SEC Filing | U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2016



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-35416

U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		26-3718801
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8490 Progress Drive, Suite 300

Frederick, Maryland 21701

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(301) 682-0600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

As of August 1, 2016, 63,583,321 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant were outstanding.

U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page
PART I	Financial Information (Unaudited):
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	30

PART II	Other Information:
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	31
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	31
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	32
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	32
Item 5.	Other Information	33
Item 6.	Exhibits	34
Signatures		S-1

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands)



	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
	(unaudited)			(audited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	454,208		$	277,077
Short-term investments	—			21,849
Accounts receivable, net	54,293			58,706
Inventories, net	67,158			65,004
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	8,899			9,921
Income tax deposits	1,145			6,583
Total current assets	585,703			439,140
Property, plant and mine development, net	555,487			561,196
Goodwill	68,647			68,647
Trade names	14,474			14,474
Customer relationships, net	6,205			6,453
Deferred income taxes, net	1,314			—
Other assets	17,323			18,709
Total assets	$	1,249,153		$	1,108,619
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	48,217		$	49,631
Dividends payable	4,080			3,453
Accrued liabilities	11,538			11,708
Accrued interest	57			58
Current portion of long-term debt	3,336			3,330
Deferred revenue	4,622			15,738
Total current liabilities	71,850			83,918
Long-term debt	486,705			488,375
Deferred revenue	67,537			59,676
Liability for pension and other post-retirement benefits	63,887			55,893
Deferred income taxes, net	—			19,513
Other long-term obligations	17,828			17,077
Total liabilities	707,807			724,452
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock	—			—
Common stock	639			539
Additional paid-in capital	381,349			194,670
Retained earnings	190,964			220,974
Treasury stock, at cost	(10,850		)	(15,845		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(20,756		)	(16,171		)
Total stockholders’ equity	541,346			384,167
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,249,153		$	1,108,619

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited; dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Sales	$	116,994		$	147,511		$	239,504		$	351,469
Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization)	102,707			117,200			209,458			255,853
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative	14,585			6,575			30,088			33,536
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	15,209			13,695			29,765			26,938
	29,794			20,270			59,853			60,474
Operating income (loss)	(15,507		)	10,041			(29,807		)	35,142
Other income (expense)
Interest expense	(6,647		)	(6,928		)	(13,290		)	(13,764		)
Other income, net, including interest income	608			498			2,398			509
	(6,039		)	(6,430		)	(10,892		)	(13,255		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(21,546		)	3,611			(40,699		)	21,887
Income tax benefit	9,555			6,342			18,048			2,889
Net income (loss)	$	(11,991	)	$	9,953		$	(22,651	)	$	24,776
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.19	)	$	0.19		$	(0.38	)	$	0.46
Diluted	$	(0.19	)	$	0.18		$	(0.38	)	$	0.46
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	63,417			53,303			58,900			53,361
Diluted	63,417			53,857			58,900			53,864
Dividends declared per share	$	0.06		$	0.13		$	0.13		$	0.25

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(unaudited; dollars in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
Net income (loss)	$	(11,991	)	$	9,953	$	(22,651	)	$	24,776
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (net of tax of $34 and $6 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $55 and $8 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively)	(20		)	9		15			12
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments (net of tax of ($1) and $8 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and ($4) and $30 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively)	(1		)	14		(6		)	49
Pension and other post-retirement benefits liability adjustment (net of tax of ($1,227) and $2,823 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and ($2,768) and $2,588 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively)	(2,036		)	4,557		(4,594		)	4,178
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(14,048	)	$	14,533	$	(27,236	)	$	29,015

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited; dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)



	Common Stock		Treasury Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	539	$	(15,845	)	$	194,670		$	220,974		$	(16,171	)	$	384,167
Net income (loss)	—		—			—			(22,651		)	—			(22,651		)
Issuance of common stock (secondary offering at $20 per share, net of issuance costs of $13,798)	100		—			186,102			—			—			186,202
Unrealized gain on derivatives	—		—			—			—			15			15
Unrealized loss on short-term investments	—		—			—			—			(6		)	(6		)
Pension and post-retirement liability	—		—			—			—			(4,594		)	(4,594		)
Cash dividend declared ($0.125 per share)	—		—			—			(7,359		)	—			(7,359		)
Common stock-based compensation plans activity:
Equity-based compensation	—		—			5,355			—			—			5,355
Net tax effect	—		—			(123		)	—			—			(123		)
Proceeds from options exercised	—		1,950			(651		)	—			—			1,299
Issuance of restricted stock	—		1,335			(1,335		)	—			—			—
Shares withheld for employee taxes related to vested restricted stock and stock units	—		1,710			(2,669		)	—			—			(959		)
Balance at June 30, 2016	$	639	$	(10,850	)	$	381,349		$	190,964		$	(20,756	)	$	541,346

