognized revenue as variable consideration from shortfall fees according to contract terms in the amounts of $58.6 million and $48.0 million, respectively. In some cases, amounts recorded are estimates which are in negotiation and may increase or decrease. We believe these amounts are the best estimates of revenue to recognize as of year end.
97



During the second quarter of 2021, we entered into an agreement to settle a customer dispute regarding fees related to minimum purchase commitments from 2014-2020. As a result of this settlement, we recognized approximately $49.0 million in revenue as of June 30, 2021. These amounts were received in full during the second and third quarters of 2021.
Foreign Operations
The following table includes information related to our foreign operations (in thousands):
For the years ended
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Total Sales$96,317 $86,179 $92,788 
Pre-tax income$11,252 $8,509 $7,010 
Net income$8,889 $6,722 $5,538 
Foreign operations constituted approximately $30.7 million and $31.0 million of consolidated assets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

NOTE T— RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
There were no related party transactions during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 or 2019.

NOTE U— SEGMENT REPORTING
Our business is organized into two reportable segments, Oil & Gas Proppants and Industrial & Specialty Products, based on end markets. The reportable segments are consistent with how management views the markets that we serve and the financial information reviewed by the chief operating decision maker. We manage our Oil & Gas Proppants and Industrial & Specialty Products businesses as components of an enterprise for which separate information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance.
In the Oil & Gas Proppants segment, we serve the oil and gas recovery market primarily by providing and delivering fracturing sand, or “frac sand,” which is pumped down oil and natural gas wells to prop open rock fissures and increase the flow rate of oil and natural gas from the wells.
The Industrial & Specialty Products segment consists of over 600 product types and materials used in a variety of markets including building and construction products, fillers and extenders, filtration, glassmaking, absorbents, foundry, and sports and recreation.
An operating segment’s performance is primarily evaluated based on segment contribution margin, which excludes selling, general, and administrative costs, corporate costs, plant capacity expansion expenses, and facility closure costs. We believe that segment contribution margin, as defined above, is an appropriate measure for evaluating the operating performance of our segments. However, segment contribution margin is a non-GAAP measure and should be considered in addition to, not a substitute for, or superior to, net income (loss) or other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The other accounting policies of each of the two reportable segments are the same as those in Note B - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to these Consolidated Financial Statements.
98



The following table presents sales and segment contribution margin (in thousands) for the reportable segments and other operating results not allocated to the reported segments for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019:
 Year Ended 
 
December 31,
 202120202019
Sales:
Oil & Gas Proppants$615,448 $414,897 $1,010,521 
Industrial & Specialty Products488,431 430,988 463,956 
Total sales1,103,879 845,885 1,474,477 
Segment contribution margin:
Oil & Gas Proppants160,052 142,041 248,594 
Industrial & Specialty Products168,499 159,176 178,215 
Total segment contribution margin328,551 301,217 426,809 
Operating activities excluded from segment cost of sales(19,655)(30,402)(85,625)
Selling, general and administrative(119,628)(124,171)(150,848)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization(161,131)(155,568)(179,444)
Goodwill and other asset impairments(202)(110,688)(363,847)
Interest expense(71,157)(79,885)(95,472)
Other income, net, including interest income6,146 24,350 19,519 
Income tax benefit2,755 60,025 99,151 
Net loss$(34,321)$(115,122)$(329,757)
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest(560)(1,028)(675)
Net loss attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. $(33,761)$(114,094)$(329,082)

Asset information, including capital expenditures and depreciation, depletion, and amortization, by segment is not included in reports used by management in its monitoring of performance and, therefore, is not reported by segment. At both December 31, 2021 and 2020, goodwill of $185.6 million has been allocated to these segments with zero assigned to Oil & Gas Proppants and $185.6 million to Industrial & Specialty Products.



99



NOTE V— PARENT COMPANY FINANCIALS

U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
(PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
 December 31,
20212020
 (in thousands)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$46,996 $46,851 
Due from affiliates165,632 168,276 
Total current assets212,628 215,127 
Investment in subsidiaries401,691 412,169 
Total assets$614,319 $627,296 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities$50 $286 
Dividends payable186 219 
Total current liabilities236 505 
Total liabilities236 505 
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock  
Common stock845 827 
Additional paid-in capital1,218,575 1,200,023 
Retained deficit(429,260)(395,496)
Treasury stock, at cost(186,294)(181,615)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)349 (8,479)
Total U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. stockholders’ equity604,215 615,260 
Non-controlling interest9,868 11,531 
Total stockholders' equity614,083 626,791 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$614,319 $627,296 










100



U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
(PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
 Year ended December 31,
 202120202019
(in thousands)
Sales$ $ $ 
Cost of sales   
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative252 253 253 
Total operating expenses252 253 253 
Operating loss(252)(253)(253)
Other income (expense)
Interest income5 210 1,440 
Total other income5 210 1,440 
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity in net earnings of subsidiaries(247)(43)1,187 
Income tax expense  (327)
(Loss) income before equity in net earnings of subsidiaries(247)(43)860 
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax(34,074)(115,079)(330,617)
Net loss(34,321)(115,122)(329,757)
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest(560)(1,028)(675)
Net loss attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (33,761)(114,094)(329,082)
Net loss(34,321)(115,122)(329,757)
Other comprehensive (loss) income
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (net of tax of $, $973, and $(456) for 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively)
 3,053 (1,432)
Foreign currency translation adjustment (net of tax of $(309), $444, and $(60) for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively)
(1,000)1,391 (188)
Pension and other post-retirement benefits liability adjustment (net of tax of $3,131, $2,207, and $(1,024) for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively)
9,828 6,931 (3,214)
Comprehensive loss(25,493)(103,747)(334,591)
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest(560)(1,028)(675)
Comprehensive loss attributable to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.(24,933)(102,719)(333,916)







101



U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
(PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(amounts in thousands)Par ValueTreasury StockAdditional Paid-In CapitalRetained Earnings (Deficit) - PresentAccumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) IncomeTotal U.S. Silica, Inc. Stockholders' EquityNon-controlling InterestTotal
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance at January 1, 2019$818 $(178,215)$1,169,383 $67,854 $(15,020)$1,044,820 $7,484 $1,052,304 
Net loss— — — (329,082)— (329,082)(675)(329,757)
Unrealized loss on derivatives— — — — (1,432)(1,432)— (1,432)
Foreign currency translation adjustment— — — — (188)(188)— (188)
Pension and post-retirement liability— — — — (3,214)(3,214)— (3,214)
Cash dividend declared ($0.25 per share)
— — — (18,728)— (18,728)— (18,728)
Contributions from non-controlling interest— — — — — — 4,554 4,554 
Common stock-based compensation plans activity:
Equity-based compensation— — 15,906 — — 15,906 — 15,906 
Proceeds from options exercised— 296 (168)— — 128 — 128 
Shares withheld for employee taxes related to vested restricted stock and stock units5 (2,993)(5)— — (2,993)— (2,993)
Balance at December 31, 2019$823 $(180,912)$1,185,116 $(279,956)$(19,854)$705,217 $11,363 $716,580 
Net loss— — — (114,094)— (114,094)(1,028)(115,122)
Unrealized gain on derivatives— — — — 3,053 3,053 — 3,053 
Foreign currency translation adjustment— — — — 1,391 1,391 — 1,391 
Pension and post-retirement liability— — — — 6,931 6,931 — 6,931 
Cash dividend declared ($0.02 per share)
— — — (1,446)— (1,446)— (1,446)
Contributions from non-controlling interest— — — — — — 1,196 1,196 
Common stock-based compensation plans activity:
Equity-based compensation— — 14,911 — — 14,911 — 14,911 
Shares withheld for employee taxes related to vested restricted stock and stock units4 (703)(4)— — (703)— (703)
Balance at December 31, 2020$827 $(181,615)$1,200,023 $(395,496)$(8,479)$615,260 $11,531 $626,791 
Net loss— — — (33,761)— (33,761)(560)(34,321)
Foreign currency translation adjustment— — — — (1,000)(1,000)— (1,000)
Pension and post-retirement liability— — — — 9,828 9,828 — 9,828 
Cash dividends— — — (3)— (3)— (3)
Distributions to non-controlling interest— — — — — — (1,103)(1,103)
Common stock-based compensation plans activity:
Equity-based compensation— — 18,809 — — 18,809 — 18,809 
Proceeds from options exercised— 344 (239)— — 105 — 105 
Shares withheld for employee taxes related to vested restricted stock and stock units18 (5,023)(18)— — (5,023)— (5,023)
Balance at December 31, 2021$845 $(186,294)$1,218,575 $(429,260)$349 $604,215 $9,868 $614,083 

102





U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.
(PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 Year ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (in thousands)
Operating activities:
Net loss$(34,321)$(115,122)$(329,757)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Undistributed loss from equity method investment, net34,074 115,079 330,617 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(236)155 (88)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(483)112 772 
Investing activities:
Investment in subsidiary   
Net cash used in investing activities   
Financing activities:
Dividends paid(26)(6,185)(18,592)
Proceeds from options exercised105  128 
Tax payments related to shares withheld for vested restricted stock and stock units(5,023)(703)(2,993)
(Distributions to) contributions from non-controlling interest(1,103)1,196 4,554 
Net financing activities with subsidiaries6,675 582 (39,171)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities628 (5,110)(56,074)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents145 (4,998)(55,302)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period46,851 51,849 107,151 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$46,996 $46,851 $51,849 
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash received during the period for:
Interest$(17)$(210)$(1,440)

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrant (Parent Company Only)
These condensed parent company only financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Rule 12-04, Schedule I of Regulation S-X, because the restricted net assets of the subsidiaries of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (as defined in Rule 4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X) exceed 25% of our consolidated net assets. The ability of our operating subsidiaries to pay dividends may be restricted due to the terms of our Credit Facility, as discussed in Note K - Debt to these financial statements.    
These condensed parent company financial statements have been prepared using the same accounting principles and policies described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements; the only exceptions are that (a) the parent company accounts for its subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting, (b) taxes are allocated to the parent from the subsidiary using the separate return method, and (c) intercompany loans are not eliminated. In the parent company financial statements, our investment in subsidiaries is stated at cost plus equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries since the date of acquisition. These condensed parent company financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
No cash dividends were paid to the parent by its consolidated entities for the years presented in the condensed financial statements.
103




NOTE W— IMPAIRMENTS

We recorded impairment charges (in thousands) for the following assets:
DescriptionDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Inventories, net$ $6,837 $4,100 
Property, plant and mine development, net164 11,822 243,064 
Operating lease right-of-use assets 3,406 115,443 
Goodwill 86,100  
Intangible assets, net38 2,523 1,240 
Total$202 $110,688 $363,847 

2020 Impairments

During 2020, there was an unprecedented drop in global demand combined with the breakdown of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and other oil producing nations ("OPEC+") agreement to restrict oil production that led to one of the largest annual crude oil inventory builds in history. This led to a sharp reduction in global crude oil prices. Containment measures and other economic, travel, and business disruptions caused by COVID-19 also affected refinery activity and future demand for crude oil, and consequently, the services and products of our Oil & Gas Proppants segment. As a result of these triggering events, we completed impairment assessments for our assets, including plant, property and mine development, right-of-use assets, inventories, and other intangible assets.

Inventories, net

We recorded impairment charges primarily related to unused inventory at plants we idled. These charges relate to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment and are recorded in "Goodwill and other asset impairments" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Property, plant and mine development
We estimated the future undiscounted net cash flows of certain asset groupings using estimates of proven and probable sand reserves, estimated future sales prices (considering historical and current prices, price trends and related factors) and operating costs and anticipated capital expenditures. In the cases where the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, we recognized an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the assets. Impairment charges were recorded related primarily to our Kosse, Texas facility, which was idled. These charges relate to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment and are recorded in "Goodwill and other asset impairments" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Operating lease right-of-use assets

We determined the fair value of the railcars primarily utilizing internally developed cash flow models and quoted market prices, discounted at an appropriate weighted average cost of capital. As a result, we recognized impairment charges primarily related to various equipment leases and an office building lease. These charges relate mainly to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment and are recorded in "Goodwill and other asset impairments" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Goodwill

We performed a quantitative analysis and determined that the goodwill of our Oil & Gas Proppants reporting unit was impaired. We recognized goodwill impairment charges during the first quarter of 2020. These impairment charges were recorded in the "Goodwill and other asset impairments" caption of our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of our reporting units was determined using the discounted cash flow method.

104



Intangible assets, net

We recorded impairments of $1.1 million for trade names and $1.4 million for patents and intellectual property as of December 31, 2020, which was recorded in the Industrial & Specialty Products segment as a result of the discontinuance of a minor product line. These charges were recorded in the "Goodwill and other asset impairments" caption of our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

2019 Impairments
During the fourth quarter of 2019, similar to the fourth quarter of 2018, we experienced a sharp decline in customer demand for Northern White frac sand and for regional non-in-basin frac sand as more tons are produced and sold in-basin. Additionally, the price of frac sand decreased significantly. Given the changes in demand and customer preferences of local in-basin sand, we also experienced a significant decline in the utilization of the sand railcar fleet in our transload network. A significant number of sand railcars were put into storage and were no longer used to deliver sand to our customers. In response to these economic conditions, we implemented numerous cost reductions including headcount reductions and a reduction of frac sand capacity at multiple locations. As a result of the aforementioned triggering events, which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2019, we completed an impairment assessment of our frac sand-related assets, including plant, property and mine development, right-of-use assets, inventories, and other intangible assets.

Inventories, net

We recorded impairment charges for unused inventory at frac sand plants we idled. These charges relate to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment and are recorded in "Goodwill and other asset impairments" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Property, plant and mine development
We estimated the future undiscounted net cash flows of asset groupings, which are at the plant level, using estimates of proven and probable sand reserves, estimated future sales prices (considering historical and current prices, price trends and related factors) and operating costs and anticipated capital expenditures. In the cases where the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, we recognized an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the assets. Impairment charges were recorded mainly related to facilities that have reduced capacity or have been idled, including Tyler, Texas, Sparta, Wisconsin, and Utica, Illinois. These charges relate to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment and are recorded in "Goodwill and other asset impairments" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Operating lease right-of-use assets

We determined the fair value of the railcars primarily utilizing internally developed cash flow models and quoted market prices, discounted at an appropriate weighted average cost of capital. As a result, we recognized impairment charges to write down the value of railcars to their estimated fair value. These charges relate mainly to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment and are recorded in "Goodwill and other asset impairments" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Intangible assets, net

We recorded an impairment of customer relationships related to the Oil & Gas Proppants segment that was recorded in the "Goodwill and other asset impairments" caption of our Consolidated Statements of Operations.


NOTE X-SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In February 2022, we terminated a minimum purchase obligation in the amount of $9.9 million for a one-time payment of $6.5 million.    

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None. 

105



ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management, under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).
Our system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the framework in 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). As noted in the COSO framework, an internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance to management and the Board of Directors regarding achievement of an entity's financial reporting objectives. Based upon the evaluation under this framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, as stated in its report below.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act during the quarter ended December 31, 2021 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

106




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.

Opinion on internal control over financial reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, and our report dated February 25, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Houston, Texas
February 25, 2022



107




ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable. 
ITEM 9C.DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.


PART III
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this item with respect to directors and corporate governance will be set forth under “Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors” in the 2022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this item with respect to executive officers of U.S. Silica, pursuant to instruction 3 of paragraph (b) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K, is set forth following Part I, Item 1. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Executive Officers of the Registrant”. 
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item will be set forth under “Executive and Director Compensation” and “Report of Compensation Committee” in the 2022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management will be set forth under “Stock Ownership” in the 2022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is furnished as a separate item captioned “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” included in Part II, Item 5. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item will be set forth under “Transactions with Related Persons” and “Determination of Independence” in the 2022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item will be set forth under “Ratification of Grant Thornton LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022” in the 2022 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
108



PART IV.
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
    Consolidated Financial Statements
The Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the report thereon of Grant Thornton LLP, dated February 25, 2022, are included as part of Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
 Page

    Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Parent (U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.) at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 is included in Note V - Parent Company Financial Statements to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included as part of Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

    Exhibits
The information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibit Index included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Description
Form
File No.
Exhibit
Filing Date
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 22, 2018, by and among EP Acquisition Parent, Inc. US Silica Company, Tranquility Acquisition Corp., EPMC Parent LLC, as the Stockholders' Representative, and solely for the purposes of Section 11.17, Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc.
10-Q
001-35416
2.1
April 24, 2018
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc., effective May 4, 2017.
8-K
001-35416
3.1
May 10, 2017
Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc., effective May 4, 2017.
8-K
001-35416
3.2
May 10, 2017
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
S-1/A
333-175636
4.1
December 7, 2011
Description of the Registrant's Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act
10-K001-354164.2February 25, 2020
Third Amended and Restated 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan.
8-K
001-35416
10.1
May 14, 2021
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement.
S-1/A
333-175636
10.17
August 29, 2011
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
S-1/A
333-175636
10.20
December 29, 2011
109



Letter Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2011, by and between William J. Kacal and U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
S-1/A
333-175636
10.24
December 29, 2011
Letter Agreement, dated April 27, 2012, by and between Peter Bernard and U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
8-K
001-35416
10.10
May 1, 2012
Omnibus Amendment dated February 18, 2016 to Award Agreements.
8-K
001-35416
10.3
February 23, 2016
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement.
10-K
001-35416
10.2
February 25, 2015
Amendment dated February 18, 2016 to Employment Agreement by and between U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. and Bryan Shinn.
8-K
001-35416
10.2
February 23, 2016
Omnibus Amendment dated November 3, 2016 to Award Agreements.
10-K
001-35416
10.22
February 23, 2017
Letter Agreement, effective August 15, 2017, by and between Diane Duren and U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
8-K
001-35416
10.1
August 18, 2017
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2018, by and among U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, USS Holdings, Inc., as guarantor, and U.S. Silica Company, as borrower, and certain of U.S. Silica’s subsidiaries as additional guarantors and BNP Paribas, as administrative agent and the lenders named therein.
8-K
001-35416
10.1
May 2, 2018

Consent and Amendment Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2019, among U.S. Silica Company and BNP Paribas, as administrative agent and the lenders named therein, amending that certain Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2018.10-Q
001-35416
10.1October 30, 2019
Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (Adjusted Cash Flow) Pursuant to the Amended and Restated U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan10-Q
001-35416
10.1May 1, 2019
Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (Relative TSR) Pursuant to the Amended and Restated U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan10-Q
001-35416
10.2May 1, 2019
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement Pursuant to the Amended and Restated U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan.10-Q
001-35416
10.3May 1, 2019
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, pursuant to the Amended and Restated U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan.10-Q001-3541610.1May 1, 2020
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Plan, as amended and restated April 29, 2020.10-Q001-3541610.2May 1, 2020
Form of Performance Share Unite Agreement (Relative TSR) Pursuant to the Amended and Restated U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan10-Q001-3541610.1April 30, 2021
Letter Agreement, effective September 21, 2021, by and between Sandra Rogers and U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
List of subsidiaries of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
110



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Consent of Qualified Person
Consent of Third Party Qualified Person, Lamesa Site, Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas
Consent of Third Party Qualified Person, Ottawa Site, LaSalle County, Illinois
Consent of Third Party Qualified Person, Colado Site, Pershing County, Nevada
Consent of Third Party Qualified Person, Colado Site, Pershing County, Nevada
Consent of Third Party Qualified Person, Lamesa Site, Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas
Consent of Third Party Qualified Person, Ottawa Site, LaSalle County, Illinois
Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification by Bryan A. Shinn, Chief Executive Officer.
Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification by Donald A. Merril, Chief Financial Officer.
Section 1350 Certification by Bryan A. Shinn, Chief Executive Officer.
Section 1350 Certification by Donald A. Merril, Chief Financial Officer.
Mine Safety Disclosure.
Technical Report Summary, Ottawa Site, LaSalle County, Illinois
Technical Report Summary, Colado Site, Pershing County, Nevada
Technical Report Summary, Lamesa Site, Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas
101*
101.INS XBRL Instance - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition
104*
Cover Page from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 formatted Inline XBRL (and contained in Exhibit 101)
#Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. We will furnish the omitted schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request by the Commission.
+Management contract or compensatory plan/arrangement
*Filed herewith
We will furnish to any of our stockholders a copy of any of the above exhibits upon the written request of such stockholder and the payment to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. of the reasonable expenses incurred in furnishing such copy or copies.
111




112



ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.

113



SIGNATURES
    Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 25th day of February, 2022.
 
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
/s/ BRYAN A. SHINN
Name:  Bryan A. Shinn
Title:Chief Executive Officer
    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name  Capacity Date
/S/ BRYAN A. SHINN
  Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
 February 25, 2022
Bryan A. Shinn
/S/ DONALD A. MERRIL
  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 February 25, 2022
Donald A. Merril
/S/ CHARLES SHAVER
  Chairman of the Board February 25, 2022
Charles Shaver
/S/ PETER BERNARD
  Director February 25, 2022
Peter Bernard
/s/ DIANE DURENDirectorFebruary 25, 2022
Diane Duren
/S/ WILLIAM J. KACAL
  Director February 25, 2022
William J. Kacal
/s/ SANDRA ROGERSDirectorFebruary 25, 2022
Sandra Rogers


S-1
Document
    
https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-image_1a.jpg





September 20, 2021

Sandra Rogers
4422 N. 75th St. Unit 2005
Scottsdale, AZ 85251


Dear Sandra:

Re:    U.S. Silica Board of Directors
On behalf of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), I am pleased to invite you to become a member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), effective October 1, 2021.  We believe that your skills, expertise and knowledge will prove very helpful to the Company and our stockholders as we strive to deliver best in class returns while balancing the needs of all our stakeholders. In addition to your normal Board duties, we invite you to also serve as a member of the Audit Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee of the Board.
To facilitate your onboarding, please complete, sign and return the following enclosed documents:
Section 16 Power of Attorney
Indemnification Agreement
For your reference, we have also enclosed copies of the 2020 Form 10-K, the 2021 Proxy Statement, the 2021 Board calendar, and the current draft of the 8-K announcing your appointment. In the next week we will be sending you a draft of the press release that will accompany the 8-K.
In connection with your service as a director, you will be eligible for equity awards under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan. Upon the commencement of your service on the Board, you will receive the 2021 director equity award of restricted stock units with a fair market value of $120,000, pro-rated to reflect the time you will serve on the Board between the date of your execution of this letter and the vesting of the award on May 13, 2022. The number of restricted stock units to be granted to you will be determined by dividing the value of the grant by the average closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange over the thirty (30) trading days immediately preceding the grant date. Future annual equity grants will be determined by the Board based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board.  In addition to equity compensation, you will be entitled to receive cash compensation of (1) an Annual Retainer of $75,000, payable in quarterly installments, for your service as a director, (2) an Annual Retainer of $10,000, payable in quarterly installments, for your service as a member of the Audit Committee, and (3) an Annual Retainer of $10,000, payable in quarterly installments, for your service as a member of the Nominating & Governance Committee.  You will be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with your services to the Company in accordance with the Company’s established policies.  Further, you will be covered by the Company’s D&O insurance and given an opportunity to execute the Company’s standard director indemnification agreement.
The Board and its committees will meet at least quarterly. It is our expectation that you will participate in those meetings in person to the extent possible. We also ask that you make yourself available to participate in various telephonic meetings from time to time.
Your services on the Board will be in accordance with, and subject to, the Company’s Bylaws and Certificate of Incorporation, as such may be amended from time to time. By accepting this offer, you represent to us that (1) you do not know of any conflict that would restrict you from becoming a director of the Company and (2) you will not provide the Company with any documents, records or other confidential information belonging to any other parties.
To accept this offer, please sign below and return the fully executed letter to us. You should keep one copy of this letter for your own records. This letter sets forth the terms of your service with the Company and supersedes any prior representations or agreements, whether written or oral. This letter
24275 Katy Freeway, Suite 600, Katy, TX 77494

phone (281) 258-2170


may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement, signed by a duly authorized representative of the Company and by you.
I look forward to receiving your acceptance and I am very excited to have you join our Board.  We are looking forward to seeing you in Texas for our Board meeting on November 10-11th.
 
Sincerely,
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
/s/ Bryan Shinn
Bryan A. Shinn
Chief Executive Officer
 
Accepted and agreed to this 21st day of September, 2021
/s/ Sandra Rogers
Sandra Rogers

Enclosures


cc:    Charles Shaver, Chairman of the Board
    Peter Bernard, Chairman of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
    Stacy Russell, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-image_0a.jpg
Document

Exhibit 21.1
Name
Jurisdiction of Formation
Hourglass Acquisition I, LLCDelaware
Preferred Rocks USS Inc.Delaware
Hourglass Holdings, LLCDelaware
USS Holdings, Inc.Delaware
U.S. Silica CompanyDelaware
Pennsylvania Glass Sand CorporationDelaware
The Fulton Land and Timber CompanyPennsylvania
Ottawa Silica CompanyDelaware
Ottawa Silica Company, Ltd.Quebec, Canada
Coated Sand Solutions, LLCDelaware
Cadre Services Inc.Delaware
Cadre Material Products, LLCTexas
Fairchild Silica, LLCDelaware
Utica Silica, LLCDelaware
Tyler Silica CompanyDelaware
New Birmingham Resources, LLCTexas
NBR Sand, LLCTexas
NBR Maritime I, LLCTexas
NBR Maritime II, LLCTexas
Sandbox Enterprises, LLCTexas
Oren Technologies, LLCTexas
Sandbox Leasing, LLCTexas
Sandbox Logistics, LLCTexas
Sandbox Transportation, LLCTexas
Mississippi Sand, LLCMissouri
Arcadia Sand, LLCDelaware
Boss Energy Resources, LLCDelaware
Seagraves Development, LLCDelaware
EP Minerals Holdings, Inc.Delaware
EP Acquisition, LLCDelaware
EP Management CorporationDelaware
EP Minerals, LLCDelaware
2473428 Ontario, Inc.Ontario, Canada
EP Engineered Clays CorporationDelaware
EP Minerals International S.A.S.France
EP Minerals Europe Verwaltungs und Beteiligungs GmbHGermany
EP Minerals Europe GmbH & Co. KGGermany
EP Mexican Parent, Inc.Delaware
EP Minerals de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.Mexico
Celatom de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.Mexico
Kermit Pipeline, LLC (50% ownership)Texas
Spruce Acquisition, LLCDelaware


Document



                                                 Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have issued our reports dated February 25, 2022, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. on Forms S-8 (333-179480, 333-204062 and 333-238198, 333-256839 and 333-258323).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
February 25, 2022


Document

CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON

I, Mr. Terrance N. Lackey, Mining Director at U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc., in connection with the Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2021 and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the Form 10-K), consent to:

●    the filing and use of the technical report summaries titled “Technical Report Summary, Ottawa Mine, LaSalle County, Illinois,” “Technical Report Summary, Colado Site, Pershing County, Nevada” and “Technical Report Summary, Lamesa Site, Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas,” (collectively the “Technical Reports”), with an effective date of December 31, 2021, as a exhibits to and referenced in the Form 10-K;
●    the use of and references to my name, including my status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 10-K and the Technical Reports; and
●    the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Technical Reports, or portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that I supervised the preparation of and/or that was reviewed and approved by me, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K.
I was responsible for authoring, and this consent pertains to, the following Sections of the Technical Reports:

1.0Executive Summary
16.0Market Studies
18.0Capital and Operating Costs
19.0Economic Analysis
I also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-256389, 333-238198, 333-204062, 333-179480) and Form S-3ASR (No.333-258323) of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. of the above items as included in the Form 10-K.

Dated this February 24, 2022


/s/ Terrance N. Lackey_____________
Terrance N. Lackey    
BSc. Eng, MSc. Eng
Mining Director
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.
SME Member # 04312151


Document

Westward Environmental, Inc.
4 Shooting Club Road
Boerne, Texas, USA 78006

 
CONSENT OF THIRD-PARTY QUALIFIED PERSON
 
Westward Environmental, Inc. (“Westward”), in connection with the annual report on Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the Form 10-K), consent to:
 
the filing and use of the technical report summary titled “Technical Report Summary, Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas” (the “Lamesa Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of December 31, 2021, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Form 10-K;
 
the use of and references to our firm name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 10-K and any such Lamesa Technical Report Summary; and
 
the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Lamesa Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was reviewed and approved by us, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K.
 
Westward is responsible for contributing to, and this consent pertains to, the following Sections of the Lamesa Technical Report Summary:
 
1.0Executive Summary
2.0Introduction
3.0Property Description
4.0Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
5.0History
6.0Geologic Setting, Mineralization and Deposit
7.0Exploration
8.0Sample Preparation, Analyses & Preparation
9.0Data Verification
10.0Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
11.0Mineral Resource Estimate
12.0Mineral Reserve Estimate
17.0Environmental Studies, Permitting, Plans, Negotiations or Agreements with Local Individuals or Groups
20.0    Adjacent Properties
21.0    Other Relevant Data and Information
22.0    Interpretations and Conclusions
23.0    Recommendations & Associated Costs
24.0    References



25.0    Reliance on Information Provided By Registrant

Westward also consents to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-256389, 333-238198, 333-204062, 333-179480) and Form S-3ASR (No.333-258323) of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. of the above items as included in the Form 10-K.
Westward Environmental, Inc.

/s/ Thomas O. Mathews______________
Thomas O. Mathews, PG, REM
President
Westward Environmental, Inc., a Qualified Third-Party Firm

Dated this February 24, 2022
 


Document

Westward Environmental, Inc.
4 Shooting Club Road
Boerne, Texas, USA 78006

 
CONSENT OF THIRD-PARTY QUALIFIED PERSON
 
Westward Environmental, Inc. (“Westward”), in connection with the annual report on Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the Form 10-K), consents to:
 
the filing and use of the technical report summary titled “Technical Report Summary, Ottawa Site, Lasalle County, Illinois” (the “Ottawa Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of December 31, 2021, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Form 10-K;
 
the use of and references to our firm name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 10-K and any such Ottawa Technical Report Summary; and
 
the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Ottawa Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was reviewed and approved by us, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K.
 
Westward is responsible for contributing to, and this consent pertains to, the following Sections of the Ottawa Technical Report Summary:
 
1.0Executive Summary
2.0Introduction
3.0Property Description
4.0Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
5.0History
6.0Geologic Setting, Mineralization and Deposit
7.0Exploration
8.0Sample Preparation, Analyses & Preparation
9.0Data Verification
10.0Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
11.0Mineral Resource Estimate
12.0Mineral Reserve Estimate
17.0Environmental Studies, Permitting, Plans, Negotiations or Agreements with Local Individuals or Groups
20.0    Adjacent Properties
21.0    Other Relevant Data and Information
22.0    Interpretations and Conclusions



23.0    Recommendations & Associated Costs
24.0    References
25.0    Reliance on Information Provided By Registrant

Westward also consents to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-256389, 333-238198, 333-204062, 333-179480) and Form S-3ASR (No.333-258323) of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. of the above items as included in the Form 10-K.

Westward Environmental, Inc.

/s/ Thomas O. Mathews______________
Thomas O. Mathews, PG, REM
President
Westward Environmental, Inc., a Qualified Third-Party Firm

Dated this February 24, 2022
 


Document

Westward Environmental, Inc.
4 Shooting Club Road
Boerne, Texas, USA 78006

 
CONSENT OF THIRD-PARTY QUALIFIED PERSON
 
Westward Environmental, Inc. (“Westward”), in connection with the annual report on Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the Form 10-K), consent to:
 
the filing and use of the technical report summary titled “Technical Report Summary, Colado Site, Pershing County, Nevada” (the “Colado Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of December 31, 2021, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Form 10-K;
 
the use of and references to our firm name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 10-K and any such Colado Technical Report Summary; and
 
the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Colado Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was reviewed and approved by us, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K.
 
Westward is responsible for contributing to, and this consent pertains to, the following Sections of the Colado Technical Report Summary:
 
1.0Executive Summary
2.0Introduction
3.0Property Description
4.0Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
5.0History
6.0Geologic Setting, Mineralization and Deposit
7.0Exploration
8.0Sample Preparation, Analyses & Preparation
9.0Data Verification
10.0Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
11.0Mineral Resource Estimate
12.0Mineral Reserve Estimate
17.0Environmental Studies, Permitting, Plans, Negotiations or Agreements with Local Individuals or Groups
20.0    Adjacent Properties
21.0    Other Relevant Data and Information
22.0    Interpretations and Conclusions



23.0    Recommendations & Associated Costs
24.0    References
25.0    Reliance on Information Provided By Registrant

Westward also consents to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-256389, 333-238198, 333-204062, 333-179480) and Form S-3ASR (No.333-258323) of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. of the above items as included in the Form 10-K.
Westward Environmental, Inc.

/s/ Thomas O. Mathews______________
Thomas O. Mathews, PG, REM
President
Westward Environmental, Inc., a Qualified Third-Party Firm

Dated this February 24, 2022
 


Document
Q4 Impact Group, LLC
8050 Freedom Ave. NW North Canton, Ohio 44720


CONSENT OF THIRD-PARTY QUALIFIED PERSON

Q4 Impact Group, LLC (“Q4”), in connection with the annual report on Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the Form 10-K), consent to:

the filing and use of the technical report summary titled “Technical Report Summary, Colado Site, Pershing County, Nevada” (the “Colado Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of December 31, 2021, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Form 10- K;

the use of and references to our firm name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 10-K and any such Colado Technical Report Summary; and

the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Colado Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was reviewed and approved by us, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K.

Q4 is responsible for contributing to, and this consent pertains to, the following Sections of the Colado Technical Report Summary:

1.0    Executive Summary
13.0    Mining Methods
14.0    Processing and Recovery Methods
15.0    Infrastructure
21.0    Other Relevant Data and Information
22.0    Interpretations and Conclusions
23.0    Recommendations & Associated Costs
24.0    References
25.0    Reliance on Information Provided By Registrant

Q4 also consents to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-256389, 333-238198, 333-204062, 333-179480) and Form S-3ASR (No.333-258323) of
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. of the above items as included in the Form 10-K.



Q4 Impact Group, LLC




https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-image_0.jpg /s/ Robert Archibald
Robert Archibald CEO
Q4 Impact Group, LLC a Qualified Third-Party Firm Dated this February 24, 2022

Document
Q4 Impact Group, LLC
8050 Freedom Ave. NW North Canton, Ohio 44720


CONSENT OF THIRD-PARTY QUALIFIED PERSON

Q4 Impact Group, LLC (“Q4”), in connection with the annual report on Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the Form 10-K), consent to:

the filing and use of the technical report summary titled “Technical Report Summary, Lamesa Site, Dawson County, Texas” (the “Lamesa Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of December 31, 2021, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Form 10- K;

the use of and references to our firm name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 10-K and any such Lamesa Technical Report Summary; and

the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Lamesa Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was reviewed and approved by us, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K.

Q4 is responsible for contributing to, and this consent pertains to, the following Sections of the Lamesa Technical Report Summary:

1.0    Executive Summary
13.0    Mining Methods
14.0    Processing and Recovery Methods
15.0    Infrastructure
21.0    Other Relevant Data and Information
22.0    Interpretations and Conclusions
23.0    Recommendations & Associated Costs
24.0    References
25.0    Reliance on Information Provided By Registrant

Q4 also consents to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-256389, 333-238198, 333-204062, 333-179480) and Form S-3ASR (No.333-258323) of
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. of the above items as included in the Form 10-K.



Q4 Impact Group, LLC




/s/ Robert Archibaldhttps://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-image_02.jpg
Robert Archibald CEO
Q4 Impact Group, LLC a Qualified Third-Party Firm Dated this February 24, 2022

Document
Q4 Impact Group, LLC
8050 Freedom Ave. NW North Canton, Ohio 44720


CONSENT OF THIRD-PARTY QUALIFIED PERSON

Q4 Impact Group, LLC (“Q4”), in connection with the annual report on Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the Form 10-K), consent to:

the filing and use of the technical report summary titled “Technical Report Summary, Ottawa Site, Lasalle County, Illinois” (the “Ottawa Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of December 31, 2021, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Form 10- K;

the use of and references to our firm name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 10-K and any such Ottawa Technical Report Summary; and

the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Ottawa Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was reviewed and approved by us, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K.

Q4 is responsible for contributing to, and this consent pertains to, the following Sections of the Ottawa Technical Report Summary:

1.0    Executive Summary
13.0    Mining Methods
14.0    Processing and Recovery Methods
15.0    Infrastructure
21.0    Other Relevant Data and Information
22.0    Interpretations and Conclusions
23.0    Recommendations & Associated Costs
24.0    References
25.0    Reliance on Information Provided By Registrant

Q4 also consents to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-256389, 333-238198, 333-204062, 333-179480) and Form S-3ASR (No.333-258323) of
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. of the above items as included in the Form 10-K.



Q4 Impact Group, LLC




https://cdn.kscope.io/29ad9c5f2006ba702c50c2318b14f92c-image_01.jpg/s/ Robert Archibald
Robert Archibald CEO
Q4 Impact Group, LLC a Qualified Third-Party Firm Dated this February 24, 2022

Document

Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Bryan A. Shinn, certify that:
 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021;
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 25, 2022
 
/s/ BRYAN A. SHINN
Name: Bryan A. Shinn
Title: Chief Executive Officer


Document

Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Donald A. Merril, certify that:
 
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021;
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 25, 2022
 
/s/ DONALD A. MERRIL
Name: Donald A. Merril
Title: Chief Financial Officer


Document

Exhibit 32.1
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
I, Bryan A. Shinn, Chief Executive Officer, U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 i.
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 ii.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 25, 2022
 
/s/ BRYAN A. SHINN
Name: Bryan A. Shinn
Title: Chief Executive Officer
A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.

Document

Exhibit 32.2
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
I, Donald A. Merril, Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 i.
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 ii.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 25, 2022
 
/s/ DONALD A. MERRIL
Name: Donald A. Merril
Title: Chief Financial Officer
A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.

Document

Exhibit 95.1
Mine Safety Disclosure

The following disclosures are provided pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, which requires certain disclosures by companies required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that operate mines regulated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”).

Mine Safety Information. Whenever the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) believes a violation of the Mine Act, any health or safety standard or any regulation has occurred, it may issue a citation which describes the alleged violation and fixes a time within which the U.S. mining operator must abate the alleged violation. In some situations, such as when MSHA believes that conditions pose a hazard to miners, MSHA may issue an order removing miners from the area of the mine affected by the condition until the alleged hazards are corrected. When MSHA issues a citation or order, it generally proposes a civil penalty, or fine, as a result of the alleged violation, that the operator is ordered to pay. Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed. The number of citations, orders and proposed assessments vary depending on the size and type (underground or surface) of the mine as well as by the MSHA District’s approach to enforcement. Due to timing and other factors, the data below may not agree with the mine data retrieval system maintained by the MSHA at www.MSHA.gov

The following table details violations, citations, and orders issued and civil penalties assessed to us by MSHA during 2021 calendar year:
(whole dollars)
Mine or Operating Name/MSHA Identification NumberSection 104 S&S CitationsSection 104(b) OrdersSection 104(d) Citations and OrdersSection 110(b)(2) ViolationsSection 107(a) OrdersTotal Dollar Value of MSHA Assessments Proposed (1)Total Number of Mining Related FatalitiesReceived Notice of Pattern of Violations Under Section 104(e) (yes/no)Received Notice of Potential to Have Pattern Under Section 104(e) (yes/no)Legal Actions Pending as of Last Day of PeriodLegal Actions Initiated During PeriodLegal Actions Resolved During Period
Berkley Springs, WV / 460280500000$971.000NoNo000
Celatom Mine, OR / 350323700000$159.000NoNo000
Celatom Plant, OR / 350323600000$883.000NoNo000
Cheto Mine, AZ / 020010300000$0.000NoNo000
Clark, NV / 260067700000$547000NoNo000
Columbia, SC / 380013850000$6,411.000NoNo066
Crane, TX / 410533100001$1,602.00*0NoNo011
Dubberly, LA / 160048900000$0.000NoNo000
Fernley, NV / 260195020000$1,451.000NoNo000
Festus, MO / 230237700000$1,000.000NoNo000
Fowlkes Mine, MS / 220046000000$0.000NoNo000
Hazen Mine, NV/ 260067900000$0.000NoNo000



Hurtsboro, AL / 010061700000$0.000NoNo000
Jackson, MS / 220041500000$0.000NoNo000
Jackson, TN / 400293700000$0.000NoNo000
Kosse, TX / 410026200000$0.000NoNo000
Lamesa, TX / 4105363100000$25,261.000NoNo000
Lovelock (Colado Plant) / 260068040000$32,394.000NoNo0527
Lovelock, NV (Colado Mine) / 260067210000$1,028.000NoNo000
Mapleton, PA / 360312200000$782.000NoNo000
Mauricetown, NJ / 280052610000$849.000NoNo001
Middletown, TN / 400296810000$1,324.000NoNo000
Mill Creek Mine, OK / 340083600000$125.000NoNo000
Mill Creek Plant, OK / 340037700000$375.000NoNo000
Millen, GA / 090123200000$250.000NoNo000
Montpelier, VA / 440282900000$500.000NoNo000
Ottawa, IL / 110101340000$5,002.000NoNo044
Pacific, MO / 230054400000$375.000NoNo000
Popcorn Mine, NV / 260223600000$0.000NoNo000
Port Elizabeth, NJ / 280051000000$0.000NoNo000
Rockwood, MI / 200060810000$327.000NoNo000
Sparta, WI / 470364400000$250.000NoNo000
Tyler, TX /410418200000$0.000NoNo000
Utica, IL / 110326800000$0.000NoNo000



Amounts included are the total dollar value of proposed assessments received from MSHA on or before December 31, 2021, regardless of whether the assessment has been challenged or appealed. Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are sometimes reduced in severity and amount, and sometimes dismissed. The number of citations, orders, and proposed assessments vary by the MSHA District’s approach to enforcement and vary depending on the size and type of the operation.

*MSHA issued a Section 107(a) for the practice of an independent contractor because the operator was present during the inspection.


slca-20211231xex961
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY OTTAWA SITE OTTAWA, LASALLE COUNTY, ILLINOIS Submitted to: U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. Prepared By: Boerne, Texas 830-249-8284 Effective Date: February 11, 2022 Project No. 10711-025


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Product ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 History of Acquisition ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Mineral Rights ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Location ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.6 Geology ............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.7 Exploration ........................................................................................................................................ 5 1.8 Testing ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.9 Mineable Ore Estimate ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.10 Mining Methods ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.11 Processing and Recovery Methods .................................................................................................... 6 1.12 Infrastructure ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.13 Permitting .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.14 Capital and Operating Costs .............................................................................................................. 8 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Sources of Information ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Personal Inspections .......................................................................................................................... 9 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Location ........................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Area ................................................................................................................................................. 11 3.3 Leases, Royalties and Mineral Rights ............................................................................................. 12 3.4 Encumbrances.................................................................................................................................. 12 4.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE & PHYSIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................ 14 4.1 Topography...................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2 Means of Access .............................................................................................................................. 14 4.3 Climate ............................................................................................................................................ 15 4.4 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................... 15 5.0 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................................... 16 6.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION AND DEPOSIT ........................................... 16 6.1 Historical Geology ........................................................................................................................... 19


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 6.2 Structural Geology ........................................................................................................................... 20 6.3 Economic Geology .......................................................................................................................... 20 7.0 EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................................... 22 8.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ....................................................... 25 9.0 DATA VERIFICATION .................................................................................................................. 26 10.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ............................................. 27 11.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE ............................................................................................ 32 12.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES ............................................................................................. 32 12.1 U.S. Silica Methodology ................................................................................................................. 32 12.2 Data Verification Methodology ....................................................................................................... 35 12.3 Process Verification Methodology .................................................................................................. 36 12.4 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 36 12.5 In-Situ, Mineable Ore Estimates ..................................................................................................... 36 12.6 Cut Off Grades ................................................................................................................................ 37 13.0 MINING METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 37 13.1 Clearing, Grubbing and Overburden Removal ................................................................................ 40 13.2 Mining Process ................................................................................................................................ 41 13.3 Pit Repair and Maintenance ............................................................................................................. 43 13.4 Mine Equipment .............................................................................................................................. 44 13.5 Mine Planning and Production Scheduling ..................................................................................... 44 13.6 Manning ........................................................................................................................................... 47 14.0 PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS ............................................................................ 50 14.1 Wet Processing Plant ....................................................................................................................... 51 14.2 Dry Processing Plant – Whole Grain Silica ..................................................................................... 52 14.3 Dry Processing Plant – Ground Silica ............................................................................................. 55 15.0 INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................................................................... 55 15.1 Road and Truck Access ................................................................................................................... 57 15.2 Rail .................................................................................................................................................. 58 15.3 Barge ............................................................................................................................................... 58 15.4 Electric Power ................................................................................................................................. 59 15.5 Natural Gas ...................................................................................................................................... 59 15.6 Water ............................................................................................................................................... 59 15.7 Tailings Handling and Disposal ...................................................................................................... 60


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 15.8 Buildings ......................................................................................................................................... 64 15.9 Comments on Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 64 16.0 MARKET STUDIES ........................................................................................................................ 64 16.1 General Marketing Information ....................................................................................................... 64 16.1.1 Silica Sand Market .............................................................................................................. 66 16.2 Material Contracts Required for Production ................................................................................... 67 17.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS ................................................ 67 17.1 Existing Environmental Permits, Plans, and Authorizations ........................................................... 67 17.2 Federal Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 68 17.3 State Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 69 17.4 Other ................................................................................................................................................ 71 17.5 Mississippi Sands Authorizations .................................................................................................... 71 17.6 Additional Studies ........................................................................................................................... 72 17.7 Pending Expansion .......................................................................................................................... 72 18.0 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS ........................................................................................ 72 18.1 Operating Cost ................................................................................................................................. 72 18.2 Capital Costs .................................................................................................................................... 73 18.3 Assumptions .................................................................................................................................... 74 18.4 Accuracy .......................................................................................................................................... 74 19.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 74 19.1 Operating Costs ............................................................................................................................... 74 19.2 Capital Costs .................................................................................................................................... 75 19.3 Economic Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 75 19.4 Sensitivity Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 76 20.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................ 80 21.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION .................................................................. 80 22.0 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................. 80 22.1 Exploration ...................................................................................................................................... 80 22.2 Data Verification ............................................................................................................................. 81 22.3 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing ................................................................................ 81 22.4 Comments on Mining Methods ....................................................................................................... 81 22.5 Comments on Processing and Recovery Methods .......................................................................... 81


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 22.6 Electricity ........................................................................................................................................ 81 22.7 Natural Gas ...................................................................................................................................... 82 22.8 Comments on Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 82 22.9 Environmental Permitting ............................................................................................................... 82 23.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................. 82 24.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 83 25.0 RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT ................................ 83


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Technical Report Summary (“TRS”) has been prepared at the request of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (“U.S. Silica”) by Westward Environmental, Inc. (“WESTWARD”) who has conducted an audit of the proven and probable reserves at the Ottawa, Illinois mine (the “Ottawa Site”) as of December 31, 2021. This audit was performed in conjunction with the U.S. Silica’s Mine Engineering and Geology staff and was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 and Item 601(b)(96) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). 1.1 Background The Ottawa Site is the company’s largest blended operation, supplying various grades of silica sand to both the oil and gas and the industrial and specialty markets. The Ottawa quarrying and sand processing facilities are located approximately 75 miles southwest of Chicago in Ottawa Township, LaSalle County, Illinois. Silica sand is mined from the St. Peter Sandstone Formation which developed in the Ordovician age. The surface mine in Ottawa uses natural gas and electricity to produce whole grain and ground silica sand products through a variety of mining methods, including mechanical mining and hydraulic mining. 1.2 Product The Ottawa Site produces a wide range of silica sand products that serve U.S. Silica’s Oil and Gas, and Specialty Minerals business units. The Ottawa operation supplies high-silica sand into every major market segment including glassmaking, chemical, foundry, building products, American Society for Testing and Materials (“ASTM”) testing sand, and the oil and gas sectors. This location’s proppant sands consist of the sands commonly known as “Northern White” which is silica sand exhibiting higher crush strength grading from 20/40 to 100 mesh and micro proppants.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 2 1.3 History of Acquisition The Ottawa Silica Company was founded in March 1900 by Edmund B. Thornton. Mining commenced on the property west of the city of Ottawa shortly thereafter. By the 1920’s, the company had taken over most of the silica production in the Ottawa area. The Thornton family owned and operated the Ottawa Silica Company until 1986, expanding the plant, improving product quality, and acquiring additional reserves. In 1986, the Thornton family sold Ottawa Silica Company to Rio Tinto Zinc (“RTZ”), a large mining conglomerate based in London. In January 1987, RTZ formed U.S. Silica Company, merging the Ottawa Silica Company with Pennsylvania Glass Sand Company.1 1.4 Mineral Rights Being wholly owned and possessing both land and mineral rights, there are no leases, no royalties, and no other associated payments specific to the Ottawa Site parcels. 1.5 Location The Ottawa Site is in LaSalle County, approximately 75 miles southwest of Chicago, IL and approximately 60 miles northeast of Peoria, IL. The Plant and Mine are accessible by major highways including U.S. Interstate 80. (Figure 1.1). The Ottawa mine site is located on IL State Route 71 and is approximately 2.5 miles south southwest of the Plant Site. (Figure 1.2). This section intentionally left blank. 1 U.S. Silica Internal Report Dated December 31, 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 3 Figure 1.1 Regional map of Ottawa mine and plant location.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 4 Figure 1.2 Ottawa Mine and Plant Site Map 1.6 Geology The sandstone deposit mined at the Ottawa Site is known as the St. Peter Sandstone. The formation is present at varying depths across the entire state of Illinois. The St. Peter Sandstone is generally described as a fine-grained, well-sorted, well-rounded, friable to weakly cemented, non-fossiliferous, nearly pure quartz sandstone, essentially free of clay, carbonates, and heavy minerals.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 5 1.7 Exploration Core drilling is conducted periodically to verify the presence, thickness, and quality of the sandstone formation. To date, 116 exploratory holes have been drilled on the South Ottawa and Mississippi Sands tracts (collectively known as the “South Ottawa Pit”). Core sections are logged noting the location (hole number), lithography (general rock type) and color.2 1.8 Testing The cores are split and sampled for chemical contamination by x-ray fluorescence and particle size distribution using a U.S. Mesh standard sieve stack. This analysis is performed at the U.S. Silica Corporate Lab in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia. Half of the core is retained for future use. 1.9 Mineable Ore Estimate Information used in the preparation of this mineable ore estimate includes data collected from drilling over 320 borings and available lab results. Of those total borings drilled, 116 were drilled on the South Ottawa Pit tracts. Based on 3D modeling performed by U.S. Silica and audited by WESTWARD using the most recent data available from U.S. Silica, the Ottawa operation has in- situ, mineable ore reported as follows: Deposit Classification In-Situ, Mineable Ore Tons Proven Reserve 66,926,671 Probable Reserve 33,002,024 TOTAL 99,928,695 Table 1.1 U.S. Silica Estimated In-Situ, Mineable Ore 2 U.S. Silica internal report dated December 31, 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 6 1.10 Mining Methods The Ottawa Site mine is a silica sandstone mine which has been active for over 100 years. U.S. Silica mines a thickness of St. Peter Sandstone between 100 and 200 ft. by conventional surface mining methods. Overburden material is removed and placed back into the pit as part of the mine reclamation plan. Blasted St. Peter Sandstone is hauled to a location in the pit where it is further processed by hydraulic mining and mixed with water to produce a slurry product for pumping to the processing plant some two and a half miles to the northeast of the mine. The mine has the capacity to meet the full production requirements of the processing plant and currently produces approximately 4.0 M tons per year. Expansion of the pit is to the west with adjacent areas of similar lithology to the existing pit. Mining methods will remain the same in these expansion areas. 1.11 Processing and Recovery Methods The processing plant receives a silica sand slurry pumped from the mine. The plant uses wet and dry processing methods to produce Oil and Gas products and Specialty minerals products. Finished goods are either whole grain silica products or ground silica products. Total demand and product mix varies relative to economic cycles of end users and the competitive environment. The Ottawa Site runs 365 days per year, and it operates 24 hours per day. The combined wet-plant and dry-plant has a capacity of 10.2 K tons per day. The Ottawa Site ships by rail, by barge and by truck bulk carrier and also produces a bagged product. 1.12 Infrastructure The Ottawa Site has been operating in a generally mixed community of industrial and suburban geography. The infrastructure required for the ongoing operations is generally in place at Ottawa. Several infrastructure capital expenditures are required for replacement and expansion projects to maintain mining and processing capacity. The physical address of the Site is as follows:


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 7 U.S. Silica Company–Ottawa Site 701 Boyce Memorial Drive Ottawa, Illinois 61350 Main Office: 1-(815) 434-0188 The mine and plant are accessible by roads maintained by the city, county and state as well as by two railroads. Road access is critical for the delivery of materials used in the production of finished goods and for shipment of finished goods to U.S. Silica customers. Similarly, the rail infrastructure is a critical component for the transportation of the finished goods from the Ottawa Site. U.S. Silica has an extensive rail-car loading, storage, and handling facility at Ottawa. Additionally, the Ottawa Site has access to a privately-owned barge terminal that leases property from U.S. Silica for its operation. The Ottawa Site has excellent access to reliable electric power and supplies of natural gas. Water is a critical component in both transporting and processing the silica sand. The Ottawa Site has an abundance of recycled slurry water and processing water available. Potable water is provided by a municipal supply. The Plant routinely discharges excess water through permitted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) locations. Tailings handling and settling capacity is a critical element for long-term viability of the Ottawa Site. U.S. Silica utilizes a series of settling ponds to remove waste from the process water and must construct new pond facilities from time to time to store the waste that will be produced over life of the mine. Historically, the Ottawa Site has used mined-out portions of the property for the settling and storage of the waste produced. Additional areas are available for potential storage. Certain capital and expense projects are planned over the life of the mine to meet these needs.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 8 1.13 Permitting The Ottawa Site maintains several permits, licenses, and sets of rules that need to be approved and followed, most of which are set to be renewed on a five-year basis. As of the date of this report, the Ottawa Site operates under valid material permits. 1.14 Capital and Operating Costs In 2020 and 2021 total operating costs were $53,662,000 and $47,635,000 and total capital costs were $2,182,000 and $1,441,000 respectively (Table 18-1). The higher than average capital spend in 2020 was associated with scheduled maintenance and continuous improvement projects to drive and maintain cost efficiencies. The Ottawa Site maintains a five-year capital forecast for planned capital expenditures to support current production. A summary of foreseen capital expenditures through 2026 is provided on Table 18-2. As shown on Table 18-2, total estimated capital expenditure through 2026 is $16,565,000. Listed expenditures are based on historic cost data, vendor/contractor quotations, and similar operation comparisons and are within +/-15% level of accuracy. 2.0 INTRODUCTION This TRS has been prepared at the request of U.S. Silica by WESTWARD who has conducted an audit of the proven and probable reserves at the Ottawa Site as of December 31, 2021. This audit was performed in conjunction with U.S. Silica’s Mine Engineering and Geology staff and was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 and Item 601(96) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. U.S. Silica common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “SLCA”. WESTWARD’S third-party reserves analysis (Section 11.0 and Section 12.0 of this report), completed on February 11, 2022, that is presented in this TRS was prepared for public disclosure by U.S. Silica in filings made with the SEC in accordance with the requirements set forth in the


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 9 SEC rules and regulations. Any capitalized terns used herein, but not defined herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Item 1300 of Regulation S-K. 2.1 Sources of Information Information used in the preparation of this report includes: • Internal reports and records • Third-party evaluation – JT Boyd Valuation Report, 2006 • Google Earth images and maps • Core hole drilling and data analysis using various 3-D mine planning software packages • “The White Cliffs of Ottawa”, 2005, Illinois State Geology Survey • Illinois State Geological Survey Fieldtrip Guidebook 1971 and 1972 • United States Geological Survey (“USGS”) publications • USGS Mineral Commodity Summary 2021 • St. Peter Sandstone Mineral Resource Evaluation, Missouri, USA, Justin G. Davis, Arizona Geological Survey Special Paper 9 Chapter #6, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals Scottsdale, Arizona | April 30 - May 4, 2012 • U.S. Silica information published on the U.S. Silica website Tailings Deposition Comparison, Rev. 1, U.S. Silica Ottawa, 1/19/2017, Barr Engineering Co. study 2.2 Personal Inspections Michelle M. Lee, PG (TX #6071, SME Registered Member #4130340RM) with WESTWARD performed a site visit to the Ottawa Site on May 28, 2021. During this site visit, the Plant Manager gave Ms. Lee a tour of pertinent parts of the mine including water wells, ponds, pit areas, reserve areas (historic and recent), and property perimeter. The main processing facility was also toured. Rob Vogel (MMSA #01504QP) and Robert Archibald, PE (VA #0402023235, SME Registered Member #00082450RM) with Q4 Impact Group visited the Ottawa Site on September 30, 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 10 During this site visit, the Plant Manager gave Messrs. Vogel and Archibald a tour of the mine including water wells, ponds, pit areas, reserve areas (historic and recent), and property perimeter. The main processing facility and packing plant were also toured. 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 3.1 Location The Ottawa Site is located in LaSalle County, IL approximately 75 miles southwest of Chicago, IL and approximately 60 miles northeast of Peoria, IL. The Site is accessible by major highways including U.S. Interstate 80. (Figure 3.1). The mine site is located on Illinois State Route 71 and is approximately 2.5 miles south southwest of the Ottawa Site. The Site is accessible by interstate, city, county and state roads as shown in Figure 3.1. The most direct route from the I-80 Ottawa/Dekalb (Exit 90) interchange is to proceed southbound approximately 3.7 miles on Illinois State Route 23 to Route 6. Turn onto U.S. Route 6 West and travel 1.3 miles before turning southbound on Boyce Memorial drive. Continue traveling 0.5 miles south on Boyce Memorial Drive and the plant entrance (coordinate 41.346512, - 88.865274) will be on the west side of the road appearing to be a continuation of Madison Street to the east. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 11 Figure 3.1 Location map of the Ottawa Site An alternate route is from the Interstate 80 Utica (Exit 81) interchange with Illinois Route 178. Turning onto Illinois 178 South proceed for 0.5 miles to the intersection with U.S. Route 6. Turn onto U.S. Route 6 East and continue for 7.8 miles to Boyce Memorial Drive. Turn South onto Boyce Memorial Drive and the plant entrance is on the west side of the road appearing to be a continuation of Madison Street to the east. This is shown as the truck route in yellow in Figure 3.1. The Ottawa Site is also served by rail and barge. 3.2 Area The Ottawa Site includes approximately 2,100 acres that are owned outright by U.S. Silica or its consolidated subsidiaries. The North Ottawa Site and former mine site covers 890 acres, the South Ottawa mine includes 900 acres, and the Mississippi Sands tract is 310 acres.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 12 3.3 Leases, Royalties and Mineral Rights Being wholly owned and possessing both land and mineral rights, there are no leases, no royalties, and no other associated payments specific to the Ottawa, IL land parcels. 3.4 Encumbrances To operate active mining operations on the property, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Department of Mines and Minerals requires an approved Land Reclamation Plan. Reclamation Permits consist of 15 parts that includes, but is not limited to, information such as Mining Operations Plans, Geological Information, Drainage Control, Streams & Wetlands, Fish and Wildlife, and Reclamation Plans.3 Additional restrictions on the use of lands are included in other permits that are required by various Illinois State agencies to operate the mine and plant. A minimum of a 100-ft. wide, “no mining” buffer was designed to be left in place around both sides of a county road that separates the South Ottawa properties. The sand that lies within these areas was excluded from the Ottawa ore reserve calculation. Wetlands or Navigable Waters of Illinois that are planned to not be mitigated or relocated, are designed with a 50-ft. wide “no disturbance” buffer along the perimeter. These buffer areas are shown in Figure 3.2. This section intentionally left blank. 3 U.S. Silica Internal Report.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 13 Figure 3.2 Encumbrances in the South Pit mining area


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 14 Currently the Ottawa Site has several encumbrances in place that preclude mining (Figure 3.2) in certain areas. At the time of this report, the encumbrances are as follows: • County Roads – west of current mining operations • Catlin Salt Marsh – west of current mining operations • Ernat Salt Marsh – west of current mining operations • Browns Brook – west of current mining operations • High overburden areas – located to the southwest, south and southeast of current mining areas • Wetlands and jurisdictional waters – west of the current mining operations 4.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE & PHYSIOGRAPHY 4.1 Topography The Ottawa Site is located on both sides of the Illinois River in Ottawa, IL which runs roughly east to west in the vicinity of the Site. The topography is gently sloping toward the river which has an approximate surface elevation of 457 ft. above mean sea level (“AMSL”).4 On the south side of the river where active mining is ongoing, the topography rises to the south and reaches a maximum elevation of approximately 611 ft. AMSL in the southwestern corner. 4.2 Means of Access The Ottawa Site is accessible by major highways including U.S. Interstate 80. The Ottawa, IL mine site is located on IL State Route 71 and is approximately two and a half miles south- southwest of the Plant. The mine complex straddles the Illinois River and has barge/boat access as well as rail access on the north side of the river. 4 Google Earth.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 15 4.3 Climate As determined by the Koppen climate classification system5, the Ottawa Site is located in a humid continental climate zone. This region typically has four distinct seasons typified by large seasonal temperature changes. Annual precipitation averages are 37” of rain and 21” of snow. The mining season continues all year long, despite freezing winter temperatures, in order to provide mine feed so the processing plant can produce various sand products year-round. 4.4 Infrastructure The Ottawa Site location has been operating in a generally mixed community of industrial and suburban geography. The infrastructure required for the ongoing operations is generally in place at Ottawa. Several infrastructure capital expenditures are required for replacement and expansion projects to maintain mining and processing capacity. The site is accessible by roads maintained by the city, county, and state as well as by two railroads. Road access is critical for the delivery of materials used in the production of finished goods and for the shipment of finished goods, both bulk and packaged to U.S. Silica customers. Similarly, the rail infrastructure is a critical component for the transportation of the finished goods from the Ottawa Site. U.S. Silica has an extensive rail-car loading, storage, and handling facility at Ottawa. Additionally, the Ottawa Site has access to a privately-owned barge terminal that leases property from U.S. Silica for its operation. The Ottawa Site has excellent access to reliable electric power and suppliers of natural gas. Water is a critical component in both the transporting and processing of the silica sand. The Ottawa Site has an abundance of recycled slurry water and processing water available. Potable water is provided by a municipal supply. The location routinely discharges excess water through permitted NPDES locations. 5 Köppen climate classification - Wikipedia.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 16 Tailings handling and settling capacity is a critical element for long-term viability of the Ottawa Site. U.S. Silica utilizes a series of settling ponds to remove waste from the process water and, from time to time, must construct new pond facilities from to store the waste that will be produced over life of the mine. Historically, the Ottawa Site has used mined-out portions of the property for the settling and storage of the waste produced. Additional areas are available for potential storage. Certain capital and expense projects are planned over the life of the mine to meet these needs. 5.0 HISTORY The Ottawa Silica Company was founded in March 1900 by Edmund B. Thornton6. Mining commenced on the property west of the city of Ottawa shortly thereafter. By the 1920’s, the company had taken over most of the silica production in the Ottawa area. The Thornton family owned and operated the Ottawa Silica Company until 1986, expanding the plant, improving product quality, and acquiring additional reserves. In 1986, the Thornton family sold Ottawa Silica Company to RTZ a large mining conglomerate based in London. In January 1987, Pennsylvania Glass Sand Company merged with the Ottawa Silica Company forming the U.S. Silica Company. Exploration data reviewed for the TRS consisted of drilling information conducted from 2000 to 2014 for the South Ottawa Pit. There is no record of any exploration being performed prior to 2000 in the area of the South Ottawa Pit. No other exploration data for the mined-out areas in the U.S. Silica property north of the river were reviewed for this report. 6.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION AND DEPOSIT The sandstone deposit mined at the Ottawa facility is known as the St. Peter Sandstone Formation. It is of Ordovician age and was deposited approximately 450 Ma7The formation is 6 U.S. Silica Internal Report. 7 The White Cliffs of Ottawa The St. Peter Sandstone and North America’s Largest Silica Production Facility, Karan S. Keith and Tim J. Kemmis, with contribution from U.S. Silica, June 13, 2005.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 17 present at varying depths across the entire state of Illinois. The following geologic history and detailed descriptions of the Ottawa sandstone deposit are used with permission from the Illinois State Geological Survey tour guidebook “The White Sands of Ottawa.”8 A generalized stratigraphic column of the region is provided in Table 6.1 below.9 This section intentionally left blank. 8 The White Cliffs of Ottawa The St. Peter Sandstone and North America’s Largest Silica Production Facility, Karan S. Keith and Tim J. Kemmis, with contribution from U.S. Silica, June 13, 2005. 9 Kay, R.T., and Bailey, C.R., 2016, Hydrogeologic Framework of Lasalle County, Illinois; U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2016-5154, 97 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20165154.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 18 Table 6.1 Generalized stratigraphic column of the Ottawa area. The St. Peter Sandstone Formation is generally a fine-grained, well-sorted, well-rounded, friable to weakly cemented, non-fossiliferous, nearly pure quartz sandstone, essentially free of clay, carbonates, and heavy minerals.10 The deposit has a minimum silica (SiO2) content of 99%. The 10 U.S. Silica Internal Report.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 19 controlling attributes are grain crush strength, iron (Fe2O3) content and grain size distribution. Iron is concentrated near the surface, where orange iron staining is evident and increases where the bottom contact becomes concentrated in iron pyrite. Maximum average full-face iron content is 0.045%. The deposit tends to exhibit a coarser grain size distribution in the top half of deposit. 6.1 Historical Geology The ultimate source of the St. Peter Sandstone is quartz grains derived from pre-Cambrian crystalline rocks of the Canadian Shield that were eroded to form Ordovician and Cambrian sandstones approximately 450 Ma The transportation of the sand to the deposition site by the prevailing northerly winds eroded the profile of the individual angular sand grains into a nearly round shape and wore away much of the contamination on the surface of the grain, leaving a scuffed or “frosted” surface. A sheet of this windblown sand was deposited in clear, shallow water near the shoreline of an ancient sea. Through time, the level of the sea rose and receded several times across what was to become the North American midcontinent. The repeated cycles of marine erosion and reworking concentrated and sorted the quartz-rich sands, giving the St. Peter Sandstone its distinctive composition, grain size, and grain shape. As the sea transgressed continually northward, waves and currents deposited the clean, white sand over parts of Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. The St. Peter Sandstone is generally described as a fine-grained, well-sorted, well- rounded, friable to weakly cemented, non-fossiliferous, nearly pure quartz sandstone, essentially free of clay, carbonates, and heavy minerals.11 11 The White Cliffs of Ottawa The St. Peter Sandstone and North America’s Largest Silica Production Facility, Karan S. Keith and Tim J. Kemmis, with contribution from U.S. Silica, June 13, 2005.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 20 6.2 Structural Geology The St. Peter Sandstone at Ottawa is exposed near the crest of one of the major structural features in the Illinois Basin, the La Salle Anticlinorium. In the Ottawa area, this folded basement bedrock pushed upward as much as 2,500 ft. and is responsible for the St. Peter Sandstone occurring near the current ground surface. Following the uplift, late glacial floodwaters carved the upper reaches of the Illinois River Valley, removing nearly 100 ft. of overburden and leaving the sandstone near the land surface as an exposed bedrock bench that can be clearly seen in photos and on topographic maps.12 6.3 Economic Geology Grain size is generally uniform on a regional basis and normally grades from medium to medium-coarse in the upper section to medium to fine-grained in the lower section. As a rule, the lower portion of the formation is fine-grained with iron, alumina and carbonate contamination increasing with depth. Iron content and size distribution drive the mine planning. Iron tends to be concentrated near the surface and is visible in orange staining. Iron also increases at the bottom sandstone contact, occurring mostly as pyrite. The deposit is coarser in its top half. Where the upper part of the formation is eroded, mining must accommodate multiple faces to ensure adequate coarse sand is available to meet product specifications.13 Simplified cross sections of the South Ottawa Pit mine area is shown below in Figure 6.1 and Figure 6.2. This section intentionally left blank. 12 U.S. Silica Internal Report. 13 U.S. Silica Internal Report.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 21 Figure 6.1 Cross section of the St. Peters (Tonti) Sandstone at the U.S. Silica South Ottawa Pit. Figure 6.2 Cross section of drilled borings at the U.S. Silica South Ottawa Pit. West is on the left side of the graphic.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 22 7.0 EXPLORATION Based on review of the geologic database provided by U.S. Silica, over 300 borings have been drilled in one manner or another at both the North Ottawa Pit and South Ottawa Pit.14 The U.S. Silica database includes lithology information such as boring identification, specific interval depths and total depth. Actual drilling logs, coordinates, drilling method or date drilled were not available for most of the borings listed in the database. This is due to the older records belonging to borings that were drilled in the North Ottawa Pit area, which is not part of this report, and older handwritten records that could not be located. According to the plant manager, mining was completed in the North Ottawa Pit in 2010 but exploration of the South Ottawa Pit began in 2000.15 Based on the site visit performed by the QP, geologic knowledge of the formation, lack of geologic structure that would alter the thickness of the deposit, and the number of available drilling records from 2000 to 2014 in the South Ottawa Pit area, there is sufficient drilling data available to meet the requirements of this section. Some boring logs were available for review by WESTWARD of the drilling performed in the South Ottawa Pit. Sixty-three logs were provided by U.S. Silica that covered drilling events from 2000 to 2014 in the South Ottawa Pit area which includes the Mississippi Sands tract. A Boring Location Map is provided in Figure 7.1 below. From the logs, information such as drilling method, driller, lithology, and total depth was found. Boring locations that did not have individual boring logs did have sandstone interval data available for review in the database. 14 U.S. Silica’s Shared Drive geologic database, June 2021. 15 Pat Smelko, Plant Manager, site visit on 5.28.21.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 23 Figure 7.1 Boring Location Map for South Ottawa


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 24 The information in the database was reviewed to include borings in the South Ottawa Pit that had no log available for review. Information regarding the interval thickness of the St. Peter Sandstone in the database was consistent with the data provided in the available boring logs. A table of pertinent drilling data for the South Ottawa Pit is provided in Table 7.1 below. PHASE DATE DRILLER BORINGS METHOD TD RANGE (ft.) I 2000 Raimonde SO00-1 to SO00-17 NQ Core 108 – 148.5 II 2001 Raimonde OS0101 to OS0122 NQ Core 108.1 – 143.1 III 2010 Boart Longyear DDH-1-10 to DDH-8-10 Sonic & HQ Core 87 – 114 IV 2011 Boart Longyear OS2011-1 to OS2011-9 Unknown 72 - 135 V 2014 Wang Engineering DH-1-14 to DH-7-14 Rotary coring 69 - 138 Table 7.1 South Ottawa Pit Exploration Summary From 2000 – 2014 To collect representative samples, coring is the most effective way to drill this kind of deposit. Sonic drilling can create too much vibration in the core barrel, breaking up the material, which can result in the material to fall out of the bottom. Coring produces a solid piece of core, in most instances, that illustrates the physical condition of the deposit in the subsurface in better detail. The NQ and HQ reference in the table above indicates the size of the core barrel used. Same methodology, just a different diameter of core collected. HQ core samples have a larger diameter than NQ cores. Borings logs reviewed for the South Ottawa Pit showed the vertical extent of the deposit was defined. The underlying formation was observed in each of the boring logs reviewed. This allows for more accurate reporting of volumes but also aids in mine planning in determining a final floor elevation for the pit. Figure 7.2 below shows what a typical section of St. Peter Sandstone looks like.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 25 Figure 7.2 Typical Section of St. Peters Sandstone 8.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY All samples collected during exploration phases in 2000, 2001, and 2011 were tested internally by U.S. Silica at the Katy, Texas and Berkeley Springs, West Virginia laboratories. Samples from the 2010 exploration event were tested by Bowser Morner in their Dayton, Ohio lab. There is no documentation of sample security, transport or preservation available for review for this site. Based on the physical nature of the sandstone, specific preservation methods, such as temperature, acid preservation, airtight container, etc., would not have been necessary. Since coring was the predominant exploration method from 2000 on, samples would have likely been placed into cardboard or wooden boxes. It is recommended that U.S. Silica prepare sample collection protocol, which includes photographs, for future exploration events.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 26 U.S. Silica does have written laboratory procedures in place that adhere to International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”) 9001 / Quality System criteria.16 U.S. Silica uses the Approved American National Standards Institute (“ANSI”) and American Petroleum Institute (“API”) approved “Measurement of Properties of Proppants used in Hydraulic Fracturing and Gravel-packing Operations, ANSI/API Recommended Practice 19C, First Edition, May 2008; ISO 13503-2.2006 (Identical), Petroleum and natural gas industries – Completion Fluids and Materials Part 2: Measurement of Properties of Proppants Used in Hydraulic Fracturing and Gravel Packing Operations” as part of the laboratory testing documentation. Other protocols reviewed as part of this report include the U.S. Silica Company ISO 9001 / Quality System – Process Washing: CAP605 (“corporate analytical procedure”) and the U.S. Silica Company ISO 9001 / Quality System – Attrition Scrubbing documents. Both documents were signed by David Weller, Technology Director, ISP in 2016 and distributed internally. These documents detail the change history, scope, safety, equipment and procedure instructions for each test. 9.0 DATA VERIFICATION The internal U.S. Silica labs located in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia and Katy, Texas were used to evaluate most of the material sampled during drilling performed at the site. Lab testing procedures for Bowser Morner who performed the 2010 testing were not available for review. Based on the review of U.S. Silica results, overall contiguous nature of the deposit, and large volume of sales of customer specific products, this is not considered to be material. The U.S. Silica labs follow the same protocols for testing samples from the Ottawa Site and for the Lamesa Site which both produce one commodity, silica sand. There is no known certification of the U.S. Silica laboratory from any recognized testing entity. Written statements from U.S. Silica indicate that the internal labs follow all protocols discussed here.17 16 Terry Lackey email of 9.24.21. 17 Terry Lackey email of 9.24.21.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 27 The Ottawa Site makes multiple finished silica sand products for numerous customers. Not all finished products adhere to a published set of product specifications. Silica sand used for proppant does have the API RP 19C criteria as guidelines for use as frac sand. However, it must be noted that the API criteria are merely guidelines and not an absolute specification requirement. 10.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING The mining of the South Ottawa Pit began sometime in 2006.18 The St. Peter Sandstone in the Ottawa area exhibits horizontal stratigraphy and reasonably consistent elevation and thickness (Figure 6.1 above). The thickness of the St. Peter Sandstone in Illinois is commonly 100 ft. to 200 ft.19 Observation of the overburden thickness of approximately 10 ft. to 20 ft. is corroborated by U.S. Silica drilling information showing 5 ft. to 25 ft. of overburden thickness. This type of lithology favors surface mining by conventional methods. Testing has two main components: mineralogy and grain size. Once the mineralogy (minerals present in the sample) is adequately delineated, additional mineralogy testing is on an as need basis. Mineralogy testing indicates the other minerals present in the deposit are usually attritioned, or washed off, away during processing. This means that the individual grains are not coated with minerals that could possibly require removal with the use of acid or other similar treatment. Testing is performed on the entire sandstone interval as noted in Table 8.1. Note the relative even distribution of minerals detected during testing. This information helps with development of product specifications and processing methodology. 18 Google Earth Imagery. 19 The White Cliffs of Ottawa The St. Peter Sandstone and North America’s Largest Silica Production Facility, Karan S. Keith and Tim J. Kemmis, with contribution from U.S. Silica, June 13, 2005.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 28 Table 8.1 Mineralogy test results for borings OS-01-08 and OS-01-09 Silica sand grain size testing is also important to know so the material can be sized properly in the plant for use in multiple finished products. It is common that similar deposits may have areas with a coarser grain size or the finer silica sand grains are located at a certain depth. Grain size testing helps identify those areas. Sieve analysis, particle size distribution or gradations are common names for this type of testing. Table 8.2 below illustrates a typical gradation analysis for a sample collected during the 2001 exploration event. Note how the entire sandstone interval is tested.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 29 Drill Hole #: OS-01-05 Top 8 38 60 82 Bottom 38 60 82 106 Slimes 2.3 3.8 2.1 4.6 +16 Mesh 0.3 0.1 2.7 1.7 Product 097 096 095 094 Sieve % Retained % Retained % Retained % Retained 20 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 30 5.9 0.6 1.0 1.8 40 40.7 13.7 25.9 9.2 50 29.6 38.9 45.9 23.1 70 13.0 24.4 19.0 28.9 100 6.7 12.6 6.2 23.2 140 2.7 7.2 1.4 10.4 200 1.1 2.1 0.3 2.9 270 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.5 pan 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 GFN 41.2 51.9 42.4 58.5 Sieve % Cum % Cum % Cum % Cum 20 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 30 6.0 0.6 1.1 1.9 40 46.7 14.4 27.0 11.0 50 76.3 53.2 72.9 34.2 70 89.3 77.7 91.9 63.0 100 95.9 90.3 98.1 86.2 140 98.7 97.5 99.5 96.6 200 99.8 99.5 99.8 99.4 270 99.9 99.9 99.9 100.0 pan 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 30 Table 8.2 Typical sieve analysis test result from boring OS-01-05 Based on review of laboratory reports provided, testing performed on samples collected is appropriate for this type of deposit and end uses. Furthermore, individual customers also run their internal quality assurance and quality control to determine if the product is acceptable. The high volume of sales at this location and longevity of this operation are good indicators that the sand is of sufficient quality. Internal testing was performed for grain size distribution and mineralogy by U.S. Silica at the Berkely Springs, West Virginia and Katy, Texas laboratories. No results for testing under the API RP-19C protocol were available for review. However, proppant is one of the products created from this deposit and has been sold as such for many years. U.S. Silica performs internal testing according to API RP 19C protocol on the samples collected during exploration events. API RP 19C frac sand testing parameters include roundness, sphericity, turbidity, acid solubility and crush resistance. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 D ep th % Retained 30 40 50 70 100 140 200 270 OS-05


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 31 Roundness measures how smooth the sand grain is whereas sphericity measures how closely the sand shape resembles a sphere. Grains with sharp edges will crush (fail) under less pressure and will create fines. The more spherical a grain then the more pressure it can withstand during the frac process. The more pressure a grain can withstand, the deeper underground, or in higher pressure plays, it can be used. Turbidity testing is a measure of water clarity and how many suspended particles that are invisible to the naked eye may be present. Suspended materials include soil particles (clay, silt, and very fine sand), algae, plankton, microbes, and other substances. This value needs to be low so that the ingredients in the fracking fluids do not react with the suspended particles and cause a reduction in the effectiveness of the frac. Acid solubility testing indicates if grains may be coated with other minerals that are not readily washed off during processing. If the solubility numbers are high, then this indicates that the sand may react with the acids present in fracking fluids creating fines that may lower the effectiveness of the frac. Crush resistance testing shows how much pressure the grains can endure before crushing or failing. The crush value (“K-value”) varies depending on the size and shape of the grains. The higher the crush value, the higher the durability of the sand. High crush values are preferred when using sand for fracking. U.S. Silica did not have any internal density testing data at the time of this report. Terracon provided the density value of the sand.20 This value is used to convert BCY to tons. The Terracon reported specific gravity/density of the material from the Ottawa mine is 135 lbs./ft.3 This value is in line with other reported density values from the St. Peters Sandstone.21 20 U.S. Silica Internal Report. 21 Select Sands NI43-101 Report dated March 21, 2016.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 32 11.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE Based on information provided, collected and reviewed, the deposit at the Ottawa Site is classified as a reserve. This section is not applicable. 12.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES 12.1 U.S. Silica Methodology U.S. Silica Company reports its Ore Reserves in "Mineable Tons". As such, a geologic "Resource" that is identified by exploration drilling is further defined by several other key criteria before it can be considered a "Mineable Ore Reserve". The most important of these criteria are that the Resource must: (1) exhibit reliable / repeatable geologic continuity, (2) be defined by a reasonable drill hole spacing (appropriate for the expected variability characteristic of this type of geologic deposit), (3) contain products that meet generally accepted quality specifications (API or ISO), (4) be critically evaluated to eliminate any uncertain or marginal test results, (5) be critically evaluated to eliminate any physical constraints (property boundaries, environmental setbacks, utility and infrastructure setbacks, etc.), (6) be factored for mining recovery / losses based on the mining method employed, and (7) contain products that can be sold at a profit (be economic). "Proven and Probable" ore reserves will meet all the above criteria. "Possible" ore reserves typically fail the drill hole spacing requirement but could be included with additional in-fill drilling. They may also represent like material that is tied up in currently unmineable blocks (boundary pillars, infrastructure setbacks, etc.) or that can’t be extracted using the current mining method. A change in mining method or infrastructure relocation could allow "Possible" ore to be converted to “Proven and Probable” ore. "Possible" ore reserves may be used internally but are not reported externally on the company’s ore reserve statements.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 33 Core drilling was conducted periodically to verify the presence, thickness, and quality of the sandstone formation. The data and lab results from each core hole are entered into a database for geologic block modeling using GEOVIA SURPAC modeling and mine design software. The intercepts of stratigraphic changes are then triangulated between drill holes to build a block model based strictly off lithology. Once the sandstone unit is identified within the block model the results logged in the database are then applied within certain parameters to fill quality data within the sandstone unit. The Ottawa ore body has been filled with the additional core data and lab results using the nearest neighbor method. The data is then examined by U.S. Silica’s Mining Team to determine cut off limits and build a mineable body of ore meeting certain specifications. Once the sandstone deposit is delineated and characterized, the following mine design criteria are used to refine the estimate of mineable reserves: • Slopes of 33% in topsoil, clay, gravel, or unconsolidated materials. • Slopes of 70° in ore and rock. • A minimum of a 10-ft wide safety bench is left at the alluvium/rock and rock/sand contacts. • A minimum of a 25-ft wide safety bench is left at approximately 425’ (AMSL). • The bottom of mineable reserves is a variable elevation by pit design to allow proper drainage with the maximum depth at 378’ (AMSL). A minimum of a 100-ft. wide, “no mining” buffer was designed to be left in place on the west side and a 200 ft. buffer on the west side of a county road that separates the South Ottawa properties. The sand that lies within these areas was excluded from the Ottawa ore reserve calculation. Wetlands or Navigable Waters of the State that are planned not to be mitigated or relocated are designed with a 50-ft. wide no disturbance buffer along the perimeter. These buffer areas are shown in Figure 12.1 below.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 34 12.1 Existing Mine Buffers


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 35 To determine final “Proven and Probable” Reserves, the calculated in-situ volume of the identified ore located within the designed pit limits was calculated using GEOVIA SURPAC software. A standard bulk density factor of cubic yard or 135 pounds per cubic ft. (Tetra Tech) was then applied to yield total tons of proven in-situ ore reserves. Next, site-specific mining recovery factors are applied to the calculated in-situ ore tonnage to allow for absent, poor quality, unmineable or uneconomic ore areas. Mining recoveries applied may vary across a given site or project – at South Ottawa, a 90% mining recovery was used across the property to allow for areas where sand may not be mineable. The mechanical mining process allows the mine to be more selective and potentially avoid areas of low-quality sand while a 100% hydraulic mining operation recovers the entire sandstone layer essentially eliminating the selective mining process. Mining process losses include undesired waste material (tailings) that are pumped to the plant with the sand; good sand lost during the separation of the waste material; and any product spillage that sometimes occurs in the plant process and loading areas. This methodology was applied during the evaluation of the Mississippi Sands property in 2016. The Technical Memorandum summarizing this work was reviewed by WESTWARD. 12.2 Data Verification Methodology WESTWARD coordinated with U.S. Silica personnel to compile copies of all available exploratory field logs, gradational test results and a database of the geologic model inputs. Once compiled a spreadsheet was developed including a list of all exploratory boings from the model, their locations, elevations, and exploration depths. If supporting documentation was available, it was indicated on the spreadsheet next to the associated boring. To address whether model inputs matched supporting documentation, spot checking was used. Spot checking was conducted randomly for both lithological and gradational data inputs. Spot checking was performed on at least 10% of available data sets.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 36 12.3 Process Verification Methodology WESTWARD developed an independent geologic model of the South Ottawa Pit deposit from the provided U.S. Silica data inputs, setbacks, and mining assumptions. RockWorks21 modeling software was used to develop the independent model with the Inverse Distance Weighting algorithm and a 40x40x1 ft. model resolution. Volumetric estimates of in-situ raw material for each mine block were extracted from the model. Reductions for overburden and highwall design were not incorporated into the model. Overburden was assumed to be one ft. thick across the entire site and a pit slope reduction was calculated for each mine block based on the mine block perimeter, average modeled thickness, and cross-sectional area assuming a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (3H:1V) highwall slope. The in-situ volumes were reduced by the assumed overburden volume, and the calculated highwall volume estimate. A 10 % reduction for mining loss was then applied resulting in a Net Mineable Ore volume. A unit weight of 135.5 pounds per cubic ft. was applied to calculate Net Mineable Ore tons which is the value compared against U.S. Silica estimates. 12.4 Results There was sufficient data available for review to classify the deposit at the Ottawa Site as having both proven and probable reserves. The difference between the model run by U.S. Silica and WESTWARD to calculate reserves differed by approximately 2%. This is an acceptable value. Reserves estimates of in-situ silica sand as reported by U.S. Silica are shown in Table 12.1 below. 12.5 In-Situ, Mineable Ore Estimates Currently silica sand is being mined from the South Ottawa Pit. As of December 31, 2021, the mineral reserves of the Ottawa Site are reported as follows:


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 37 Deposit Classification In-Situ, Mineable Ore Tons Proven Reserve 66,926,671 Probable Reserve 33,002,024 TOTAL 99,928,695 Table 12.1 U.S. Silica In-Situ, Mineable Ore Estimate 12.6 Cut Off Grades Cut-Off grade is the minimum grade required for a mineral or metal to be economically mined (or processed). Material found to be above this grade is considered to be ore, while material below this grade is considered to be waste. Exploration and testing are performed to determine where the mineable/saleable material is located. Only areas that meet the criteria for being economic are mined. At the Ottawa Site, material is considered to be economically mineable when the cost to extract, process and then sell the material results in a profit. As a result, the silica sand in the pit areas shown in Figure 12.1 are considered economic as it meets the cut-off grade for a saleable silica sand product. One commodity is mined and processed at the Ottawa Site, silica sand. The end use of the silica sand can be multiple products based on individual customer needs. As a result, the silica sand is sold by the ton regardless of the product type. Please refer to Section 19.0 Economic Analysis for pricing information. 13.0 MINING METHODS U.S. Silica mines silica sand from an open pit located approximately two and one-half miles southeast of the processing facility in Ottawa, IL. The mineable minerals come exclusively from the St. Peter Formation. The current mineable property is situated south of the Illinois River and


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 38 is known as the South Ottawa Pit (Figure 3.1). The formation being mined is designated commercially as silica sand22 and is recognized in at least nine states surrounding Illinois. 23,24 Mining of the St. Peter has been commercially viable for many years, beginning as early as the 1860’s.25 The Illinois State Geologic Survey classifies the formation as “world famous as a glass sand, but it is also used as molding sand (foundry sand), as an abrasive, in the manufacture of silica brick, ceramic glazes; and ferro-silicon, and for a score of other uses.”26 Other uses include the production of proppants, or fracturing sand (frac sand) for use in the oil and gas industry.27 This section intentionally left blank. 22 Typical Rocks And Minerals In Illinois, George E. Ekblaw And Don L. Carroll, 1931, State Of Illinois Department Of Registration And Education State Geological Survey. 23 USGS, National Geologic Map Database, Geolex — Unit Summary, https://ngmdb.USgs.gov/Geolex/Units/StPeter_3945.html. 24 St. Peter Sandstone Mineral Resource Evaluation, Missouri, USA, Justin G. Davis, Arizona Geological Survey Special Paper 9 Chapter #6, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals Scottsdale, Arizona | April 30 - May 4, 2012. 25 The White Cliffs of Ottawa The St. Peter Sandstone and North America’s Largest Silica Production Facility, Karan S. Keith and Tim J. Kemmis, with contribution from U.S. Silica, June 13, 2005. 26 Illinois State Geological Survey, Guide Leaflet 1971-D, La Salle, Bureau, and Putnam Counties, David L. Reinertsen and Myrna M. Killey, September 11, 1971, and May 20, 1972. 27 Ibid.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 39 Figure 13.1 - An overview of the sandstone mining operations at the U.S. Silica Ottawa Site showing the St. Peter sandstone face and pit loading and hauling The St. Peter in the Ottawa area exhibits horizontal stratigraphy and reasonably consistent elevation and thickness (Figure 13.1). The thickness of the St. Peter in Illinois is commonly 100 to 200 ft.28 Observation of the overburden thickness of approximately 10 ft. to 20 ft. is corroborated by U.S. Silica drilling information showing 5 ft. to 25 ft. of overburden thickness. This type of lithology favors surface mining by conventional methods. 28 The White Cliffs of Ottawa The St. Peter Sandstone and North America’s Largest Silica Production Facility, Karan S. Keith and Tim J. Kemmis, with contribution from U.S. Silica, June 13, 2005.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 40 13.1 Clearing, Grubbing and Overburden Removal The future mining areas are either farmland or farmland buffer with tree cover. The terrain is gently undulating and easily accessible. U.S. Silica utilizes contractors to clear and grub the desired acreage and contractors to remove the overburden materials. Overburden is alluvial sand, gravel and clays and a thin limestone cap rock.29 A tracked excavator and articulated haul trucks are used to move the overburden material to mined-out areas of the pit where it is utilized for reclamation purposes. Figure 13.2 shows the St. Peter sandstone “bench”30 after clearing, grubbing and overburden removal. This section intentionally left blank. 29 Caprock or cap rock is a harder or more resistant rock type overlying a weaker or less resistant rock type. Kearey, Philip (2001). Dictionary of Geology, 2nd ed., Penguin Reference, London, New York, etc., p. 41, ISBN 978-0-14- 051494-0. 30 A “bench” is a mining term referencing the economic resource in its natural state before removal by mining.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 41 Figure 13.2 - A bench of St. Peter sandstone after clearing and grubbing has prepared the sandstone for drilling and blasting. 13.2 Mining Process When the St. Peter has been exposed, U.S. Silica uses conventional drilling and blasting to loosen the formation in preparation for hydraulic mining of the silica sand. The St. Peter sandstone, in the Ottawa area, is poorly cemented together. Blasting provides the ability to easily load the material into trucks to be hauled to a common location for the next stage of mining. A blast hole drill is used to provide vertical holes for the placement of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil (“ANFO”), a common and cost-effective blasting agent. Both drilling and blasting are accomplished through third-party contractors.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 42 Figure 13.3 - A front end loader loading blasted sandstone into an articulating haul truck. After the rock is fragmented by blasting, hydraulic mining techniques are used to further fragment the blasted rock and move the silica sand to the processing plant. This process begins as front-end loaders load the shot rock into articulated haul trucks (Figure 13.3). The trucks carry the shot rock to a stockpile located on the pit floor. A bulldozer pushes the stockpiled rock to a location where a water “monitor” can further break up the silica sand (Figure 13.4). A monitor is a high-pressure water cannon similar to the nozzles mounted on firetrucks used by firefighters. The high pressure and high volume of water from the monitor is used to create a slurry of water and sand for pumping to a wet-screen house to remove any oversized material. From the wet screen house, the slurry begins the journey to the processing plant, two and a half miles to the north north-east of the pit. All water used to pump the slurry is recycled water from the processing plant.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 43 Figure 13.4 - Hydraulic mining utilizing a monitor to produce silica sand slurry for pumping to the processing plant. The slurry pumped to the processing plant and the water returning to the pit for use in producing fresh slurry is moved through a series of high-density polyethylene (“HDPE”) pipes connected to several pump stations. The pipes are positioned under the roadways to the north of the pit and under the Illinois River through lines drilled by directional boring methods. Booster pump stations along the slurry line allow the sand to stay in suspension in the slurry to maintain the process. This is an efficient method of transporting the raw silica sand to the plant for further processing. 13.3 Pit Repair and Maintenance Regular maintenance of pit equipment owned by U.S. Silica is performed by U.S. Silica


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 44 personnel located at the Ottawa facility. Any activity provided by contractors such as clearing and grubbing, drilling and blasting, etc. is provided by the contractor. Major component rebuilds, not within the capability of the U.S. Silica personnel, are contracted to local repair facilities. This is a common industry practice. 13.4 Mine Equipment U.S. Silica uses a combination of owned and leased mobile equipment in the pit. A list of the pit equipment currently utilized at Ottawa is shown in Table 13.1. Initial lease terms are generally 36 months. The decision of lease versus purchase is made by the corporate financial group. Repair and maintenance activity is a combination of U.S. Silica personnel and outside contractors. Pit equipment mechanical availability generally averages about 85-percent. This availability is high enough to maintain the production requirements represented in the Economic Analysis portion of this report (Section 19.0). Table 13.1 Equipment currently utilized in the Ottawa pit 13.5 Mine Planning and Production Scheduling U.S. Silica employs personnel responsible for mine planning and production scheduling. Mine planners provide direction and support to the operating group to ensure proper sequencing of mining activities. These activities include permit compliance, removal of adequate amounts of Quantity Model Type Manufacturer Year Owned/ Leased 1 D8 Dozer Caterpillar 2008 Leased 1 1050 Dozer John Deere 2016 Leased 4 460E Haul Truck John Deere 2019 Owned 1 772 Motor Grader John Deere 2011 Owned 1 444 Front End Loader John Deere 2008 Leased 2 350F Front End Loader Volvo 2017 Leased 1 480EC Tracked Excavator Volvo Leased Ottawa Mine Equipment


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 45 overburden, planned sequencing of areas to me mined, and other production needs of the operating group. With a horizontally bedded sandstone such as this location, the mine planner sequences specific areas, or “blocks” of sandstone to be moved. Mining advances through these blocks, advancing the active mining “face,”31 in the direction prescribed by the planners. Figure 13.5 shows the overburden thickness overlain on an aerial map. The Figure shows the approximate location of the current mining faces as of November 2021. The mining will advance westward, progressing to the pit limit on the north, west, and south (magenta line). Some infrastructure will be required to reach these limits. Infrastructure is discussed further in Section 15. Detailed mine planning activity at Ottawa has occurred in the past but is currently out-of-date. According to U.S. Silica personnel: “Current studies underway regarding Brown’s Brook will impact [mine] design changes and until those are completed a full complete life-of-mine plan for South Ottawa and West Ottawa will [be] unable to [be] developed.”32,33 The impact to the life-of-mine relating to Brown’s Brook is the area required to be left in-place to allow for a natural flow of Brown’s Brook and for access to the “West Pit” from the “South Ottawa Pit.” Figure 13.5 shows a representation of the area set aside in this report to allow for development of the “West Pit” resource block of silica sand. This set aside reduces the potential reserves of silica sand and this reduction is estimated and accounted for in the life-of-mine Economic Analysis in this report. 31 A mining “face” is the vertical wall of rock which will be blasted for excavating the rock. 32 Email response from Matt Crofoot. (U.S. Silica) to Rob Vogel (Q4 Impact Group) on November 8, 2021. 33 South Ottawa and West Ottawa are divisions of the mining area referenced in Figure 5 in the direction of mining.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 46 Figure 13.5 – Overburden thickness isopach map showing the approximate location of the current mining benches and the mining limits (reserve limits). The deposit at Ottawa is a relatively simple deposit to mine as the entire vertical block is minable as ore. Consequently, the mine planning is basic. The risk of intrusive mineralization may be near the top or bottom of the deposit due to contamination from water carrying undesirable mineralization. This has proven to be easily avoidable with proper overburden removal practices and appropriate control of blast hole depth. For these reasons, a short-term lack of a detailed mine plan does not negatively impact the ultimate recovery of the resource and, it does not hinder the day-to-day mining activity at Ottawa.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 47 The annual production schedule is determined based on the forecasted sales demand provided by the sales and marketing group. This production schedule is adjusted to produce the targeted annual mining volume by factoring in losses for waste, in-pit uses, etc. Production schedules are then developed to assure adequate feed is provided to the processing plant to meet the finished- goods demand in a timely manner. Table 13.2 shows the estimated production for the next five years.34 This is achievable with current equipment and personnel. A projection consistent with this analysis for mine production levels is included for the life-of-mine in the Economic Analysis section of this report (Section 19.0). Table 13.2 - Projected sales volume and production schedule required to meet finished goods requirements for the next five years. 13.6 Manning The Ottawa Site has a stable workforce with low turnover that currently totals 145 people. The average workforce age is approximately 48-years35 old and 17% of the workforce is above 60- 34 Email from Terry Lackey, U.S. Silica, of November 9,2021. 35 The average age of the U.S. workforce was 42 years in 2020 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment projections). Year Forecast Finished Goods Sales (MMT) Annual Mining Volume (MMT) 2018 3.5 4.5 2019 2.8 3.7 2020 1.5 1.9 2021 Forecast 2.3 3.0 2022 Projection 3.1 4.0 2023 Projection 3.1 4.0 2024 Projection 3.1 4.0 2025 Projection 3.1 4.0 2026 Projection 3.1 4.0


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 48 years old.36 The hourly workforce comprises 82% of the location census and is represented by the United Steelworkers of America. Table 13.3 shows the manning at Ottawa. Table 13.3 Manning Table for the Ottawa, IL Plant Figure 13.6 below shows the final pit design for the South Ottawa Pit provided by U.S. Silica. This section intentionally left blank. 36 About 14 percent of the U.S. workforce is over age 60 (Household Data Annual Average for 2020 from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). Classification Census Mine Operations 36 Plant Operations 59 Maintenance 24 Salaried 26 Total 145


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 49 Figure 13.6 South Ottawa Pit Final Pit Design


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 50 14.0 PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS Figure 14.1 The Ottawa, IL plant overview The processing plant in Ottawa is U.S. Silica’s largest blended operation.37 Purchased in 1987, the plant has been upgraded since that time.38 The production of finished goods begins when the plant receives a silica sand slurry from the mine located south of the processing plant. From this slurry, multiple products are generated through various processing methods. U.S. Silica utilizes both wet and dry processing in producing over thirty products for sale to two customer groups: Oil and Gas production companies and the Specialty Minerals industry. An overview of the processing plant is shown in Figure 14.1 above. The annual production of finished goods at the Ottawa facility is a function of customer demand and the production capacity, by size fraction, of the plant. Total demand and product mix varies relative to economic cycles of end users and the competitive environment. The plant operating 37 U.S. Silica internal report. 38Locations | U.S. Silica (ussilica.com)..