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited; dollars in thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(22,651	)	$	24,776
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	29,765			26,938
Debt issuance amortization	696			703
Original issue discount amortization	192			192
Deferred income taxes	(18,199		)	(6,903		)
Deferred revenue	(3,255		)	(9,216		)
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment	29			811
Equity-based compensation	5,355			(89		)
Excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation	—			(264		)
Bad debt provision	101			(1,231		)
Other	1,211			(5,927		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable	4,312			44,335
Inventories	(2,154		)	2,529
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	1,022			(445		)
Income taxes	5,438			(3,233		)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(1,584		)	(35,446		)
Accrued interest	(1		)	—
Liability for pension and other post-retirement benefits	1,044			927
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,321			38,457
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(23,388		)	(27,128		)
Maturities of short-term investments	21,872			4,593
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment	66			77
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,450		)	(22,458		)
Financing activities:
Dividends paid	(6,732		)	(13,444		)
Repurchase of common stock	—			(15,255		)
Issuance of common stock	200,000			—
Common stock issuance costs	(13,798		)
Proceeds from options exercised	1,299			363
Excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation	—			264
Tax payments related to shares withheld for vested restricted stock	(959		)	(722		)
Repayment of long-term debt	(2,550		)	(2,550		)
Financing fees	—			(64		)
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities	177,260			(31,408		)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	177,131			(15,409		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	277,077			263,066
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	454,208		$	247,657
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest	$	10,571		$	10,977
Taxes	$	(5,299	)	$	6,984

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited; dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE A—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (the “Financial Statements”) of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings,” and together with its subsidiaries “we,” “us” or the “Company”) included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). They do not contain certain information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015; therefore, the interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with that Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Financial Statements have been included. Such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. We have reclassified certain immaterial amounts in the prior years’ operating activities section of the consolidated statement of cash flows to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net cash flows from operations.

In order to make this report easier to read, we refer throughout to (i) our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as our “Balance Sheets,” (ii) our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as our “Income Statements,” and (iii) our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as our “Cash Flows.”

Unaudited Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2016; the Income Statements and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016; and other information disclosed in the related notes are unaudited. The Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as included in our 2015 Annual Report.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of the Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to mineral reserves that are the basis for future cash flow estimates utilized in impairment calculations and units-of-production amortization calculations; environmental, reclamation and closure obligations; estimates of recoverable minerals; estimates of allowance for doubtful accounts; estimates of fair value for certain reporting units and asset impairments (including impairments of goodwill and other long-lived assets); write-downs of inventory to net realizable value; equity-based compensation expense; post-employment, post-retirement and other employee benefit liabilities; valuation allowances for deferred tax assets; reserves for contingencies and litigation; and the fair value and accounting treatment of financial instruments including derivative instruments. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an Accounting Standards Update, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies the income tax consequences, accounting for forfeitures and classification on the Statements of Cash Flows. This Update is effective for public entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years; early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that the new guidance will have on our financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update, Leases, which supersedes the existing lease guidance and requires all leases with a term greater than 12 months to be recognized on the balance sheet as assets and obligations. This Update is effective for public entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years; early application is permitted. This standard mandates

a modified retrospective transition method. We are currently evaluating the effect that the new guidance will have on our financial statements and related disclosures.

On July 22, 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The new standard requires an entity to measure most inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, thereby simplifying the current guidance under which an entity must measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. The new standard will not apply to inventories that are measured using either the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method or the retail inventory method. This Update is effective for public entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years; early application is permitted. We have elected to adopt the standard early effective January 1, 2016 prospectively and have measured our inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value on our Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2016.

NOTE B—CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND ACCUMULATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Common Stock

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.01. Subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock, all of the voting power of the stockholders of Holdings shall be vested in the holders of the common stock.

In March 2016, we completed a public offering of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock for total cash proceeds of approximately $186.2 million net of underwriting discounts and offering costs. There were 63,581,010 shares of common stock issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016. As of June 30, 2015, there were 53,383,613 shares issued and outstanding.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, our Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends as follows:



Dividends per Common Share		Declaration Date	Record Date	Payable Date
$	0.0625	February 22, 2016	March 15, 2016	April 5, 2016
$	0.0625	May 5, 2016	June 15, 2016	July 6, 2016

All dividends were paid as scheduled.