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 51 personnel periodically coordinate with the sales group to produce finished goods to meet a sales forecast. The plant at Ottawa has high flexibility in relation to the sand size required and the mix between individual wet and dry products by varying the equipment configuration.39 The plant at Ottawa can run 365 days per year and it operates twenty-four hours per day. The combined wet-plant and dry-plant has a nameplate40 capacity of 10.2 K tons per day. The plant capacity is limited by the ability to separate the fine silica sand and by permitted drying capacity. U.S. Silica indicates a reasonable 85-percent mechanical availability for their plant.41 Table 13.2 shows the yearly production history and a forecast for the next five years for the combined production from the Wet Plant and the Dry Plant. Based on finished goods production from prior years, this plant production is achievable with current equipment and personnel. A projection consistent with this analysis for total sales volume is included for the life-of-mine in the Economic Analysis section of this report (Section 19.0). 14.1 Wet Processing Plant The wet plant was originally built in 1975 and underwent expansions in 2009 and 2011. The plant receives its feed through the slurry pumping system from the mine that discharges to the wet plant. Figure 14.2 shows a simplified process flow from the mine to the product distribution and Table 14.1 shows the main processing equipment used in the Wet Processing Plant. 42 The slurry from the mine is processed through a material washer to remove the very fine size fractions which are too small to produce salable products. These very fine particles, or tailings, are separated from the plant feed and are sent to mine settling ponds where the water is recovered and recycled back to the plant and pit as process water. The silica sand plant feed is still a slurry at this point, and it moves to a bank of hydrosizers, hydro-cyclones, and vacuum filters to remove excess water. This water is also 39 Email from Terry Lackey, U.S. Silica, of November 9,2021. 40 Nameplate is a term for the theoretical maximum capacity for a piece of equipment. For a plant it is the theoretical maximum capacity a plant can run at 100-percent mechanical availability. 41 Email from Terry Lackey, U.S. Silica, of November 9,2021 and November 11, 2021. 42 Conveyors, pumps, bins, and other numerous pieces of equipment are omitted for clarity in Table 4.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 52 reclaimed for future use. At this point in the process, the sand has been separated into two portions, coarse and fine particle size fractions (see Figure 14.2). From this point forward, the two streams are processed in dedicated, parallel coarse and fine circuits based on the sizes of their intended final use. The wet silica sand streams are then dried in four fluidized bed dryers where the dried silica sand is processed as whole grain silica in the Sizing and Fine Sand Plant or sent to the Grinding Mill for production of ground silica products. One dryer is dedicated to the coarse-sand stream and three to the fine-sand stream (see Figure 14.2). 14.2 Dry Processing Plant – Whole Grain Silica Whole grain products are shipped primarily to the foundry, glass, and hydraulic fracturing industries. The Fine Sand Plant was built in the 1950’s. Dry processing of whole grain silica begins by taking a split of a dried portion of the coarse-sand stream and the dried fine stream from the Wet Plant where a series of screens separate the fine sand into size fractions. Figure 14.2 shows a schematic of this circuit and Table 14.1 shows the main processing equipment used in the Dry Processing Plant, which includes the Fine Sand Plant and the Sizing Plant of Table 4.43 The finished product is prepped for shipment by either a bulk carrier (rail or truck) or is loaded into bags in the bagging plant and warehoused for specific end-use markets (see Figure 14.2). This section intentionally left blank. 43 Ibid.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 53 Figure 14.2 – Processing Plant flow sheet for Ottawa, IL


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 54 Table 14.1 - Main processing equipment used in the Ottawa Site. Plant Description Quantity Slurry Delivery Mine-side wet screen 1 Wet Plant 10X20 coarse Hydrosizer 2 Wet Plant 8X8 coarse Hydrosizer 1 Wet-Plant-silo Hydrocyclone 3 Wet-plant wet screen 4 Wet-plant pre-filter cyclone 4 Vacuum filter belt 4 Fluid bed dryer 4 Bucket elevator 5 Primary dry Derrick screens 6 Secondary dry Derrick screens 6 Rotex screen 2 Bucket elevators 2 Hummer screens 3 Ball mills 6 Bucket elevators 9 Air classifiers 4 Vibrating screen 6 Rotex screen 10 Bucket elevator 7 20/40 scalping screen 2 Wet Plant Fine Sand Plant Grinding Plant Sizing Plant


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 55 14.3 Dry Processing Plant – Ground Silica The grinding mills are fed by material produced from the coarse-sand stream of materials or from the Fine Sand Plant. The Grinding Plant was built in the 1940’s and utilizes dry ball mills to reduce whole-grain silica sand into ground-silica products for the specialty and composite glass, fused silica, adhesives and countertop markets. It is also used as a filler and extender for a range of applications including paints and coatings, sealants, ceramics, and epoxy.44 Whole grain sand is pulverized dry in ball mills using ceramic grinding balls to minimize product contamination. The mill discharge is classified into size fractions using air classifiers. The products produced are moved into storage bins for bulk loading or packaging. The oversize grains are rejected by the classifiers and return to the mill feed for re-grinding in a closed circuit (see Figure 14.2). Table 14.1 shows the main processing equipment used in the Grinding and Sizing Plant.45 The products produced as ground silica carry the trademark Sil-Co-SilTM. 15.0 INFRASTRUCTURE The U.S. Silica Ottawa Site has been operating in this location since before the turn of the 20th century. Expansions and upgrades have occurred to allow both the mine and the plant to adequately supply the markets they serve and to maintain a social license to operate in the Ottawa community. This requires periodic updates and expansions to the infrastructure required to maintain a sustainable presence in this generally mixed community of industry and suburban geography. The infrastructure required for the ongoing operations is generally in place at Ottawa. Certain capital expenditures are required to replace depreciating assets. Other expansion capital (including additional incremental investment to maintain capacity, such as additional pump houses and settling capacity) is provided and commented on below and in Section 18. Figures 15.1 and 15.2 illustrate critical infrastructure for the Ottawa Site. 44 https://www.ussilica.com/products/sil-co-silr. 45 Conveyors, pumps, bins, and other numerous pieces of equipment are omitted for clarity in Table 14.1.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 56 Figure 15.1 Critical Infrastructure for the Ottawa Site


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 57 Figure 15.2 Electrical Power Lines for the South Ottawa Pit 15.1 Road and Truck Access The site is accessible roads maintained by the City, County and State. Road access is critical for the delivery of materials used in the production of finished goods and for shipment of finished goods to U.S. Silica customers. The plant and pit have access to roadways rated for the loads to be shipped to and from the facility. Bulk finished goods are loaded into bulk hopper trucks at several locations, depending upon the product grade. Truck loading capacity is limited by the permitted hours and by the rate at which the existing equipment can load trucks.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 58 15.2 Rail The rail infrastructure is a critical component for the transportation of the finished goods from the Ottawa Site. The Illinois Railway, LLC (the “IR”) is a short line railroad owning about 113 miles of former BNSF trackage in Illinois. It is owned by OmniTRAX.46 The IR handles the loaded rail cars and returns the empties to the plant. It interchanges with the CSX, a Class 1 railroad,47 at Ottawa, IL just north of the U.S. Silica plant. The IR also connects with the BNSF (a Class 1 railroad) railroad north of Oswego, IL and south at Streator, IL. Two additional Class 1 railroads, the Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, can be accessed by truck transloading. U.S. Silica has an extensive rail-car loading, storage, and handling facility at Ottawa. The main track and switches are maintained by the IR. Ottawa Site personnel maintain all plant trackage with the help of an outside contractor. Routine inspections occur from time to time by the IR and the CSX. Bulk product is loaded into covered hopper cars in a partially enclosed building adjacent to the rail yard. All cars are leased by U.S. Silica. Switching in the plant area is accomplished by Company owned Trackmobile Railcar Movers.48 Rail loading capacity is limited by the permitted hours and by the rate at which the existing equipment can load rail cars. 15.3 Barge Located on the Illinois River, the Ottawa Site also has access to a privately-owned barge terminal that leases property from U.S. Silica for its operation. The facilities are available to U.S. Silica if they are needed. The barge terminal is maintained by others. 46 OmniTrax is a privately owned transportation and transportation infrastructure company out of Denver, CO. 47 Railroad classes are determined by the revenue received by the railroad. The Surface Transportation Board adjusts the threshold annually for each class of railroad. Class 1 railroads are the largest and primary movers of goods over long distances. There are seven Class 1 railroads. (https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-network- development/freight-rail-overview). 48 A Trackmobile is a flexible rail car moving vehicle with both steel rail wheels and rubber tires. It is capable of traveling either on rail or on a roadway and is efficient for the movement of multiple rail cars.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 59 15.4 Electric Power The Ottawa Site uses electric power supplied by Ameren Illinois.49 Power is delivered by an above-ground network of pole lines generally running along the CSX rail corridor on the north side of the property and terminating at a substation on the west side of the plant, south of the Dry Plant. Distribution to the processing plant from the substation is through a combination buried power lines and overhead poles. The Ottawa Pit uses power supplied by Cornbelt Energy Corporation.50 U.S. Silica has a history of reliable electric power supply. 15.5 Natural Gas Natural gas is used as a fuel for drying the silica sand in the plant. The gas is currently supplied by NiCor.51 The natural gas is delivered to the plant via underground pipeline generally running along the CSX rail corridor. Gas is distributed into the plant through various underground pipelines. Nicor is a reliable supplier of natural gas. 15.6 Water U.S. Silica’s Ottawa Site uses vast amounts of water. Most of the consumption is for transporting mined silica sand as a slurry from the mine to the plant and for the processing of the sand in the plant itself. Potable water is provided to the plant location by the City of Ottawa’s public water system. The company has a private well at the mine site for any sanitary needs of the employees there. Water is a critical component to the transportation of the mined silica sand and in the handling and classification of wet sand in the processing plant. The distribution of slurry and process water relies on pump stations and a network of HDPE pipelines on the property. Maintenance of 49 Ameren Illinois is part of Ameren Corporation; a Fortune 500 company that trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol AEE. 50 Corn Belt Energy Corporation is an energy coop in 18 counties in Illinois. Their energy is supplied by Wabash Valley Power Alliance, a generation and transmission cooperative based in Indianapolis, IN. Wabash provides wholesale electricity to 28 distribution systems in Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Missouri. 51 NiCor is a subsidiary of Nicor Inc., publicly traded on the NYSE as GAS. They are the largest natural gas supplier in Illinois.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 60 pumps, pump stations, and pipelines is a vital component in the process of producing finished goods and cost control. Ottawa maintenance personnel routinely monitor the mechanical health of the slurry distribution system and recycle water lines. They perform routine maintenance as required. The HDPE slurry lines are regularly rotated to provide efficient transportation of the silica sand from the mine to the plant and to extend the life of the slurry pipelines. The investment in pipeline replacement, pump and pipeline repair, and construction of additional pipeline and pumphouses is an ongoing expense and capital cost for the plant. The Ottawa Site has an abundance of recycled slurry water and processing water available. The facility captures precipitation in the active mine and tailings ponds which provides for a natural source of additional process water. The mined-out areas also are a source for ground water as it migrates through the exposed formations. The location routinely discharges excess water through permitted NPDES locations. There is no record of the Ottawa Site having to purchase water for sand slurry use or processing use in the last 10 years.” U.S. Silica believes any risk of the lack of water could be mitigated by the permitting and construction of high-capacity wells. 15.7 Tailings Handling and Disposal Tailings handling and settling capacity is a critical element for long-term viability of the Ottawa Site. The mined silica sand contains components that are unable to be sold and are therefore considered a byproduct, or “waste,” from the production of finished goods. This waste is largely fine silica sand and non-silica mineralization contained within the St. Peter Sandstone formation. This waste is removed from the production streams as fine sand and silt suspended in the process water. The Ottawa Site removes the waste from the process water and recycles the water back to the mine and plant for use as slurry water and process water as needed.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 61 The method U.S. Silica utilizes to remove the waste from the recycled water is an industry standard method of “settling” the fines out of the water. A series of settling ponds have been used by U.S. Silica for this purpose for the life of the plant. The very fine particles in the water are allowed to settle by gravity, thereby clarifying the water carrying the particles. The ponds must have a large enough surface area to allow for the time necessary for settlement. The depth of the pond allows for storage of the sediment. 52 Therefore, U.S. Silica must provide for ongoing construction of new pond surface area and depth for the ponds to maintain the required storage area for the waste that will be produced over life of the mine. Historically, the Ottawa Site has used mined-out portions of the property for the settling and storage of the waste produced. Figure 15.3 below shows the locations historically utilized for waste storage: A-Pit, B-Pit (North) and B-Pit (South). U.S. Silica must maintain a “fresh” water pond so that water can be stored after processing through the settling ponds. Currently this is provided by S-Pit in Figure 8 where clarified water is recovered for reuse. D-Pit, in Figure 8, is a large area that is partially suitable for tailings storage (approximately five years’ worth of volume53). This section intentionally left blank. 52 Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Steven J. Goldman, Katharine Jackson, and Taras A. Bursztynsky, McGraww-Hill, 1986, pp. 8-13. 53 Draft – Tailings Deposition Comparison, Rev. 1, U.S. Silica Ottawa, 1/19/2017, Barr Engineering Co. study.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 62 Figure 15.3 - Possible tailings storage pond locations in the plant area. The remainder of D-Pit must be kept free from tailings storage due to the current and future use of the area for slurry lines and pump houses. B-Pit (South) is the current settling pond for deposition of waste. B-Pit (South) has limited storage capacity, insufficient for the life of the mine. Additional areas are available for potential storage in the current mining location. These are identified in Figure 13.5 as the South Ottawa Pit and the West Pit. When the South Ottawa Pit is mined out, and mining progresses west into the West Ottawa Pit (Figure 13.5), there will be sufficient storage capacity for tailings to meet life-of-mine expectations. The need for additional capacity has been anticipated. A capital and expense project are in the early stages of implementation. A sequence of pond construction, higher dam construction, and additional pumps and slurry lines is being developed by U.S. Silica to provide for increased settling pond surface area and storage in areas previously utilized for storage: A-Pit, B-Pit (North) and B-Pit (South) as part of the mine planning efforts commented on in Section 13. In the future, U.S. Silica plans to construct additional storage in area in the South Ottawa Pit south of the Illinois River. A projection of adequate capital spending and operating cost impacts,


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 63 consistent with this analysis for mine production and plant processing levels is included for the life-of-mine in Section 18.0 Capital and Operating Costs and in Section 19.0 Economic Analysis of this report. U.S. Silica projects the implementation of these projects will provide tailings- storage capacity for the next 10 years. After that the plan is to deposit tailings in the South Ottawa Pit area (Figure 15.4), which is estimated to have capacity for the duration of the West Ottawa Pit operations and the capacity to accept tailings from the production from the Mississippi Sands Pit located west of the West Ottawa Pit if needed. Figure 15.4 - Possible tailings storage pond locations in the South Ottawa and West Pit areas. In addition to the capital and expense projects related to tailings storage capacity, U.S. Silica is utilizing and is exploring operational tactics to create space. When the fine sand demand increases, the operations group historically has been able to recycle some of the deposited tailings, thus creating additional storage capacity. Additionally, solid tailings can be stacked - providing more storage capacity without raising impoundments.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 64 15.8 Buildings The Ottawa mine and plant has undergone various modifications in its 100-year plus history. The existing buildings are adequate for the purposes of which they are utilized. The facility employs an office building holding engineering, financial, and administrative staff. Several buildings house the plant processing machinery and support (see Figure 14.1). These include wet and dry processing, bagging, warehousing, loadout, employees, and maintenance activities. There are several miscellaneous buildings on the plant site, some fully utilized and some vacant. The mine site has a maintenance building, administrative space, and an employee building. All utilized structures appear to be well maintained. 15.9 Comments on Infrastructure In the opinion of the QP, the current infrastructure is adequate to maintain the historical levels of finished goods production except for the current capacity of tailings storage. U.S. Silica is planning to create additional storage volume and is underway with the planning process. In the opinion of the QP, the capital required to provide the necessary tailings storage capacity and allow U.S. Silica to maintain the current levels of production and product quality to support the life-of-mine plan are represented in the Economic Analysis in this report. 16.0 MARKET STUDIES U.S. Silica’s Ottawa operation supplies high-silica sand into every major market segment including glassmaking, chemical, foundry, building products, ASTM testing sand, and the Oil and Gas sectors. 16.1 General Marketing Information The Ottawa Site is the company’s largest blended operation, supplying various grades of silica sand to both the Oil and Gas and the Industrial and Specialty markets. The Ottawa Silica Company was founded in March 1900 by Edmund B. Thornton. In 1986, the Thornton family sold Ottawa Silica Company to RTZ. In January 1987, the Pennsylvania Glass Sand Company merged with the Ottawa Silica Company forming the U.S. Silica Company.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 65 U.S. Silica’s Ottawa operation supplies high-silica sand into every major market segment including glassmaking, chemical, foundry, building products, ASTM testing sand, and the Oil and Gas sectors. The Ottawa Site produces a wide range of silica products that serve U.S. Silica’s Oil and Gas, and Specialty Minerals business units: • The Oil and Gas proppants are used in hydraulic fracturing petroleum-bearing rock layers. They are highly crush-resistant, and the industry specifies different grades depending on the requirements of the individual rock formations. • The F-Grade sands are used primarily in foundry casting. The grade numbers represent the American Foundry Society Grain Fineness Number; the sand increases in fineness as the GFN increases. The Fine and Standard Melt grades are used in glassmaking. • 200-Mesh ground silica is used as an additive to cement that is injected into a well to bond the steel well casing to the rock wall of the drillhole. • Sil-Co-SilTM is produced by grinding whole-grain sand into fine, bright white powder. The grade numbers indicate the maximum grain size in the product expressed in microns. The various grades are used in fiberglass, specialty glass, countertops, and ceramics. • Particularly noteworthy are the Ottawa’s ASTM products. U.S. Silica has the distinct advantage of supplying the well-known, highly respected original “Ottawa Silica” that is used for cement and abrasion testing. Ottawa remains the only supplier of fully ASTM- compliant sands in the world.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 66 U.S. Silica has an annual production capacity of 3.6 M tons at this location. Through the renovated and upgraded facilities it can produce multiple products through various processing methods, including washing, hydraulic sizing, grinding, screening, and blending. 16.1.1 Silica Sand Market In the late 1990’s and early 2000’s the market saw a dramatic increase in the use of sand for hydraulic fracturing tight shale formations. The widespread development of the Marcellus Shale in 2008 triggered several expansions by silica sand producers, including U.S. Silica. In 2009, Ottawa’s frac sand capacity underwent a 500 K ton expansion followed by a 900 K ton expansion in 2011. Beginning in 2018, however, the proppant sand market in the region began to contract. This change was fueled primarily by three factors: (1) Many regional sand mines were commissioned near the large Oil and Gas play in the Permian Basin in west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. Oil and Gas drilling operations is this area are nearly exclusively supplied by this newly developed resource; displacing sand previously supplied by mines in the upper Midwest including Ottawa. (2) The energy service companies have shifted toward the use of finer grades of proppant sand such as 40/70 and 100 Mesh. The demand for coarser grades produced by Ottawa and nearby competitors has declined. (3) Relatively low crude oil prices have curtailed drilling in the Bakken (North Dakota) and the Marcellus (Ohio River Valley) shale deposits. The Bakken was impacted by the high cost of completing a well in the region combined with limited available infrastructure (pipelines and rail). Environmental concerns over the hydraulic fracturing process also resulted in the idling or scale back of numerous proppant sand mines. Oil and Gas demand, as well as whole silica demand generally, dropped in 2020 as compared to 2019 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, recovery began in the fourth quarter of 2020


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 67 and continued throughout 2021. The QP believes the whole grain silica end segment should see growth through 2026. The QP believes the compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) for Container Glass is 2% and the CAGR for Solar Glass is 9% through 2026. A fair estimate of future reserve consumption is between 2.5 and 3.0 M tons of raw sand annually. In 2020, the average selling price (“ASP”) was $36.90 per ton. In 2021, the ASP dropped to $29.50 per ton. Given the projected growth in the whole gain silica end segment, the QP believes it is reasonable to assume that pricing will sustain and appreciate at 2% per annum thereafter for the life-of-mine. Consequently, in the long-term, the QP believes that price forecast will increase from an ASP of $30.10 per ton in 2022 to $35.20 per ton in 2030. See Table 19.1 for the projected ASP over the life-of-mine. 16.2 Material Contracts Required for Production There are no material contracts required for production. 17.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS 17.1 Existing Environmental Permits, Plans, and Authorizations WESTWARD was contracted by US Silica to provide third party review of environmental plans, permits, and requirements of the Ottawa Site. A summary of findings is included below based on current regulatory research and documents provided by U.S. Silica. Table 17.1 summarizes the current permitting status at the Ottawa Site.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 68 Item Regulatory Authority Status SPCC Plan EPA Complete NWP 12 IDNR/USACE Approved Surface Mining Permits IDNR Approved Mine Refuse Disposal Permit IDNR Approved NPDES General Permit ILG840203 ILEPA Approved NPDES Individual Permit IL0001325 ILEPA Approved Air Permit #95060046 ILEPA Approved VSQG Hazardous Waste ILEPA Approved Radioactive Material License IEMA Approved Floodplain Development Permit #2014-12 LaSalle County Approved Floodplain Development Permit 2015-20 LaSalle County Approved Floodplain Variance Resolution 12-21 LaSalle County Approved Public Water System State/County Health Departments Approved Table 17.1 Permitting Summary for Ottawa 17.2 Federal Requirements US Silica maintains a Spill Prevention, Controls and Countermeasure (“SPCC”) Plan at the Ottawa location to address requirements of the federal Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations (40 CFR Part 112). The SPCC plan establishes oil spill preparedness, prevention, planning, response, and notification procedures per the federal regulations and addresses state-specific oil spill reporting notification and response requirements as administered by the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (“IEMA”). U.S. Silica currently utilizes a pipeline that extends underneath the Illinois River from the South Ottawa mine to the North Ottawa processing plant. The purpose of the pipeline is to transport sand


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 69 slurry material from the South Ottawa pit(s) to the processing plant at the North Ottawa location. Construction of the pipeline project was authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) and Illinois Department of Natural Resources (“IDNR”) as a Nationwide Permit 12 (CEMVR-OD-P-2006-53). In May of 2017 US Silica received approval from IDNR to replace the existing sand slurry pipeline within their easement under Statewide Permit No. 8 which authorizes the construction of underground pipeline and utility crossings. 17.3 State Requirements U.S. Silica retains a Surface Mining Permit (#1862-12) and associated reclamation bond through the IDNR for authorization of mining. A surety bond was issued to IDNR in the amount of $344,000.00 for approximately 80 acres of surface mining reclamation. The bond may be released by IDNR upon completion of surface mining and approved reclamation plan within three years of completion. An additional Surface Mining Permit (#1866-22) and approved reclamation plan for approximately 45 acres (D Pit) within the North Ottawa Site, located north of Dee Bennett Road is also maintained by U.S. Silica. The permit includes a conservation and reclamation plan which outlines slope and vegetation establishment. U.S. Silica holds three additional Surface Mining Permits which authorizes the ongoing mining activity at the South Ottawa tract (#1743-15, 1776-17, and 1825-19) with associated reclamation bonds. Reclamation bond records (and amounts) were requested from IDNR by U.S. Silica (Todd Lindblad). Though the aforementioned records were unavailable at the time of review, it is WESTWARD’s understanding that should permit coverage areas or bond amounts require an update based on the mine footprint, U.S. Silica is able to do so by administrative update with IDNR. IDNR authorized a Mine Refuse Disposal Permit 1947-SP for the slurry refuse disposal area within an approximately 43-acre inactive pit (“A Pit”) located at the North Ottawa Site. The permit includes a description of proposed reclamation activities following disposal activities, including


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 70 grading and seeding specifications. Costs associated with reclamation activities are provided in Section 19.0 Economic Analysis. U.S. Silica is permitted to discharge stormwater from the Mississippi Sands tract (South Ottawa) under NPDES General Permit No. ILG840203. No mining disturbance has been initiated by US Silica at the former Mississippi Sands tract as of the date of this report. Individual Permit No. IL0001325 as approved by the ILEPA authorizes discharge of wastewater from the North and South Ottawa Sites. Sampling and reporting requirements include three grab samples monthly reported using the Discharge Monitoring Report (“DMR”) system, quarterly visual monitoring, semi-annual monitoring and reporting of metals, arsenic, cyanide and total phenols, and an annual inspection report. Air emissions resulting from the processing plant at Ottawa are authorized under the ILEPA Clean Air Act Permit Program (“CAAPP”) Permit #95060046. Provisions of the permit include maintenance and calibration of monitoring devices and monthly opacity visible emissions observations. Project review of the Mississippi Sands tract by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR; as requested by ILEPA for NPDES authorization), identified three Illinois Natural Areas Inventory (“INAI”) sites within one mile of the project area. IDNR determined that adverse events to the INAI sites due to mining of the tract are unlikely to occur. IDNR recommended that a discharge point should be placed downstream of the Ernat’s Marsh INAI to avoid the possibility of adversely modifying the water quality in the Marsh. The Ottawa Site is classified under RCRA Subtitle C as a Very Small Quantity Generator (“VSQG”) of Hazardous Waste (EPA ID #ILD155166952), generating less than or equal to 100 kilograms per month of non-acute hazardous waste. Waste classifications handled at the site include D001 Ignitable waste, D002 Corrosive waste, and D009 Mercury. U.S. Silica personnel


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 71 maintain an Illinois Radioactive Material License (#IL-01709-01) through the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (“IEA”). 17.4 Other U.S. Silica maintains a LaSalle County Floodplain Development Permit #2014-12 for construction of an earthen berm within a regulated Special Flood Hazard Area (flood zone AE) of the Illinois River watershed basin. U.S. Silica received approval from the state and county health departments to deepen an existing well for potable drinking water (non-community public water system) at the Ottawa Site in 2018. U.S. Silica has not engaged in any agreements pertaining to hiring or local procurement. 17.5 Mississippi Sands Authorizations The following authorizations issued to Mississippi Sands, LLC during their previous ownership of the Mississippi Sands tract were reviewed as part of the feasibility study: • Special Use Permit 11-24 SU authorized Mississippi Sands, LLC to convert portions of the Mississippi Sands tract from farmland to mining use by letter dated February 1, 2012, from the LaSalle County Clerk. Conditions of the Special Use permit include, but are not limited to, the following: • Well agreements with neighboring property owners • Specified blasting surveys, timeline, maximum charge per day, and notifications • Neighboring homeowners’ property agreements • Landscape and buffer plan review by the City of Ottawa • No excavation shall take place above the 490 ft. level • Compliance with transportation plans (not more than 22 truckloads of aggregate product transported through the City of Ottawa per day), and • The County may hire a third-party consultant in the event the owner/operator is assigned any corrective action by any federal, state, or county agency.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 72 17.6 Additional Studies Previous archaeological study of the South Ottawa Site revealed an area of potential archaeological significance (Archaeological Site 11LS953) which led to U.S. Silica entering a Declaration of Preservation Covenant with the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency (“IHPA”) in March 2005. It was determined upon Phase II Testing of the site by SCI Engineering in the fall of 2011 that the archaeological site did not require a preservation covenant as it was unlikely to be recorded in the National Register of Historic Places. The IHPA approved of the Phase II Test Report, determined that no Phase III Archaeological Mitigation Plan was required, and released the deed covenant on July 17, 2012. 17.7 Pending Expansion U.S. Silica has engaged the IMEG company to complete a wetlands assessment, archaeological study, and aquifer testing and impacts analysis of the Catlin Salt Marsh to determine the feasibility of mining the former Mississippi Sands Property. 18.0 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS Capital and operating costs discussed in this section were developed utilizing current and historic cost data from continuous and ongoing operation of the facility, first principles, vendor and contractor quotations, and similar operation comparisons. 18.1 Operating Cost Total operating costs incurred at the Ottawa Site from 2020 through 2021 are provided in Table 18.1. Costs include but are not limited to mining equipment, plant/shipping, wages and premiums, maintenance materials, and power. The average cost of sales was $29.5 per ton in 2020 and $20.9 per ton in 2021. Headcount has remained fairly stable over the period with 104 hourly and 35 salaried employees in 2020 and 119 hourly and 26 salaried employees in 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 73 Capital Costs 2020 $2,182,000 2021 $1,441,000 Operating Costs 2020 $53,662,000 2021 $47,635,000 Table 18.1: Summary of Capital and Operating Costs: 2020-2021 18.2 Capital Costs The average annual capital expenditure since 2020 at the Ottawa Site is $1,811,500, with $2,182,000 in 2020 and $1,441,000 in 2021 (Table 18.1). The higher than average capital spend in 2020 was associated with scheduled maintenance and continuous improvement projects to drive and maintain cost efficiencies. A summary of foreseen capital expenditures through 2026 is provided in Table 18.2. As shown in Table 18.2, total estimated capital expenditure through 2026 is $16,565,000 and primarily includes routine maintenance and continuous improvement projects to drive cost and capacity efficiencies. Listed expenditures are based on historic cost data, vendor/contractor quotations, and similar operation comparisons and are within +/-15% level of accuracy. There are risks regarding the current capital costs estimates through 2026, including escalating costs of raw materials and energy, equipment availability and timing due to either production delays or supply chain gaps.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 74 Projected Capital Expenditures 2022 $6,000,000 2023 $4,000,000 2024 $2,135,000 2025 $2,213,000 2026 $2,217,000 Table 18.2: Summary of Projected Capital Expenditures: 2022-2026 18.3 Assumptions The capital projects are assumed to be constructed in a conventional Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management (“EPCM”) format. U.S. Silica routinely retains a qualified contractor to design projects and act as its agent to bid and procure materials and equipment, bid and award construction contracts, and manage the construction of the facilities. 18.4 Accuracy The accuracy of this estimate for those items identified in the scope-of work is estimated to be within the range of plus 15% to minus 15%; i.e., the cost could be 15% higher than the estimate or it could be 15% lower. Accuracy is an issue separate from contingency, the latter accounts for undeveloped scope and insufficient data (e.g., geotechnical data). 19.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 19.1 Operating Costs An economic model was created for the Ottawa Facility to provide validation of the economic viability of the estimated reserve for the life of mine until 2061. The following are the key assumptions: • Proven and Probable Tons of 99,928,695 as of December 31, 2021 • Revenue Growth of 2%


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 75 • Tons Growth of 0% • Costs of Goods Sold Growth of 2% • Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Growth of 2% • Capital Expenditures Growth of 2% • Inflation Rate of 2% • Tax Rate of 26% • Discount Rate of 8% • Net Working Capital change year over year of 25% • Mine Yield of 89% The QP used budgeted 2021 operating costs as the benchmark for which to model operating costs throughout the life of mine and applied future site investment escalations that are consistent with demonstrated plant maintenance history and robust enough to cover future mine and production changes. The QP based the ASP for 2022 on the ASP in 2021 and anticipated market dynamics. The QP then applied a 2% per annum increase from the 2021 ASP through the life of mine. Based on average selling price trends from 2018 through 2021, the QP believes that 2% per annum growth rate is a reasonable method for a base case scenario. For additional information on the ASP, see “Section 16.1.1— Silica Sand Market.” 19.2 Capital Costs As an ongoing project that is in production and profitable, the QP established a going forward capital expenditure based on the running average capital costs at the mine since 2020. The QP then applied a 2% per annum increase to the capital costs through the life of mine. 19.3 Economic Analysis The financial evaluation of the project comprises the determination of the net present value (“NPV”) at a discount rate of 8%, the internal rate of return (“IRR”) and payback period (time in


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 76 years to recapture the initial capital investment). Annual cash flow projections are estimated over the life of the mine based on the estimates of capital expenditures and production cost and sales revenue. Review of the base case model indicates that the project has an IRR of 17%, a payback period of 0.10 years, and an NPV of $70,708,000. The Economic Feasibility Model (Table 19.1.1) was modeled on the basis of historical operational costs and future site investment escalations that are consistent with demonstrated plant maintenance history and robust enough to cover future mine and production changes. 19.4 Sensitivity Analysis The QP assessed sensitivity of key variables, including reduction in expected selling price, increased capital expenses and associated depreciation, and operating costs. To assess these variables, the QP created moderate and upside models where the following variables were increased by the percentages listed in Table 19.2: • Average Selling Price Growth • Tons Growth • Average Cost of Sale Growth • Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Growth • Capital Expenditures Growth • Inflation Rate • Inflation Adjusted Discount Rate • Mine Yield The NPV of the project is null when 2022 average selling price is reduced to $24.96 / ton. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 77 Table 19.1.1: Economic Feasibility Base Model In Thousand (000) Book Value 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 Reserve Balance Tons (000) 116,059 99,928 97,371 94,802 92,222 89,630 87,026 84,411 81,783 79,144 76,494 73,831 71,156 68,469 65,770 63,059 60,336 57,601 Mined Tons (000) 2,045 2,557 2,569 2,580 2,592 2,604 2,615 2,627 2,639 2,651 2,663 2,675 2,687 2,699 2,711 2,723 2,735 2,748 Sold Tons (000) 1,820 2,276 2,286 2,297 2,307 2,317 2,328 2,338 2,349 2,359 2,370 2,381 2,391 2,402 2,413 2,424 2,435 2,446 R/S Ratio 1.6% 2.3% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8% 2.9% 3.0% 3.1% 3.2% 3.3% 3.5% 3.6% 3.8% 3.9% 4.1% 4.3% 4.5% 4.8% ASP (Selling Price) 36.9$ 29.5$ 30.1$ 30.7$ 31.3$ 31.9$ 32.5$ 33.2$ 33.9$ 34.5$ 35.2$ 35.9$ 36.7$ 37.4$ 38.1$ 38.9$ 39.7$ 40.5$ ACS (Cost of Sale) 29.5$ 20.9$ 21.3$ 21.8$ 22.2$ 22.7$ 23.1$ 23.6$ 24.0$ 24.5$ 25.0$ 25.5$ 26.0$ 26.5$ 27.1$ 27.6$ 28.2$ 28.7$ Rev 67,191$ 67,095$ 68,745$ 70,435$ 72,167$ 73,942$ 75,760$ 77,623$ 79,532$ 81,488$ 83,491$ 85,544$ 87,648$ 89,803$ 92,011$ 94,274$ 96,592$ 98,967$ Cost of Sale 53,662$ 47,635$ 48,806$ 50,006$ 51,236$ 52,496$ 53,787$ 55,109$ 56,465$ 57,853$ 59,276$ 60,733$ 62,227$ 63,757$ 65,325$ 66,931$ 68,577$ 70,263$ CM 13,530$ 19,460$ 19,939$ 20,429$ 20,931$ 21,446$ 21,973$ 22,514$ 23,067$ 23,634$ 24,216$ 24,811$ 25,421$ 26,046$ 26,687$ 27,343$ 28,015$ 28,704$ Change in CM -$ 5,930$ 479$ 490$ 502$ 515$ 527$ 540$ 554$ 567$ 581$ 595$ 610$ 625$ 640$ 656$ 672$ 689$ SG&A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EBITDA 13,530$ 19,460$ 19,939$ 20,429$ 20,931$ 21,446$ 21,973$ 22,514$ 23,067$ 23,634$ 24,216$ 24,811$ 25,421$ 26,046$ 26,687$ 27,343$ 28,015$ 28,704$ D&A 10,165$ 8,902$ 9,533$ 9,218$ 9,376$ 9,297$ 9,336$ 9,316$ 9,326$ 9,321$ 9,324$ 9,322$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ EBIT 3,365$ 10,558$ 10,405$ 11,211$ 11,556$ 12,149$ 12,637$ 13,197$ 13,741$ 14,313$ 14,892$ 15,489$ 16,098$ 16,723$ 17,364$ 18,020$ 18,692$ 19,381$ Taxes 875$ 2,745$ 2,705$ 2,915$ 3,004$ 3,159$ 3,286$ 3,431$ 3,573$ 3,721$ 3,872$ 4,027$ 4,185$ 4,348$ 4,515$ 4,685$ 4,860$ 5,039$ Operating Income 2,490$ 7,813$ 7,700$ 8,296$ 8,551$ 8,990$ 9,352$ 9,766$ 10,168$ 10,592$ 11,020$ 11,462$ 11,913$ 12,375$ 12,849$ 13,335$ 13,832$ 14,342$ Plant Capex (2,182)$ (1,441)$ (6,000)$ (4,000)$ (2,135)$ (2,213)$ (2,217)$ (2,260)$ (2,283)$ (2,317)$ (2,346)$ (2,378)$ (2,409)$ (2,442)$ (2,474)$ (2,507)$ (2,540)$ (2,574)$ Total Capex (2,182)$ (1,441)$ (6,000)$ (4,000)$ (2,135)$ (2,213)$ (2,217)$ (2,260)$ (2,283)$ (2,317)$ (2,346)$ (2,378)$ (2,409)$ (2,442)$ (2,474)$ (2,507)$ (2,540)$ (2,574)$ Change in NWC -$ (1,483)$ (120)$ (123)$ (126)$ (129)$ (132)$ (135)$ (138)$ (142)$ (145)$ (149)$ (153)$ (156)$ (160)$ (164)$ (168)$ (172)$ Net Income 308$ 4,889$ 1,580$ 4,174$ 6,291$ 6,649$ 7,002$ 7,371$ 7,747$ 8,133$ 8,529$ 8,935$ 9,351$ 9,778$ 10,215$ 10,664$ 11,124$ 11,596$ FCF (86,400)$ 10,473$ 13,791$ 11,114$ 13,391$ 15,666$ 15,945$ 16,338$ 16,688$ 17,073$ 17,454$ 17,852$ 18,257$ 18,674$ 19,100$ 19,538$ 19,987$ 20,447$ 20,919$ 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 54,853 52,093 49,320 46,535 43,738 40,928 38,105 35,269 32,421 29,560 26,686 23,799 20,899 17,986 15,060 12,121 9,169 6,203 3,224 231 2,760 2,773 2,785 2,798 2,810 2,823 2,836 2,848 2,861 2,874 2,887 2,900 2,913 2,926 2,939 2,952 2,966 2,979 2,992 231 2,457 2,468 2,479 2,490 2,501 2,512 2,524 2,535 2,546 2,558 2,569 2,581 2,593 2,604 2,616 2,628 2,639 2,651 2,663 206 5.0% 5.3% 5.6% 6.0% 6.4% 6.9% 7.4% 8.1% 8.8% 9.7% 10.8% 12.2% 13.9% 16.3% 19.5% 24.4% 32.3% 48.0% 92.8% 100.0% 41.3$ 42.1$ 42.9$ 43.8$ 44.7$ 45.6$ 46.5$ 47.4$ 48.4$ 49.3$ 50.3$ 51.3$ 52.4$ 53.4$ 54.5$ 55.6$ 56.7$ 57.8$ 59.0$ 60.1$ 29.3$ 29.9$ 30.5$ 31.1$ 31.7$ 32.4$ 33.0$ 33.7$ 34.3$ 35.0$ 35.7$ 36.4$ 37.2$ 37.9$ 38.7$ 39.4$ 40.2$ 41.0$ 41.9$ 42.7$ 101,401$ 103,894$ 106,449$ 109,067$ 111,749$ 114,497$ 117,312$ 120,197$ 123,152$ 126,181$ 129,284$ 132,463$ 135,720$ 139,057$ 142,477$ 145,980$ 149,570$ 153,248$ 157,016$ 12,376$ 71,991$ 73,761$ 75,575$ 77,433$ 79,337$ 81,288$ 83,287$ 85,335$ 87,434$ 89,584$ 91,786$ 94,044$ 96,356$ 98,725$ 101,153$ 103,640$ 106,189$ 108,800$ 111,476$ 8,787$ 29,410$ 30,133$ 30,874$ 31,633$ 32,411$ 33,208$ 34,025$ 34,862$ 35,719$ 36,597$ 37,497$ 38,419$ 39,364$ 40,332$ 41,324$ 42,340$ 43,381$ 44,448$ 45,541$ 3,590$ 706$ 723$ 741$ 759$ 778$ 797$ 817$ 837$ 857$ 878$ 900$ 922$ 945$ 968$ 992$ 1,016$ 1,041$ 1,067$ 1,093$ (41,951)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 29,410$ 30,133$ 30,874$ 31,633$ 32,411$ 33,208$ 34,025$ 34,862$ 35,719$ 36,597$ 37,497$ 38,419$ 39,364$ 40,332$ 41,324$ 42,340$ 43,381$ 44,448$ 45,541$ 3,590$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 20,087$ 20,810$ 21,551$ 22,311$ 23,088$ 23,885$ 24,702$ 25,539$ 26,396$ 27,274$ 28,174$ 29,096$ 30,041$ 31,009$ 32,001$ 33,017$ 34,058$ 35,125$ 36,218$ (5,733)$ 5,223$ 5,411$ 5,603$ 5,801$ 6,003$ 6,210$ 6,423$ 6,640$ 6,863$ 7,091$ 7,325$ 7,565$ 7,811$ 8,062$ 8,320$ 8,584$ 8,855$ 9,132$ 9,417$ (1,491)$ 14,864$ 15,400$ 15,948$ 16,510$ 17,085$ 17,675$ 18,279$ 18,899$ 19,533$ 20,183$ 20,849$ 21,531$ 22,230$ 22,947$ 23,680$ 24,432$ 25,203$ 25,992$ 26,801$ (4,243)$ (2,608)$ (2,643)$ (2,678)$ (2,714)$ (2,750)$ (2,786)$ (2,824)$ (2,861)$ (2,899)$ (2,938)$ (2,977)$ (3,016)$ (3,057)$ (3,097)$ (3,138)$ (3,180)$ (3,222)$ (3,265)$ (3,309)$ (3,353)$ (2,608)$ (2,643)$ (2,678)$ (2,714)$ (2,750)$ (2,786)$ (2,824)$ (2,861)$ (2,899)$ (2,938)$ (2,977)$ (3,016)$ (3,057)$ (3,097)$ (3,138)$ (3,180)$ (3,222)$ (3,265)$ (3,309)$ (3,353)$ (176)$ (181)$ (185)$ (190)$ (194)$ (199)$ (204)$ (209)$ (214)$ (220)$ (225)$ (231)$ (236)$ (242)$ (248)$ (254)$ (260)$ (267)$ (273)$ -$ 12,080$ 12,576$ 13,085$ 13,606$ 14,141$ 14,689$ 15,252$ 15,828$ 16,419$ 17,026$ 17,647$ 18,284$ 18,938$ 19,607$ 20,294$ 20,998$ 21,720$ 22,460$ 23,219$ (7,596)$ 21,403$ 21,899$ 22,407$ 22,929$ 23,464$ 24,012$ 24,575$ 25,151$ 25,742$ 26,349$ 26,970$ 27,607$ 28,260$ 28,930$ 29,617$ 30,321$ 31,043$ 31,783$ 32,542$ 1,727$


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 78 Table 19.1.2: Economic Feasibility Moderate Model In Thousand (000) Book Value 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Reserve Balance Tons (000) 116,059 99,928 97,371 94,790 92,187 89,560 86,909 84,235 81,536 78,813 76,066 73,294 70,497 67,675 64,827 Mined Tons (000) 2,045 2,557 2,580 2,604 2,627 2,651 2,674 2,699 2,723 2,747 2,772 2,797 2,822 2,848 2,873 Sold Tons (000) 1,820 2,276 2,296 2,317 2,338 2,359 2,380 2,402 2,423 2,445 2,467 2,489 2,512 2,534 2,557 R/S Ratio 1.6% 2.3% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8% 3.0% 3.1% 3.2% 3.3% 3.5% 3.6% 3.8% 4.0% 4.2% 4.4% ASP (Selling Price) 36.9$ 29.5$ 30.7$ 31.9$ 33.2$ 34.5$ 35.9$ 37.3$ 38.8$ 40.3$ 42.0$ 43.6$ 45.4$ 47.2$ 49.1$ ACS (Cost of Sale) 29.5$ 20.9$ 21.6$ 22.2$ 22.9$ 23.6$ 24.3$ 25.0$ 25.7$ 26.5$ 27.3$ 28.1$ 29.0$ 29.8$ 30.7$ Rev 67,191$ 67,095$ 70,407$ 73,882$ 77,529$ 81,356$ 85,371$ 89,585$ 94,007$ 98,648$ 103,517$ 108,626$ 113,988$ 119,615$ 125,519$ Cost of Sale 53,662$ 47,635$ 49,506$ 51,450$ 53,470$ 55,570$ 57,752$ 60,020$ 62,377$ 64,827$ 67,372$ 70,018$ 72,768$ 75,625$ 78,595$ CM 13,530$ 19,460$ 20,901$ 22,432$ 24,059$ 25,786$ 27,619$ 29,565$ 31,630$ 33,821$ 36,144$ 38,608$ 41,221$ 43,989$ 46,924$ Change in CM -$ 5,930$ 1,441$ 1,531$ 1,626$ 1,727$ 1,833$ 1,946$ 2,065$ 2,191$ 2,324$ 2,464$ 2,612$ 2,769$ 2,934$ SG&A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EBITDA 13,530$ 19,460$ 20,901$ 22,432$ 24,059$ 25,786$ 27,619$ 29,565$ 31,630$ 33,821$ 36,144$ 38,608$ 41,221$ 43,989$ 46,924$ D&A 10,165$ 8,902$ 9,533$ 9,218$ 9,376$ 9,297$ 9,336$ 9,316$ 9,326$ 9,321$ 9,324$ 9,322$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ EBIT 3,365$ 10,558$ 11,368$ 13,215$ 14,683$ 16,489$ 18,283$ 20,249$ 22,304$ 24,500$ 26,821$ 29,286$ 31,897$ 34,667$ 37,601$ Taxes 875$ 2,745$ 2,956$ 3,436$ 3,818$ 4,287$ 4,754$ 5,265$ 5,799$ 6,370$ 6,973$ 7,614$ 8,293$ 9,013$ 9,776$ Operating Income 2,490$ 7,813$ 8,412$ 9,779$ 10,866$ 12,202$ 13,530$ 14,984$ 16,505$ 18,130$ 19,847$ 21,672$ 23,604$ 25,653$ 27,825$ Plant Capex (2,182)$ (1,441)$ (6,000)$ (4,000)$ (2,135)$ (2,213)$ (2,283)$ (2,360)$ (2,438)$ (2,519)$ (2,602)$ (2,688)$ (2,778)$ (2,870)$ (2,965)$ Total Capex (2,182)$ (1,441)$ (6,000)$ (4,000)$ (2,135)$ (2,213)$ (2,283)$ (2,360)$ (2,438)$ (2,519)$ (2,602)$ (2,688)$ (2,778)$ (2,870)$ (2,965)$ Change in NWC -$ (1,483)$ (360)$ (383)$ (407)$ (432)$ (458)$ (487)$ (516)$ (548)$ (581)$ (616)$ (653)$ (692)$ (734)$ Net Income 308$ 4,889$ 2,052$ 5,396$ 8,324$ 9,557$ 10,789$ 12,138$ 13,551$ 15,063$ 16,664$ 18,367$ 20,174$ 22,091$ 24,126$ FCF (86,400)$ 10,473$ 13,791$ 11,585$ 14,614$ 17,700$ 18,854$ 20,125$ 21,454$ 22,877$ 24,385$ 25,988$ 27,690$ 29,497$ 31,414$ 33,449$ 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 61,954 59,055 56,130 53,178 50,200 47,195 44,164 41,104 38,018 34,903 31,761 28,590 25,390 22,162 18,905 15,619 12,302 8,957 5,581 2,174 2,899 2,925 2,951 2,978 3,005 3,032 3,059 3,087 3,114 3,143 3,171 3,199 3,228 3,257 3,287 3,316 3,346 3,376 3,406 2,174 2,580 2,603 2,627 2,650 2,674 2,698 2,723 2,747 2,772 2,797 2,822 2,847 2,873 2,899 2,925 2,951 2,978 3,005 3,032 1,935 4.7% 5.0% 5.3% 5.6% 6.0% 6.4% 6.9% 7.5% 8.2% 9.0% 10.0% 11.2% 12.7% 14.7% 17.4% 21.2% 27.2% 37.7% 61.0% 100.0% 51.0$ 53.1$ 55.2$ 57.4$ 59.7$ 62.1$ 64.6$ 67.2$ 69.9$ 72.7$ 75.6$ 78.6$ 81.7$ 85.0$ 88.4$ 91.9$ 95.6$ 99.4$ 103.4$ 107.6$ 31.7$ 32.6$ 33.6$ 34.6$ 35.6$ 36.7$ 37.8$ 38.9$ 40.1$ 41.3$ 42.5$ 43.8$ 45.1$ 46.5$ 47.9$ 49.3$ 50.8$ 52.3$ 53.9$ 55.5$ 131,714$ 138,216$ 145,038$ 152,197$ 159,710$ 167,593$ 175,865$ 184,546$ 193,655$ 203,214$ 213,245$ 223,770$ 234,816$ 246,406$ 258,569$ 271,332$ 284,725$ 298,779$ 313,527$ 208,105$ 81,681$ 84,889$ 88,223$ 91,687$ 95,288$ 99,030$ 102,919$ 106,960$ 111,160$ 115,526$ 120,062$ 124,777$ 129,677$ 134,770$ 140,062$ 145,562$ 151,279$ 157,219$ 163,393$ 107,411$ 50,033$ 53,327$ 56,816$ 60,510$ 64,422$ 68,563$ 72,947$ 77,586$ 82,495$ 87,688$ 93,182$ 98,993$ 105,139$ 111,637$ 118,507$ 125,770$ 133,446$ 141,560$ 150,133$ 100,695$ 3,109$ 3,294$ 3,489$ 3,695$ 3,912$ 4,141$ 4,383$ 4,639$ 4,909$ 5,194$ 5,494$ 5,811$ 6,145$ 6,498$ 6,870$ 7,263$ 7,677$ 8,113$ 8,574$ (49,439)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,033$ 53,327$ 56,816$ 60,510$ 64,422$ 68,563$ 72,947$ 77,586$ 82,495$ 87,688$ 93,182$ 98,993$ 105,139$ 111,637$ 118,507$ 125,770$ 133,446$ 141,560$ 150,133$ 100,695$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 40,710$ 44,004$ 47,493$ 51,187$ 55,099$ 59,240$ 63,624$ 68,263$ 73,172$ 78,365$ 83,859$ 89,670$ 95,816$ 102,314$ 109,184$ 116,447$ 124,123$ 132,237$ 140,810$ 91,372$ 10,585$ 11,441$ 12,348$ 13,309$ 14,326$ 15,403$ 16,542$ 17,748$ 19,025$ 20,375$ 21,803$ 23,314$ 24,912$ 26,602$ 28,388$ 30,276$ 32,272$ 34,382$ 36,611$ 23,757$ 30,125$ 32,563$ 35,145$ 37,879$ 40,773$ 43,838$ 47,082$ 50,515$ 54,147$ 57,990$ 62,056$ 66,356$ 70,904$ 75,712$ 80,796$ 86,170$ 91,851$ 97,855$ 104,200$ 67,615$ (3,063)$ (3,165)$ (3,270)$ (3,378)$ (3,490)$ (3,606)$ (3,725)$ (3,849)$ (3,976)$ (4,108)$ (4,244)$ (4,385)$ (4,530)$ (4,681)$ (4,836)$ (4,996)$ (5,162)$ (5,333)$ (5,510)$ (5,692)$ (3,063)$ (3,165)$ (3,270)$ (3,378)$ (3,490)$ (3,606)$ (3,725)$ (3,849)$ (3,976)$ (4,108)$ (4,244)$ (4,385)$ (4,530)$ (4,681)$ (4,836)$ (4,996)$ (5,162)$ (5,333)$ (5,510)$ (5,692)$ (777)$ (823)$ (872)$ (924)$ (978)$ (1,035)$ (1,096)$ (1,160)$ (1,227)$ (1,298)$ (1,373)$ (1,453)$ (1,536)$ (1,625)$ (1,718)$ (1,816)$ (1,919)$ (2,028)$ (2,143)$ -$ 26,285$ 28,575$ 31,003$ 33,577$ 36,305$ 39,197$ 42,261$ 45,506$ 48,944$ 52,584$ 56,438$ 60,518$ 64,837$ 69,407$ 74,243$ 79,359$ 84,770$ 90,494$ 96,547$ 61,923$ 35,608$ 37,898$ 40,326$ 42,900$ 45,628$ 48,520$ 51,584$ 54,829$ 58,267$ 61,907$ 65,761$ 69,841$ 74,160$ 78,730$ 83,566$ 88,682$ 94,093$ 99,817$ 105,869$ 71,246$


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois Effective Date: December 31, 2021 79 Table 19.1.3: Economic Feasibility Upside Model In Thousand (000) Book Value 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Reserve Balance Tons (000) 116,059 99,928 97,371 94,779 92,152 89,490 86,792 84,057 81,285 78,476 75,629 72,744 69,820 66,856 63,852 Mined Tons (000) 2,045 2,557 2,592 2,627 2,662 2,698 2,735 2,772 2,809 2,847 2,885 2,924 2,964 3,004 3,044 Sold Tons (000) 1,820 2,276 2,307 2,338 2,369 2,401 2,434 2,467 2,500 2,534 2,568 2,603 2,638 2,673 2,709 R/S Ratio 1.6% 2.3% 2.7% 2.8% 2.9% 3.0% 3.2% 3.3% 3.5% 3.6% 3.8% 4.0% 4.2% 4.5% 4.8% ASP (Selling Price) 36.9$ 29.5$ 31.2$ 33.1$ 35.1$ 37.2$ 39.5$ 41.8$ 44.3$ 47.0$ 49.8$ 52.8$ 56.0$ 59.3$ 62.9$ ACS (Cost of Sale) 29.5$ 20.9$ 22.0$ 23.1$ 24.2$ 25.4$ 26.7$ 28.0$ 29.4$ 30.9$ 32.5$ 34.1$ 35.8$ 37.6$ 39.5$ Rev 67,191$ 67,095$ 72,081$ 77,437$ 83,192$ 89,373$ 96,015$ 103,150$ 110,815$ 119,049$ 127,896$ 137,400$ 147,610$ 158,579$ 170,363$ Cost of Sale 53,662$ 47,635$ 50,692$ 53,945$ 57,407$ 61,091$ 65,012$ 69,184$ 73,624$ 78,348$ 83,376$ 88,727$ 94,421$ 100,481$ 106,929$ CM 13,530$ 19,460$ 21,389$ 23,492$ 25,785$ 28,282$ 31,003$ 33,966$ 37,191$ 40,701$ 44,520$ 48,673$ 53,189$ 58,098$ 63,434$ Change in CM -$ 5,930$ 1,929$ 2,103$ 2,292$ 2,498$ 2,721$ 2,963$ 3,225$ 3,510$ 3,819$ 4,153$ 4,516$ 4,909$ 5,336$ SG&A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EBITDA 13,530$ 19,460$ 21,389$ 23,492$ 25,785$ 28,282$ 31,003$ 33,966$ 37,191$ 40,701$ 44,520$ 48,673$ 53,189$ 58,098$ 63,434$ D&A 10,165$ 8,902$ 9,533$ 9,218$ 9,376$ 9,297$ 9,336$ 9,316$ 9,326$ 9,321$ 9,324$ 9,322$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ EBIT 3,365$ 10,558$ 11,856$ 14,274$ 16,409$ 18,986$ 21,667$ 24,650$ 27,865$ 31,380$ 35,196$ 39,350$ 43,866$ 48,776$ 54,111$ Taxes 875$ 2,745$ 3,082$ 3,711$ 4,266$ 4,936$ 5,633$ 6,409$ 7,245$ 8,159$ 9,151$ 10,231$ 11,405$ 12,682$ 14,069$ Operating Income 2,490$ 7,813$ 8,773$ 10,563$ 12,143$ 14,049$ 16,034$ 18,241$ 20,620$ 23,221$ 26,045$ 29,119$ 32,461$ 36,094$ 40,042$ Plant Capex (2,182)$ (1,441)$ (6,000)$ (4,000)$ (2,135)$ (2,213)$ (2,391)$ (2,532)$ (2,708)$ (2,882)$ (3,075)$ (3,276)$ (3,493)$ (3,723)$ (3,969)$ Total Capex (2,182)$ (1,441)$ (6,000)$ (4,000)$ (2,135)$ (2,213)$ (2,391)$ (2,532)$ (2,708)$ (2,882)$ (3,075)$ (3,276)$ (3,493)$ (3,723)$ (3,969)$ Change in NWC -$ (1,483)$ (482)$ (526)$ (573)$ (624)$ (680)$ (741)$ (806)$ (877)$ (955)$ (1,038)$ (1,129)$ (1,227)$ (1,334)$ Net Income 308$ 4,889$ 2,291$ 6,037$ 9,435$ 11,212$ 12,962$ 14,968$ 17,106$ 19,461$ 22,016$ 24,805$ 27,839$ 31,143$ 34,739$ FCF (86,400)$ 10,473$ 13,791$ 11,824$ 15,255$ 18,810$ 20,509$ 22,298$ 24,284$ 26,432$ 28,783$ 31,339$ 34,127$ 37,162$ 40,466$ 44,062$ 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 60,808 57,723 54,595 51,426 48,214 44,959 41,659 38,315 34,926 31,491 28,010 24,482 20,906 17,282 13,609 9,887 6,114 2,290 3,085 3,127 3,169 3,212 3,255 3,299 3,344 3,389 3,435 3,481 3,528 3,576 3,624 3,673 3,723 3,773 3,824 2,290 2,746 2,783 2,821 2,859 2,897 2,936 2,976 3,016 3,057 3,098 3,140 3,182 3,225 3,269 3,313 3,358 3,403 2,038 5.1% 5.4% 5.8% 6.2% 6.8% 7.3% 8.0% 8.8% 9.8% 11.1% 12.6% 14.6% 17.3% 21.3% 27.4% 38.2% 62.5% 100.0% 66.6$ 70.6$ 74.9$ 79.4$ 84.1$ 89.2$ 94.5$ 100.2$ 106.2$ 112.6$ 119.4$ 126.5$ 134.1$ 142.2$ 150.7$ 159.7$ 169.3$ 179.5$ 41.4$ 43.5$ 45.7$ 48.0$ 50.4$ 52.9$ 55.5$ 58.3$ 61.2$ 64.3$ 67.5$ 70.9$ 74.4$ 78.1$ 82.0$ 86.1$ 90.5$ 95.0$ 183,023$ 196,623$ 211,234$ 226,931$ 243,794$ 261,910$ 281,373$ 302,282$ 324,744$ 348,876$ 374,801$ 402,653$ 432,574$ 464,718$ 499,252$ 536,351$ 576,207$ 365,761$ 113,791$ 121,094$ 128,865$ 137,135$ 145,935$ 155,301$ 165,267$ 175,873$ 187,160$ 199,171$ 211,953$ 225,555$ 240,030$ 255,434$ 271,826$ 289,271$ 307,835$ 193,562$ 69,231$ 75,529$ 82,369$ 89,796$ 97,859$ 106,610$ 116,106$ 126,409$ 137,585$ 149,705$ 162,848$ 177,098$ 192,544$ 209,285$ 227,425$ 247,080$ 268,373$ 172,199$ 5,798$ 6,298$ 6,840$ 7,427$ 8,063$ 8,751$ 9,496$ 10,303$ 11,176$ 12,121$ 13,143$ 14,249$ 15,446$ 16,741$ 18,141$ 19,655$ 21,292$ (96,174)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 69,231$ 75,529$ 82,369$ 89,796$ 97,859$ 106,610$ 116,106$ 126,409$ 137,585$ 149,705$ 162,848$ 177,098$ 192,544$ 209,285$ 227,425$ 247,080$ 268,373$ 172,199$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 9,323$ 59,909$ 66,206$ 73,046$ 80,473$ 88,536$ 97,287$ 106,783$ 117,086$ 128,262$ 140,382$ 153,526$ 167,775$ 183,221$ 199,962$ 218,103$ 237,758$ 259,050$ 162,876$ 15,576$ 17,214$ 18,992$ 20,923$ 23,019$ 25,295$ 27,764$ 30,442$ 33,348$ 36,499$ 39,917$ 43,622$ 47,637$ 51,990$ 56,707$ 61,817$ 67,353$ 42,348$ 44,332$ 48,993$ 54,054$ 59,550$ 65,517$ 71,992$ 79,019$ 86,643$ 94,914$ 103,883$ 113,609$ 124,154$ 135,584$ 147,972$ 161,396$ 175,941$ 191,697$ 120,528$ (4,231)$ (4,510)$ (4,807)$ (5,124)$ (5,462)$ (5,823)$ (6,207)$ (6,616)$ (7,053)$ (7,518)$ (8,014)$ (8,542)$ (9,106)$ (9,707)$ (10,347)$ (11,029)$ (11,757)$ (12,533)$ (4,231)$ (4,510)$ (4,807)$ (5,124)$ (5,462)$ (5,823)$ (6,207)$ (6,616)$ (7,053)$ (7,518)$ (8,014)$ (8,542)$ (9,106)$ (9,707)$ (10,347)$ (11,029)$ (11,757)$ (12,533)$ (1,449)$ (1,574)$ (1,710)$ (1,857)$ (2,016)$ (2,188)$ (2,374)$ (2,576)$ (2,794)$ (3,030)$ (3,286)$ (3,562)$ (3,862)$ (4,185)$ (4,535)$ (4,914)$ (5,323)$ -$ 38,652$ 42,909$ 47,537$ 52,569$ 58,038$ 63,982$ 70,439$ 77,452$ 85,067$ 93,335$ 102,309$ 112,049$ 122,616$ 134,080$ 146,514$ 159,997$ 174,617$ 107,996$ 47,975$ 52,231$ 56,860$ 61,892$ 67,361$ 73,305$ 79,761$ 86,774$ 94,390$ 102,658$ 111,632$ 121,372$ 131,939$ 143,403$ 155,837$ 169,320$ 183,940$ 117,319$


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois December 31, 2021 80 Case 5% 10% Drivers Base Moderate Upside Average Selling Price Growth 2% 4% 6% Tons Growth 0.5% 1% 1% Costs of Goods Sold Growth 2% 3% 5% Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Growth 2% 5% 10% Capital Expenditures Growth 2% 5% 10% Inflation Rate 2% 3% 4% Inflation Adjusted Discount Rate 10% 11% 12% Mine Yield 89% 89% 89% Case Payback IRR NPV Base 0.10 Years 17% $70,708,000 Moderate 0.10 Years 21% $124,455,000 Upside 0.00 Years 23% $146,277,000 Table 19.2 Sensitivity Analysis 20.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES There are no other silica sand mining operations adjacent to the Ottawa mine. The areas to the east are mostly residential and light commercial development. To the north, south and west is vacant land primarily used for agricultural purposes. 21.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION There is no additional data or information to include in this section. 22.0 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 22.1 Exploration Based on the review of U.S. Silica provided exploration data for the South Ottawa Pit, it is the QP’s opinion there is sufficient drilling data available and the spacing of the borings drilled is acceptable for this report.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois December 31, 2021 81 22.2 Data Verification It is the QP’s opinion that it is reasonable to rely on laboratory testing procedures provided by U.S. Silica. Based on the review of provided lab documentation provided by U.S. Silica, it is the QP’s opinion that the testing procedures and results presented herein are acceptable for the purpose of this report. 22.3 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing Based on review of the lab procedures provided by U.S. Silica, the overall relative homogenous mineralogy of the deposit, it is the QP’s opinion that the procedures and laboratory testing reviewed are acceptable for the purposes of this report. 22.4 Comments on Mining Methods In the opinion of the QP, detailed mine planning has not been accomplished to adequately delineate the surface area required to describe the resources left in-place54 from the areas known as “South Ottawa” and the “West Pit” to maintain the buffer around Brown’s Brook. 22.5 Comments on Processing and Recovery Methods In the opinion of the QP, the current facilities dedicated to Processing and Recovery Methods will allow U.S. Silica to maintain the current levels of production and product quality to support the life-of-mine plan represented by the Economic Analysis in this report (Section 19.0). 22.6 Electricity In the opinion of the QP the risk of material interruption of the supply of electric power is low. The highest risk relative to electric power is real cost escalation of the power without a long-term contract. 54 A block of St. Peter Sandstone to be left in-place to allow for the natural course of Brown’s Brook to remain in a natural state and the necessary construction of a bridge over Brown’s Book. See the Infrastructure discussion in Section 15.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois December 31, 2021 82 22.7 Natural Gas In the opinion of the QP the risk of material interruption of the supply of natural gas is low. The highest risk relative to natural gas is real cost escalation of the gas supply without a long-term contract. 22.8 Comments on Infrastructure In the opinion of the QP, the current infrastructure is adequate to maintain the historical levels of finished goods production except for the current capacity of tailings storage. U.S. Silica is planning to create additional storage volume and is underway with the planning process. In the opinion of the QP, the capital required to provide the necessary tailings storage capacity and allow U.S. Silica to maintain the current levels of production and product quality to support the life-of-mine plan are represented in the Economic Analysis (Section 19.0) in this report. 22.9 Environmental Permitting It is the opinion of the QP that the existing permits and plans for the active mine and processing plant operations adequately address environmental compliance and permitting requirements and that U .S. Silica can reasonably anticipate that they will be able to obtain the future authorizations needed to complete the mine plan. Based on review of previous permit documents, history of the site, the mine plan, and the regulatory requirements it is the opinion of WESTWARD that it is highly likely U.S. Silica would be able to obtain authorizations to develop the reserves as classified herein. It is the opinion of the QP that the current authorizations held by Mississippi Sands can likely be transferred to U.S. Silica or, in the event that transfer is not an option, it is reasonable anticipated that U.S. Silica would receive new authorizations for the above-listed permits and agreements. 23.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The primary recommendation of this report is to design and implement a third-party sampling and testing program to provide outside quality control for U.S. Silica’s internal testing program.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois December 31, 2021 83 The program should be written with detailed instructions on proper collection methods; sample containers, preservation, labeling, chain of custody, security, and transport; and testing. Anticipated cost for this program is estimated to be up to $7,000 - $10,000 annually depending on the number of tests conducted and which parameters are run. 24.0 REFERENCES All references used are cited in each individual section as footnotes. 25.0 RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT The information, conclusions, opinions, and estimates contained in this Technical Report Summary were formed based on a combination of inputs from U.S. Silica and Independent Qualified Persons (QP’s) observations. This Technical Report Summary assumes and relies on the fact that all the source data provided to the QP’s by U.S. Silica and the information and technical documents listed in Section 24.0 (References) are accurate and complete in all material aspects. The authors have carefully reviewed the information provided to them by U.S. Silica within the scope of their technical expertise The information, conclusions, opinions, and estimates contained in the Technical Report Summary are based on the following parameters: • Information available to U.S. Silica at the time of preparation of this Technical Report Summary. • Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this Technical Report Summary. The QPs have relied upon the ownership and title and permitting information provided by employees of U.S. Silica for inclusion in Sections 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 5.0. The QPs have not researched property title or mineral rights for the Ottawa Site and express no opinion as to the ownership status of the property.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois December 31, 2021 84 The QPs have relied on various U.S. Silica departments for relevant data, analysis, and guidance on applicable market studies, contracts, taxes, royalties and other government levies or interests applicable to revenue or income from the Ottawa operation.


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois December 31, 2021 85


 


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois December 31, 2021 87


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois December 31, 2021 88 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES & TABLES - OTTAWA FIGURES Figure 1.1 Regional map of Ottawa mine and plant location Figure 1.2 Mine & Plant Site Map Figure 3.1 Site Location Map Figure 3.2 No Mining Buffer Zones Figure 6.1 Cross section of St. Peters Sandstone Figure 6.2 Cross section of drilled borings Figure 7.1 Boring Location Map – South Ottawa Pit Figure 7.2 Typical Mine Face in of St. Peter Sandstone Figure 12.1 Existing Mine Buffers Figure 13.1 Overview showing the St. Peter sandstone face Figure 13.2 St. Peter sandstone bench after clearing Figure 13.3 Loading blasted sandstone into haul truck Figure 13.4 Hydraulic mining with a monitor to produce silica sand slurry for pumping to the processing plant. Figure 13.5 Overburden thickness isopach map showing location of current mining benches and the mining limits Figure 14.1 Plant Overview Figure 14.2 Processing Plant flow sheet for the Ottawa Site Figure 15.1 Critical infrastructure at the Ottawa Site Figure 15.2 Electrical power lines for the South Ottawa Site Figure 15.3 Possible tailings storage pond locations in plant area Figure 15.4 Possible tailings storage pond locations in the South Ottawa and West Pit areas TABLES Table 6.1 Stratigraphic Column Table 7.1 South Ottawa Pit Exploration Summary Table 12.1 U.S. Silica In-Situ, Mineable Ore Estimate Table 13.1 Pit equipment currently utilized Table 13.2 Projected sales volume and production schedule Table 13.3 Manning table Table 14.1 Main processing equipment used in Ottawa plant Table 18.1 Major capital and expense projects at Ottawa


 
Technical Report Summary Ottawa, Lasalle County, Illinois December 31, 2021 89 ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS ACRONYM DESCRIPTION AMSL Above Mean Sea Level ANFO Ammonium Nitrate and Fuel Oil ANSI Approved American National Standard API American Petroleum Institute CAAPP Clean Air Act Permit Program CSX Class 1 railroad DMR Discharge Monitoring Report EIA Energy Information Administration EPA Environmental Protection Agency EPCM Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management HDPE High Density Polyethylene FT Fett/Foot IDNR Illinois Department of Natural Resources IEMA Illinois Emergency Management Agency IHPA Illinois Historic Preservation Agency IR Illinois Railway, LLC ISO International Organization for Standardization K Thousand M Million Ma Million Years Ago MSL Mean Sea Level NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NYSE New York Stock Exchange QP Qualified Person RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RTZ Rio Tinto Zinc SEC Securities and Exchange Commission SLCA U.S. Silica ticker symbol SME Society for Mining, Metallurgy, & Exploration SPCC Spill Prevention, Controls and Countermeasure TRS Technical Report Summary USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers VSQG Very Small Quantity Generator


 
slca-20211231xex962
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY COLADO SITE LOVELOCK, PERSHING COUNTY, NEVADA Submitted to: U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. Prepared By: Boerne, Texas 830-249-8284 Date: February 11, 2022 Project No. 10711-025-006 -ML-


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Product ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 History of Acquisition ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Mineral Rights ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Location ............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.6 Geology ............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.7 Exploration ........................................................................................................................................ 8 1.8 Testing ............................................................................................................................................... 9 1.9 Mineable Ore Estimate .................................................................................................................... 10 1.10 Mining Methods .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.11 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.12 Permitting ........................................................................................................................................ 12 1.13 Capital & Operating Costs ............................................................................................................... 13 1.14 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Sources ............................................................................................................................................ 14 2.2 Personal Inspection .......................................................................................................................... 14 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Location ........................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Leases/Royalties .............................................................................................................................. 17 3.3 Encumbrances.................................................................................................................................. 18 3.4 Permitting ........................................................................................................................................ 19 4.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE & PHYSIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................ 19 4.1 Topography...................................................................................................................................... 19 4.2 Means of Access .............................................................................................................................. 19 4.3 Climate and Operating Season ........................................................................................................ 21 4.4 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................... 21 5.0 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................................... 21 6.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION AND DEPOSIT ........................................... 22 7.0 EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................................... 26


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 7.1 Exploration ...................................................................................................................................... 26 7.2 Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................................. 30 8.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ....................................................... 30 9.0 DATA VERIFICATION .................................................................................................................. 32 10.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ............................................. 32 11.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES .......................................................................................... 34 12.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES ............................................................................................. 35 12.1 U.S. Silica Methodology ................................................................................................................. 35 12.2 Data Verification Methodology ....................................................................................................... 38 12.3 Process Verification Methodology .................................................................................................. 38 12.4 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 39 12.5 Recoverable Ore Estimates .............................................................................................................. 39 12.6 Cut-Off Grade .................................................................................................................................. 40 13.0 MINING METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 40 13.2 Overburden and Interburden Waste Handling ................................................................................. 46 13.3 Mining Process ................................................................................................................................ 47 13.4 Mine Ore Stockpiles ........................................................................................................................ 48 13.5 Pit Repair and Maintenance ............................................................................................................. 49 13.6 Mine Equipment .............................................................................................................................. 49 13.7 Plant Logistics Equipment ............................................................................................................... 51 13.8 Mine Engineering, Planning, and Production Scheduling ............................................................... 52 14.0 PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS ............................................................................ 58 15.0 INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................................................................... 58 15.1 Roads ............................................................................................................................................... 58 15.2 Energy ............................................................................................................................................. 60 15.3 Water ............................................................................................................................................... 60 15.4 Buildings ......................................................................................................................................... 60 16.0 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS ..................................................................................... 60 16.1 General Marketing Information ...................................................................................................... 60 16.1.1 DE Market ........................................................................................................................... 61 16.2 Material Contracts Required for Production ................................................................................... 62 17.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS ................................................ 62


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 17.1 Federal Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 62 17.2 State Requirements ......................................................................................................................... 64 17.3 Other Requirements ........................................................................................................................ 64 18.0 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS ........................................................................................ 65 18.1 Operating Cost ................................................................................................................................ 65 18.2 Capital Costs ................................................................................................................................... 66 18.3 Assumptions .................................................................................................................................... 67 18.4 Accuracy ......................................................................................................................................... 67 19.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 67 19.1 Operating Costs ............................................................................................................................... 67 19.2 Capital Costs .................................................................................................................................... 68 19.3 Economic Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 68 19.1.4 Sensitivity Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 69 20.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................ 73 21.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION .................................................................. 73 22.0 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................. 73 22.1 Comments on Exploration ............................................................................................................... 73 22.2 Comments on Data Verification ...................................................................................................... 74 22.4 Comments on Recoverable Ore Estimates ...................................................................................... 74 22.5 Comments on Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing ...................................................... 74 22.6 Comments on Mining Methods ....................................................................................................... 74 22.7 Comments on Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 75 22.8 Comments on Permitting ................................................................................................................. 75 23.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................. 75 24.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 76 25.0 RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT ................................ 76


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Technical Report Summary (“TRS”) has been prepared at the request of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (“U.S. Silica”) by Westward Environmental, Inc. (“WESTWARD”) who has conducted an audit of the proven and probable reserves at the Colado mine (“Colado Site”), Pershing County, Nevada mine as of December 31, 2021. The Colado Site as referenced herein includes only the mining area located northwest of Lovelock, NV. The processing plant is not included in this report. This audit was performed in conjunction with the U.S. Silica’s Mine Engineering and Geology staff based on the definitions and disclosure guidelines set forth in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contained in Title 17, Code of Federal Regulation, Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants, Final Rule released October 31, 2018. There are numerous individual pits at the Colado Site that have been mined over the years to various degrees. Not all are actively being mined as of the writing of this report. Only pits that are currently designated with proven or probable reserves equal to, or greater than, 100,000 tons were considered material by U.S. Silica for this report. It must be noted that there are several other pits with proven or probable reserves that were not included in the Recoverable Ore estimates provided in this report. The overall volume of recoverable DE is greater than what is presented herein. The Lovelock Processing Plant is not considered a material asset by U.S. Silica and as a result is not included in this report. All information provided herein pertains strictly to the mine complex where the ore is being extracted. 1.1 Background EP Minerals, LLC (“EPM”), an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Silica, operates four different diatomaceous earth (“DE”) operations. The Colado Site in northwestern Nevada, northwest of the town of Lovelock, is one of these operations. There are two more operations in Nevada, one close to the city of Reno and one close to the city of Fernley, with the fourth facility located in


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 2 Oregon, near the towns of Drewsey and Juntura. All four operations consist of at least one Mining Complex and an associated DE Processing Plant. DE products are used in hundreds of marketing applications by thousands of customers in the global industrial minerals’ marketplace. 1.2 Product DE, also known as Kieselguhr or Diatomite, is a sedimentary mineral with physical properties that are like soil.1 In Nevada, diatomite is the silica skeletons of billions of single-celled algae organisms deposited millions of years ago at the bottom of freshwater lakes. The remains of these single celled organisms create a soft, siliceous material with some unique chemical and physical properties. When dried, DE contains over 80% voids by volume.2 1.3 History of Acquisition In late 1950’s Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. submitted a Plan of Operations to conduct DE mining in the Colado District. Since then, the company has undergone several name and ownership changes: 1. November 1986: Eagle-Picher Industries (Minerals Division) became Eagle-Picher Minerals, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. 2. April 2003: The parent company Eagle-Picher Industries became Eagle Picher, Inc., and Eagle-Picher Minerals, Inc. was renamed Eagle Picher Filtration & Minerals, Inc. 3. March 2006: Eagle Picher Filtration & Minerals, Inc. was renamed EP Minerals, LLC. 4. August 1, 2011: EPM Minerals, LLC was acquired by Golden Gate Capital. 5. May 1, 2018: EPM Minerals, LLC was acquired by U.S. Silica. U.S. Silica’s corporate headquarters are in Katy, Texas and Reno, Nevada (the former EPM headquarters). EPM is a fully owned indirect subsidiary of U.S. Silica and is licensed to operate the Colado Mine and Process Plant. 1 U.S. Silica Internal Report Colado, December 31, 2020. 2 U.S. Silica Internal Report Colado, December 31, 2020.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 3 1.4 Mineral Rights U.S. Silica, through EPM, holds land leases with the Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation, and the United States Federal Government. The land lease with Franco-Nevada is for 3,718 acres and is renewed annually. Additionally, U.S. Silica, through EPM, holds 176 mineral claims on Federal, Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) land. Of the 176 mineral claims, 146 are active and are classified as placer claims. Mineral claims are renewed on an annual basis, with the annual maintenance fee due on or before September 1st. The Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation leases are based on a royalty-type structure that considers the tons of product sold during the lease period and how material used for the product tons sold was mined from each lease area. The leases also include a minimum annual amount, to ensure a minimum annual payment to the landowners. The royalty unit values are adjusted based on the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), a statistical index that is calculated and published annually by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Regarding the Federal land lease, BLM publishes a mining claim fees schedule on an annual basis. The Colado Site permit & claim map below (Figure 1.1) illustrates where the leases are: This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 4 Figure 1.1 U.S. Silica Mine Permit and Claim Map An aerial view of Colado and overall boundaries is provided in Figure 1.2 below:


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 5 Figure 1.2 Colado Mine Complex


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 6 In particular, the Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation lease is based on a $45,000 minimum amount, with an above minimum payment of $0.77 per ton shipped adjusted by an increase in price (current price $5.32 plus 2.5% surcharge).3 For 2021, the maintenance fees for existing mineral claims were set to $165 per claim. The 2021 land lease payments were $242,687.04 for the Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation lease, and $28,380.00 for the BLM lease. Lease and royalty payments for the last-4 years are listed in Table 1.1 below:4 YEAR Franco Nevada BLM 2021 $242,687.04 $28,380 2020 $141,908.87 $28,380 2019 $248,756.27 $28,380 2018 $135,695.31 $26,660 Table 1.1 Lease and royalty payments 1.5 Location The Colado Site is located approximately 19 miles to the northwest of the town of Lovelock, NV, in central-west Pershing County (Figure 1.3). Specifically, active operations are in Sections 16, 20, and 21 in Township 28N Range 29E in Pershing County (Figure 1.1). The mine is accessible solely by a paved road, CR 399 (also known as 7 Troughs Rd.). Due to the mine site’s remote location, there is no official address associated with it (Figure 1.3). 3 U.S. Silica Internal Report dated December 31, 2020. 4 U.S. Silica email date January 2022 from Terry Lackey.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 7 Figure 1.3 Aerial location of the Colado Site and Lovelock Plant 1.6 Geology The Colado Site is in an area known as the Great Basin. A region comprising nearly the entire state of Nevada, western Utah, and small portions of southwest Idaho, southern Oregon, and eastern California. The Great Basin is marked most significantly by crustal extension where large scale basins and ranges predominate, however smaller scale structural features, in the form of grabens, concentrate in and around the variably aged lacustrine sediments.5 5 USGS The Basin and Range Province in Utah, Nevada and California, 1943.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 8 DE sequences are both spatially and temporally related to these grabens and are present throughout the Great Basin ranging in age from 16 to 40 Ma (“million years ago”). Stratigraphic thicknesses of DE present in Colado range from inches to 50 ft. thick and are separated by friable tuffaceous units that are typically light gray in color. Welded and lithic tuff units overlie the DE strata, with Tertiary aged basalts forming capping units that have protected the underlying strata from erosion over millions of years. Bi-modal volcanics form the substrate on which the diatomite sequences reside; these volcanics are rhyolitic, basaltic andesite, and basaltic in composition. 1.7 Exploration Exploration activities in the Colado Site region have been ongoing since the 1960’s, with variable phases incorporating geologic mapping, field sampling, three-dimensional analysis, drilling, and survey techniques. Drilling methods have included rotary, reverse circulation, sonic and diamond core techniques to investigate subsurface geology. Over 600 drill holes have been performed in the region to date6. Locations of drill holes are illustrated in Figure 1.4 below. This section intentionally left blank. 6 U.S. Silica Internal Report dated December 31, 2020.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 9 Figure 1.4 Boring Location Map 1.8 Testing All ore samples from the drilling operations are transferred to the U. S. Silica dry lab located at the Vale Plant in Oregon. Testing in the dry lab is performed by lab technicians under the direction of the lab manager and lab supervisor. Sample drying, preparation and groups of chemical and physical tests are conducted on each of the drill samples.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 10 The primary tests for diatomite ore are determinations of wet bulk density, permeability, and brightness on both natural and muffle burned samples. Post-muffle burn lab tests are conducted by the dry lab technician to determine soluble metal concentrations. A standard group of tests are set as a work instruction for testing of filter aid products of white and pink ore, as well as a group of tests made for natural filler products. Non-routine tests of samples are completed in the research and development lab in Reno, Nevada, and include x-ray fluorescence, used to determine chemical analyses of samples, centrifuge wet density tests, x-ray diffraction mineralogical testing and scanning electron microscope evaluations to determine diatom genus. 1.9 Mineable Ore Estimate The ore volume that is measured in the SURPAC module’s block model is reported in cubic ft. This volume is converted to bank cubic yards (“BCY”). A mining recovery ranging from 75% to 90% is assigned to account for ore losses resulting from extraction of the in-situ deposit to stockpiles located in designated areas of the Colado Site. The mining recovery used for the deposits in the Colado Mine is most commonly 85%. The recoverable ore is converted to a value of stockpile cubic yards (“SCY”) by multiplying the amount of extracted ore by 110% which is a swell factor. This is determined from how the volume of DE increases due to moving the ore with loader and truck from the mine bench to the stockpile area. Next the SCY is converted to a Dry Ore Ton using a factor of 3:1. The Reserve Tons are equal to the Dry Ore Tons and are reported as the Mineable Ore Tons and reported to the SEC in U.S. Silica’s annual reports. Mineable Ore Tons also meet the requirements of having a completed mine plan and obtaining an operational mine permit from the BLM and the State of Nevada Bureau of Regulation and Reclamation (“BMRR”). Reserve estimates present in Table 1.3 show only the reserves at the Colado Site from material pits that are considered proven and probable. Other deposits at the Colado Site that are currently classified as indicated or inferred resources and are not included in this report.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 11 Location Resource Type Recoverable Ore (tons)* Colado Proven 1,100,000 Probable 3,361,000 Total 4,461,000 *Tons rounded down to the nearest 1,000 Table 1.3 U.S. Silica Reserve Estimates 1.10 Mining Methods Colado consists of multiple DE mine properties, four of which are currently active.7 A summary of mine areas is provided in Table 1.2 below. MINE AREA STATUS Horseshoe Basin Active Horseshoe Basin - East Pit Extension Active Horseshoe Basin – South Knob Idle Tarp Stand Idle Antelope Basin Idle Burro Basin Idle Black Butte Idle Atlantis Active Liberty Idle Quivera Active Tunnel Hill Idle Table 1.2 Individual Mine Areas at the Colado Site The mine utilizes conventional open pit mining methods averaging approximately 600,000 cubic yards (“yd3”) of stockpiled DE production yearly, operating about 200 days per year. The mine 7 Terry Lackey email dated February 8, 2022.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 12 has a full production capacity of 3.0 million (“M”) yd3 of DE per year. The quantities of overburden and interburden waste are backfilled into the pit as a part of the mine reclamation plan. Expansion of mining into the additional three properties will proceed as the current pits are depleted. Other than stockpiling the mined ore, no processing of raw DE is performed at Colado. The raw ore is delivered by truck to the U.S. Silica plant northeast of Lovelock, NV approximately 19 miles away. 1.11 Infrastructure The Colado mine is remote with few improved roads and installed mine-related infrastructure. The site is accessible by roads maintained as private roads and by CR 399. Energy is provided primarily by diesel powered equipment with minor amounts provided by solar. Water requirements are primarily for dust suppression and is trucked to Colado from Lovelock. Bottled water is provided for employees. The required infrastructure has generally been provided by the mine operator. The existing infrastructure is adequate for current production levels and for the ramp-up of operations to full capacity. 1.12 Permitting As of the effective date of this report, the U.S. Silica Colado Site has the necessary permits and plans in place to mine the DE deposit as discussed in this report. Please refer to Section 17.0 for further information regarding permitting. A summary of permits/plans is provided in Table 1.4 below. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 13 Item Regulatory Authority Area Covered Status Reclamation Permit NDEP & BLM South Knob Major Mod in Review Best Practice Plan N/A Mines Complete Class II Surface Area Disturbance Permit NDEP Mines Approved Class III Landfill Waiver NDEP Mines Approved Hazardous Materials Permit NSFM Mines Approved Hazardous Materials Permit NSFM Shop Approved Groundwater Use Permit NDWR Plant/Mines Approved Table 1.4 Colado Site permit summary 1.13 Capital & Operating Costs In 2020 and 2021 total operating costs were $38,875,000 and $46,913,000 and total capital costs were $1,731,000 and $2,631,000 respectively (Table 18.1). The higher than average capital spend in 2021 was associated with scheduled maintenance and continuous improvement projects to drive and maintain cost efficiencies. The Colado Site maintains a five-year capital forecast for planned capital expenditures to support current production. A summary of foreseen capital expenditures through 2026 is provided on Table 18.2. As shown on Table 18.2, total estimated capital expenditure through 2026 is $12,075,000. Listed expenditures are based on historic cost data, vendor/contractor quotations, and similar operation comparisons and are within +/-15% level of accuracy. 1.14 Recommendations The primary recommendations of this report include performing third party laboratory testing and consider revising the way recoverable ore tonnage values are reported. Please refer to Section 22.0 Recommendations for additional information.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 14 2.0 INTRODUCTION This TRS has been prepared at the request of U.S. Silica by Westward Environmental, Inc. (“WESTWARD”) who has conducted an audit of the proven and probable reserves present at the Colado Site, Pershing County, Nevada mine as of December 31, 2021. This audit was performed in conjunction with the U.S. Silica’s Mine Engineering and Geology staff and was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 and Item 601(b)(96) of regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. U.S. Silica common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SLCA”. WESTWARD’S third-party reserves audit (Section 11.0 & Section 12.0 of this report), completed on February 11, 2022, presented in this TRS, was prepared for public disclosure by U.S. Silica in filings made with the SEC in accordance with the requirements set forth in the SEC regulations. Any capitalized terms used herein, but not defined herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Item 1300 of Regulation S-K. 2.1 Sources U.S. Silica United States Geological Survey Google Earth Bureau of Land Management Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Nevada Division of Water Resources Nevada State Fire Marshall Nevada Department of Water Resources 2.2 Personal Inspection Michelle M. Lee, PG (TX #6071, SME Registered Member 413034RM) performed a site visit to Colado on May 25, 2021, and September 15, 2021. During these site visits, a tour of pertinent


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 15 parts of the mine was conducted by the plant manager that included each mine area, staging areas, stockpile areas, pit areas, reserve areas, and property perimeter. Although a general walk about of the processing plant area was performed in May, the facility was not toured in depth as plant processing is out of the Qualified Person’s (“QP”) expertise. Furthermore, the processing plant located in Lovelock in not considered by U.S. Silica to be material and is not included in this report. 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 3.1 Location The Colado Site is located about 19 miles northwest of the town of Lovelock, NV, in west central Pershing County (Figure 1.1). Specifically, active operations are in Section 16, Section 20, and Section 21 in Township 28N Range 29E in Pershing County. The mine is accessible by a paved road, the 7 Troughs Rd. (CR 399). Due to the mine site’s remote location, there is no official address associated with it. The Colado Site consists of approximately 10,798+/- acres (Figures 3.1 and 3.2 below) that is a combination of private, state and federal lands as follows: approximately 3,773 acres of owned private land and private leased land, and approximately 7,025-acres of leased Federal land (administered in tandem by the BLM in Winnemucca, NV and NDEP in Carson City, NV. The front entrance to Colado is located at approximately 40.274948, -118.727916.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 16 Figure 3.1 Overall Colado Site Map


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 17 Figure 3.2 Colado Site location relative to processing plant in Lovelock, NV 3.2 Leases/Royalties U.S. Silica holds land leases with the Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation, and the United States Federal Government8. The land lease with Franco-Nevada is for 3,719 acres and is renewed annually. Additionally, U.S. Silica holds 176 mineral claims in BLM land. Of the 176 mineral claims, 146 are active and are classified as placer claims. Mineral claims are renewed on an annual basis, with the annual maintenance fee due on or before September 1st. The Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation leases are based on a royalty-type structure that considers the tons of product sold during the lease period, and how material used for the product tons sold was mined from each lease area. The leases also include a minimum annual amount, to ensure a 8 U. S. Silica Internal Report dated December 31, 2020.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 18 minimum annual payment to the landowners. The royalty unit values are adjusted based on the CPI, a statistical index that is calculated and published annually by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. In particular, the Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation lease is based on a $45,000 minimum amount, with an above minimum payment of $0.77 per ton shipped adjusted by an increase in price (current price $5.32 plus 2.5% surcharge).9 For 2021, the maintenance fees for existing mineral claims were set to $165 per claim. The 2021 land lease payments were $242,687.04 for the Franco-Nevada U.S. Corporation lease, and $28,380.00 for the BLM lease. For the past few years, non-federal lease and royalty payments are listed in Table 3.1 below:10 YEAR Franco Nevada BLM 2021 $242,687.04 $28,380.00 2020 $141,908.87 $28,380.00 2019 $248,756.27 $28,380.00 2018 $135,695.31 $26,660.00 Table 3.1 Colado Site lease and royalty payments U.S. Silica issued a payment of $28,380.00 that was received by the BLM on August 9, 2021, for the 2022 maintenance fees on 146 active mine claims. 3.3 Encumbrances No significant encumbrances exist at the mine site. Topography and the presence of overburden limit the accessibility of the ore in certain areas but there are no known pipelines, easements, jurisdictional areas or other related restrictions to prevent mining at the Colado Site. 9 U.S. Silica Internal Report dated December 31, 2020. 10 Terry Lackey email dated January 24, 2022.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 19 3.4 Permitting State and federal permits are required to mine the DE. Surface disturbance is permitted as needed in accordance with state regulations. Major modifications to the permit are made as needed. As of the writing of this report, U.S. Silica has all the necessary permits in place to mine the DE. Please refer to Section 17.0 for detailed information regarding permitting at the Colado Site. 4.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE & PHYSIOGRAPHY 4.1 Topography The topography at the Colado Site varies significantly. The Site is located in a Basin – Range province region that is marked by abrupt changes in topography. Steep mountains give way to low lying, flat valleys in alternating patterns across the region. Vegetation is sparse due to lack of rainfall in the region. Refer to Figure 13.1. 4.2 Means of Access The Colado Site is located about 19 miles northwest of the town of Lovelock, NV, in west- central Pershing County (Figure 4.1). Specifically, active operations are in Sections 16, 20, and 21 Township 28N Range 29E in Pershing County. The mine is accessible by a paved road CR 399. This is the only means of access to the Colado Site. Due to the mine site’s remote location, there is no official address associated with it. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 20 Figure 4.1 Regional Map of the Colado Mine Area


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 21 4.3 Climate and Operating Season According to the Koppen climate classification system11, the Colado Site is located in an arid climate region. Annual precipitation averages less than 7” annually which meets the definition of a dessert.12 The Colado mine operates year-round with ore mining activity starting in early spring and concluding sometime in the late fall when either sufficient ore has been stockpiled, or when inclement weather makes ore mining too costly or difficult. The April to November time frame provides optimum working conditions; moreover, the dry hot weather aids the natural drying of the ore in the stockpiles. Colder winter months are used for stripping operations and reclamation projects. 4.4 Infrastructure Colado has the necessary infrastructure in place to operate the mine. Solar and diesel power on site operations and water is trucked in from Lovelock, NV. Please refer to Section 15.0 for more information regarding infrastructure. 5.0 HISTORY In the late 1950’s, Eagle-Picher Ind., Inc. submitted a Plan of Operations to conduct DE mining in the Colado District. Since then, the company has undergone several name and ownership changes: 1. November 1986 - Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. (Minerals Division) became Eagle-Picher Minerals Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. 2. April 2003 - The parent company Eagle-Picher Industries became Eagle Picher, Inc., and Eagle-Picher Minerals Inc. was renamed Eagle Picher Filtration & Minerals Inc. 3. March 2006 - Eagle Picher Filtration & Minerals, Inc. was renamed EP Minerals, LLC. 11 Koppen climate classification system – Wikipedia, Köppen climate classification - Wikipedia. 12 Koppen climate classification system – Wikipedia, Köppen climate classification - Wikipedia.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 22 4. August 1, 2011 – EP Minerals, LLC was acquired by Golden Gate Capital. 5. May 1, 2018 – EP Minerals, LLC was acquired by U.S. Silica. U.S. Silica’s corporate headquarters are in Katy, Texas and Reno, Nevada (the former EPM headquarters). EPM is a wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of U.S. Silica and is licensed to operate the Colado Mine and Process Plant. Significant exploration has been undertaken by EPM (and affiliates) prior to the acquisition by U.S. Silica in 2018. Most of the information has been entered into an exploration database from which geologic and reserve models have been built from. U.S. Silica has undertaken an effort to convert the numerous handwritten boring logs into digital format but has not yet completed this task. Records from before 2012 are in the process of being digitized. 6.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION AND DEPOSIT The Colado Site near Lovelock, NV is in the Great Basin, a region comprising nearly the entire state of Nevada, western Utah, and small portions of southwest Idaho, southern Oregon, and eastern California. The Great Basin is marked most significantly by crustal extension where large scale basins and ranges predominate, however smaller scale structural features in the form of grabens concentrate variably aged lacustrine sediments.13 DE sequences are both spatially and temporally related to these grabens and are present throughout the Great Basin ranging in age from 16 to 40 Ma. Stratigraphic thicknesses of DE present in the Colado mine area range from inches to 50 ft. thick and are separated by friable tuffaceous units that are typically light gray in color. Welded and lithic tuff units overlie the DE strata, with Tertiary basalts forming capping units that have protected the underlying strata from erosion for millions of years. Bi-modal volcanics form the substrate on which the diatomite 13 USGS The Basin and Range Province in Utah, Nevada and California, 1943.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 23 sequences reside; these volcanics are rhyolitic, basaltic andesite, and basaltic in composition.14 A general stratigraphic column of the region is provided in Figure 6.1 below. 14 USGS The Basin and Range Province in Utah, Nevada and California, 1943.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 24 Figure 6.1 General Stratigraphic Column of the Colado Mine Complex


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 25 Figures 6.2 and 6.3 illustrate some of the geology in the pit highwalls at Colado. Figure 6.2 View to the north from the Atlantis Pit. Figure 6.3 View to the southwest from the Quivera Pit


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 26 7.0 EXPLORATION 7.1 Exploration As shown in Figures 7.1 and 7.2 below, to date more than 600 borings have been drilled at the Colado Site.15 Figure 7.1 Boring Location Map I Colado Site 15 U.S. Silica Internal Report 2020.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 27


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 28 Based on discussions with U.S. Silica16, drilling was performed using sonic, air rotary and coring methods. The predominant method was air rotary as it was the most cost effective to determine thicknesses of the DE across the multiple pit areas. Sonic drilling resulted in very poor recoveries as the material was either pulverized or too broken up to retain. Coring was used much less frequently, due to cost, and only in instances when specialized testing was required or a sample was needed for future reference. Drilling recovery information was not available for review. The predominant drilling method is air rotary. This method breaks up the material into chips and uses air to blow the chips back to the surface. Sample recovery cannot reasonably be measured using this method. Based on the QP’s experience with this drilling method, overall homogeneous geologic nature of the DE, the lack of this information does not materially affect the accuracy and reliability of the exploration results reviewed. Once the DE is extracted, it is spread out and stockpiled in a designated area to dry out. The DE is not separated at Colado based on grade but only by location. The DE is loaded into trucks and transported to the processing plant located in Lovelock approximately 19 miles away. Any separation due to quality occurs at the processing plant and not at Colado. Geologic mapping and outcrop sampling were made on a district scale using exposures within each of the mine areas and areas peripheral to the mine pits. The variable physical and chemical character of the field samples were lab tested and the locations of DE grade quality DE confirmed through additional field sample collection and follow up lab test work. Mapping and drilling have identified distinct deposits of DE stratigraphic sequences. DE in these deposits is of variable thicknesses up to 50 ft. thick. A cross section representing a typical diatomite section in the Colado Mine area is shown in Figure 7.3, and the location of this cross section is shown in Figure 7.4 below. 16 Ryan Bresnahan meeting, May 24, 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 29 Figure 7.3 Horseshoe Basin cross section location map Figure 7.4 Cross section of DE intervals from the Horseshoe Basin pit - south is on the left of the illustration


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 30 Some very limited trenching was performed in the prospecting stage to identify potential DE at the surface on certain claims. However, samples were not collected from these trenches. The DE is deposited as a dried-up lake in relatively homogeneous structural deposits. Post depositional events such as extreme faulting, that is associated with being in a Basin and Range Province geological setting, have moved the blocks of DE from their original position. The DE has remained intact as a lacustrine deposit that is evident in the white colored nature of the DE. Other materials, such as volcanic ash and basalt, are distinctly different in physical nature and color that the DE is easily recognizable in drill cuttings. This is why using a rotary drill to do exploration is acceptable for determining interval thicknesses. 7.2 Hydrogeology There are no natural surface water features at, or near, the Colado Site. There are no water wells at the Colado Site. Water used for mine activities/dust suppression is derived from municipal water wells near Lovelock and is trucked to the mine site. A desktop hydrogeological study was performed by Hydro Resources Aquifer Imaging Group (“Hydro”) in 2012 to conduct a groundwater-availability study in order to provide background information needed to optimize the design of a geophysical aquifer-imaging survey with the Aqua Gem system on the Lovelock mine property. Hydro conducted a two-township water well search in the mine area which did not reveal any publicly available water well records in the NDWR database. Hydro proposed several geophysical testing transects across the Colado Site around known fault lines in order to locate an optimal location for a proposed groundwater well. The study was not performed. There has been no analysis or testing of groundwater performed at the Colado Site. 8.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY No documentation showing sample collection or security measure undertaken for transport was available at the time of this report. Based on review of the U.S. Silica Internal Laboratory


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 31 procedure documents17, all ore samples from the drilling operations are transferred to the dry lab located at the Vale Plant in Oregon. Testing in the dry lab is performed by lab technicians under the direction of the lab manager and lab supervisor. Sample drying, preparation and groups of chemical and physical tests are conducted on each of the submitted samples. The primary tests for diatomite ore are determinations of wet bulk density, permeability, and brightness on both natural and muffle burned samples. Post-muffle burn lab tests are conducted by the dry lab technician to determine soluble metal concentrations. A standard group of tests are set as a work instruction for testing of filter aid products of white and pink ore, as well as a group of tests made for natural filler products. Non-routine tests of samples are completed in the research and development lab in Reno, Nevada. Such non-routine tests include x-ray fluorescence, used to determine chemical analyses of samples, centrifuge wet density tests, x-ray diffraction mineralogical testing and scanning electron microscope evaluations to determine diatom genus. U.S. Silica does have numerous written laboratory procedures in place that adhere to International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”) 9001 / Quality System criteria. Other protocols reviewed as part of this report include the U.S. Silica Company ISO 9001 / Quality System – Process Washing: CAP605 (“corporate analytical procedure”) and the U.S. Silica Company ISO 9001 / Quality System – Attrition Scrubbing documents. Both documents were signed by David Weller, Technology Director, ISP in 2016 and distributed internally. These documents detail the change history, scope, safety, equipment, and procedure instructions for each test. Written statements from U.S. Silica indicate that the internal labs follow all protocols discussed here.18 Based on the QP review, there is sufficient data in the documents reviewed to show laboratory procedures are adequate. There is no documentation of sample transport and/or 17 Lab procedures provide by U.S. Silica. 18 Terry Lackey email dated 9.24.21.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 32 security measures taken for sample delivery. It is recommended that procedures be drafted to address this task. It is also recommended that U.S. Silica develop a third-party laboratory testing program to validate in house testing procedures and results. 9.0 DATA VERIFICATION Only exploration samples are tested at the Colado Site for basic mineralogical parameters. Since the DE is made into numerous different finished products, each individual customer has internal quality requirements and quality control/quality assurance (“QA/QC”) methods to verify the quality of the finished product. Available laboratory reports were reviewed for content. The reports showed the concentrations of up to 60 individual minerals/compounds that were selected for analysis. However, not every sample was tested for the same parameters. The primary testing parameter used is mineralogy. The mineralogical makeup of finished DE products varies significantly from customer to customer which is market driven. The purity of the DE varies slightly from one pit to another with the Atlantis pit having the highest level of purity according to U.S. Silica. Please refer to Section 12.2 Data Verification Methodology and Section 12.3 Process Verification below for further detail. 10.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING The DE is extracted from the ground at the placed into stockpiles to dry. A stockpile may be worked on occasion to turn over the ore to enhance drying. Moisture content testing is performed routinely until the DE reaches a certain level of dryness before it is transported to the processing plant. The DE is then loaded into trucks and transported approximately 19 miles to the processing plant located in Lovelock. NV. No other processing or testing is performed at the mine.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 33 All testing is performed internally at U.S. Silica labs. Testing is only performed on the samples collected during exploration. Basic mineralogical testing is adequate for the samples collected during exploration. Since the DE is used to make multiple finished products for numerous different customers, it is not reasonable to conduct other testing at the exploration stage. The results of the testing performed do not include material that has been processed at the plant in Lovelock. Only the raw ore is extracted at the Colado Site. Table 10.1 shows partial results from a sample collected from the exploration performed at the Atlantis pit. The actual table is too large to fit into this report format. The selection of results presented below shows the results of 18 of the 26 individual parameters noted in the spreadsheet. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 34 Table 10.1 Partial mineralogy test results from samples collected during exploration performed at the Atlantis pit. 11.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES Based on information provided by U.S. Silica, the reserves being reported are only for the mine areas that have a probable or proven reserves. Areas with material that is currently indicated or inferred are not addressed in this report. This section is not applicable. Hole ID Sampl e ID_B From To Moist ure GCOA % CWD (lb/ft (Y) Asse mblag L* a* b* blue SiO2 (%) Al2O3 (%) CaO (%) MgO (%) Na2O (%) K2O (%) Fe2O3 (%) MnO (%) TiO2 (%) P2O5 (%) Cr2O3 (%) LOI (%) Sum (%) Sb (PPM) As (PPM) Ba (PPM) Cu (PPM) ATL1407A 1 216 220 1.5 128 30.1 79.34 91.39 0.4 3.63 74.92 91.85 2.88 0.43 0.41 0.2 0.13 0.96 0.01 0.11 0.02 0.001 3 100 7 2 121 11 ATL1303 10 125 130 1.6 143 24 79.87 91.63 0.04 5.15 73.55 91.36 3.04 0.52 0.36 0.26 0.24 1.19 0.02 0.11 0.03 0.001 2.79 100 33 1.5 163 10 ATL1303 11 130 135 1.4 141 26 83.81 93.37 0.06 4.67 77.9 93.3 2.03 0.34 0.22 0.24 0.16 0.69 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.001 2.82 100 14 1.5 129 8 ATL1303 12 135 140 1.9 125 26 76.32 90.01 0.14 7.53 67.4 87.25 4.65 0.76 0.52 0.31 0.26 2.52 0.02 0.24 0.03 0.001 3.35 100 37 9 166 12 ATL1303 1 61 65 1.5 169 22.7 81.64 92.42 0.16 6.05 74.12 93.39 1.87 0.44 0.22 0.29 0.21 0.88 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.001 2.49 100 23 1.5 151 11 ATL1303 2 65 70 1.6 156 23.1 83.3 93.15 -0.09 5.25 76.68 92.45 2.24 0.65 0.28 0.29 0.2 1.07 0.02 0.11 0.04 0.001 2.53 100 21 2 152 11 ATL1303 3 70 75 1.5 177 21.9 85.76 94.21 -0.04 4.39 80.12 94.96 1.33 0.33 0.19 0.18 0.09 0.5 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.001 2.23 100 1.5 1.5 131 7 ATL1303 4 75 80 1.5 171 22.3 83.27 93.13 -0.18 5.79 75.97 92.92 2.08 0.51 0.31 0.26 0.2 1.03 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.001 2.48 100 23 1.5 150 7 ATL1303 5 80 85 1.6 180 20.5 81.88 92.52 -0.26 5.64 74.84 92.99 1.93 0.5 0.32 0.22 0.14 1.14 0.03 0.06 0.02 0.001 2.54 100 8 1.5 140 14 ATL1303 6 105 110 1.6 143 23.6 81.36 92.29 -0.2 5.27 74.82 91.54 2.53 0.77 0.27 0.34 0.34 1.06 0.02 0.09 0.11 0.001 2.85 100 54 1.5 177 10 ATL1303 7 110 115 1.4 153 23.1 82.24 92.68 -0.08 4.89 76.12 92.32 2.45 0.52 0.26 0.29 0.23 0.79 0.02 0.09 0.03 0.001 2.9 100 31 1.5 160 9 ATL1303 8 115 120 1.4 156 23.1 84.21 93.54 -0.08 4.12 78.97 92.86 2.28 0.39 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.61 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.001 2.86 100 41 1.5 166 7 ATL1303 9 120 125 1.6 126 26.6 79.02 91.24 -0.26 5.06 72.85 88.69 4.06 0.71 0.47 0.37 0.45 1.65 0.02 0.14 0.04 0.001 3.27 100 74 4 201 12 ATL1306 17 95 100 1.9 154 19.5 76.72 90.19 0.3 9.97 64.98 87.43 3.51 0.71 0.4 0.31 0.24 2.31 0.03 0.2 0.03 0.001 4.75 100 36 31 149 13 ATL1306 18 100 105 2.8 143 25.5 77.01 90.32 0.25 8.22 67.24 84.5 4.75 1.08 0.58 0.38 0.28 2.85 0.03 0.22 0.1 0.001 5.16 100 43 12 148 13 ATL1308 1 25 30 1.8 177 29.7 85.77 94.21 -0.43 5.55 78.62 91.82 2.09 0.7 0.31 0.2 0.11 1.08 0.01 0.08 0.02 0.002 3.47 100 6 1.5 127 11 ATL1308 2 30 35 2.7 138 24.5 79.47 91.45 -0.53 6.12 71.99 84.34 5.22 1.1 0.84 0.43 0.38 2.36 0.04 0.18 0.04 0.003 5.1 100 65 3 207 15 ATL1308 3 35 40 1.9 190 19.8 83.6 93.28 -0.34 5.03 77.23 91.43 2.36 0.56 0.36 0.19 0.14 1.14 0.01 0.09 0.03 0.002 3.7 100 10 2 130 7 ATL1308 7 55 60 4.4 110 27.1 70.45 87.21 0.31 9.26 60.14 81.61 6.24 1.25 0.92 0.39 0.27 3.49 0.02 0.26 0.06 0.005 5.5 100 40 7 159 14 ATL1308 8 60 65 3.4 91 29.7 72.78 88.34 0.19 7.88 63.75 77.26 8.19 1.99 1.01 0.62 0.37 3.25 0.02 0.44 0.06 0.003 6.87 100 46 8 180 17 ATL1308 9 110 115 3 54 37.8 63.63 83.77 0.76 7.67 55.61 84.05 5.3 1.21 0.75 0.35 0.23 2.31 0.02 0.22 0.09 0.01 5.31 100 21 6 145 16


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 35 12.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES 12.1 U.S. Silica Methodology Reserves are that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Proven Reserves, also referred to as Measured Mineral Resources, are that part of mineral resource for which both overall and local tonnages, densities, shapes, physical characteristics, grades and mineral contents can be estimated with high level of confidence. It is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops trenches, pits, working and drill holes. The locations are spaced closely enough to confirm geologic and grade continuity. The term “overall” means within that part of the deposit for which measured, indicated and inferred mineral resources are reported. The term “local” means within selected parts of the deposit related to mining increments which are suitable for development of detailed mine plans and financial analyses. Probable Reserves, also referred to as Indicated Mineral Resource, are that part of the mineral resources that only overall (and not local) tonnages, densities, shapes, physical characteristics, grades and mineral contents can be estimated with high level of confidence. Also, they are not based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information, and the locations are too widely or inappropriately spaced to confirm geological continuity but are spaced closely enough for continuity to be estimated. In other words, a probable mineral reserve has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a proven reserve. Reserves for the Colado Mine are estimated using SURPAC mine software and routine block modeling methods. The drill log information and analytical lab data are used to construct three dimensional models to constrain volumetric calculations and estimates of Recoverable ore reserves.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 36 Drill hole data is extracted from a Geosequel database and is examined for quality purposes. The data checks include ensuring correct drill collar coordinates and correct drill hole azimuth and dip record. The physical and chemical data sets are each reviewed for values that do not appear reasonable. If a discrepancy is noted, it is resolved by consulting the plant laboratory and the data set is corrected. A judgment call is made whether to isolate and ignore suspect data from historic, pre-2010 records. Three dimensional geologic solid models are created using Leapfrog software and the lithologic data contained in the drill hole database. The solid models generated for a deposit include at least one diatomite ore solid but may contain as many as four or more solid layers for diatomite ore. Geologic solid models are also constructed for ash seams interbedded in a diatomite ore deposit ash, soil and alluvium that occurs as waste overburden, and volcanic units that form the bottom of the ore zones. Assay data is composited as 5 ft. sample lengths constrained within the ore solids. Composite grades are assigned as length weighted values. As a conservative model step, grade estimations include all sample values, and no high values are capped. Use of a cap to treat an anomalous high value would result in an inappropriate downgrading of the high value to be used in the estimation. Lab values reported as below a detection limit are set as a value as one-half of the detection limit value. There are no cases where the reported lab values exceed an upper detection limit. The block dimensions are routinely assigned as 25 ft. (x) by 25 ft. (y) by 5 ft. (z) as the smallest minable unit (“SMU”) for the individual deposit. A search ellipse orientation is selected based on the strike and dip of the stratigraphic sequence determined from geologic mapping or is interpreted using cross sections of the diatomite deposit. The search ellipse uses a 10:10:1 anisotropy as the major: semi-major: minor ellipse axes respectively in order to honor the layered character of the deposits formed in the lacustrine depositional environment.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 37 An ore model block is considered as Proven if it is contained in a 200 ft. search ellipse and an ore model block is considered as Probable if it is contained within a 400 ft. search ellipse. The 200 ft. and 400 ft. search distances are used because a close agreement is demonstrated between estimated in-situ ore quality and the grade quality of mined ore production as determined in stockpile sampling evaluations reported as certificate of analysis. An ore model block is further required to have at least five composite grade values within the 200 ft. search ellipse to be designated as Proven and an ore model block is further required to have at least three composite grade values within the 400 ft. search ellipse to be designated as Probable. In all cases the maximum number of eight samples are used to estimate a block grade. The block model grade estimations use an inverse distance cubed (“ID3”) interpolation method. Sets of block grade estimation using nearest neighbor, varying powers of inverse distance, and ordinary kriging methods were evaluated in a block model validation study. The ID3 interpolation was selected because this produced the most reasonable result for block model estimation in the validation study. The ID3 block models are validated by a combination of comparing block statistics with composite drill hole grade statistics and comparing graphical, cross sectional, displays of estimated block grades with composite drill hole grade values. The ore volume that is measured in the SURPAC module’s block model is reported in cubic ft. This volume is converted to BCY. A mining recovery ranging from 75% to 90% is assigned to account for ore losses resulting from mining transitions from waste to ore and ore to waste horizons. The mining recovery used for the deposits in the Colado Mine is most commonly 85%. The recoverable ore is calculated by multiplying the in-situ ore volume by the recoverable ore factor. The recoverable ore is converted to a value of SCY by multiplying by 110% (swell factor) determined as the volume increases due to moving the ore with loader and truck from the mine bench to the stockpile. Next the SCY is converted to a Dry Ore Ton using a factor of 3:1. The Reserve Tons are equal to the Dry Ore Tons and are reported as the Recoverable Ore Tons and reported to the SEC in U.S.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 38 Silica’s annual reports. Recoverable Ore Tons also meet the requirements of having a completed mine plan and obtaining an operational mine permit from the BLM and the BMRR. WESTWARD utilized two approaches in confirming U.S. Silica’s internal Colado Site reserve estimates: data verification and process verification. The purpose of data verification was to address whether data incorporated in the U.S. Silica’s models was supported by documentation and that the model inputs matched those documents. The purpose of process verification was to address whether U. S. Silica’s results could be replicated using identical data sets. 12.2 Data Verification Methodology WESTWARD coordinated with U.S. Silica personnel to compile copies of all available exploratory field logs, gradational test results and a database of the geologic model inputs. Once compiled a spreadsheet was developed including a list of all exploratory boings from the model, their locations, elevations, and exploration depths. If supporting documentation was available, it was indicated on the spreadsheet next to the associated boring. To address whether model inputs matched supporting documentation, field logs were checked against lithological inputs to the Atlantis deposit model. At least 30% of modeled borings were checked against field logs. 12.3 Process Verification Methodology Westward developed an independent geologic model of the Atlantis deposit from the provided U.S. Silica data inputs, setbacks, and mining assumptions. RockWorks21 modeling software was used to develop the independent model with the Inverse Distance Weighting algorithm and a 40x40x1 ft. model resolution. Volumetric estimates of in-situ raw material for each mine block were extracted from the model. Reductions were made for reported production based on the provided topo date resulting in a bank cubic yard volume of ore. This value was compared against U.S. Silica estimates.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 39 12.4 Results During the data verification process, WESTWARD determined that supporting documentation was not available for every boring incorporated into the U.S. Silica geologic models. This is primarily due to the vintage of some of the drilling performed by EP Minerals prior to being purchased by U.S. Silica. Handwritten logs were not converted into electronic documents. Furthermore, most areas with missing logs are considered inferred or indicated and are not included in the reserve estimate presented in this report. Where performed, WESTWARD’S process verification resulted in a less than four percent difference between the U. S. Silica and WESTWARD bank cubic yard ore estimates. This is acceptable. 12.5 Recoverable Ore Estimates There are numerous individual pits at the Colado Site that have been mined over the years to various degrees. Not all are actively being mined as of the writing of this report. Only pits that are currently designated with proven or probable reserves equal to, or greater than, 100,000 tons were considered material by U.S. Silica for this report. It must be noted that there are several other pits with proven or probable reserves that were not included in the Recoverable Ore Estimates provided in this report. The overall volume of recoverable DE is higher than what is presented herein. As of December 31, 2021, the mineral reserves of the Colado Site are reported as follows: Location Resource Type Recoverable Ore (tons)* Colado Proven 1,100,000 Probable 3,361,000 Total 4,461,000 *Tons rounded down to the nearest 1,000 Table 12.1 U.S. Silica Recoverable Ore Estimates


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 40 12.6 Cut-Off Grade Cut-Off grade is the minimum grade required for a mineral or metal to be economically mined (or processed). Material found to be above this grade is considered to be ore, while material below this grade is considered to be waste. Exploration and testing are performed to determine where the mineable/saleable material is located. Only areas that meet the criteria for being economic are mined. At the Colado Site, material is considered to be economically mineable when the cost to extract, process and then sell the material results in a profit. The mineable material is defined in individual mine blocks that are created based on exploration results. Only blocks with economic deposits of DE are modeled. One commodity is mined at the Colado Site, DE. The end use of the DE is multiple products based on individual customer needs. As a result, the DE is sold by the ton regardless of the finished product type. Please refer to Section 19.0 Economic Analysis for pricing information. 13.0 MINING METHODS U.S. Silica mines DE approximately 19 miles northwest of the town of Lovelock, Nevada. This complex is known as the Colado Site and provides raw DE ore to the U.S. Silica processing plant located in Lovelock, Nevada which is approximately 19 miles to the southeast. The Colado encompasses approximately 1,456 acres of a total of approximately 7,025 acres of land U.S. Silica has under lease. Figure 1.1 in Section 1.0 Executive Summary, shows the Colado boundaries, and the mining locations identified by U.S. Silica. The thicknesses of economically viable DE deposits in the Colado mine area range from a few inches to 50 ft. These mining horizons are separated by a waste product called tuff.19 Tuff is a 19 Tuff is a common name of a pyroclastic rock made up of volcanic ash which was ejected from a volcano, likely through a vent or hole in the side of the volcano. (https://geology.com/rocks/tuff.shtml and https://www.mindat.org/min-48591.html).


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 41 common material in the basin and range geologic setting in Pershing County, NV.20 Tuff varies in thickness depending on its distance from the volcanic vent. In addition to the interbedded21 tuff material and basalt,22 layers may overlay the other deposits. If present, this basalt layer and any overlying organics and dirt (all called overburden) must be removed before mining the DE. Colado is in topography known as basin and range. The surface is a mix of gentle undulating landforms to small scale uplifts forming small cliffs. From a mining standpoint, this type of surface irregularity does not provide unwieldy difficulty. Figure 13.1 shows the typical topography at the Colado Site. The DE mining horizons at Colado are relatively shallow and are moderately dipping.23 These traits favor surface mining by conventional methods. Where the DE is relatively friable,24 it is considered mineable. The friability of the deposit, a limited amount of overburden, and the relatively shallow dip of the deposit are the characteristics which designate the deposit as mineable. This section intentionally left blank. 20 “Geologic units in Pershing County, Nevada, “USGS, https://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/fips- unit.php?code=f32027. 21 Interbedded implies the mineral may occur between other units of the geologic column; when mined it is called “interburden.” 22 Basalt is a fine-grained igneous rock that is the most common rock under the earth’s surface which usually forms as a flow of molten rock (https://geology.com/rocks/basalt.shtml). 23 Dipping refers to a deposit that is not horizontal and the plane of the deposit is inclined to the horizontal plane. 24 Friable is “a rock or mineral that crumbles naturally or is easily broken, pulverized, or reduced to powder, … ;“ Illinois State Geological Survey, https://isgs.illinois.edu/outreach/geology-resources/friable.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 42 Figure 13.1 Typical rolling landform and vegetation at Colado There are eight open pit mining locations at Colado. These pits are named Atlantis, Horseshoe Basin, Quivera, Antelope Basin, Tunnel Hill, Burro Basin, Black Butte, and Liberty (Figure 13.2).25 Currently, active mining is occurring in only two of these pits Atlantis and Horseshoe Basin-Quivera. Figure 13.3 shows the arrangement of these production areas. Colado operates under a 2001 Plan,26 which provided approval for disturbance and operation on 968.7 acres. In 2018, an “as built”27 reconciliation was performed to determine the extent of unauthorized disturbance. The amount of surface disturbance was found to be 1,372.9 acres, exceeding the permitted acreage by some 404.2 acres. The BLM and the State of Nevada allowed the bond to be increased to account for the additional disturbance.28 In October 2021, a Minor Modification 25 Email from Terry Lackey from December 2, 2021, on geotechnical. 26 The term “2001 Plan” is used here without specificity to represent the Plan of Operations and permits required by the Bureau of Land Management and the State of Nevada in place to allow ongoing operations of Colado in 2001. 27 The term “as-built” refers to a revision of the plan based on the essential completion of initial construction parameters and the actual surface disturbance of the project upon the on-set of operations. 28 EP Minerals, LLC Colado Mine Project, Mine Plan of Operations, NVN-065329/ Nevada Reclamation Permit No. 0182, Major Modification submittal of November 2021, EM Strategies for EP Minerals, LLC.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 43 for 55 acres was approved by the State for additional surface disturbance on private lands in the new South Knob (Horseshoe Basin) mine area. Figure 13.2 Colado Layout


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 44 Figure 13.3 Current mining areas at Colado. The mine capacity is 3.0 MM yd3 of stockpiled DE ore. The average annual production for the last five years has been approximately 600 K yd3 of stockpiled DE. The daily rate of mining is approximately 15.0 K yd3 or 4,839 tons per day. Colado schedules mining approximately 200


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 45 days per year.29 Figure 13.4 shows a typical cross section of the various benches at Colado. The DE deposit is the light-tan-colored lenticular deposits in the benches. Individual pits will vary. Figure 13.4 Typical cross section of different mining benches Mining has been ongoing at Colado since 1986. U.S. Silica acquired the right to mine in May of 2018 with the acquisition of EPM. No site visit was made by the mining QP. The information presented in this section is based on a review of previous technical reports available for the Colado Site, discussions with U.S. Silica’s team and site photos from the WESTWARD site visits. Opinions herein are based on those reports provided to the QP by U.S. Silica, literature search of available information, and interviews of available U.S. Silica personnel. 29 Email from Terry Lackey of November 14, 2021, on equipment and capacity.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 46 13.2 Overburden and Interburden Waste Handling The vegetation on the future mining areas on the Colado property is classified as either “Salt Desert Scrub” or “Sagebrush Steppe.”30 This type of vegetation is sparse and relatively easily cleared. The typical vegetative cover and basalt overburden is shown in Figure 13.5. The practice at Colado is to remove the organic material and brush as part of the basalt overburden removal process. Organic soils are nonexistent to less than 1 ft. across the property. Drilling and experience have shown the anticipated depth of the overburden will remain in the range where U.S. Silica believes the organic and other deleterious materials can be removed in this manner throughout the life of the mine.31 Figure 13.5 Typical vegetative scrub and basalt cap rock in the overburden overlying the mining horizon at Colado. The basalt overburden and the tuff interburden are waste products produced as U.S. Silica removes the DE ore. The quantity of waste material moved is dependent upon the local lithology and the quantity of DE needed for the raw DE stockpile. The waste is mined separately from the 30“An annotated checklist of the bryophytes of Nevada, with notes on collecting history in the state,” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228360582_An_annotated_checklist_of_the_bryophytes_of_Nevada_with _notes_on_collecting_history_in_the_state. 31 Email from Terry Lackey of December 2, 2021, email from Terry Lackey on geotechnical.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 47 ore by conventional open pit methods using excavators and other conventional mining equipment. Blasting may be required to fragment the basalt cap rock and the less friable tuff interburden from time to time.32 Drilling and blasting are performed by a contractor.33 The tuff interburden layers between the primary ore strata are mined in 15-to-20-ft. benches. Colder winter months are reserved for overburden removal operations and reclamation projects.34 The tuff waste and other non-basaltic waste are subject to erosion from wind and water. In July of 2021, Golder Associates Inc. (“Golder”) authored a report35 addressing the construction of certain waste dumps in a manner which complies with the objectives set forth in the Modified Plan of Operation, submitted by U.S. Silica in November of 2020. The Modified Plan of Operation and subsequent Golder report requires segregation of the waste so the basalt overburden can be used to cap the erodible interburden material in a manner which protects the waste materials from wind and water erosion and establishes vegetation appropriate for the life zone of the surrounding area. In their report Golder developed mining and blasting recommendations for the basalt to provide the synergistic use of the material for reclamation purposes. U.S. Silica has a procedure in place to mine, segregate, and place the waste materials in a manner consistent with industry best practices and the Golder July 2021 report. This procedure is part of their November 2, 2021, Major Modification submission.36 The QP believes the plan in place to handle the overburden and interburden is a best practice. 13.3 Mining Process Mine engineering design factors, and current operational practices are critical in defining mine- bench parameters. The objective is an ultimate overall 45‐degree highwall slope with substantial 32 Terry Lackey email of November 11, 2021, on face heights. 33 IT Service Desk - RE_ SK1300 - Mine Info.msg, email of September 21, 2021, from Joe Petersen. 34 Internal U.S. Silica document, “Reserve Report: Colado Complex – Lovelock, NV,” 200714 - Colado Mine NV - FINAL - USS Internal Reserve Report. 35 “Basalt Overburden Closure Cover Evaluation, U.S. Silica Colado Mine,” Golder Associates Inc., July 8, 2021. 36 Email from Terry Lackey of December 2, 2021, on geotechnical.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 48 safety benches. This is the standard design constraint used on all current and active U.S. Silica mine designs. Each pit has its own local geologic characteristics. The DE bench heights are reported to be between 20 and 25 ft.37 depending on the pit and the location within a given pit. U.S. Silica reports the constraining factors for bench height are mining equipment limitations and engineering design controlled by the rock mechanics.38 Excavation depth, for the benches in the diatomaceous earth, is limited to approximately 10 ft. due to the limitations of the tracked excavator. Two passes on each bench are required to mine the total height of the bench. No blasting is required due to the friable nature of the DE deposit. Once exposed by removal of overburden and interburden waste rock, the DE is loaded into articulating haul trucks by a tracked excavator. Using haul roads within the mine, the haul trucks move the DE ore to raw ore stockpiles near the pit. The Colado Site operates year-round with ore mining activity starting in early spring and concluding sometime in the late fall when either sufficient ore has been stockpiled, or when inclement weather makes ore mining too costly or difficult. The April to November timeframe provides optimum working conditions. Dry hot weather aids the natural drying of the ore in the stockpiles.39 13.4 Mine Ore Stockpiles While the mining at Colado is seasonal and the processing plant operates year-around to meet market demand. As a result, a large stockpile of raw DE is required to act as a buffer for processing-plant feed when the mine is not operating. Stockpile areas are constructed with appropriate drainage for storm water runoff. 37 Email from Terry Lackey of December 2, 2021, relative operational practices. 38 Email from Terry Lackey of December 2, 2021, relative operational practices. 39 Internal U.S. SILICA document, “Reserve Report: Colado Complex – Lovelock, NV,” 200714 - Colado Mine NV - FINAL - USS Internal Reserve Report.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 49 Mined ore is placed in one of several stockpiles based upon the grade of the ore and the current needs of the plant. Stockpiles of ore are constructed in the vicinity of the pit where the ore was mined to maximize the utilization of the mining haul trucks. The most efficient logistics, from the mine stockpiles to the processing plant northeast of Lovelock, NV is by standard over-the- road semi-tractor trailer haul trucks. The semi-truck hauling from the pit stockpile to the processing plant operates 365 days per year and 24 hours per day. The location of the processing plant, relative to the mine sites, is shown in Figure 3.2, northeast of Lovelock along Interstate 80. One-way haul from the mine stockpile to the processing plant ranges between 20 and 30 miles. 13.5 Pit Repair and Maintenance The loading and hauling are performed on a contract basis and, therefore, the mobile equipment repair and maintenance is handled by a contractor. The costs thereof are part of the fee paid by U.S. Silica during the duration of the contract period. 13.6 Mine Equipment The mine uses hydraulic excavators as the primary loading equipment in the pit. Hauling is performed by articulating haul trucks with approximately 40-ton capacity. Miscellaneous mining and support equipment include dozers, motor grader, water truck, service trucks, etc. The equipment is largely owned by U.S. Silica with a few pieces leased. The buy versus lease decision is a financial one and made at the time of acquisition of a piece of capital equipment. The mobile equipment used for mining is shown in Table 13.1. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 50 Table 13.1 Mining equipment currently employed by U.S. Silica at the Colado mine.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 51 13.7 Plant Logistics Equipment Stockpiled raw DE ore is moved from the mine pit location to the plant northeast of Lovelock, NV using semi tractors and trailers. This equipment is owned by U.S. Silica. The buy versus lease decision is a financial one and made at the time of acquisition of a piece of capital equipment. The mobile equipment used for stockpiled material transport is shown in Table 13.2. Table 13.2 Mobile equipment used for stockpile material transport. Manufacturer Type Year Owned/ Leased Peterbilt Semi Tractor 1996 Owned Peterbilt Semi Tractor 2001 Owned Peterbilt Semi Tractor 2012 Owned Peterbilt Semi Tractor 2015 Owned Peterbilt Semi Tractor 2015 Owned Peterbilt Semi Tractor 2020 Owned Peterbilt Semi Tractor 2020 Owned International Semi Tractor 2001 Owned Peterbilt Semi Tractor 1996 Owned Kenworth Semi Tractor 1994 Owned N/A Water Truck 1975 Owned Star Semi Trailer 2008 Owned Star Semi Trailer 2009 Owned Star Semi Trailer 2009 Owned Star Semi Trailer 2011 Owned Star Semi Trailer 2011 Owned Star Semi Trailer 2011 Owned Star Semi Trailer 2011 Owned Trinity Eagle Bridge Trailer 2020 Owned Trinity Eagle Bridge Trailer 2020 Owned


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 52 13.8 Mine Engineering, Planning, and Production Scheduling The Colado Site reserves are mined by open pit methods. The operations require engineering design and monitoring for various aspects of the mining process (mine engineering). This engineering work includes, but is not limited to, rock mechanics, mine planning, environmental, safety, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, civil engineering, etc. U.S. Silica either employs personnel responsible for these disciplines or U.S. Silica hires consulting experts to assist with the engineering needs at the mine. A review of the mine planning and mine engineering activities demonstrates U.S. Silica exercises industry standard practices in its approach to mine engineering. In that review, the QP looked at limited examples of operational matters and the corresponding engineering and operational responses.40,41 The QP is satisfied U.S. Silica generates a practical response, implements the necessary material actions, and exercises reasonable care to meet the standards of industry standard practices in such matters. U.S. Silica submitted a “Modification to Plan of Operations NVN-065329/Nevada Reclamation Permit (“NRP”) No. 0182” to the BLM and the NDEP on or about November 2, 2021. This submittal was in response to a request by the BLM in January of 2021. The modification was requested to address “the unauthorized disturbance, reclamation of erosion areas, and proposed expansions for continued DE mining and processing operations at the Colado Mine Project (Project).”42 The mining at the Colado Site is sufficiently complicated that a moderate level of detailed is required in mine planning activity. This activity is normally performed by the engineering function, assisted in the field by the operations staff. The deposit of DE is reasonably uniform 40 See email from Terry Lackey of December 2, 2021, on response to highwall stability. 41 See email from Terry Lackey of December 2, 2021, on response to geotechnical questions. 42 EM Strategies cover letter for the submittal of “EP Minerals LLC’s Colado Mine Project; Pershing County, Nevada – Resubmittal of Major Modification to Plan of Operations NVN-065329/Nevada Reclamation Permit (NRP) No. 0182” of November 2, 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 53 with no unusual risk of intrusive mineralization. However, the lithology is such that sequencing overburden and interburden removal requires sufficient coordination and appropriate planning. Regular communication between engineering staff and operating staff is necessary as mining advances. The annual production schedule is determined based on the forecasted sales demand provided by the sales and marketing group. This production schedule is adjusted to produce the targeted mining volume by factoring in losses for waste, in-pit uses, etc. Production schedules are then developed to assure adequate feed is provided to the processing plant to meet the finished-goods demand in a timely manner. Table 13.3 shows the estimated production for the next five years.43 This is achievable with current contractual arrangements in the pit, U.S. Silica equipment, and U.S. Silica personnel. A projection consistent with this analysis for mine production levels is included for the life of mine in the Economic Analysis section of this report. Table 13.3 Historical and projected mining volumes for Colado 43 070621- FINAL_ MII - U.S. SILICA Q2 2021 Reserves provided by US Silica.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 54 The Colado location currently employs 33 people. 25 (20 of whom are hourly employees) work in the production of mining and stockpiling raw DE ore at the individual pits. The remainder are tasked with moving the stockpiled raw ore to the processing plant outside Lovelock, NV. Table 13.4 shows the current manning at the Colado location. Table 13.4 Manning table for the Colado mine Figures 13.6, 13.7 and 13.8 below are the final pit design maps for the Atlantis, Horseshoe Basin and Antelope pits. This section intentionally left blank. Mine Operations Quantity Mine Operators 14 Mine Maintenance 4 Shop Maintenance 2 Total Mine Operations 20 Logistics Operations Quantity Load and Haul 7 Salary Staff Quantity Mine Supervision 4 Logistics Supervision 1 Mine Maintenance 1 Total Salaried Staff 6


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 55 Figure 13.6 Final pit design for Antelope pit.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 56 Figure 13.7 Final pit design for Atlantis


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 57 Figure 13.8 Final pit design for Horseshoe Basin


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 58 14.0 PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS Once the DE is extracted, it is placed in a designated stockpile area to dry. Occasionally the material will be turned with a dozer or other piece of mechanized equipment to facilitate drying. No processing of the DE is performed at the Colado Site. The DE is loaded into trucks using a dozer and is transported to the processing plant located in Lovelock approximately 19 miles to the southeast from the mine. The processing plant is not considered material by U.S. Silica and therefore is not addressed in this report. 15.0 INFRASTRUCTURE The U.S. Silica Colado Site has been operating in this location for many years. The mine is located in a remote area with mountainous topography with few improved roads and installed infrastructure. The required infrastructure has generally been provided by the mine operator. Historically, the Colado operator has been able to meet the demand for finished goods with the existing infrastructure. The infrastructure required to maintain a sustainable presence in this generally rural local community is in place. The infrastructure required for the future ramp-up of operations to nameplate44 capacity is in place. Little capital expenditure is required relative to infrastructure to maintain the nameplate capacity of the Colado Site. Capital is commented on in Section 18.0. 15.1 Roads The Colado Site is accessible by roads maintained as private roads and by State roads. Road access is critical for the delivery of materials used in the production of finished goods and for shipment of raw DE ore to the processing plant northeast of Lovelock. The mine has access to roadways rated for the loads to be shipped to and from the facility. Figure 15.1 shows the access to the Colado Site using CR 399 (7 Troughs Road) that connects to Interstate 80 east of Colado. 44 Nameplate is a term for the theoretical maximum capacity for a piece of equipment. For a mine it is the theoretical maximum capacity of the lowest producing unit operation such as loading, the haul ft., etc.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 59 Figure 15.1 Means of access to the Colado Site complex


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 60 15.2 Energy The Colado Site is powered primarily by diesel powered equipment. Shop and office requirements for electric power is provided by diesel generators and solar power. 15.3 Water Water is used primarily for dust suppression at the Colado Site. Water is supplied by a municipal water source that is trucked by tanker to the Colado Site. 15.4 Buildings The only onsite buildings are a maintenance shelter used to service the mine equipment and small office portable. The shelter is adequate for the servicing equipment and for light maintenance. 16.0 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS U.S. Silica’s Colado Complex in Lovelock, Nevada is a DE processing operation owned and operated by EPM, an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Silica. DE, also known as Kieselguhr or Diatomite, is a sedimentary mineral with physical properties that are like soil. 16.1 General Marketing Information The Colado Mining Complex consists of approximately 1,456 acres of surface disturbance in the Project Area. The average annual production for the last 5 years has been approximately 600,000 SCY. Mine operations include eight separate open pits with four active operating areas, utilizing open pit mining methods, ore stockpiles, waste rock repositories, access roads, a staging area, a field maintenance shop, exploratory drill holes and reclaimed areas. The Colado Mining Complex operates year-round with ore mining activity starting in early spring and concluding sometime in the late fall when either sufficient ore has been stockpiled, or when inclement weather makes ore mining too costly or difficult. The April to November


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 61 timeframe provides optimum working conditions; moreover, the dry hot weather aids the natural drying of the ore in the stockpiles. Colder winter months are used for stripping operations and reclamation projects. The final products produced in the Colado Processing Plant Complex are mainly marketed as filtration products (filter-aids) and filler products (fine-fillers). Food grade products sold into the filtration markets are used extensively to filter out contaminants from fruit juices, wine, beer, sugar, bio-diesel fuel, high fructose corn syrup, and water. Fine-filler products are used as additives in paints, rubber, paper, and plastics. A third final product category is aggregate products, which are used primarily as industrial absorbents, catalysts, and carriers for pesticides. The aggregate volume products are significantly smaller compared to the filtration and filler products. 16.1.1 DE Market The total annual global DE market is about 1 M tons of DE. The prices that are considered during the market study process are driven by supply & demand. In 2021 and continuing into 2022, the QP expects demand to outpace the U.S. Silica’s ability to process and ship material to the market due to demand rebound coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as international logistics and labor issues brought on by the pandemic. When it comes to contracts pricing, the Colado Mining Complex utilized both spot-based and contractual prices. The contractual prices have an average timeframe of 2 years. In 2020, the average selling price (“ASP”) of DE was $496.00 per ton. In 2021, the ASP rose to $554.00 per ton. DE is utilized in the food and beverage industry and the pool and recreation industry amongst others. The QP believes the projected compound annual growth rate for these industries is in the range of 3% for the food and beverage industry and 6% for the pool and recreation industry. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that pricing will sustain and appreciate at 2% per annum thereafter for the life of mine. Consequently, in the long-term, we believe that


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 62 price forecast will increase from an ASP of $565.00 per ton in 2022 to $662.00 per ton in 2030. See Table 19.1 for the projected ASP over the life of mine. 16.2 Material Contracts Required for Production There are no material contracts required for production. 17.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS WESTWARD was contracted to provide third party review of environmental plans, permits, and requirements of the Colado Site. A summary of findings is included below in Table 1.1 based on current regulatory research and documents provided by U.S. Silica. Item Regulatory Authority Area Covered Status Reclamation Permit NDEP & BLM Mines Major Mod in Review Best Practice Plan N/A Mines Complete Class II Surface Area Disturbance Permit NDEP Mines Approved Class III Landfill Waiver NDEP Mines Approved Hazardous Materials Permit NSFM Mines Approved Hazardous Materials Permit NSFM Shop Approved Groundwater Use Permit NDWR Plant/Mines Approved Table 17.1 Colado Site Permit Summary 17.1 Federal Requirements The Colado Site operates under the Mine Plan of Operations NVN-065329/Nevada Reclamation Permit No. 0182 for mining of DE within private and BLM land. U.S. Silica received initial approval for 968.7 acres of surface disturbance in 2001. U.S. Silica has updated the plan and permit over the course of mining as surface disturbance has increased. Most recently, U.S.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 63 Silica has received approval from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (“NDEP”) and the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) in fall of 2021 for minor amendments to their existing permit, including the addition of 55 acres of disturbance in the new South Knob mine area. The surety bond amount for reclamation activities in favor of BLM was increased to $17,664,227.00 per BLM requirements. U.S. Silica has since conducted an audit of as-built disturbances, resulting in the submittal of a major modification application to NDEP and BLM for review to bring their plan into full compliance with the total existing and proposed disturbed area of 1,795 acres. The major modification application package addresses unpermitted disturbance, reclamation of erosion areas, and proposed expansions for continued DE mining operations. Compliance with the permit/plan includes submitting an annual report to the BLM and NDEP BMRR, a division of NDEP, on/before April 15th documenting surface disturbance locations, types of disturbance, and any completed concurrent reclamation that occurred in the previous calendar year. Waste materials are placed as pit backfill and graded per the slope angle requirements specified in the plan. Basaltic material is stockpiled throughout the active operational areas to be used as the final reclamation cover for mine area features, prior to placement of salvaged growth media and hydroseeding, to encourage vegetative cover growth. The reclamation cost estimate (used to calculate reclamation surety bond) associated with the major modification package is being developed and will be submitted to the appropriate agencies for review in 2022. It is expected that approval of the major modification application will be granted in 2022. U.S. Silica utilizes a Best Practice Plan for to prevent and respond to potential spills of fuels, lubricants, and used oil that are kept at the mine equipment service shop, Horseshoe Basin, and Section 7 Mine. As stated in the plan, there are no permanent streams or ponds within the vicinity of these operations, and mining to date has not encountered any significant groundwater. Therefore, U.S. Silica management believes that there is no reasonable likelihood of a petroleum


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 64 product spill reaching waters of the state from the Lovelock mines. The quantity of petroleum products kept in bulk storage at the mine shop is less than 1,320 gallons. 17.2 State Requirements U.S. Silica holds an air permit for the Colado Site authorized by NDEP including a Class I Air Quality Operating Permit #AP1499-3768 and a NDEP Class II Surface Area Disturbance Permit #AP1499-0862.04. The Surface Area Disturbance Permit requires annual reports to the director including the status of the areas where surface disturbance is active/proposed. NDEP has authorized a Class III Landfill Waiver (#SWW1713) for the Colado Mine allowing U.S. Silica to dispose of wastes in on-site landfills according to their Operations Plan. Hazardous materials and liquids are not allowed to be disposed of at either site. U.S. Silica maintains the following Hazardous Materials Permits through the Nevada State Fire Marshal: • Hazardous Materials Permit (#95886) for fuels located at the mine • Hazardous Materials Permit (#95888) for fuels located at the shop. U.S. Silica is authorized by a Nevada Division of Water Resources for annual use of up to 1,052.44 acre-feet of groundwater (Permit 87089; Permit 18091, Certificate 5238; Permit 24074, Certificate 7558). Monthly reporting and meter installation requirements are specified in the respective permit approvals. This permit is associated with the processing plant which is not included in this report. Water is trucked into the mine sites for use as dust suppression from municipal sources in Lovelock. 17.3 Other Requirements U.S. Silica contracted Hydro Resources Aquifer Imaging Group in 2012 to conduct a groundwater- availability study to provide background information needed to optimize the design of a geophysical aquifer-imaging survey with the Aqua Gem system at the Colado Site. Hydro


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 65 conducted a two-township water well search in the mine area which did not reveal any water well records in the State of Nevada Division of Water Resources database. Hydro proposed several geophysical testing transects across the site around known fault lines in order to locate an optimal location for a proposed groundwater well. The reclamation permit is issued by NDEP and BLM. Requirements for reclamation are detailed in permit reviewed by the QP. Costs associated with reclamation activities are provided in Section 19.0 Economic Analysis. U.S. Silica does not maintain any agreements or procurement contracts with local individuals or groups for the Colado mines or processing plant. U.S. Silica has not engaged in any agreements pertaining to hiring or local procurement. 18.0 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS Capital and operating costs discussed in this section were developed utilizing current and historic cost data from continuous and ongoing operation of the facility, first principles, vendor and contractor quotations, and similar operation comparisons. 18.1 Operating Cost Total operating costs incurred at the Colado Site from 2020 through 2021 are provided in Table 18.1. Costs include but are not limited to mining equipment, plant/shipping, wages and premiums, maintenance materials, and power. The average cost of sales was $329.00 per ton in 2020 and $388.00 per ton in 2021. There were 33 total salaried and hourly employees in 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 66 Capital Costs 2020 $1,731,000 2021 $2,631,000 Operating Costs 2020 $38,875,000 2021 $46,913,000 Table 18.1 Summary of Capital and Operating Costs: 2020-2021 18.2 Capital Costs The average annual capital expenditure since 2020 at the Colado Site is $2,181,000, with $1,731,000 in 2020 and $2,631,000 in 2021 (Table 18.1). The higher than average capital spend in 2021 was associated with scheduled maintenance and continuous improvement projects to drive and maintain cost efficiencies. A summary of foreseen capital expenditures through 2026 is provided in Table 18.2. As shown in Table 18.2, total estimated capital expenditure through 2026 is $12,075,000 and primarily includes routine maintenance and continuous improvement projects to drive cost and capacity efficiencies. Listed expenditures are based on historic cost data, vendor/contractor quotations, and similar operation comparisons and are within +/-15% level of accuracy. There are risks regarding the current capital costs estimates through 2026, including escalating costs of raw materials and energy, equipment availability and timing due to either production delays or supply chain gaps. Projected Capital Expenditures 2022 $2,225,000 2023 $2,476,000 2024 $2,398,000 2025 $2,486,000 2026 $2,490,000 Table 18.2 Summary of Projected Capital Site Expenditures: 2022-2026


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 67 18.3 Assumptions The capital projects are assumed to be constructed in a conventional Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management (“EPCM”) format. U.S. Silica routinely retains a qualified contractor to design projects and act as its agent to bid and procure materials and equipment, bid and award construction contracts, and manage the construction of the facilities. 18.4 Accuracy The accuracy of this estimate for those items identified in the scope-of work is estimated to be within the range of plus 15% to minus 15%; i.e., the cost could be 15% higher than the estimate or it could be 15% lower. Accuracy is an issue separate from contingency, the latter accounts for undeveloped scope and insufficient data (e.g., geotechnical data). 19.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 19.1 Operating Costs An economic model was created for the Colado Site to provide validation of the economic viability of the estimated reserve for the life of mine. The following are the key assumptions: • Proven and Probable Tons of 4,461,000 as of December 31, 2021 • Revenue Growth of 2% • Tons Growth of 2% • Costs of Goods Sold Growth of 2% • Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Growth of 2% • Capital Expenditures Growth of 2% • Inflation Rate of 2% • Tax Rate of 26% • Discount Rate of 8% • Net Working Capital of 25% • Mine Yield of 83%


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 68 The QP used budgeted 2021 costs as the benchmark for which to model operating costs throughout the life of mine and applied future site investment escalations that are consistent with demonstrated plant maintenance history and robust enough to cover future mine and production changes. The QP based the ASP for 2022 on the ASP trends in 2021. The QP then applied a 2% per annum increase from the 2021 ASP through the life of mine. Based on ASP trends of 2021, the QP believes that 2% per annum growth rate is a reasonable method for a base case scenario. For additional information on the ASP, see “Section 16.1.1 - DE Market.” 19.2 Capital Costs As an ongoing project that is in production and profitable, the QP established a going forward capital expenditure based on the running average capital costs at the mine from 2018 through 2020. The QP then applied a 2% per annum increase to the capital costs through the life of mine. The QP included optional capital expenditures that will be deployed as required to increase or maintain the capacity of the plant. 19.3 Economic Analysis The financial evaluation of the project comprises the determination of the net present value (“NPV”) at a discount rate of 8%, the internal rate of return (“IRR”) and payback period (time in years to recapture the initial capital investment). Annual cash flow projections are estimated over the life of the mine based on the estimates of capital expenditures and production cost and sales revenue. Review of the base case model indicates that the project has an IRR of 52%, a payback period of 0.10 years, and an NPV of $130,645,000. The Economic Feasibility Model (Table 19.1.1) was modeled on the basis of historical operational costs and future site investment escalations that are consistent with demonstrated plant maintenance history and robust enough to cover future mine and production changes.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 69 19.1.4 Sensitivity Analysis The QP assessed sensitivity of key variables, including reduction in expected selling price, increased capital expenses and associated depreciation, and operating costs. To assess these variables, the QP created moderate and upside models where the following variables were increased by the percentages listed in Table 19.2: • Average Selling Price Growth • Tons Growth • Costs of Goods Sold Growth • Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Growth • Capital Expenditures Growth • Inflation Rate • Inflation Adjusted Discount Rate • Mine Yield The NPV of the project is null when the 2022 average selling price is reduced to $397.84/ ton. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 70 Table 19.1.1: Economic Feasibility Base Model In Thousand (000) Book Value 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 Reserve Balance Tons (000) 4,053 4,461 4,315 4,167 4,015 3,860 3,702 3,541 3,377 3,210 3,039 2,865 2,687 2,506 2,321 2,132 1,940 1,744 1,544 1,339 1,131 919 702 481 256 26 Mined Tons (000) 142 146 149 152 155 158 161 164 167 171 174 178 181 185 189 192 196 200 204 208 212 217 221 225 230 26 Sold Tons (000) 118 121 123 126 128 131 134 136 139 142 145 147 150 153 157 160 163 166 169 173 176 180 183 187 191 22 R/S Ratio 2.9% 2.7% 3.4% 3.6% 3.9% 4.1% 4.3% 4.6% 5.0% 5.3% 5.7% 6.2% 6.7% 7.4% 8.1% 9.0% 10.1% 11.5% 13.2% 15.5% 18.8% 23.6% 31.5% 46.8% 89.8% 100.0% ASP (Selling Price) 496$ 554$ 565$ 576$ 588$ 599$ 611$ 624$ 636$ 649$ 662$ 675$ 688$ 702$ 716$ 731$ 745$ 760$ 775$ 791$ 807$ 823$ 839$ 856$ 873$ 891$ ACS (Cost of Sale) 329$ 388$ 395$ 403$ 411$ 420$ 428$ 437$ 445$ 454$ 463$ 473$ 482$ 492$ 502$ 512$ 522$ 532$ 543$ 554$ 565$ 576$ 588$ 599$ 611$ 624$ Rev 58,478$ 66,992$ 69,698$ 72,514$ 75,444$ 78,492$ 81,663$ 84,962$ 88,395$ 91,966$ 95,681$ 99,547$ 103,568$ 107,752$ 112,106$ 116,635$ 121,347$ 126,249$ 131,350$ 136,656$ 142,177$ 147,921$ 153,897$ 160,114$ 166,583$ 19,221$ Cost of Sale 38,875$ 46,913$ 48,808$ 50,780$ 52,832$ 54,966$ 57,187$ 59,497$ 61,901$ 64,401$ 67,003$ 69,710$ 72,527$ 75,457$ 78,505$ 81,677$ 84,976$ 88,409$ 91,981$ 95,697$ 99,563$ 103,586$ 107,771$ 112,125$ 116,654$ 13,460$ CM 19,603$ 20,079$ 20,890$ 21,734$ 22,612$ 23,526$ 24,476$ 25,465$ 26,494$ 27,564$ 28,678$ 29,836$ 31,042$ 32,296$ 33,601$ 34,958$ 36,370$ 37,840$ 39,368$ 40,959$ 42,614$ 44,335$ 46,126$ 47,990$ 49,929$ 5,761$ Change in CM -$ 476$ 811$ 844$ 878$ 914$ 950$ 989$ 1,029$ 1,070$ 1,114$ 1,159$ 1,205$ 1,254$ 1,305$ 1,357$ 1,412$ 1,469$ 1,529$ 1,590$ 1,655$ 1,722$ 1,791$ 1,864$ 1,939$ (44,168)$ SG&A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EBITDA 19,603$ 20,079$ 20,890$ 21,734$ 22,612$ 23,526$ 24,476$ 25,465$ 26,494$ 27,564$ 28,678$ 29,836$ 31,042$ 32,296$ 33,601$ 34,958$ 36,370$ 37,840$ 39,368$ 40,959$ 42,614$ 44,335$ 46,126$ 47,990$ 49,929$ 5,761$ D&A 7,058$ 7,393$ 7,226$ 7,309$ 7,267$ 7,288$ 7,278$ 7,283$ 7,280$ 7,282$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ EBIT 12,545$ 12,686$ 13,665$ 14,425$ 15,345$ 16,237$ 17,198$ 18,182$ 19,213$ 20,282$ 21,397$ 22,555$ 23,760$ 25,014$ 26,319$ 27,677$ 29,089$ 30,558$ 32,087$ 33,678$ 35,332$ 37,054$ 38,845$ 40,709$ 42,647$ (1,520)$ Taxes 3,262$ 3,298$ 3,553$ 3,750$ 3,990$ 4,222$ 4,472$ 4,727$ 4,995$ 5,273$ 5,563$ 5,864$ 6,178$ 6,504$ 6,843$ 7,196$ 7,563$ 7,945$ 8,343$ 8,756$ 9,186$ 9,634$ 10,100$ 10,584$ 11,088$ (395)$ Operating Income 9,283$ 9,388$ 10,112$ 10,674$ 11,355$ 12,016$ 12,727$ 13,455$ 14,218$ 15,009$ 15,834$ 16,691$ 17,583$ 18,511$ 19,476$ 20,481$ 21,526$ 22,613$ 23,744$ 24,921$ 26,146$ 27,420$ 28,745$ 30,124$ 31,559$ (1,125)$ Plant Capex (1,731)$ (2,631)$ (2,225)$ (2,476)$ (2,398)$ (2,486)$ (2,490)$ (2,538)$ (2,564)$ (2,602)$ (2,635)$ (2,671)$ (2,706)$ (2,742)$ (2,779)$ (2,816)$ (2,853)$ (2,891)$ (2,930)$ (2,968)$ (3,008)$ (3,048)$ (3,089)$ (3,130)$ (3,171)$ (3,213)$ Total Capex (1,731)$ (2,631)$ (2,225)$ (2,476)$ (2,398)$ (2,486)$ (2,490)$ (2,538)$ (2,564)$ (2,602)$ (2,635)$ (2,671)$ (2,706)$ (2,742)$ (2,779)$ (2,816)$ (2,853)$ (2,891)$ (2,930)$ (2,968)$ (3,008)$ (3,048)$ (3,089)$ (3,130)$ (3,171)$ (3,213)$ Change in NWC -$ (119)$ (203)$ (211)$ (220)$ (228)$ (238)$ (247)$ (257)$ (268)$ (278)$ (290)$ (301)$ (314)$ (326)$ (339)$ (353)$ (367)$ (382)$ (398)$ (414)$ (430)$ (448)$ (466)$ (485)$ -$ Net Income 7,552$ 6,637$ 7,684$ 7,987$ 8,738$ 9,302$ 9,999$ 10,670$ 11,396$ 12,139$ 12,920$ 13,730$ 14,575$ 15,455$ 16,371$ 17,326$ 18,320$ 19,355$ 20,433$ 21,555$ 22,724$ 23,941$ 25,209$ 26,529$ 27,903$ (4,338)$ FCF (29,000)$ 14,610$ 14,030$ 14,910$ 15,296$ 16,005$ 16,590$ 17,277$ 17,953$ 18,677$ 19,421$ 20,201$ 21,011$ 21,857$ 22,736$ 23,653$ 24,607$ 25,601$ 26,636$ 27,714$ 28,837$ 30,006$ 31,223$ 32,490$ 33,810$ 35,184$ 2,943$


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 71 Table 19.1.2: Economic Feasibility Moderate Model In Thousand (000) Book Value 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 Reserve Balance Tons (000) 4,053 4,461 4,315 4,164 4,006 3,842 3,671 3,494 3,310 3,118 2,918 2,711 2,495 2,270 2,037 1,794 1,542 1,279 1,006 722 427 120 Mined Tons (000) 142 146 152 158 164 171 177 184 192 200 207 216 224 233 243 252 263 273 284 295 307 120 Sold Tons (000) 118 121 126 131 136 142 147 153 159 166 172 179 186 194 201 210 218 227 236 245 255 99 R/S Ratio 2.9% 2.7% 3.5% 3.8% 4.1% 4.4% 4.8% 5.3% 5.8% 6.4% 7.1% 8.0% 9.0% 10.3% 11.9% 14.1% 17.0% 21.3% 28.2% 40.9% 71.9% 100.0% ASP (Selling Price) 496$ 554$ 576$ 599$ 623$ 648$ 674$ 701$ 729$ 758$ 788$ 820$ 852$ 886$ 922$ 959$ 997$ 1,037$ 1,078$ 1,122$ 1,166$ 1,213$ ACS (Cost of Sale) 329$ 388$ 399$ 411$ 424$ 436$ 449$ 463$ 477$ 491$ 506$ 521$ 537$ 553$ 569$ 586$ 604$ 622$ 641$ 660$ 680$ 700$ Rev 58,478$ 66,992$ 72,459$ 78,371$ 84,766$ 91,683$ 99,165$ 107,256$ 116,008$ 125,475$ 135,713$ 146,788$ 158,766$ 171,721$ 185,733$ 200,889$ 217,282$ 235,012$ 254,189$ 274,931$ 297,365$ 120,684$ Cost of Sale 38,875$ 46,913$ 50,253$ 53,831$ 57,664$ 61,770$ 66,168$ 70,879$ 75,925$ 81,331$ 87,122$ 93,325$ 99,970$ 107,088$ 114,712$ 122,880$ 131,629$ 141,001$ 151,040$ 161,794$ 173,314$ 69,662$ CM 19,603$ 20,079$ 22,205$ 24,540$ 27,102$ 29,913$ 32,997$ 36,378$ 40,083$ 44,143$ 48,591$ 53,463$ 58,796$ 64,633$ 71,021$ 78,009$ 85,653$ 94,011$ 103,149$ 113,136$ 124,051$ 51,022$ Change in CM -$ 476$ 2,126$ 2,335$ 2,562$ 2,811$ 3,083$ 3,381$ 3,706$ 4,060$ 4,448$ 4,871$ 5,333$ 5,837$ 6,388$ 6,988$ 7,643$ 8,358$ 9,138$ 9,988$ 10,915$ (73,029)$ SG&A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EBITDA 19,603$ 20,079$ 22,205$ 24,540$ 27,102$ 29,913$ 32,997$ 36,378$ 40,083$ 44,143$ 48,591$ 53,463$ 58,796$ 64,633$ 71,021$ 78,009$ 85,653$ 94,011$ 103,149$ 113,136$ 124,051$ 51,022$ D&A 7,058$ 7,393$ 7,226$ 7,309$ 7,267$ 7,288$ 7,278$ 7,283$ 7,280$ 7,282$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ EBIT 12,545$ 12,686$ 14,980$ 17,231$ 19,835$ 22,625$ 25,719$ 29,094$ 32,803$ 36,862$ 41,310$ 46,181$ 51,514$ 57,352$ 63,740$ 70,728$ 78,371$ 86,730$ 95,867$ 105,855$ 116,770$ 43,741$ Taxes 3,262$ 3,298$ 3,895$ 4,480$ 5,157$ 5,883$ 6,687$ 7,565$ 8,529$ 9,584$ 10,741$ 12,007$ 13,394$ 14,911$ 16,572$ 18,389$ 20,377$ 22,550$ 24,925$ 27,522$ 30,360$ 11,373$ Operating Income 9,283$ 9,388$ 11,085$ 12,751$ 14,678$ 16,743$ 19,032$ 21,530$ 24,274$ 27,278$ 30,570$ 34,174$ 38,121$ 42,440$ 47,167$ 52,339$ 57,995$ 64,180$ 70,942$ 78,333$ 86,409$ 32,368$ Plant Capex (1,731)$ (2,631)$ (2,290)$ (2,584)$ (2,559)$ (2,700)$ (2,761)$ (2,867)$ (2,954)$ (3,056)$ (3,155)$ (3,261)$ (3,369)$ (3,481)$ (3,596)$ (3,715)$ (3,838)$ (3,966)$ (4,097)$ (4,233)$ (4,373)$ (4,518)$ Total Capex (1,731)$ (2,631)$ (2,290)$ (2,584)$ (2,559)$ (2,700)$ (2,761)$ (2,867)$ (2,954)$ (3,056)$ (3,155)$ (3,261)$ (3,369)$ (3,481)$ (3,596)$ (3,715)$ (3,838)$ (3,966)$ (4,097)$ (4,233)$ (4,373)$ (4,518)$ Change in NWC -$ (119)$ (532)$ (584)$ (641)$ (703)$ (771)$ (845)$ (926)$ (1,015)$ (1,112)$ (1,218)$ (1,333)$ (1,459)$ (1,597)$ (1,747)$ (1,911)$ (2,090)$ (2,284)$ (2,497)$ (2,729)$ -$ Net Income 7,552$ 6,637$ 8,263$ 9,583$ 11,479$ 13,340$ 15,501$ 17,818$ 20,393$ 23,206$ 26,302$ 29,695$ 33,419$ 37,500$ 41,974$ 46,876$ 52,246$ 58,125$ 64,560$ 71,603$ 79,308$ 27,850$ FCF (29,000)$ 14,610$ 14,030$ 15,489$ 16,893$ 18,746$ 20,628$ 22,778$ 25,101$ 27,674$ 30,488$ 33,583$ 36,977$ 40,700$ 44,782$ 49,256$ 54,158$ 59,527$ 65,406$ 71,842$ 78,884$ 86,589$ 35,131$


 
Technical Report Summary Colado, Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 72 Table 19.1.3: Economic Feasibility Upside Model In Thousand (000) Book Value 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 Reserve Balance Tons (000) 4,053 4,461 4,315 4,161 3,997 3,823 3,639 3,444 3,237 3,018 2,786 2,539 2,278 2,002 1,708 1,397 1,068 718 348 Mined Tons (000) 142 146 155 164 174 184 195 207 219 232 246 261 277 293 311 330 349 370 348 Sold Tons (000) 118 121 128 136 144 153 162 172 182 193 204 217 230 243 258 274 290 307 289 R/S Ratio 2.9% 2.7% 3.6% 3.9% 4.3% 4.8% 5.4% 6.0% 6.8% 7.7% 8.8% 10.3% 12.1% 14.7% 18.2% 23.6% 32.7% 51.6% 100.0% ASP (Selling Price) 496$ 554$ 587$ 622$ 659$ 699$ 741$ 785$ 832$ 882$ 935$ 992$ 1,051$ 1,114$ 1,181$ 1,252$ 1,327$ 1,406$ 1,491$ ACS (Cost of Sale) 329$ 388$ 407$ 427$ 449$ 471$ 495$ 520$ 546$ 573$ 601$ 632$ 663$ 696$ 731$ 768$ 806$ 846$ 889$ Rev 58,478$ 66,992$ 75,272$ 84,576$ 95,029$ 106,775$ 119,972$ 134,801$ 151,462$ 170,183$ 191,218$ 214,852$ 241,408$ 271,246$ 304,772$ 342,442$ 384,768$ 432,325$ 430,667$ Cost of Sale 38,875$ 46,913$ 52,214$ 58,114$ 64,681$ 71,990$ 80,125$ 89,179$ 99,257$ 110,473$ 122,956$ 136,850$ 152,314$ 169,526$ 188,682$ 210,003$ 233,733$ 260,145$ 256,703$ CM 19,603$ 20,079$ 23,058$ 26,461$ 30,348$ 34,785$ 39,847$ 45,622$ 52,206$ 59,711$ 68,262$ 78,002$ 89,094$ 101,721$ 116,090$ 132,439$ 151,035$ 172,180$ 173,965$ Change in CM -$ 476$ 2,979$ 3,403$ 3,887$ 4,437$ 5,062$ 5,774$ 6,584$ 7,505$ 8,551$ 9,741$ 11,092$ 12,627$ 14,370$ 16,349$ 18,596$ 21,145$ 1,785$ SG&A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EBITDA 19,603$ 20,079$ 23,058$ 26,461$ 30,348$ 34,785$ 39,847$ 45,622$ 52,206$ 59,711$ 68,262$ 78,002$ 89,094$ 101,721$ 116,090$ 132,439$ 151,035$ 172,180$ 173,965$ D&A 7,058$ 7,393$ 7,226$ 7,309$ 7,267$ 7,288$ 7,278$ 7,283$ 7,280$ 7,282$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ 7,281$ EBIT 12,545$ 12,686$ 15,833$ 19,152$ 23,081$ 27,496$ 32,569$ 38,339$ 44,925$ 52,429$ 60,981$ 70,721$ 81,813$ 94,439$ 108,809$ 125,158$ 143,753$ 164,899$ 166,683$ Taxes 3,262$ 3,298$ 4,116$ 4,980$ 6,001$ 7,149$ 8,468$ 9,968$ 11,681$ 13,632$ 15,855$ 18,387$ 21,271$ 24,554$ 28,290$ 32,541$ 37,376$ 42,874$ 43,338$ Operating Income 9,283$ 9,388$ 11,716$ 14,173$ 17,080$ 20,347$ 24,101$ 28,371$ 33,245$ 38,797$ 45,126$ 52,334$ 60,541$ 69,885$ 80,519$ 92,617$ 106,377$ 122,025$ 123,346$ Plant Capex (1,731)$ (2,631)$ (2,399)$ (2,767)$ (2,841)$ (3,084)$ (3,259)$ (3,489)$ (3,711)$ (3,960)$ (4,219)$ (4,499)$ (4,795)$ (5,111)$ (5,448)$ (5,808)$ (6,191)$ (6,599)$ (7,035)$ Total Capex (1,731)$ (2,631)$ (2,399)$ (2,767)$ (2,841)$ (3,084)$ (3,259)$ (3,489)$ (3,711)$ (3,960)$ (4,219)$ (4,499)$ (4,795)$ (5,111)$ (5,448)$ (5,808)$ (6,191)$ (6,599)$ (7,035)$ Change in NWC -$ (119)$ (745)$ (851)$ (972)$ (1,109)$ (1,266)$ (1,444)$ (1,646)$ (1,876)$ (2,138)$ (2,435)$ (2,773)$ (3,157)$ (3,592)$ (4,087)$ (4,649)$ (5,286)$ (446)$ Net Income 7,552$ 6,637$ 8,572$ 10,555$ 13,267$ 16,154$ 19,577$ 23,438$ 27,887$ 32,961$ 38,769$ 45,400$ 52,974$ 61,617$ 71,478$ 82,722$ 95,538$ 110,139$ 115,865$ FCF (29,000)$ 14,610$ 14,030$ 15,798$ 17,864$ 20,534$ 23,442$ 26,855$ 30,721$ 35,168$ 40,243$ 46,050$ 52,681$ 60,255$ 68,898$ 78,759$ 90,003$ 102,819$ 117,421$ 123,146$


 
Technical Report Summary Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 73 Case 5% 10% Drivers Base Moderate Upside Average Selling Price Growth 2% 4% 6% Tons Growth 2% 4% 6% Costs of Goods Sold Growth 2% 3% 5% Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Growth 2% 5% 10% Capital Expenditures Growth 2% 5% 10% Inflation Rate 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% Inflation Adjusted Discount Rate 10% 11% 12% Mine Yield 83% 83% 83% Case Payback IRR NPV Base 0.10 Years 52% $130,645,000 Moderate 0.00 Years 56% $179,409,000 Upside 0.00 Years 58% $196,277,000 Table 19.2 Sensitivity Analysis 20.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES Adjacent properties to the Colado Site are undeveloped. There is no other known DE mine operation in Pershing County at the time of this report. 21.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION There is no additional data or information to include in this section. 22.0 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 22.1 Comments on Exploration It is the opinion of the QP that the amount of exploration and methodology performed at the Colado Site is acceptable for the purposes of this report.


 
Technical Report Summary Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 74 22.2 Comments on Data Verification It is the QP’s opinion that it is reasonable to rely on laboratory testing procedures provided by U.S. Silica. Based on the review of lab documentation provided by U.S. Silica, it is the QP’s opinion that the testing procedures and results presented herein are acceptable for the purpose of this report. 22.3 Comments on Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing Based on review of the lab procedures provided by U.S. Silica, the overall relative homogenous mineralogy of the deposit, it is the QP’s opinion that the procedures and laboratory testing reviewed are acceptable for the purposes of this report. 22.4 Comments on Recoverable Ore Estimates The Recoverable Ore Estimate provided in this report only includes tonnages for material pits as designated by U.S. Silica. The actual recoverable ore at the Colado Site is more than what is reported herein. WESTWARD was able to confirm the data and process methods used by U.S. Silica to calculate BCY volumes. It is the QP’s opinion that there only potential risk factor identified that could possibly alter the mineable ore estimates provided herein is if the reserve estimating methodology is changed to report all reserves as wet, in-situ tons or as dry, recoverable ore. 22.5 Comments on Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing Based on review of the lab procedures provided by U.S. Silica, the overall relative homogenous mineralogy of the deposit, it is the QP’s opinion that the procedures and laboratory testing reviewed are acceptable for the purposes of this report. 22.6 Comments on Mining Methods In the opinion of the QP, the current mine planning, mining methods, manpower, mine equipment, and maintenance and repair practices dedicated to supplying the processing plant


 
Technical Report Summary Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 75 with DE will allow U.S. SILICA to maintain the projected levels of annual production and product quality to support the life-of-mine plan represented by the financial analysis in this report. The QP believes U.S. Silica has plans in place to provide sustainable operations in the pit relative to pit stability, waste handling and erosion control. These plans are reflected in U.S. Silica’s current mine design and operational practices. The QP recommends a routine review process that addresses this effectiveness of the operational practices. 22.7 Comments on Infrastructure In the opinion of the QP, the existing infrastructure is adequate for the projected production of finished goods through the life of mine. The current and planned maintenance-capital investment in infrastructure is adequate to maintain the projected levels of finished goods production and is represented by the financial analysis in this report. 22.8 Comments on Permitting It is the QP’s opinion that the proposed permit revisions, existing permits and plans for the active Colado mine operations adequately address requirements related to environmental compliance and permitting requirements and that U.S. Silica can reasonably anticipate that they will be able to obtain the future authorizations needed to complete the mine plan. Based on review of previous permit documents, history of the site, the mine plan, and the regulatory requirements it is the QP’s opinion that it is highly likely U.S. Silica would be able to obtain authorizations to develop the reserves as classified herein. 23.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The primary recommendation of this report is to design and implement a third-party sampling and testing program to provide outside quality control for U.S. Silica’s internal testing program. The program should be written with detailed instructions on proper collection methods; sample containers, preservation, labeling, security, and transport, and testing. Anticipated cost for this


 
Technical Report Summary Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 76 program is estimated to be up to $7,000 - $10,000 annually depending on how many tests are conducted and what testing parameters are run. 24.0 REFERENCES References are in each section as footnotes. 25.0 RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT The information, conclusions, opinions, and estimates contained in this Technical Report Summary were formed based on a combination of inputs from U.S. Silica and Independent Qualified Persons (QPs) observations. This Technical Report Summary assumes and relies on the fact that all the source data provided to the QPs by U.S. Silica and the information and technical documents listed in Chapter 24 (References) are accurate and complete in all material aspects. The authors have carefully reviewed the information provided to them by U.S. Silica within the scope of their technical expertise. The information, conclusions, opinions, and estimates contained in the Technical Report Summary are based on the following parameters: • Information available to U.S. Silica at the time of preparation of this Technical Report Summary. • Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this Technical Report Summary. The QPs have relied upon the ownership and title and permitting information provided by employees of U.S. Silica for inclusion in Section 3 (Property Description). The QPs have not researched property title or mineral rights for the Colado Site and expresses no opinion as to the ownership status of the property.


 
Technical Report Summary Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 77 The QPs have relied on various U.S. Silica departments for relevant data, analysis, and guidance on applicable market studies, contracts, taxes, royalties and other government levies or interests applicable to revenue or income from the Ottawa operation. Multiple QPs were involved in the preparation of this report. The information for the sections listed below was provided by U.S. Silica and reviewed and opined by WESTWARD and/or Q4 as follows:


 
Technical Report Summary Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 78


 


 
Technical Report Summary Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 80


 
Technical Report Summary Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 81 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Lease Payments Table 1.2 Individual mine areas Table 1.3 U.S. Silica Recoverable Ore Estimates Table 1.4 Colado Site Permit Summary Table 3.1 Lease payment summary Table 12.1 U.S. Silica Recoverable Ore Estimates Table 13.1 Mining equipment currently employed by U.S. Silica at the Colado Site Table 13.2 Mobile equipment used for stockpile material transport Table 13.3 Historical and projected mining volumes for Colado Table 13.4 Manning table for the Colado Site Table 17.1 Colado Site Permit Summary Table 18.1 Summary of Capital and Operating Costs: 2020-2021 Table 18.2 Summary of Projected Capital Expenditures: 2022-2026 Table 19.1.1 Economic Feasibility Base Model Table 19.1.2 Economic Feasibility Moderate Model Table 19.1.3 Economic Feasibility Upside Model Table 19.2 Sensitivity Analysis FIGURES Figure 1.1 U.S. Silica Colado Mine Permit and Claim Map Figure 1.2 Aerial of the Colado Site Figure 1.3 Aerial showing location of Colado Site& Lovelock Plant Figure 1.4 Boring Location Map Figure 3.1 Overall Colado Site Map Figure 3.2 Complex location relative to processing plant in Lovelock, NV Figure 4.1 Regional Map of the Colado Site Area Figure 6.1 General stratigraphic column of the region Figure 6.2 View to the north of Atlantis Pit Figure 6.3 View to the southwest from Quivera Pit Figure 7.1 Boring Location Map I Colado Site Figure 7.2 Boring Location Map II Colado Site Figure 7.3 Cross section of DE intervals from the Horseshoe Basin pit - south is on the left of the illustration Figure 7.4 Cross section from Horseshoe Basin pit. Figure 13.1 Typical rolling landform and vegetation at Colado Figure 13.2 Colado Site Layout Figure 13.3 Current mining areas at Colado Figure 13.4 Typical cross section of different mining benches Figure 13.5 Typical vegetative scrub and basalt cap rock in the overburden overlying the mining horizon at Colado


 
Technical Report Summary Pershing County, Nevada December 31, 2021 82 Figure 13.6 Final pit design for Antelope pit Figure 13.7 Final pit design for Atlantis Figure 13.8 Final pit design for Horseshoe Basin Figure 15.1 Means of access to the Colado Site ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS ACRONYM DEFINITION ASP Average Selling Price BCY Bank Cubic Yard BLM Bureau of Land Management CPI Consumer Price Index DE Diatomaceous Earth EPM EP Minerals, LLC ID3 Inverse Distance Cubed IRR Internal Rate of Return ISO International Organization for Standardization EPCM Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management M Million Ma Million Years Ago NDEP Nevada Division of Environmental Protection NDWR Nevada Division of Water Resources NPV Net Present Value NSFM Nevada State Fire Marshall QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control QP Qualified Person SCY Stockpile Cubic Yard SEC Securities and Exchange Commission SMU Smallest Minable Unit TRS Technical Report Summary USGS United States Geological Survey U.S. Silica U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. yd3 Cubic Yards


 
slca-20211231xex963
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY LAMESA SITE LAMESA, DAWSON COUNTY, TEXAS Submitted to: U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. Prepared By: Boerne, Texas 830-249-8284 Date: February 11, 2022 Project No. 10711-025


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Product ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 History of Acquisition ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Mineral Rights ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Location ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.6 Geology ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.7 Exploration ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.8 Testing ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1.9 Mining Methods ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.10 Processing and Recovery Methods .................................................................................................... 4 1.11 Infrastructure ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.12 Capital and Operating Costs .............................................................................................................. 5 1.13 In-situ, Mineable Ore Estimate .......................................................................................................... 5 1.14 Permitting .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.15 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Sources of Information ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Personal Inspection ............................................................................................................................ 7 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Location ............................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Leases/Royalties .............................................................................................................................. 11 3.3 Encumbrances.................................................................................................................................. 11 4.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE & PHYSIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Topography...................................................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Means of Access .............................................................................................................................. 13 4.3 Climate ............................................................................................................................................ 13 4.4 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................... 13 5.0 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................................... 15 6.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION AND DEPOSIT ........................................... 15


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 7.0 EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................................... 20 7.1 Drilling ............................................................................................................................................ 20 7.2 Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................................. 22 8.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ....................................................... 23 9.0 DATA VERIFICATION .................................................................................................................. 24 10.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ............................................. 24 11.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES .......................................................................................... 26 12.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES ............................................................................................. 26 12.1 U.S. Silica Methodology ................................................................................................................. 26 12.2 Data Verification Methodology ....................................................................................................... 30 12.3 Process Verification Methodology .................................................................................................. 30 12.4 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 31 12.5 In-Situ, Mineable Ore Reserves....................................................................................................... 31 12.6 Cut Off Grades ................................................................................................................................ 32 13.0 MINING METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 32 13.1 Clearing, Grubbing and Overburden Removal ................................................................................ 35 13.2 Mining Process ................................................................................................................................ 35 13.3 Pit Repair and Maintenance ............................................................................................................. 39 13.4 Mine Equipment .............................................................................................................................. 39 13.5 Mine Planning and Production Scheduling ..................................................................................... 40 14.0 PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS ............................................................................ 44 14.1 Wet Processing Plant ....................................................................................................................... 45 14.2 Dry Processing Plant ....................................................................................................................... 46 14.3 U.S. Silica Plant Equipment - Mobile ............................................................................................. 46 14.4 Plant Manning ................................................................................................................................. 48 15.0 INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................................................................... 48 15.1 Roads ............................................................................................................................................... 48 15.2 Rail .................................................................................................................................................. 49 15.3 Electric Power ................................................................................................................................. 50 15.4 Natural Gas ...................................................................................................................................... 51 15.5 Water ............................................................................................................................................... 51 15.6 Tailings Handling and Disposal ...................................................................................................... 53 15.7 Buildings ......................................................................................................................................... 54


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 16.0 MARKET STUDIES ........................................................................................................................ 54 16.1 General Marketing Information ....................................................................................................... 54 16.1.1 Frac Sand Market .................................................................................................................... 55 16.2 Materials Contracts Required for Production .................................................................................. 55 17.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS ................................................ 56 17.1 Existing Environmental Permits, Plans, and Authorizations ........................................................... 56 17.2 State Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 57 17.3 Federal Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 58 18.0 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS ........................................................................................ 58 18.1 Operating Costs ............................................................................................................................... 58 18.2 Capital Costs .................................................................................................................................... 59 18.3 Assumptions .................................................................................................................................... 60 18.4 Accuracy .......................................................................................................................................... 60 19.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 60 19.1 Operating Costs ............................................................................................................................... 60 19.2 Capital Costs .................................................................................................................................... 61 19.3 Economic Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 61 19.4 Sensitivity Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 62 20.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................ 66 21.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION .................................................................. 66 22.0 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................. 66 22.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 66 22.2 Comments on Exploration ............................................................................................................... 67 22.3 Comments on In-Situ, Mineable Ore Estimates .............................................................................. 67 22.5 Comments on Mining Methods ....................................................................................................... 67 22.6 Comments on Processing and Recovery Methods .......................................................................... 67 22.7 Comments on Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 68 22.8 Comments on Permitting ................................................................................................................. 68 23.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................. 68 24.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 68 25.0 RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT ................................ 69


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Technical Report Summary (“TRS”) has been prepared at the request of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (“U.S. Silica”) by Westward Environmental, Inc. (“WESTWARD”) who has conducted an audit of the proven and probable reserves at the Lamesa, Texas mine (“Lamesa Site”) as of December 31, 2021. This audit was performed in conjunction with the U.S. Silica’s Mine Engineering and Geology staff and was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 and Item 601(b)(96) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). 1.1 Background U.S. Silica operates two regional hydraulic fracturing sand (“frac sand”) production facilities in the West Texas Permian Oil Basin region.1 The Lamesa Site was built from 2018 through 2019 and became operational in the third quarter of 2018 with a designed annual production capacity of six (“M”) tons. The Lamesa Site is comprised of a large, mechanized surface mining operation that supplies raw ore to a fully automated, state-of-the-art processing plant. The facility’s substantial on-site products storage silo capacity, and its strategic in-basin location allows shipment of regional sands by truck making the Lamesa Site a prime low-cost supplier of proppant sand to customers. 1.2 Product The Lamesa Site produces proppant sand (commonly referred to as “frac sand”) which is used in the hydraulic fracturing process, a completion method used by oil and gas companies to extract natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil from unconventional, low permeability reservoirs such as shale. Two fine-grained frac sand products are manufactured at the Lamesa plant: an American Petroleum Institute (“API”) standard 40/70 sized silica sand product, and a non-API 100-Mesh (50/140) sized silica sand product. However, the end use of the sand is not strictly as proppant; it may also fit specifications for other industrial sand products. 1 U.S. Silica’s website – December 2021, Home | U.S. Silica (ussilica.com).


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 2 1.3 History of Acquisition U.S. Silica purchased 3,523-acres (five and a half sections) of undeveloped land from the Medlin Ranch in Dawson County, TX in July 2017. The Lamesa Site is located approximately 11 miles northwest of the town of Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas. The property acquisition was undertaken in mid-May 2017 after U.S. Silica’s Mine Planning Department completed a two- phased exploration program that delineated a continuous sand dune deposit containing greater than 100 million tons (“MT”) of Proven and Probable ore reserves. 1.4 Mineral Rights The Lamesa Site is wholly owned by U.S. Silica. Because U.S. Silica also purchased both land and mineral rights, there are no leases, no royalties, and no other associated payments specific to the Lamesa land parcel. 1.5 Location The mine is in remote West Texas with a history of agriculture being the predominant industry. As a result, there is very little urbanization in the area. There is a significant amount of oil and gas activity in the region and specifically near Big Springs, TX which located approximately 45 miles to the southeast. The Lamesa plant is the closest source of mined sand to the oil and gas activity in this part of Texas. Dallas, TX is located approximately 312 miles to the east, San Antonio approximately 360 miles to the southeast, and Midland, TX is approximately 60 miles to the southwest. The mine is located approximately 75 to approximately 85 miles to the northeast of numerous other sand mines located near Kermit and Monahans, TX. 1.6 Geology The formation being mined at Lamesa is comprised of Quaternary aged wind-blown sand deposits. This sand formation is present across the surface of the site and most of Winkler County in the form of sheets, dunes and dune ridges.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 3 Most of the surface at Lamesa is a loosely consolidated sand with some silt and caliche. The subsurface is a cover sand that has clay and silt that is underlain by a very stiff, red silty clay. This basal unit in the mine area is made up of a mixture of fine-grained, clay-rich Playa deposits that predominately form a hard, red clay horizon of unknown thickness. Exploration drill holes completed during the initial property assessment and ore reserve delineation at Lamesa did not attempt to find the thickness of this basal clay unit. It is believed that any sand layers lying below this red clay horizon would be very heavily contaminated with clays and carbonates– making it unfit for economic extraction or production. 1.7 Exploration The Lamesa Site was evaluated with a two-phase sonic exploration program referred to as “Project Thunderhead” in early 2017 and a third phase of sonic drilling in 2018. The 2017 drilling was comprised of a total of 16 borings that were drilled to depths ranging from 25 ft. to 65 ft. The 2018 exploration effort contained 18 additional borings drilled to depths ranging from 25 ft. to 80 ft. Borings were terminated in the underlying clay unit. 1.8 Testing Testing of the sand was performed internally by U.S. Silica and results indicate that the material meets the recommended API guidelines. Individual customers may have other internal specifications that do not follow or meet the API suggested guidelines. The number of sales of the silica sand from Lamesa indicate the suitability of the material for multiple customers. 1.9 Mining Methods U.S. Silica began mining operations at Lamesa in the third quarter of 2018. Lamesa Sites dune sand which lays in “sheets” of variable thickness and the less variable Clayey Cover Sands below the dune sand. At full capacity, the mine can deliver enough sand to supply the processing plant that has an annual nameplate capacity of six M tons. The nature of the sand deposits favors surface mining by conventional methods. The vegetation and other organics, generally around 1-ft. thick, are mined as part of the sand deposit therefore there is no


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 4 overburden to remove. A contractor is employed to mine the sand. Front-end loaders and articulating haul trucks are used for mining. The contractor’s haul trucks deliver the mined sand to one of two large surge piles of raw sand, where it is available for processing through the Lamesa plant. 1.10 Processing and Recovery Methods Constructed in 2018, the Lamesa processing plant is located east of the active mining area on the same property as the mine. The annual production of finished goods at the Lamesa facility is a function of customer demand and the production capacity, by size fraction, of the plant. Current shipments are approximately 3.6 M tons of finished goods. Raw sand is fed into the wet processing plant where it is cleaned, and some preliminary sizing is accomplished. From the wet plant the sand is moved to the dry plant after the water has had a chance to drain to below 10% moisture content. In the dry plant, the sand is dried in rotary dryers and then sized for sale as finished goods. 1.11 Infrastructure The Lamesa location has been operating since 2018. The infrastructure required to maintain a sustainable presence in this generally rural local community is in place. Lamesa is accessible by roads maintained as private roads and by County and State roads. Road access is critical for the delivery of materials used in the production of finished goods and for shipment of finished goods to U.S. Silica customers. The Lamesa location has excellent access to reliable electric power and supplies of natural gas. Water is a critical component in processing the silica sand. Lamesa has four on-site wells and there are water contracts in place with third parties which cover the life of the mine and provide for adequate access to processing water. Tailings handling and settling capacity is a critical element for the long-term viability of the Lamesa location. U.S. Silica utilizes a series of settling ponds to remove waste from the


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 5 process water and recycle this process water. Lamesa must construct new tailings pond facilities from time to time to store the waste that will be produced over life of the mine. Certain capital and expense projects are planned over the life of the mine to meet these needs. 1.12 Capital and Operating Costs In 2020 and 2021 total operating costs were $32,593,000 and $36,815,000 and total capital costs were $3,510,000 and $159,000 respectively (Table 18.1). The higher than average capital spend in 2020 was associated with scheduled maintenance and continuous improvement projects to drive and maintain cost efficiencies. The Lamesa Site maintains a five-year capital forecast for planned capital expenditures to support current production. A summary of foreseen capital expenditures through 2026 is provided on Table 18.2. As shown on Table 18.2, total estimated capital expenditure through 2026 is $830,000. Listed expenditures are based on historic cost data, vendor/contractor quotations, and similar operation comparisons and are within +/-15% level of accuracy. 1.13 In-situ, Mineable Ore Estimate Information used in the preparation of this mineable ore estimate includes data collected from drilling 34 borings and associated lab results. Based on 3D modeling performed by U.S. Silica and audited by WESTWARD using the most recent data available from U.S. Silica, the Lamesa Site has mineable ore reported as follows: Deposit Classification In-Situ, Mineable Ore Tons* Proven Reserve 85,678,000 Probable Reserve 6,800,000 TOTAL 92,478,000 Table 1.1 U.S. Silica In-Situ, Mineable Ore Reserves Estimate


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 6 1.14 Permitting As of the effective date of this report, the Lamesa Site has the necessary permits and plans in place to mine the silica sand deposit as discussed in this report. 1.15 Recommendations The primary recommendation of this report includes the design and implementation of a third- party sampling and testing program to provide outside quality control on U.S. Silica’s internal testing program. 2.0 INTRODUCTION This TRS has been prepared at the request of U.S. Silica by WESTWARD who has conducted an audit of the proven and probable reserves at the Lamesa, Texas mine as of December 31, 2021. This audit was performed in conjunction with the U.S. Silica’s Mine Engineering and Geology staff was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 and Item 601(b)(96) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. U.S. Silica common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “SLCA”. WESTWARD’S third-party reserves analysis (Section 11.0 & Section 12.0 of this report), completed on February 11, 2022, presented in this TRS, was prepared for public disclosure by U.S. Silica in filings made with the SEC in accordance with the requirements set forth in the SEC rules and regulations. Any capitalized terms used herein, but not defined herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Item 1300 of Regulation S-K of the SEC Regulations. 2.1 Sources of Information • U.S. Silica: reports, maps, models, correspondence, calls, website • United States Geological Survey • Bureau of Economic Geology • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 7 • Environmental Protection Agency • Google Earth 2.2 Personal Inspection Michelle M. Lee, PG (TX #6071, SME Registered Member #4130340RM) with WESTWARD performed a site visit to the Lamesa Site on May 3, 2021. During this site visit, the Plant Manager gave Ms. Lee a tour of pertinent parts of the mine, including water wells, ponds, pit areas, reserve areas, and property perimeter. The processing facility and plant were not toured. The QP has spent a significant amount of time in the region working on projects with multiple other frac sand mines and greenfield sites. The silica sand deposit at this site is the geologically equivalent to other silica sand deposits in the region. Robert Archibald, PE (VA 0402023235) with Q4 Impact Group performed a site visit to the Lamesa Site on October 4, 2021. During the visit, an inspection of all mine, plant and infrastructure facilities was conducted. In addition, key management personnel were interviewed and numerous aerial photographs, flow sheets and reports were examined. 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 3.1 Location The Lamesa Site is in Dawson County, TX approximately 312 miles west of Dallas, TX; approximately 56 miles southwest of Lubbock, TX; approximately 57 miles north of Midland, TX; and approximately 11 miles northwest of Lamesa, TX (Figure 3.1). US Route 87 runs through Lamesa, TX and leads directly north to Lubbock, TX and south to Big Spring, TX (Figure 3.2). This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 8 Figure 3.1 General Site Location Map The Lamesa Site is located 11 miles Northwest of the town of Lamesa, TX (Figure 3.2). The facility address is U.S. Silica – Lamesa Plant, 300 County Road 11, Lamesa, TX-79331.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 9 Figure 3.2 Lamesa Area Site Location Map The front gate entrance to the mine is approximately located at 32.806256, -102.126062. The Lamesa, TX property was purchased in July 2017 and is comprised of 3,523-acres of undeveloped ranchland that is now wholly owned by U.S. Silica as outlined by the dark blue boundary line on Figure 3.3 below.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 10 Figure 3.3 Main Mine Operation Map


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 11 3.2 Leases/Royalties U.S. Silica purchased both the land and mineral rights to the Lamesa Site property. As such, there are no leases, no royalties or other associated payments specific to the mine. 3.3 Encumbrances Due to the presence of pre-existing oil production infrastructure on the property, the land is subject to easements for roads, storage areas, pipelines and pump jack stations. A 100-ft. wide, “no mining” buffer is in place around the property boundary. There are no designated wetland areas or other environmental areas to be similarly buffered. Refer to Figure 3.3 for location of the known encumbrances. One currently active oil well pumpjack site lies within the mining area on a 300-ft. x 300-ft. square pillar that was left in place to protect this well head. The access road and pipeline routes associated with this oil well, in addition to a pipeline easement located in the southwest corner of the Lamesa property, were also protected from mining by leaving a 200-ft. wide corridor in place. Additional pump jacks and associated infrastructure are located in the southern most area of the mine that also have similar setbacks and pillars surrounding the oil field equipment. Similarly, a major oil transportation pipeline and a power line corridor run North-South across the property - each protected with a designed 200-ft. wide “no mining” pillar. These buffer zones and “no mining” pillars are shown in Figure 3.4. The sand that lies within these areas was excluded from the Lamesa ore reserve calculation.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 12 Figure 3.4 Known encumbrances 4.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE & PHYSIOGRAPHY 4.1 Topography The topography of the area is relatively flat and expressionless except for the wind-blown sand dunes in various locations. The land use in the region is primarily ranch and agricultural in nature and as a result, surface vegetation varies. Lamesa consists of rolling sand dunes with shinnery oak, grasses and other various scrub vegetation. Some of the younger sand dunes have


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 13 no vegetative cover. Surface elevations at Lamesa range from approximately 3,188 ft. AMSL along the western perimeter to approximately 3,067 ft. AMSL in the southeastern corner. 4.2 Means of Access Lamesa is well serviced and accessed by paved private, County and State roads as shown in Figure 15.1. The most direct route from the town of Lamesa, TX is to take State Road 137 North for eight (8) miles to County Road (CR) 1064 West; turn left on CR 1064 W travelling five (5) miles until the road merges with CR 11. Continue another one (1) mile on the newly paved (formerly gravel) road CR 11 to the plant entrance near the east property boundary. An alternate route is to go west on US Route 180 W from the town of Lamesa, TX, and travel seven miles to County Road 829 North. Turn right on CR 829 N and travel north 7.5 miles on CR 829 N to the intersection and junction of CR 106 W and CR 11. Turn left, travelling one (1) mile on CR 11 to the plant entrance. 4.3 Climate According to the Koppen climate classification system,2 Lamesa is in a semi-arid climate. Summers are hot typically reaching 100o F and cold winter nights below freezing. The average rainfall for the region is approximately 17.6”. As a result, the mine can operate year-round. 4.4 Infrastructure Lamesa has free and clear access to all necessary utilities needed to operate. Electrical Power for the Lamesa facility is provided by Lyntegar Power Utility. It is delivered by pole-lines running west along CR9 (1-mile north of the property) that then turn south and run cross country to the north property boundary. The lines then follow the boundary back to the east, to a point where they turn south along CR E, to the 2 Koppen climate classification system – Wikipedia, Köppen climate classification - Wikipedia.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 14 substation located at the southeast corner of the property (Figure 4.1). Plant electricity is distributed by a combination of buried lines and overhead pole-lines, where appropriate, with the main distribution lines shown in Figure 4.1. Natural Gas for the facility is provided by West Texas Gas Marketing Inc. It is also delivered from the east along CR 1064 to the southeast corner of the property, where a main control header/service shut-off valve has been established. Distribution into the plant is through buried lines that go to the burner end of the three (3) natural gas, rotary sand dryers (Figure 4.1). Water for the Lamesa is not provided by any public utility. Instead, it is mostly provided by purchase agreements with two (2) local, neighboring farmers whereby non-potable process water is delivered by surface pipelines from their ranches (Figure 4.1). Also, there is one (1) on-site water well (South Well) that U.S. Silica drilled just west of the plant and south of CR 11. This well provides an additional 150-200 gallons per minute (“gpm”) of non-potable process water–used for sand washing, sizing, tailings discharge, dust collection, grey-water sanitation, and general site clean-up activities. Potable drinking water for personnel is brought on-site in jugs and bottles using a local water vendor. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 15 Figure 4.1 General location and distribution of site utility lines servicing the Lamesa sand plant and processing facility. Photo courtesy of Adam Rodriguez, April 29, 2020 5.0 HISTORY U.S. Silica is the first landowner to mine silica sand at this location. Except for agricultural activity in the far southeastern area of the property, the previous landowners have not developed the site. It is the understanding of the QP that no other exploration or development work has been undertaken at the mine. 6.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION AND DEPOSIT The mine property lies within the Llano Estacado, a Southern High Plains extension of the Great Plains of North America that covers an area south of the Canadian River in northwest Texas and northeast New Mexico. The Llano Estacado is commonly called the Staked Plains (geologically interpreted as the “palisaded” plains) and it forms a vast elevated plain that has long been recognized as a distinct physiographic region.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 16 The economic sand unit at the Lamesa Site is made up of unnamed windblown sand deposits. The bottom, basal unit in the mine area is made up of a mixture of fine-grained, clay-rich Playa deposits that predominately form a hard, red clay horizon of unknown thickness. Exploration drill holes completed during the initial property assessment and ore deposit delineation at Lamesa did not attempt to find the thickness of this basal clay unit. It is believed that any sand layers lying below this red clay horizon would be very heavily contaminated with clays and carbonates–making it unfit for economic frac sand production. Lying on this basal clay unit is a clay-rich “cover sand” (Pleistocene Epoch sheet sands) which is exposed at the surface on the eastern third of the Lamesa Site. This cover sand is interpreted to be wind-blown dune sand that was stabilized over the last 30,000 years by vegetation and wet deposition of other minerals in an undrained desert basin, that sometimes acted like a shallow inland sea. From the geologic report by Fryberger, et.al., 1979,3 “Sand sheets are sandy plains formed by wind that consist mainly of flat to low angle eolian stratification. They commonly exist on the margins of dune fields or between belts of dunes within a sand sea.” The sand deposit here is very similar in origin, content, structure and distribution as the sand deposits in and near the Kermit – Monahans – Crane area located approximately 90 miles to the southwest of the Lamesa that are currently being mined for frac sand. A general stratigraphic column of the region4 is provided in Table 6.1 below. 3 McKee, Fryberger, Breed et al., 1979, A Study of Global Sand Seas, U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1052. 4 Barnes, V.E., project director, 1976, Geology Atlas of Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Hobbs Sheet, scale 1:250,000.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 17 Table 6.1 Abbreviated generalized stratigraphic column of the Lamesa area


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 18 Figure 6.1 Generalized cross section at the Lamesa Site location


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 19 Figure 6.2 View of the active pit area looking northwest. Figure 6.2 above shows the current mining area at the Lamesa Site. Note loose surficial sands. The eastern extent of the surface sand dune field is very abrupt, and it is in the eastern third of the Lamesa property as noted below as the “dune line” in Figure 6.3 below. Figure 6.3 Dune field extent


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 20 7.0 EXPLORATION 7.1 Drilling Thirty-four (34) borings have been drilled to date at Lamesa utilizing sonic methods. Borings were drilled in three phases as follows in Table 7.1: PHASE DATE DRILLER METHOD BORINGS TD RANGE I March 2017 Unknown Sonic T17-1 through T17-5 30 ft. – 65 ft. II April 2017 Associated Environmental Ind. Sonic T17-6 through T17-16 30 ft. – 60 ft. III September 2018 Associated Environmental Ind. Sonic L18-15 through L18-33 25 ft. – 80 ft. Table 7.1 Exploration drilling campaign history Geologic analysis of the 16 exploration drill holes drilled in 2017 showed that the mineable sand thickness ranged from 16 ft. to 65 ft. The main variation within the sand deposit is the amount of caliche, silt and clay which is consistent with observations at other mines in the region. Phase III drilling in 2018 included an additional 18 borings that were also drilled with sonic methods. Mineable sand thickness ranged from 10 ft. to 58 ft. Figure 7.1 shows the boring locations drilled to date. Drilling recovery information was not provided for review. Based on the QP experience in the region, overall homogeneous geologic nature of the deposit, the lack of this information does not materially affect the accuracy and reliability of the exploration results reviewed. This section intentionally left blank


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 21 Figure 7.1 Boring Location Map


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 22 Review of publicly available water well records in the immediate vicinity of Lamesa indicate that sand is absent in the subsurface at depths greater than those drilled during these exploration programs. Visual inspection of the property indicated that the dividing line between surface exposures of sand sheets and the cover sand area extends roughly North-South just West of the area set aside for the plant. This dividing line will be referred to in this report as the “dune line” (shown in Figure 7.1). Discussions with local ranch and farm workers indicated that sand was deeper to the west of this line, and quite thin east of it. Shovel work identified that the cover sand east of the “dune line” was like the clayey sand seen at the bottom of the drillholes. Later, geotechnical shallow drilling for the plant foundation design confirmed that there is only 3 to 6 ft. of sand in the plant area, and it is assumed that everywhere East of the “dune line” there is only thin, clayey cover sand present which will not be considered for reserves. However, some of this material has been successfully mined and processed into final product – especially in the areas of recent tailings pond construction. No other exploration method (such as geophysics or trenching) was employed to determine the presence or absence of the mineable deposit at Lamesa. 7.2 Hydrogeology There are no natural surface water features at Lamesa. Water used for processing and other assorted mine activities is pumped from water wells located on or adjacent to the plant and some well water is purchased from water purveyors in the area. Groundwater that supplies the mine operation comes from wells completed into the Ogalala Formation. The wells in this formation for the general area are completed to depths ranging from 190 ft. to 230 ft.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 23 8.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY All samples collected during the exploration phases in 2017 and 2018 were tested internally by U.S. Silica at their Katy, Texas laboratory. There is no documentation of sample security, transport or preservation available for review for this site. It is recommended that internal procedures be drafted to include this step for future sample collection. U.S. Silica does have written laboratory procedures in place that adhere to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001 / Quality System criteria that were reviewed. U.S. Silica uses the Approved American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and API approved “Measurement of Properties of Proppants Used in Hydraulic Fracturing and Gravel-packing Operations, ANSI/API Recommended Practice 19C, First Edition, May 2008; ISO 13503-2.2006 (Identical), Petroleum and natural gas industries – Completion fluids and materials Part 2: Measurement of Properties of Proppants Used in Hydraulic Fracturing and Gravel Packing Operations” as part of the laboratory testing documentation. Other protocols reviewed as part of this report include the U. S. Silica ISO 9001 / Quality System – Process Washing: CAP605 (corporate analytical procedure) and the U.S. Silica Company ISO 9001 / Quality System – Attrition Scrubbing documents. Both documents were signed by David Weller, Technology Director, ISP in 2016 and distributed internally. These documents detail the change history, scope, safety, equipment, and procedure instructions for each test. It is the QP’s opinion that adequate testing was performed to provide ample data to render an opinion to proceed with the construction of a multimillion-dollar processing plant. Additionally, the sand is continually being sold to multiple customers which supports the fact that the sand is of sufficient quality and demand. Written statements from U.S. Silica indicate that the internal labs follow all protocols discussed here.5 5 Terry Lackey email dated 9.24.21.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 24 9.0 DATA VERIFICATION In review of the laboratory protocols, discussions with U.S. Silica, and testing data provided, it is the QP’s opinion that the data provided is sufficient for the purposes of this report. This determination is also based on the QP’s extensive experience in this same sand deposit in the region. Testing was performed by PropTester to determine the density of the processed sand.6 This value is used to convert bank cubic yards to tons. The specific gravity/density of the material tested from the Lamesa wet plant is 91.5 lbs./cu ft. which equals 1.24 tons/cu. yd. This is not representative of the in-situ sand in the unmined deposit. It is likely that the density of the in-situ deposit is different from what was measured in the wet plant. Additional testing of the in-situ deposit should be performed to get a more accurate value. Please refer to Section 12.2 Data Verification Methodology and Section 12.3 Process Verification below for further detail. 10.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING The mining of the deposit at Lamesa began in late 2018. The sand is generally a loosely consolidated surficial deposit and is easily extracted by means of front-end loaders. Because the deposit is primarily silica, there are no specific mineralogical processing or testing procedures required to deliver a finished product. The sand is mined, screened, washed, attritioned, dried, and sized before it is loaded into customer trucks. Overburden has been determined to be roughly the top one ft. of vegetative material that is screened out prior to arrival at the wet plant. As a result, there is minimal processing of the material into a finished product. In some instances where caliche is present, additional attrition or screening may be required to remove the calcium carbonate. Based on review of laboratory reports provided, testing performed on samples collected is adequate for this type of deposit. 6 PropTester Report 101-19-11-97-24-B, dated November 22, 2019.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 25 U.S. Silica performed internal testing according to API RP 19C protocol on the samples collected from the 2017 exploration event. The limited API RP 19C testing showed favorable results that meet the criteria set forth in these testing methods for roundness, sphericity, turbidity, acid solubility and crush resistance. Roundness measures how smooth the sand grain is whereas sphericity measures how closely the sand shape resembles a sphere. Grains with sharp edges will crush (fail) under less pressure and will create fines. The more spherical a grain then the more pressure it can withstand during the frac process. The more pressure a grain can withstand, the deeper underground, or in higher pressure plays, it can be used. Turbidity testing is a measure of water clarity and how many suspended particles, including those that are invisible to the naked eye, may be present. Suspended materials include soil particles (clay, silt, and very fine sand), algae, plankton, microbes, and other substances. This value needs to be low so that the ingredients in the fracking fluids do not react with the suspended particles and cause a reduction in the effectiveness of the frac. Acid solubility testing indicates if grains may be coated with other minerals that are not readily washed off during processing. If the solubility numbers are high, then this indicates that the sand may react with the acids present in fracking fluids creating fines that may lower the effectiveness of the frac. Crush resistance testing shows how much pressure the grains can endure before crushing or failing. The crush value (“K-value”) varies depending on the size and shape of the grains. The higher the crush value, the higher the durability of the sand. High crush values are preferred when using sand for fracking. The Lamesa deposit is intended to be primarily, if not solely, used for Oil & Gas proppant (frac sand) sales. The scrubbed samples from the 2017 exploration event were therefore sent from the


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 26 Berkeley Springs Lab to U.S. Silica’s Oil & Gas Lab in Katy, TX, for proppant testing. Key API parameters for all drillhole intervals are shown in Table 10.1: Table 10.1 Selected Lamesa, TX sand physical test results Based on the favorable API testing from the 2017 exploration event, only grain size distribution testing (gradations or sieve analysis) was performed on the samples collected during the 2018 exploration event. The specific gravity/density of the material tested by PropTester from the Lamesa wet plant is 91.5 lbs./cu ft. which equals 1.24 tons/cu. yd. 11.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES Based on information provided, collected and reviewed, the deposit at the Lamesa Site is classified as a reserve. This section is not applicable. 12.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES 12.1 U.S. Silica Methodology U.S. Silica reports its in-situ ore reserves in “Mineable Tons.” As such, a geologic “Resource” that is identified by exploration drilling is further defined by several other key criteria before it can be considered a “Mineable Ore Reserve.” The most important of these criteria are that the Resource must: 1. Exhibit reliable/ repeatable geologic continuity,


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 27 2. Be defined by a reasonable drill hole spacing (appropriate for the expected variability characteristic of this type of geologic deposit), 3. Contain products that meet generally accepted quality specifications (API or ISO), 4. Be critically evaluated to eliminate any uncertain or marginal test results, 5. Be critically evaluated to eliminate any physical constraints (property boundaries, environmental setbacks, utility and infrastructure setbacks, etc.), 6. Be factored for mining recovery / losses based on the mining method employed, and 7. Contain products that can be sold at a profit (be economic). The sand strata that were logged in each of the 34 exploration drill holes were categorized as “Clean Sand” Ore; “Clayey Sand” Ore; and “Overburden” Waste. Overburden was conservatively defined as the top one-ft. thickness of the entire surface topographic cover-to allow for removal of inorganic surficial debris and organic contaminants such as sage brush and other grassy vegetation. Geologic block modeling was conducted inhouse using U.S. Silica’s SURPAC mine design software. The geologic block model was created using the ore and waste lithostratigraphic units and then the ore reserve model was constructed using the nearest neighbor polygonal block method. The geologic criteria for “filling” the ore reserve polygons were: (1) the true thicknesses of economic ore units (“Clean Sand” and “Clayey Sand” ores) and (2) the associated interval analytical quality data (sieve analysis particle size data and grain crush strength). Based on the lateral geologic continuity of Lamesa’s dune sand sheet deposits, “Proven Ore” reserves were defined within a quarter-mile radius (1,320-ft.) of a drill hole. “Probable Ore” reserves were defined by that material that was outside the quarter-mile radius, but within a half- mile (2,640-ft) radius of the drill hole. The absence of dune sands on the east side of the property forms a strictly defined geologic limit to the ore reserves on the Lamesa Site property (Figures 6.3 & 7.1).


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 28 A 100-ft. wide, “no mining” buffer was designed to be left in place around the property boundary. There are no wetland areas or other environmental areas to be similarly buffered. One currently active oil well pumpjack site lies within the mining area in a 300-ft. x 300-ft. square pillar was left in place to protect this wellhead. The access road and pipeline routes associated with this oil well were also protected from mining by leaving a 200-ft.-wide corridor in place. Similarly, a major oil transportation pipeline and a power line corridor run North-South across the property and are each protected with a designed 200-ft. wide “no mining” pillar. These buffer zones and “no mining” pillars are shown in Figure 12.1 below. The sand that lies within these areas was excluded from the Lamesa Site ore reserve calculation. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 29 Figure 12.1 Mine pit locations.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 30 U.S. Silica has assigned a 10% mining loss to reported in-situ volumes. This waste occurs between the point of extraction and point of arrival of the material to the plant. Once the material is extracted it is no longer considered to be in-situ. Waste due to processing is not reflected in the in-situ volumes reported. WESTWARD utilized two approaches in confirming U.S. Silica’s internal Lamesa reserve estimates: data verification and process verification. The purpose of data verification was to address whether data incorporated in the U.S. Silica models was supported by documentation and that the model inputs matched those documents. The purpose of process verification was to address whether U.S. Silica’s results could be replicated using identical data sets. 12.2 Data Verification Methodology WESTWARD coordinated with U.S. Silica personnel to compile copies of all available exploratory field logs, gradational test results and a database of the geologic model inputs. Once compiled a spreadsheet was developed including a list of all exploratory boings from the model, their locations, elevations, and exploration depths. If supporting documentation was available, it was indicated on the spreadsheet next to the associated boring. To address whether model inputs matched supporting documentation, spot checking was used. Spot checking was conducted randomly for both lithological and gradational data inputs. Spot checking was performed on at least 10% of available data sets. 12.3 Process Verification Methodology WESTWARD developed an independent geologic model of the Lamesa deposit from the provided U.S. Silica data inputs, setbacks, and mining assumptions. RockWorks21 modeling software was used to develop the independent model with the Inverse Distance Weighting algorithm and a 40x40x1 ft. model resolution.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 31 Volumetric estimates of in-situ raw material for each mine block were extracted from the model. Reductions for overburden and highwall design were not incorporated into the model. After modeling was complete, additional data was input to verify volumes. Overburden was assumed to be one ft. thick across the entire site and a pit slope reduction was calculated for each mine block based on the mine block perimeter, average modeled thickness, and cross-sectional area assuming a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (3H:1V) highwall slope. 12.4 Results The in-situ volumes were reduced by the assumed overburden volume, and the calculated highwall volume estimate. A 10 % reduction for mining loss was then applied resulting in a Net Mineable Ore volume. A unit weight of 91.5 pounds per cubic ft. was applied to calculate Net Mineable Ore tons which is the value compared against U.S. Silica estimates. 12.5 In-Situ, Mineable Ore Reserves There was sufficient data available for review to classify the deposit at the Lamesa Site as having both proven and probable reserves. The difference between the model run by U.S. Silica and WESTWARD to calculate reserves differed by approximately 2%. This is an acceptable value. Over the life of the mine, this volume is minimal. Reserve estimates of in-situ silica sand as reported by U.S. Silica are shown in Table 12.1 below. Deposit Classification In-Situ, Mineable Ore Tons* Proven Reserve 85,678,000 Probable Reserve 6,800,000 TOTAL 92,478,000 Table 12.1 U.S. Silica In-Situ, Mineable Ore Reserves Estimate


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 32 12.6 Cut Off Grades Cut-Off grade is the minimum grade required for a mineral or metal to be economically mined (or processed). Material found to be above this grade is considered to be ore, while material below this grade is considered to be waste. Exploration and testing are performed to determine where the mineable/saleable material is located. Only areas that meet the criteria for being economic are mined. At the Lamesa Site, material is considered to be economically mineable when the cost to extract, process and then sell the material results in a profit. As a result, the mineable silica sand at the site is considered economic as it meets the cut-off grade for a saleable silica sand product. One commodity is mined and processed at the Lamesa Site, silica sand. The end use of the silica sand can be multiple products based on individual customer needs. As a result, the silica sand is sold by the ton regardless of the product type. Please refer to Section 19.0 Economic Analysis for pricing information. 13.0 MINING METHODS U.S. Silica mines frac sand from a 3,523-acre location in Dawson County, TX approximately 11 miles north-west of the town of Lamesa, TX. The overall deposit is made up of two identifiable units.7 The first is classified as “Eolian dune sands”8 (13 to 46 ft. thick) and the second is a “Clayey Cover Sand” (0 to 25 ft. thick). They are part of a large regional geologic unit covering northwest Texas and northeast New Mexico. Eolian dune sand is a known source of silica 7 See Section 6 – Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit and in Section 11 – Mineral Resource Estimates. 8 Eolian (or aeolian) sand is sand perceived to be deposited by wind at some time in the past.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 33 bearing sands which are recognized as occurring not only in Texas but also in Utah,9 along the shore of Lake Michigan,10 the shores of British Columbia,11 and the Northwest Territories.12 U.S. Silica’s Lamesa, TX operation began mining and processing finished goods in the third quarter of 2018. The maximum operating capacity of the processing plant is approximately 5.1 M tons per year13 of finished goods that are destined for the oil and gas completion markets in the Permian Basin. To produce this volume of finished goods, the mine will consume about 6.0 M tons of sand reserves. The plant is well situated near the center of the Permian Basin. The dune sand mined at the Lamesa Site lays in “sheets” of variable thickness. The less variable Clayey Cover Sands are likely unconsolidated clean sands that have been contaminated with clay particles over time. Figure 13.1 shows a typical cross section looking north through the property14. It illustrates the relationship of the economic underlying Clayey Cover Sand (orange color) and the economic horizon of Upper Clean Sand (green color). The overlying red color represents estimated waste or “overburden” thicknesses through this cross section. The horizontal nature of the sand deposit and the average thickness of the sand layers favors surface mining by conventional methods. Since the sand is unconsolidated, simple excavation by tracked excavator or front-end loader is sufficient to load haul trucks for transport to the processing plant. 9 AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90169©2013 AAPG Rocky Mountain Section 62nd Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 22-24, 2013. 10 Sargent Sand Company, Ludington MI, https://www.sargentsand.com/about.html. 11 Hickin, A.S., Ferri, Fil, Ferbey, Travis, and Smith, I.R., 2010, Preliminary assessment of potential hydraulic fracture sand sources and their depositional origin, northeast British Columbia: British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Geoscience Reports 2010, p. 35–91. 12 Levson, Vic, Pyle, Leanne, and Fournier, Mike, 2012, Identification of potential silica sand deposits in the Northwest Territories: Northwest Territories Geoscience Office, Northwest Territories Open File 2012-6, p. 76. 13 Running 24 hours per day and 7 days per week and allowing for losses and downtime. 14 This is a cross section through the approximate middle of the Lamesa property from east to west (see Section 6 and Section 7 for detail).


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 34 Figure 13.1 - Geologic cross section looking north at the approximate midpoint of the property at Lamesa, TX.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 35 13.1 Clearing, Grubbing and Overburden Removal The vegetation on the planned mining areas is classified as “Silver Bluestem – Texas Wintergrass Grassland.15 This type of vegetation is sparse and easily cleared. The practice at Lamesa is to include the overburden and vegetation as part of the mining face with the deleterious portions being removed through processing. This is an efficient and cost-effective method of handling overburden so long as the thickness does not become too excessive. Overburden thicknesses average approximately 1 ft. across the property. Drilling indicates the depth of the overburden to remain in the range where U.S. Silica believes the organic and other deleterious materials can be efficiently removed through processing in the plant throughout the life of the mine.16 13.2 Mining Process The terrain is gently undulating and easily accessible. U.S. Silica utilizes a contractor to excavate the overburden, Upper Clean Sand and the Clayey Cover Sand typically in one “bank.”17 Figure 13.2 shows the mining activity at Lamesa where a front-end loader is digging the sand “bank” and loading the overburden, Upper Clean Sand, and the Clayey Cover Sand into a haul truck for transport to the processing plant. If the total mining thickness exceeds 25 ft., a second bank/bench is developed below the first, and the remaining deposit is removed in a second pass down to the top of the hard, red sand layer pit floor. These two banks may be blended to maximize sand recovery and manage clay waste products transferred to the Wet Processing Plant. Figure 13.3 shows an overall view of the mining process at Lamesa. The current mining contract runs through 2024 and is based on mining approximately 3,600 K bank-cubic-yards (“BCY”) of raw sand annually.18 However, the contract also allows for an increase in mined volume to meet the demand of finished goods. The volume of bank yards 15 The Vegetation Types of Texas, Texas Parks & Wildlife Foundation, GIS Lab, TPWD, 1984. 16 Email from Terry Lackey of November 18, 2021. 17 A “bank” is a term referencing the economic resource in its natural state before removal by mining. 18 Raw sand includes the Upper Clean Sand, the Clayey Cover Sand, and the overburden when it is not removed separately and hauled to the raw sand stockpile as part of the mining process.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 36 relates to the volume of finished goods by adjusting the volume of finished goods for losses due to plant waste and normal mining losses. These “in-process” losses equate to about 15% of the mined volume hauled to the plant. A further, “swell” adjustment is necessary to get from the “loose” volume in a haul truck to the “bank” volume19 of the raw sand in the pit. Various estimates for swell of dry sand exist in the literature. They range from 10% swell to 30% swell.20 A reasonable factor for the material mined at Lamesa is on the low end at 10% due to the unconsolidated and dry nature of the deposit. U.S. Silica is projecting a contract mining rate increase every five years through the life of the mine. Table 13.1 shows the financial parameters for the contracted hauling at Lamesa. Table 13.1 Financial parameters for contract hauling 19 Bank refers to the in-situ volume of the undisturbed sand before it is loaded into the haul truck. 20 Open Pit Mine Planning and Design, John T. Crawford, III and William A. Hustrulid, 1979, p. 294, https://www.projectengineer.net/swell-factors-for-various-soils/, https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/soil-rock-bulking-factor- d_1557.html, The Alaska DOT 1983 https://www.spikevm.com/calculators/excavation/bulking-swell-factors.php. Year Finished Goods Sales (K T) Stockpiled Volume Hauled (K BYd3) Mining Rate per Year (K T) Contract Unit Cost ($/BYd3) Additional Time and Materials ($ K) Total Contract Value ($ K) 2018 286 262 354 - - - 2019 3,384 3,104 4,191 - - - 2020 3,187 2,923 3,947 $1.24 $500 $4,125 2021 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.28 $500 $4,748 2022 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.29 $500 $4,769 2023 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.28 $500 $4,747 2024 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.28 $500 $4,762 2025 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.39 $500 $5,107 2026 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.41 $500 $5,174 2027 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.43 $500 $5,239 2028 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.43 $500 $5,230 2029 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.43 $500 $5,253 2030 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.55 $500 $5,639 2031 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.57 $500 $5,714 2032 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.59 $500 $5,784 2033 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.59 $500 $5,769 2034 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.59 $500 $5,792 2035 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.72 $500 $6,217 2036 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.75 $500 $6,295 2037 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.77 $500 $6,367 2038 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.76 $500 $6,346 2039 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.77 $500 $6,365 2040 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.91 $500 $6,830 2041 Projected 3,618 3,319 4,480 $1.93 $500 $6,911 2042 Projected 1,224 1,123 1,516 $1.95 $169 $2,363


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 37 The haul trucks utilized by the contractor are typically 40 T or 50 T articulating trucks which haul the sand approximately 4,400 ft. to the raw sand stockpiles at the processing plant. The trucks are loaded by front-end loader (8-15 cubic-yard capacity) as shown in Figure 13.2. The contractor currently maintains a fleet of 10 haul trucks which varies depending on the forecast volume to be delivered to the raw sand stockpiles. The contactor employs 15 hourly employees to operate haul trucks, front-end loaders, a water truck, a motor grader, and a dozer. The contract with U.S. Silica requires the contractor to maintain a 30-day stockpile buffer of raw sand21 to assure the Wet Processing Plant runs efficiently. The contract is set for renewal at the end of 2024. In the event U.S. Silica and the contractor cannot reach a reasonable renewal or new contract, U.S. Silica can assume the loading and hauling duties itself. The decision for U.S. Silica to buy or lease the required loading and hauling equipment is a financial one. The expertise to perform these unit operations is within the scope of U.S. Silica’s expertise. The move to “in-house” loading and hauling would require a lease or capital investment in equipment and the hiring of mining personnel. There is no material barrier for U.S. Silica to take over from the contractor. Since this type of arrangement is common in both the construction and mining industries, this choice will likely remain a financial one for U.S. Silica. The QP believes the assumption of a contractor arrangement for loading and hauling is a reasonable one for the life-of-mine financial analysis contained in this report. At the Processing Plant, the contractor’s haul trucks deliver the mined sand to one of two large surge piles of raw sand. Once in the raw sand is stockpiled, the mined sand is available for the Wet Processing Plant’s front-end loaders to feed the Wet Processing Plant. Figure 13.2 shows the generalized flow of material from the sand bank into the finished goods bins, ready for shipment to the frac sand user. 21 Or, 400,000 yd3 whichever is smaller.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 38 Figure 13.2 Generalized process flow for the Lamesa, TX facility.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 39 Figure 13.3 - Typical mining operation at Lamesa showing a front-end loader excavating the full bank section of overburden, the "Upper Clean Sand," and the Clayey Cover Sand. 13.3 Pit Repair and Maintenance The loading and hauling are performed on a contract basis and, therefore, the mobile equipment repair and maintenance is handled by the contractor. The costs thereof are included in the fee paid by U.S. Silica during the duration of the contract period. 13.4 Mine Equipment U.S. Silica contracts for the loading and hauling portion of the operations at Lamesa, TX. No U.S. Silica equipment is currently dedicated to the mine operations. The contractor currently operates the mobile equipment shown in Table 13.2.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 40 Table 13.2 Equipment currently employed by the mining contractor 13.5 Mine Planning and Production Scheduling U.S. Silica employs personnel responsible for mine planning and production scheduling. Mine planners provide direction and support to the operating group to ensure proper sequencing of mining activities. These activities include permit compliance, planned sequencing of areas to be mined, preparation of tailings disposal areas and other production needs of the operating group. Mine planning has been undertaken based on the results of drilling and identified economic mining horizons as described in Sections 11.0 Mineral Resource Estimates and Section 12.0 Mineral Reserve Estimates, describing the mineral resources and reserves. Figure 13.4 shows an overview of the property, mineral resource areas (Areas 1-3), and the existing plant. Figure 13.4 also shows the approximate mined-out area as of November 2021. East of Area 1 there is no Upper Clean Sand which is why the plant was located there. Manufacturer Quanity Type Model Catepillar 1 Front-End Loader 992 Caterpillar 1 Tracked Excavator 349F Caterpillar 1 Tracked Excavator 349F Catepillar 1 Dozer D8T Catepillar 1 Water Truck 730C Catepillar 1 Motor Grader 120M Catepillar 1 Haul Truck 745 Catepillar 1 Haul Truck 740B Volvo 6 Haul Truck A60H Volvo 2 Haul Truck A45G


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 41 Figure 13.4 Lamesa, TX location, property and mineable areas. A high level of detail is not required in the mine planning activity at Lamesa. The deposit is reasonably uniform with no material unconformity or significant risk of intrusive mineralization. With a generally horizontal and unconsolidated sand deposits such as the deposit at this location, the mine planner sequences specific areas, or “blocks” of sand to be moved. Mining advances through these blocks, advancing the active mining bank in the direction prescribed by the planners. Figure 13.2 shows the general advance of the mining, in this case, away from the camera. Normally, the objective is to minimize the haul time. The mining will continue to progress west, north, and south from the mined-out area in Area 1 to the property-line set-back boundaries (approximately 100 ft. of buffer). Area 2 (Figure 13.4) is separated from Areas 1 and 3 by “no-mining” buffers of 200 ft. due to an access road and a pipeline. On the south side of Area 3 a buffer of 300 ft. by 300 ft. is designated as buffer around


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 42 a well head. In the southeast of Area 3, there is a diagonal exclusion for a pipeline that traverses the property. Set-backs and exclusions are detailed in Section 3.0 – Property Description and Section 11.0 Mineral Resource Estimates and Section 12.0 Mineral Reserve Estimates dealing with the resource and reserve quantities. The annual production schedule is determined based on the forecasted sales demand provided by the sales and marketing group. This production schedule is adjusted to produce the targeted annual mining volume by factoring in losses for waste, in-pit uses, etc. Production schedules are then developed to assure adequate feed is provided to the processing plant to meet the finished- goods demand in a timely manner. Table 13.3 shows the estimated production for the next five years.22 This is achievable with current contractual arrangements in the pit, along with U.S. Silica’s equipment and personnel. A projection consistent with this analysis for mine production levels is included for the life-of-mine in the economic analysis section of this report. This section intentionally left blank. 22 211026 – LOM Sustaining Capital Estimates.xlsx and 201130 - Lamesa TX - FINAL - Internal Report; both provided by U.S. Silica.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 43 Figure 13.4 Lamesa, TX location, property and mineable areas. Table 13.3 Historical and projected mining volumes for Lamesa, TX. Year Finished Goods Sales (K Tons) Annual Mining Volume (K BYd 3 ) 2018 286 236 2019 3,384 2,794 2020 3,187 2,631 2021 estimated 3,966 3,274 2022 Projected 5,100 4,211 2023 Projected 6,900 5,697 2024 Projected 5,700 4,706 2025 Projected 6,500 5,366 2026 Projected 6,500 5,366


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 44 14.0 PROCESSING AND RECOVERY METHODS Figure 14.1 Aerial photo of the Lamesa, TX U.S. Silica plant The U.S. Silica Lamesa plant is located east of the active mining area on the same property as the mine. Construction of the plant began in early 2018 and the first finished goods were produced in late 2018. Figure 13.4 shows the spatial relationship of the mine and the plant. Figure 14.1 shows an aerial photograph of the overall plant area showing the processing plant area shown in Figure 13.4. The annual production of finished goods at the Lamesa facility is a function of customer demand and the production capacity, by size fraction, of the plant. Total demand and product mix varies relative to economic cycles of end users, technology employed by the well completion companies, and the competitive environment. The plant operating personnel periodically coordinate with the sales group to target a production forecast. The plant at Lamesa has limited flexibility in adapting to fluctuations in the sand sizes which naturally occurs in the deposit.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 45 Therefore, the natural mix of sand sizes dictates the mix between individual product classifications produced. The finished goods are sold primarily as two products – 40/70 Mesh and 100-Mesh API / ISO quality frac sands.23 For the raw sand from the mine to become an economically salable product, it must be processed through two plants, a Wet Processing Plant and a Dry Processing Plant. After the contractor deposits sand in the raw sand stockpiles on the west side of the plant, it is stored there until it is processed through the Wet Processing Plant by U.S. Silica personnel. 14.1 Wet Processing Plant To begin wet processing, sand from the raw sand stockpile is picked up by a front-end loader and dumped onto a static grizzly deck. The undersize from the static grizzly is conveyed onto a vibrating dry scalping screen to remove waste. This “dry sand waste” is composed of coarse debris greater than 6-inches in size such as rocks, gravel, clay agglomerates, and organic material from the overburden from the mine. It is stored in a stockpile on the mine site. The material that passes the dry scalping screen is conveyed to the wet scalping screen where wet processing begins. The silica sand material is washed on the screen and any material larger than quarter inch is removed and sent to the tailings circuit. The material finer than quarter inch is combined with water to produce a slurry, which can then be pumped through the remainder of the wet processing operation. Once in a slurry, the silica sand passes through “desliming24 cyclones25” and attrition scrubber cells. Attrition scrubber cells use a series of rotating paddles to create turbulence in the slurry 23 U.S. Silica Internal Report: Lamesa, TX., 2021. 24 “Slimes” are fine particles that are detrimental to the recovery of the economic mineral from a mine. “Desliming” is the process of separating that fine detrimental material from the desired economic material. See also: “ASM Gloss.; ASM Metals Handbook, v.1. = American Society for Metals. Metals Handbook. Volume 1. Properties and Selection of Metals. Metals Park, Ohio, 8th ed., 1961, 1300 pp. Includes a glossary of Definitions Relating to Metals and Metal working, pp. 1-41.” 25 A “cyclone” is a piece of equipment which uses a fluid (air or water) to “spin” particles and use the particle mass to separate the sizes of the particle by centrifugal force.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 46 thereby “scrubbing” or cleaning the silica particles while also liberating individual sand particles which may be agglomerated in “clusters”. The action of the paddles removes surface clay, other film, coatings, or slimes from the silica grains. Once the slurry has passed through the scrubber cells, the water is removed by a set of cyclones and de-watering screens. The moisture content of the silica sand at this point is 12% to 20%, and it is moved to a drain pad stockpile where decantation further dries the sand to 5% to 10% moisture. The wet processing of the silica sand can be seen in the plant flow in Figure 13.3. 14.2 Dry Processing Plant The dry process begins when front-end loaders pick up material from the drain-pad stockpile and load it into one of two dryer feed hoppers (Figure 13.2). From there it is conveyed into one of three rotary dryers, each with rated capacities ranging from 225 to 260 tons-per-hour. After drying, the material is sized across one of eight mineral separators. Oversize from the mineral separators is transported to the dry sand waste stockpile. The finished goods produced from the mineral separators moves to either the API grade 40/70-mesh product silos or the API 100-Mesh product silos until they are loaded into trucks for shipment to the end users. 14.3 U.S. Silica Plant Equipment - Mobile U.S. Silica uses primarily leased mobile equipment in the plant area. A list of the plant mobile equipment currently utilized at Lamesa is shown in Table 14.1. The decision to lease versus purchase is made by the corporate financial group. Repair and maintenance activity is accomplished by a combination of U.S. Silica personnel and outside contractors. Plant mobile equipment mechanical availability generally averages about 85 %. This availability is high enough to maintain the production requirements represented in the financial analysis portion of this report.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 47 Table 14.1 Plant equipment at the U.S. Silica Lamesa, TX facility. The Wet Processing Plant and the Dry Processing Plant capacities are designed to complement one another. Some limited volumes of “wet” products are currently manufactured for sale at Lamesa. The capacity of the processing plants at Lamesa is limited by drying capacity or screening capacity in the mineral separators. The plant can operate 365 days per year, and currently, it is operating 24 hours per day. Table 13.3 shows the yearly production history and a forecast for the next five years for the production at Lamesa. Based on finished goods production from prior years, this plant production is achievable with current plant equipment and plant personnel. A projection consistent with this analysis for total sales volume is included for the life of mine in the financial analysis section of this report. Manufacturer Type Model Year Owned/ Leased Monthly Lease Cost Kenworth T880 Guzzler Vacuum Truck T880 2018 Leased $10,072 International Water Truck 7400 2018 Leased $3,506 Genie Scossor Lift SX125D546 Leased $4,604 Catepillar Front-End Loader 988K 2018 Leased $13,937 Catepillar Track Loader 259D 2018 Leased $605 Catepillar Track Loader 259D 2018 Leased $605 Catepillar Front-End Loader 988K Leased $13,807 Catepillar Front-End Loader 988K Leased $13,937 Catepillar Front-End Loader 988K Leased $13,807 Catepillar Front-End Loader 988K Leased $13,807 Caterpillar Front-End Loader 938 Leased $3,556 Caterpillar Front-End Loader 988K Leased $20,931 Caterpillar Front-End Loader 988K Leased $20,932 JLG Boomlift 600SC Leased $2,960 JLG Skytrak Forklift 10042 Leased $3,164 JLG Skytrak Forklift 10042 2017 Leased $3,009 Catepillar Articulated Haul Truck 745 Leased $13,596 Catepillar Articulated Haul Truck 745 Leased $19,596 Volvo Articulated Haul Truck A40G 2014 Leased $2,433 Catepillar Front-End Loader 988H Owned Genie Manlift S40 Owned Doosan Forklift Owned Takeuchi Mini Excavator Owned


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 48 14.4 Plant Manning As of December 31, 2021, the U.S. Silica Lamesa hourly workforce totaled 98 hourly and 15 salaried employees. 15.0 INFRASTRUCTURE The U.S. Silica Lamesa location has been operating in this location since 2018. The mine and plant have been capable of adequately supplying the markets they serve while maintaining a social license to operate in the Lamesa, TX community. The infrastructure required to maintain a sustainable presence in this generally rural local community is in place. The infrastructure required for current and limited future ramp-up of operations to nameplate capacity is in place. Certain capital expenditures are required as needed for replacements due to age of depreciating assets. Other expansion capital (including additional incremental investment to maintain capacity) is minimal. Capital expenditures are discussed below and in Section 18. 15.1 Roads Lamesa is accessible by roads maintained as private roads and by County and State roads. Road access is critical for the delivery of materials used in the production of finished goods and for shipment of finished goods to U.S. Silica customers. The plant and mine have access to roadways rated for the loads to be shipped to and from the facility. Figure 15.1 shows the access to the Lamesa Site (red and green lines) for truck haulage of finished goods. This section intentionally left blank.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 49 Figure 15.1 - Roadways linking the Lamesa, TX location to the end-user market. 15.2 Rail There is no rail infrastructure at the Lamesa Site. The railroads currently serving the Permian Basin include BNSF Railway Co., Union Pacific railroad, Gardendale Railroad Inc., the Texas- New Mexico Railroad, Lubbock & Western (West Texas & Lubbock Railway) and Texas- Pacifico Transportation Ltd.26 The nearest rail operations to the Lamesa Site are the Lubbock & Western in Brownfield, TX and the Plainsman Switching Company in either Post, TX or 26 Progressive Railroading, December 2014, Rail News: Rail Industry Trends In the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale, crude's boom is the overriding theme.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 50 Lubbock, TX.27 Any connection to rail would likely be by transload in Lubbock. There are currently no plans to connect to rail. 15.3 Electric Power The Lamesa plant uses electric power provided through Lyntegar Electric Cooperative, Inc.28 Lyntegar is rural electric cooperative financed by the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation29. Further, Lyntegar is a member of Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.30 Lyntegar receives transmission and other services from Golden Spread. Power is purchased by Lyntegar from Golden Spread. Lyntegar constructed the substation on the U.S. Silica property to be able to provide the electric power distribution to the plant. Power is transmitted to the plant through an above-ground network of pole lines generally running along CR 9, about one mile north of the Lamesa property, and then south along County Road C to the plant substation on the east side of the property. From the substation, the electric power is distributed by a combination of buried and overhead lines. Lyntegar is allowed to recover their costs for capital construction according to the Rate Schedule under which power is sold. Lyntegar is allowed to adjust its rates from time to time during the term of the agreement with U.S. Silica. The term ends in 2024. There is no automatic extension provision in the contract. U.S. Silica has a history of reliable electric power supply since the plant started operating in 2018. The contracted capacity exceeds the projected demand at peak frac sand production by eighty-two percent.31 27 Texas Rail map of 2016. 28 Lyntegar Power Utility is a Texas electric cooperative corporation distributing power in eleven counties in west Texas and Lyntegar. 29 The National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation is a member-owned non-profit owned by an agglomeration of electric cooperatives in the United States. They provide financing to help promote rural development and support electric power infrastructure distribution systems. 30 Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc. is a not-for-profit generation and transmission cooperative organized in 1984 to provide electric power to its 16 Member cooperatives. 31 U.S. Silica “Lamesa – Summary Statement – Electric Power,” Adam Rodriguez, October 11, 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 51 15.4 Natural Gas Natural gas is used as a fuel for drying the silica sand in the plant. The gas is currently supplied by West Texas Gas Marketing, Inc.32 West Texas Gas delivers gas through its pipeline from the interconnect with Oneok WesTex Pipeline in Dawson County, Texas.33 The term of the contract with West Texas Gas generally runs from year to year. Pricing is determined at the beginning of the term and has no limitations on quantity. The natural gas is delivered to the plant via underground pipeline that runs along County Road 1064 (Figure 15.1). Gas is distributed into the plant through various underground pipelines. West Texas Gas Marketing, Inc. has been a reliable supplier of natural gas since the plant started operation in 2018. In the opinion of the QP the risk of material interruption of the supply of natural gas is low. The highest risk relative to natural gas is real cost escalation of the gas supply without a long-term contract. 15.5 Water Water is a critical commodity for U.S. Silica’s Lamesa plant. Water is used to wash the silica grains, sizing the sand, creating a slurry of the tailings discharge, dust control, grey-water sanitation, and site clean-up activities. Make-up water34 is provided by purchase agreements with two local ranches and from four, U.S. Silica-owned, water wells. There is no public utility capable of providing water to the Lamesa location. Potable water for human consumption is provided by purchasing bottled water from a local vendor. Water is recycled from the processing plant through the thickener and the tailings pond settling process (Figure 14.1). Clarified water from the tailings pond is reintroduced into the process through a pump on the south side of the settling pond. The processing at Lamesa requires 32Texas Gas Marketing, Inc was formed in 1996 and is a downstream gas marketing company that aggregates natural gas supply and markets this supply through transportation agreements with other pipelines. 33 Oneok WesTex is a midstream service provider of natural gas accessing production areas in the Mid-Continent region. 34 Make-up water is water added to the recycled water to provide adequate quantity for the production of the finished goods.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 52 approximately 60 gallons of make-up water per ton per ton of finished goods sold. This equates to 600 to 700 gpm of make-up water required at a 6 M tons per year of finished goods production rate.35 This make-up water requirement includes dust control, sanitation, and clean-up activities. The distribution of slurry and process water relies on pump stations and a network of high density polyethylene (“HDPE”) pipelines on the property. Maintenance of pumps, pump stations, and pipelines is a vital component in the process of producing finished goods and cost control. Lamesa maintenance personnel routinely monitor the condition of the slurry distribution system and recycle water lines. They perform routine maintenance as required. Water rights in Texas depend on whether the water is groundwater or surface water. In most cases, groundwater belongs to the landowner and is governed by the rule of capture. Surface water belongs to the State of Texas. The rule of capture would grant U.S. Silica the right to pump and capture the water beneath its property, regardless of the effects of that pumping on neighboring wells. As a result, additional wells could be drilled to mitigate the risk of the loss of one of the contract agreements, so long as there is capacity to produce additional water from the ground water beneath the U.S. Silica property. U.S. Silica believes any risk of the lack of water could be mitigated by the permitting and construction of an additional high capacity well. The four owned wells on the Lamesa Site have a combined capacity of 200 to 250 gpm, on average.36 Between 450 and 500 gpm are then required from additional sources. U.S. Silica has contracted with J&G Hogg, LLC and Jacob Teichroeb to provide up to 1,000 gpm, each, if necessary. The contracts for purchasing water provide for the supply of water from the wells so long as U.S. Silica remains operational. U.S. Silica is responsible for annual payment amounts, per-gallon fees, a portion of the electrical service fees, and 50% of the maintenance costs for the wells. 35 U.S. Silica “Lamesa – Summary Statement – Water,” Adam Rodriguez, October 11, 2021. 36 U.S. Silica “Lamesa – Summary Statement – Water,” Adam Rodriguez, October 11, 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 53 15.6 Tailings Handling and Disposal The mined silica sand contains components that are unable to be sold and are therefore considered a byproduct, or “waste,” from the production of finished goods. This waste is largely the very fine silica sand particles and non-silica mineralization contained within the mined sand layers and the overburden. This waste is removed from the production streams as fine sand and silt suspended in the process water. Waste is removed from the process water which is then recycled back to the mine and plant for use as slurry water and process water as needed. The method U.S. Silica utilizes to remove the waste from the process water is an industry standard method of “settling” the fines out of the water in a series of tailings (settling) ponds (Figure 14.1). The very fine particles in the water are allowed to settle by gravity, thereby clarifying the water carrying the particles. The ponds must have a large enough surface area to allow for the time necessary for settlement. The depth of the pond determines the capacity for storage of the sediment. 37 Therefore, U.S. Silica must provide for ongoing construction of new pond surface area and depth for the ponds to maintain the required storage area for the waste that will be produced over life of the mine. U.S. Silica must maintain a “fresh” water pond so that water can be stored after processing through the tailings ponds. Currently this is provided by the westerly pond in Figure 14.1 where clarified water is recovered for reuse. Additional area is available for construction of additional storage either in the mined-out areas of the pit or on other property not suitable for mining or required for plant operations. A projection of adequate capital spending and operating cost impacts, consistent with pond construction and plant processing levels is included for the life of mine in the financial analysis section of this report. 37 Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Steven J. Goldman, Katharine Jackson, and Taras A. Bursztynsky, McGraw-Hill, 1986, pp. 8-13.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 54 15.7 Buildings The existing buildings are adequate for the purposes for which they are utilized. The facility has offices holding administrative, engineering, and administrative staff. Several buildings house the plant maintenance and support facilities (see Figure 14.1). All structures were new in 2018 and appear to be well maintained. 16.0 MARKET STUDIES U.S. Silica produces frac sand that is used in the hydraulic fracturing process – a completion method used by oil and gas companies to extract natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil from unconventional, low permeability reservoirs such as shale. Frac sand is a naturally occurring, high-purity crystalline silica (quartz) sand that is very hard, of uniform size, and has clean, well-rounded grain shapes. These mineral characteristics create a unique sand that is both durable and high strength – giving it resistance to being crushed. Pressure injection of frac sand into the fractures of a hydrocarbon-bearing shale formation act to “prop” open the rock micro-fractures after pressure is released – hence the name “proppant.” Two fine-grained frac sand products are manufactured at the Lamesa plant – an API standard 40/70 sized-product, and a non-API 100-Mesh (50/140) sized product. 16.1 General Marketing Information U.S. Silica believes that the average annual US LAND consumption of frac sand is approximately 99 million tons. U.S. Silica owns and operates two regional, hydraulic fracturing sand production facilities in the West Texas, Permian Oil Basin. The largest of these two plants, the Lamesa, TX facility, became operational in the third quarter of 2018. The Lamesa facility has an annual production capacity of 6 million tons. The site is comprised of a large, mechanized surface mining operation that supplies raw ore to the fully automated, state-of-the-art processing plant.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 55 U.S. Silica customers in the Oil & Gas Proppants end market include major Oilfield Services companies and Exploration and Production (“E&P”) companies that are engaged in hydraulic fracturing. As of December 31, 2021, US, Silica has a range of minimum purchase supply agreements with customers in the Oil & Gas Proppants segment with initial terms spanning through 2034. 16.1.1 Frac Sand Market U.S. Silica operates in a highly competitive market that is characterized by a small number of large, national frac sand producers and a larger number of small, regional or local, privately- owned producers. Competition in the industry is based on price, consistency and quality of product, site location, distribution capability, customer service, reliability of supply, breadth of product offering and technical support. The Lamesa facility’s substantial on-site product storage silo capacity and its strategic, in-basin location allows shipment of regional sands by truck. Because transportation costs are a significant portion of the total cost to customers of Oil & Gas Proppants, development of the Lamesa, TX plant as a regional frac sand facility in the Permian Oil Basin allows U.S. Silica to compete against frac sand products being shipped from distant states like Wisconsin, Illinois, and Missouri. In 2020, the average selling price (“ASP”) was $21.90 per ton. In 2021, the ASP dropped to $15.30 per ton. The QP believes the US LAND price forecast for U.S. Silica products will remain flat in the near-term. In the long-term, the QP believes that US LAND price forecast will increase from an average selling price of $15.30 per ton in 2021 to $22.10 per ton in 2030. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that pricing will sustain and appreciate at 2% per annum thereafter for the life of mine. See Table 19.1 for the projected ASP over the life of mine. 16.2 Materials Contracts Required for Production There are no material contracts required for production.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 56 17.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, PLANS, NEGOTIATIONS OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS 17.1 Existing Environmental Permits, Plans, and Authorizations The Lamesa Site is primarily environmentally regulated by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (the “TCEQ”). However, the State of Texas does not require a mining permit to extract material. A third-party review of environmental plans, permits, and requirements of the Lamesa Site and processing plant was performed. A summary of findings is included below based on current regulatory research and documents provided by U.S. Silica. Item Regulatory Authority Area Covered Status Phase I ESA N/A Lamesa Site Complete IHW Registration TCEQ Lamesa Site Approved PST Registration TCEQ Fuel Tank Approved Air Permit TCEQ Processing Plant Approved Stormwater Discharge Permit & SWPPP TCEQ Lamesa Site Approved APO Registration TCEQ Lamesa Site Approved Table 17.1 Permitting Summary for Lamesa A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) according to scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E2247-16 of the mine property dated March 31, 2017, was conducted by Talon LPE. The assessment included observation and/or historical records of one producing oil well, three separate crude pipelines, two separate natural gas pipelines with potential subsurface leaks, several plugged and abandoned oil and gas well locations, evidence of a historic oil and gas produced water pond,


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 57 three abandoned water wells, four active water wells, and evidence of a historic release of crude oil within a pipeline adjacent to the property. According to the environmental records search, no releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products had been reported at the property as of the date of the ESA report. The assessment revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property, specifically, historical releases of petroleum and/or natural gas which pose a threat to the subsurface and groundwater, and historic land disposal of produced water which has the potential to impact groundwater. Talon LPE recommended further investigation to determine the extent of environmental concern. 17.2 State Requirements U.S. Silica maintains an Industrial Hazardous Waste (“IHW”) Solid Waste Registration (#97503) with the TCEQ which covers cleanup of hydraulic or lubricating oils from mobile equipment, including petroleum contaminated solids, and general plant and employee generated trash. A Petroleum Storage Tank (“PST”) registration #89889 is held by O’Rourke Distribution Company, Inc. for a double walled fuel tank used to fuel mobile excavation equipment on site. U.S. Silica received air permit authorization (Permit Number 151650) from the TCEQ on September 6, 2018, for air emissions from the processing plant and associated equipment. The special conditions of the permit allow for certain visible emissions at specific opacity. Annual and hourly throughput rates are listed as confidential, and the facility is authorized to operate up to 8,760 hours per year. Quarterly visible emissions and visible fugitive emissions determinations are required, and ambient air monitoring and/or other testing must be performed upon request of the TCEQ executive or regional director. U.S. Silica maintains an annual Aggregate Production Operation registration through the TCEQ. In the State of Texas, reclamation and/or remediation is not required for aggregate surface mining operations. U.S. Silica has not developed a reclamation/remediation or mine closure plan. There


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 58 are no existing agreements, plans, or negotiations between U.S. Silica and local individuals or groups. 17.3 Federal Requirements Stormwater from the Lamesa Site is authorized to leave the site according to stipulations outlined in the Stormwater Multi-Sector General Permit ‘(MSGP’) TXR05EB75. U.S. Silica maintains a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”) as a requirement of the MSGP which outlines the treatment measures and best management practices used on site to maintain stormwater discharges within the permit limitations. Per a determination made by Mark J. Krumenacher, P.G. of the GZA company dated September 4, 2018, there is no surface water mapped within approximately four miles of the plant and there is no feasible way for an oil release at the Lamesa Plant to reach a jurisdictional water of the US 18.0 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS Capital and operating costs discussed in this section were developed utilizing current and historic cost data from continuous and ongoing operation of the facility, first principles, vendor and contractor quotations, and similar operation comparisons. 18.1 Operating Costs Total operating costs incurred at the Lamesa Site from 2020 through 2021 are provided in Table 18.1. Costs include but are not limited to mining equipment, plant/shipping, wages and premiums, maintenance materials, and power. The average cost of sales was $10.23 per ton in 2020 and $10.16 per ton in 2021. Headcount increased from 2020 to 2021 with 66 hourly and 11 salaried employees in 2020 and 98 hourly and 15 salaried employees in 2021.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 59 Capital Costs 2020 $3,510,000 2021 $159,000 Operating Costs 2020 $32,593,000 2021 $36,815,000 Table 18.1 Summary of Capital and Operating Costs: 2020-2021 18.2 Capital Costs The average annual capital expenditure since 2020 at the Lamesa Site is $1,834,500, with $3,510,000 in 2020 and $159,000 in 2021 (Table 18.1). The higher-than-average capital spend in 2020 was associated with scheduled maintenance and continuous improvement projects to drive and maintain cost efficiencies. A summary of foreseen capital expenditures through 2026 is provided in Table 18.2. As shown in Table 18.2, total estimated capital expenditure through 2026 is $830,000 and primarily includes routine maintenance and continuous improvement projects to drive cost and capacity efficiencies. Listed expenditures are based on historic cost data, vendor/contractor quotations, and similar operation comparisons and are within +/-15% level of accuracy. There are risks regarding the current capital costs estimates through 2026, including escalating costs of raw materials and energy, equipment availability and timing due to either production delays or supply chain gaps.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 60 Projected Capital Expenditures 2022 $161,000 2023 $163,000 2024 $166,000 2025 $168,000 2026 $171,000 Table 18.2 Summary of Projected Plant Capital Expenditures: 2022-2026 18.3 Assumptions The capital projects are assumed to be constructed in a conventional Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management (“EPCM”) format. U.S. Silica routinely retains a qualified contractor to design projects and act as its agent to bid and procure materials and equipment, bid and award construction contracts, and manage the construction of the facilities. 18.4 Accuracy The accuracy of this estimate for those items identified in the scope-of work is estimated to be within the range of plus 15% to minus 15%; i.e., the cost could be 15% higher than the estimate or it could be 15% lower. Accuracy is an issue separate from contingency, the latter accounts for undeveloped scope and insufficient data (e.g., geotechnical data). 19.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 19.1 Operating Costs An economic model was created for the Lamesa Site to provide validation of the economic viability of the estimated reserve for the life of mine until 2039. The following are the key assumptions: • Proven and Probable Tons of 92,478,000 as of December 31, 2021 • Revenue Growth of 2%


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 61 • Tons Growth of 2% • Costs of Goods Sold Growth of 2% • Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Growth of 2% • Capital Expenditures Growth of 2% • Inflation Rate of 2% • Tax Rate of 26% • Discount Rate of 8% • Net Working Capital of 25% • Mine Yield of 85% The QP used budgeted 2021 costs as the benchmark for which to model operating costs throughout the life of mine and applied future site investment escalations that are consistent with demonstrated plant maintenance history and robust enough to cover future mine and production changes. The QP based the ASP for 2022 on the ASP trends in 2021. The QP then applied a 2% per annum increase from the 2021 ASP through the life of mine. Based on ASP trends of 2021, the QP believes that 2% per annum growth rate is a reasonable method for a base case scenario. For additional information on the ASP, see “Section 16.1.1— Frac Sand Market.” 19.2 Capital Costs As an ongoing project that is in production and profitable, the QP projected capital expenditures to grow by 2% per annum based on the property’s age and recent major improvements. The QP included optional capital expenditures that will be deployed as required to increase or maintain the capacity of the plant. 19.3 Economic Analysis The financial evaluation of the project comprises the determination of the net present value (“NPV”) at a discount rate of 8%, the internal rate of return (“IRR”) and payback period (time in


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 62 years to recapture the initial capital investment). Annual cash flow projections are estimated over the life of the mine based on the estimates of capital expenditures and production cost and sales revenue. Review of the base case model indicates that the project has an IRR of 11%, a payback period of 0.40 years, and a NPV of $11,722,000. The Economic Feasibility Model (Table 19.1.1) was modeled on the basis of historical operational costs and future site investment escalations that are consistent with demonstrated plant maintenance history and robust enough to cover future mine and production changes. 19.4 Sensitivity Analysis The QP assessed sensitivity of key variables, including reduction in expected selling price, increased capital expenses and associated depreciation, and operating costs. To assess these variables, the QP created moderate and upside models where the following variables were increased by the percentages listed in Table 19.2: • Average Selling Price Growth • Tons Growth • Average Cost of Sale Growth • Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Growth • Capital Expenditures Growth • Inflation Rate • Inflation Adjusted Discount Rate • Mine Yield The NPV of the project is null when 2022 average selling price is reduced to $14.80 per ton.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 63 Table 19.1.1 Economic Feasibility Base Model In Thousand (000) Book Value 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 Reserve Balance Tons (000) 95,051 92,478 88,217 83,870 79,437 74,915 70,303 65,598 60,799 55,904 50,912 45,819 40,625 35,327 29,923 24,410 18,788 13,053 7,203 1,236 Mined Tons (000) 3,749 4,261 4,346 4,433 4,522 4,612 4,705 4,799 4,895 4,993 5,093 5,194 5,298 5,404 5,512 5,623 5,735 5,850 5,967 1,236 Sold Tons (000) 3,187 3,622 3,694 3,768 3,844 3,921 3,999 4,079 4,161 4,244 4,329 4,415 4,504 4,594 4,685 4,779 4,875 4,972 5,072 1,051 R/S Ratio 3.4% 3.9% 4.9% 5.3% 5.7% 6.2% 6.7% 7.3% 8.1% 8.9% 10.0% 11.3% 13.0% 15.3% 18.4% 23.0% 30.5% 44.8% 82.8% 100.0% ASP (Selling Price) 21.9$ 15.3$ 15.7$ 16.0$ 16.3$ 16.6$ 16.9$ 17.3$ 17.6$ 18.0$ 18.3$ 18.7$ 19.1$ 19.5$ 19.9$ 20.3$ 20.7$ 21.1$ 21.5$ 21.9$ ACS (Cost of Sale) 10.2$ 10.2$ 10.4$ 10.6$ 10.8$ 11.0$ 11.2$ 11.4$ 11.7$ 11.9$ 12.1$ 12.4$ 12.6$ 12.9$ 13.1$ 13.4$ 13.7$ 14.0$ 14.2$ 14.5$ Rev 69,644$ 55,596$ 57,842$ 60,179$ 62,610$ 65,140$ 67,771$ 70,509$ 73,358$ 76,321$ 79,405$ 82,613$ 85,950$ 89,423$ 93,035$ 96,794$ 100,704$ 104,773$ 109,006$ 23,039$ Cost of Sale 32,593$ 36,815$ 38,302$ 39,850$ 41,460$ 43,135$ 44,877$ 46,690$ 48,577$ 50,539$ 52,581$ 54,705$ 56,915$ 59,215$ 61,607$ 64,096$ 66,685$ 69,379$ 72,182$ 15,256$ CM 37,051$ 18,781$ 19,540$ 20,329$ 21,150$ 22,005$ 22,894$ 23,819$ 24,781$ 25,782$ 26,824$ 27,908$ 29,035$ 30,208$ 31,428$ 32,698$ 34,019$ 35,394$ 36,823$ 7,783$ Change in CM -$ (18,270)$ 759$ 789$ 821$ 854$ 889$ 925$ 962$ 1,001$ 1,042$ 1,084$ 1,127$ 1,173$ 1,220$ 1,270$ 1,321$ 1,374$ 1,430$ (29,041)$ SG&A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EBITDA 37,051$ 18,781$ 19,540$ 20,329$ 21,150$ 22,005$ 22,894$ 23,819$ 24,781$ 25,782$ 26,824$ 27,908$ 29,035$ 30,208$ 31,428$ 32,698$ 34,019$ 35,394$ 36,823$ 7,783$ D&A 18,463$ 19,679$ 19,071$ 19,375$ 19,223$ 19,299$ 19,261$ 19,280$ 19,271$ 19,275$ 19,273$ 19,274$ 19,273$ 19,274$ 19,274$ 19,274$ 19,274$ 19,274$ 19,274$ 19,274$ EBIT 18,588$ (898)$ 469$ 954$ 1,927$ 2,706$ 3,633$ 4,539$ 5,511$ 6,507$ 7,551$ 8,634$ 9,762$ 10,934$ 12,155$ 13,424$ 14,746$ 16,120$ 17,550$ (11,491)$ Taxes 4,833$ (233)$ 122$ 248$ 501$ 704$ 945$ 1,180$ 1,433$ 1,692$ 1,963$ 2,245$ 2,538$ 2,843$ 3,160$ 3,490$ 3,834$ 4,191$ 4,563$ (2,988)$ Operating Income 13,755$ (665)$ 347$ 706$ 1,426$ 2,002$ 2,688$ 3,359$ 4,078$ 4,815$ 5,588$ 6,389$ 7,224$ 8,091$ 8,995$ 9,934$ 10,912$ 11,929$ 12,987$ (8,503)$ Plant Capex (3,510)$ (159)$ (161)$ (163)$ (166)$ (168)$ (171)$ (173)$ (176)$ (179)$ (181)$ (184)$ (187)$ (190)$ (193)$ (195)$ (198)$ (201)$ (204)$ (207)$ Optional Additional Capex -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Mine Capex(Permit & Reclamation) -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Mine Capex (Overburden Stripping) -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Mine Capex (Mine Infrastructure) -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Mine Capex(Mine Tailings) -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Capex (3,510)$ (159)$ (161)$ (163)$ (166)$ (168)$ (171)$ (173)$ (176)$ (179)$ (181)$ (184)$ (187)$ (190)$ (193)$ (195)$ (198)$ (201)$ (204)$ (207)$ Change in NWC -$ -$ (190)$ (197)$ (205)$ (214)$ (222)$ (231)$ (241)$ (250)$ (260)$ (271)$ (282)$ (293)$ (305)$ (317)$ (330)$ (344)$ (357)$ -$ Net Income 10,245$ (823)$ (4)$ 345$ 1,055$ 1,620$ 2,295$ 2,954$ 3,661$ 4,386$ 5,146$ 5,934$ 6,755$ 7,608$ 8,497$ 9,421$ 10,383$ 11,384$ 12,425$ (8,711)$ FCF (183,500)$ 28,708$ 18,856$ 19,067$ 19,720$ 20,278$ 20,919$ 21,556$ 22,234$ 22,932$ 23,661$ 24,419$ 25,208$ 26,028$ 26,882$ 27,771$ 28,695$ 29,657$ 30,657$ 31,699$ 10,563$


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 64 Table 19.1.2 Economic Feasibility Moderate Model In Thousand (000) Book Value 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Reserve Balance Tons (000) 95,051 92,478 88,217 83,785 79,176 74,383 69,398 64,214 58,822 53,215 47,383 41,318 35,010 28,450 21,628 14,533 7,154 Mined Tons (000) 3,749 4,261 4,432 4,609 4,793 4,985 5,184 5,392 5,607 5,832 6,065 6,308 6,560 6,822 7,095 7,379 7,154 Sold Tons (000) 3,187 3,622 3,767 3,918 4,074 4,237 4,407 4,583 4,766 4,957 5,155 5,361 5,576 5,799 6,031 6,272 6,081 R/S Ratio 3.4% 3.9% 5.0% 5.5% 6.1% 6.7% 7.5% 8.4% 9.5% 11.0% 12.8% 15.3% 18.7% 24.0% 32.8% 50.8% 100.0% ASP (Selling Price) 21.9$ 15.3$ 16.0$ 16.6$ 17.3$ 18.0$ 18.7$ 19.4$ 20.2$ 21.0$ 21.8$ 22.7$ 23.6$ 24.6$ 25.6$ 26.6$ 27.6$ ACS (Cost of Sale) 10.2$ 10.2$ 10.5$ 10.8$ 11.1$ 11.4$ 11.8$ 12.1$ 12.5$ 12.9$ 13.3$ 13.7$ 14.1$ 14.5$ 14.9$ 15.4$ 15.8$ Rev 69,644$ 55,596$ 60,133$ 65,039$ 70,347$ 76,087$ 82,296$ 89,011$ 96,274$ 104,130$ 112,627$ 121,818$ 131,758$ 142,509$ 154,138$ 166,716$ 168,097$ Cost of Sale 32,593$ 36,815$ 39,436$ 42,244$ 45,252$ 48,474$ 51,925$ 55,622$ 59,583$ 63,825$ 68,369$ 73,237$ 78,451$ 84,037$ 90,021$ 96,430$ 96,294$ CM 37,051$ 18,781$ 20,696$ 22,795$ 25,095$ 27,613$ 30,371$ 33,389$ 36,692$ 40,305$ 44,258$ 48,581$ 53,307$ 58,472$ 64,118$ 70,286$ 71,803$ Change in CM -$ (18,270)$ 1,915$ 2,099$ 2,299$ 2,518$ 2,757$ 3,018$ 3,303$ 3,614$ 3,953$ 4,323$ 4,726$ 5,166$ 5,645$ 6,168$ 1,517$ SG&A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EBITDA 37,051$ 18,781$ 20,696$ 22,795$ 25,095$ 27,613$ 30,371$ 33,389$ 36,692$ 40,305$ 44,258$ 48,581$ 53,307$ 58,472$ 64,118$ 70,286$ 71,803$ D&A 18,463$ 19,679$ 19,071$ 19,375$ 19,223$ 19,299$ 19,261$ 19,280$ 19,271$ 19,275$ 19,273$ 19,274$ 19,273$ 19,274$ 19,274$ 19,274$ 19,274$ EBIT 18,588$ (898)$ 1,625$ 3,420$ 5,872$ 8,314$ 11,110$ 14,109$ 17,421$ 21,030$ 24,985$ 29,307$ 34,033$ 39,198$ 44,844$ 51,012$ 52,529$ Taxes 4,833$ (233)$ 423$ 889$ 1,527$ 2,162$ 2,888$ 3,668$ 4,530$ 5,468$ 6,496$ 7,620$ 8,849$ 10,192$ 11,659$ 13,263$ 13,658$ Operating Income 13,755$ (665)$ 1,203$ 2,531$ 4,345$ 6,152$ 8,221$ 10,440$ 12,892$ 15,562$ 18,489$ 21,687$ 25,184$ 29,007$ 33,185$ 37,749$ 38,872$ Plant Capex (3,510)$ (159)$ (167)$ (175)$ (184)$ (193)$ (202)$ (213)$ (223)$ (234)$ (246)$ (258)$ (271)$ (285)$ (299)$ (314)$ (330)$ Total Capex (3,510)$ (159)$ (167)$ (175)$ (184)$ (193)$ (202)$ (213)$ (223)$ (234)$ (246)$ (258)$ (271)$ (285)$ (299)$ (314)$ (330)$ Change in NWC -$ -$ (479)$ (525)$ (575)$ (630)$ (689)$ (755)$ (826)$ (903)$ (988)$ (1,081)$ (1,181)$ (1,291)$ (1,411)$ (1,542)$ (379)$ Net Income 10,245$ (823)$ 557$ 1,831$ 3,587$ 5,330$ 7,329$ 9,473$ 11,843$ 14,425$ 17,255$ 20,348$ 23,732$ 27,431$ 31,474$ 35,893$ 38,163$ FCF (183,500)$ 28,708$ 18,856$ 19,628$ 21,206$ 22,810$ 24,629$ 26,590$ 28,753$ 31,113$ 33,700$ 36,528$ 39,622$ 43,005$ 46,704$ 50,748$ 55,166$ 57,436$


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas December 31, 2021 65 Table 19.1.3 Economic Feasibility Upside Model In Thousand (000) Book Value 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Reserve Balance Tons (000) 95,051 92,478 88,217 83,700 78,912 73,837 68,457 62,755 56,710 50,303 43,511 36,312 28,681 20,592 12,018 2,929 Mined Tons (000) 3,749 4,261 4,517 4,788 5,075 5,380 5,702 6,045 6,407 6,792 7,199 7,631 8,089 8,574 9,089 2,929 Sold Tons (000) 3,187 3,622 3,839 4,070 4,314 4,573 4,847 5,138 5,446 5,773 6,119 6,486 6,876 7,288 7,725 2,490 R/S Ratio 3.4% 3.9% 5.1% 5.7% 6.4% 7.3% 8.3% 9.6% 11.3% 13.5% 16.5% 21.0% 28.2% 41.6% 75.6% 100.0% ASP (Selling Price) 21.9$ 15.3$ 16.3$ 17.2$ 18.3$ 19.4$ 20.5$ 21.8$ 23.1$ 24.5$ 25.9$ 27.5$ 29.1$ 30.9$ 32.7$ 34.7$ ACS (Cost of Sale) 10.2$ 10.2$ 10.7$ 11.2$ 11.8$ 12.4$ 13.0$ 13.6$ 14.3$ 15.0$ 15.8$ 16.6$ 17.4$ 18.3$ 19.2$ 20.1$ Rev 69,644$ 55,596$ 62,468$ 70,189$ 78,864$ 88,612$ 99,564$ 111,870$ 125,697$ 141,233$ 158,690$ 178,304$ 200,342$ 225,105$ 252,927$ 86,403$ Cost of Sale 32,593$ 36,815$ 40,975$ 45,605$ 50,759$ 56,494$ 62,878$ 69,984$ 77,892$ 86,693$ 96,490$ 107,393$ 119,529$ 133,035$ 148,068$ 50,105$ CM 37,051$ 18,781$ 21,493$ 24,583$ 28,105$ 32,117$ 36,686$ 41,887$ 47,806$ 54,540$ 62,200$ 70,911$ 80,814$ 92,069$ 104,859$ 36,298$ Change in CM -$ (18,270)$ 2,712$ 3,091$ 3,522$ 4,012$ 4,569$ 5,201$ 5,919$ 6,734$ 7,660$ 8,711$ 9,903$ 11,256$ 12,790$ (68,561)$ SG&A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EBITDA 37,051$ 18,781$ 21,493$ 24,583$ 28,105$ 32,117$ 36,686$ 41,887$ 47,806$ 54,540$ 62,200$ 70,911$ 80,814$ 92,069$ 104,859$ 36,298$ D&A 18,463$ 19,679$ 19,071$ 19,375$ 19,223$ 19,299$ 19,261$ 19,280$ 19,271$ 19,275$ 19,273$ 19,274$ 19,273$ 19,274$ 19,274$ 19,274$ EBIT 18,588$ (898)$ 2,422$ 5,208$ 8,882$ 12,818$ 17,425$ 22,607$ 28,535$ 35,265$ 42,927$ 51,637$ 61,540$ 72,796$ 85,586$ 17,025$ Taxes 4,833$ (233)$ 630$ 1,354$ 2,309$ 3,333$ 4,530$ 5,878$ 7,419$ 9,169$ 11,161$ 13,426$ 16,000$ 18,927$ 22,252$ 4,426$ Operating Income 13,755$ (665)$ 1,792$ 3,854$ 6,573$ 9,485$ 12,894$ 16,729$ 21,116$ 26,096$ 31,766$ 38,211$ 45,540$ 53,869$ 63,333$ 12,598$ Plant Capex (3,510)$ (159)$ (175)$ (192)$ (211)$ (232)$ (256)$ (281)$ (309)$ (340)$ (374)$ (411)$ (453)$ (498)$ (548)$ (602)$ Total Capex (3,510)$ (159)$ (175)$ (192)$ (211)$ (232)$ (256)$ (281)$ (309)$ (340)$ (374)$ (411)$ (453)$ (498)$ (548)$ (602)$ Change in NWC -$ -$ (678)$ (773)$ (880)$ (1,003)$ (1,142)$ (1,300)$ (1,480)$ (1,684)$ (1,915)$ (2,178)$ (2,476)$ (2,814)$ (3,197)$ -$ Net Income 10,245$ (823)$ 940$ 2,890$ 5,481$ 8,250$ 11,497$ 15,148$ 19,327$ 24,072$ 29,477$ 35,622$ 42,611$ 50,557$ 59,588$ 11,996$ FCF (183,500)$ 28,708$ 18,856$ 20,011$ 22,265$ 24,704$ 27,549$ 30,758$ 34,428$ 38,598$ 43,347$ 48,750$ 54,896$ 61,885$ 69,831$ 78,862$ 31,270$


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas Effective Date: December 31, 2021 66 Case 5% 10% Drivers Base Moderate Upside ASP Growth 2% 4% 6% Tons Growth 2% 4% 6% ACS Growth 2% 3% 5% SG&A Growth 2% 5% 10% Capex Growth 2% 5% 10% Inflation Rate 2% 3% 4% Inflation Adjusted Discount Rate 10% 11% 12% Mine Yield 85% 85% 85% Case Payback IRR NPV Base 0.40 Years 11% $11,722,000 Moderate 0.30 Years 14% $33,847,000 Upside 0.30 Years 15% $40,455,000 Table 19.2 Sensitivity Analysis 20.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES Adjacent properties to the site are agricultural in nature. No other mining is being conducted in the area. 21.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION There is no additional data or information to include in this section. 22.0 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 22.1 Introduction The QPs note the following interpretations and conclusions in their respective areas of expertise, based on the review of data provided for the Report.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas Effective Date: December 31, 2021 67 22.2 Comments on Exploration It is the QP’s opinion that the amount and type of exploration performed to date has acceptable spacing of drill holes to illustrate geologic continuity of the deposit. 22.3 Comments on In-Situ, Mineable Ore Estimates It is the QP’s opinion that the only potential risk factor identified that could possibly alter the mineable ore estimates provided herein is a change in density values. If future testing of the in- situ deposit indicates that the density is lower than the reported 91.5 lbs./cu. ft. value, the number of reserves will be reduced proportionately. 22.4 Comments on Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing Based on review of the lab procedures provided by U.S. Silica, the overall relative homogenous mineralogy of the deposit, it is the QP’s opinion that the procedures and laboratory testing reviewed are acceptable for the purposes of this report. 22.5 Comments on Mining Methods The current mine planning, mining methods, manpower, mine equipment, and maintenance and repair practices dedicated to supplying the processing plant with silica sand will allow U.S. Silica to maintain the projected levels of annual production and product quality to support the life-of- mine plan represented by the financial analysis in this report. 22.6 Comments on Processing and Recovery Methods The current facilities dedicated to Processing and Recovery Methods will allow U.S. Silica to maintain the current levels of production and product quality to support the life-of-mine plan represented by the financial analysis in this report.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas Effective Date: December 31, 2021 68 22.7 Comments on Infrastructure The existing infrastructure is adequate for the projected production of finished goods through the life of mine. The current and planned maintenance capital investment in infrastructure is adequate to maintain the projected levels of finished goods production and is represented by the financial analysis in this report. The greatest risk relative to infrastructure is the availability of water for processing raw sand into finished goods. With the contracts in place to purchase the required water, there is no additional infrastructure necessary for water supply. The risk of material interruption of the supply of electric power is low. The highest risk relative to electric power is real cost escalation of the electricity without a long-term contract. 22.8 Comments on Permitting It is the QP’s opinion that the plans, permits, registrations as mentioned above are adequate to address issues related to environmental compliance and permitting. Nothing was discovered during the permitting review that would preclude mining of the deposit at this time. 23.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The primary recommendation of this report is to design and implement a third-party sampling and testing program to provide outside quality control for U.S. Silica’s internal testing program. The program should be written with detailed instructions on proper collection methods; sample containers, preservation, labeling, security, and transport; and testing. Anticipated cost for this program is estimated to be up to $7,000 - $10,000 annually depending on how many tests are run and what testing parameters are run. 24.0 REFERENCES References cited in this report are marked in each section as foot notes.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas Effective Date: December 31, 2021 69 25.0 RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT The information, conclusions, opinions, and estimates contained in this Technical Summary Report were formed based on a combination of inputs from U.S. Silica and Independent Qualified Persons (QPs) observations. This Technical Summary Report assumes and relies on the fact that all the source data provided to the QPs by U.S. Silica and the information and technical documents listed in Chapter 24 (References) are accurate and complete in all material aspects. The authors have carefully reviewed the information provided to them by U.S. Silica within the scope of their technical expertise. The information, conclusions, opinions, and estimates contained in the Technical Summary Report are based on the following parameters: • Information available to U.S. Silica at the time of preparation of this Technical Summary Report. • Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this Technical Summary Report. The QPs have relied upon the ownership and title and permitting information provided by employees of U.S. Silica for inclusion in Section 3 (Property Description). The QPs have not researched property title or mineral rights for the Lamesa property and expresses no opinion as to the ownership status of the property. The QPs have relied on various U.S. Silica departments for relevant data, analysis, and guidance on applicable market studies, contracts, taxes, royalties and other government levies or interests applicable to revenue or income from the Lamesa operation.


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas Effective Date: December 31, 2021 70


 


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas Effective Date: December 31, 2021 72


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas Effective Date: December 31, 2021 73 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1 General Site Location Map Figure 3.2 Lamesa Area Site Location Map Figure 3.3 Main Mine Map Figure 3.4 Known Encumbrances Figure 4.1 General location & distribution of site utility lines servicing Lamesa sand plant and processing facility Figure 6.1 Generalized cross section at the Lamesa Site location Figure 6.2 View of the active pit area looking northwest Figure 6.3 Dune field extent Figure 7.1 Boring location map Figure 12.1 Mine pit locations Figure 13.1 Geologic cross section looking north at the approximate midpoint of the property at Lamesa Figure 13.2 Generalized process flow for the Lamesa, TX facility Figure 13.3 Typical mining operation at Lamesa showing a front-end loader excavating the full bank section of overburden, the “Upper Clean Sand” and the Clayey Cover Sand. Figure 13.4 Lamesa Site location, property and mineable areas Figure 14.1 Aerial photo of Lamesa, TX U.S. Silica plant Figure 15.1 Roadways linking the Lamesa, TX location to the end-user market LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 In-Situ, Mineable Ore Estimates Table 6.1 Abbreviated generalized stratigraphic column of the Lamesa area Table 7.1 Exploration drilling campaign history Table 10.1 Selected Lamesa, TX sand physical test results Table 12.1 In-Situ, Mineable Ore Estimates Table 13.1 Financial parameters for contract hauling Table 13.2 Equipment currently employed by the mining contractor Table 13.3 Historical and projected mining volumes for Lamesa, TX Table 14.1 Plant equipment at the U.S. Silica Lamesa, TX facility Table 17.1 Permitting Summary for Lamesa Table 18.1 Summary of Capital and Operating Costs: 2020-2021 Table 18.2 Summary of Projected Capital Expenditures: 2022-2026 Table 19.1 Economic Feasibility Base Model Table 19.2 Economic Feasibility Moderate Model Table 19.3 Economic Feasibility Upside Model Table 19.4 Sensitivity Analysis


 
Technical Report Summary Lamesa, Dawson County, Texas Effective Date: December 31, 2021 74 ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS AACE American Association of Cost Engineers ACS Average Cost of Sale ANSI Approved American National Standard API American Petroleum Institute API American Petroleum Institute API RP American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practices APO Aggregate Production Operation ASP Average Selling Price ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials BEG Bureau of Economic Geology BGS Below Ground Surface BCY Bank Cubic Yards CAP Corporate Analytical Procedure EIA Energy Information Administration EPCM Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management ESA Environmental Site Assessment FT Feet/Foot HDPE High-Density Polyethylene IHW Industrial Hazardous Waste IRR Internal Rate of Return ISO International Organization for Standardization M Million MA Million Years Ago MSGP Multi Sector General Permit NPV Net Present Value PST Petroleum Storage Tank QP Qualified Person SEC Securities and Exchange Commission SG&A Selling, General & Administrative SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan TCEQ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality TRS Technical Report Summary USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Silica U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. USGS United States Geological Survey VSQG Very Small Quantity Generator YD3 Cubic Yards