Any determination to pay dividends and other distributions in cash, stock, or property by Holdings in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent on then-existing conditions, including our business conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital requirements, contractual restrictions including restrictive covenants contained in our debt agreements, and other factors. Additionally, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock may be limited by restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions to us, including restrictions under the terms of the agreements governing our indebtedness.

Preferred Stock

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares, in the aggregate, of preferred stock, par value of $0.01 in one or more series, to fix the powers, preferences and other rights of such series, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, including the dividend rate, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption rights and liquidation preference, and to fix the number of shares to be included in any such series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders.

There were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding at either June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015. At present, we have no plans to issue any preferred stock.

Employee Stock Awards

We grant stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance share units to our employees and directors under the Amended and Restated U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan. The weighted-average stock awards (in thousands) that are antidilutive and are therefore excluded from the calculation of our diluted earnings per common share are:



	Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016	2015	2016	2015
Weighted-average outstanding stock options excluded	1,252	450	1,279	371
Weighted-average outstanding restricted stock awards excluded	1,318	897	844	798

Share Repurchase Program

We are authorized by our Board of Directors to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As of June 30, 2016, we are authorized to repurchase up to $50 million of our common stock through December 11, 2016. Stock repurchases, if any, will be funded using our available liquidity. The timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including the market conditions as well as corporate and regulatory considerations. Under our share repurchase program, as of June 30, 2016, we have repurchased 706,093 shares of our common stock at an average price of $23.83 and are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $33.2 million of our common stock.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of fair value adjustments associated with cash flow hedges and accumulated adjustments for net experience losses and prior service cost related to employee benefit plans. The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (in thousands) by component during the six months ended June 30, 2016:



	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Unrealized gain/(loss) on cash flow hedges			Unrealized gain/(loss) on short-term investments			Pension and other post-retirement benefits liability			Total
Beginning Balance	$	(81	)	$	6		$	(16,096	)	$	(16,171	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	(66		)	(6		)	(4,878		)	(4,950		)
Amounts reclassed from accumulated other comprehensive income	81			—			284			365
Ending Balance	$	(66	)	$	—		$	(20,690	)	$	(20,756	)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to cash flow hedges category are included in interest expense in our Income Statements and amounts reclassified related to pension and other post-retirement benefits liability category are included in the computation of net periodic pension costs, respectively, at before tax amounts.

NOTE C—ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, accounts receivable (in thousands) consisted of the following:



	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Trade receivables	$	60,675		$	64,821
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts	(7,543		)	(7,686		)
Net trade receivables	53,132			57,135
Other receivables	1,161			1,571
Total accounts receivable	$	54,293		$	58,706

Changes in our allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands) during the six months ended June 30, 2016 are as follows:



	June 30, 2016
Beginning balance	$	7,686
Bad debt provision	101
Write-offs	(244		)
Ending balance	$	7,543

NOTE D—INVENTORIES

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, inventories (in thousands) consisted of the following:



	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Supplies	$	17,617	$	18,029
Raw materials and work in process	19,655		18,113
Finished goods	29,886		28,862
Total inventories	$	67,158	$	65,004

NOTE E—PROPERTY, PLANT AND MINE DEVELOPMENT

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, property, plant and mine development (in thousands) consisted of the following:



	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Mining property and mine development	$	235,910		$	222,439
Asset retirement cost	9,887			9,889
Land	30,322			30,322
Land improvements	37,977			37,791
Buildings	51,779			51,280
Machinery and equipment	369,316			360,817
Furniture and fixtures	1,917			1,917
Construction-in-progress	56,062			56,130
	793,170			770,585
Accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization	(237,683		)	(209,389		)
Total property, plant and mine development, net	$	555,487		$	561,196

The amount of interest costs capitalized in property, plant and mine development was $151 and $281 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

NOTE F—DEBT

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, debt (in thousands) consisted of the following:



	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Senior secured credit facility:
Revolver expiring July 23, 2018 (5% at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015)	$	—		$	—
Term loan facility—final maturity July 23, 2020 (4% - 4.5% at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015)	496,725			499,275
Less: Unamortized original issue discount	(1,507		)	(1,696		)
Less: Unamortized debt issuance cost	(5,177		)	(5,874		)
Total debt	490,041			491,705
Less: current portion	(3,336		)	(3,330		)
Total long-term portion of debt	$	486,705		$	488,375

Revolving Line-of-Credit

We have a $50 million revolving line-of-credit (the “Revolver”), with zero drawn and $3.3 million allocated for letters of credit as of June 30, 2016, leaving $46.7 million available under the Revolver.

Debt Maturities

At June 30, 2016, contractual maturities of long-term debt (in thousands) are as follows:



2016	$	2,550
2017	5,100
2018	5,100
2019	5,100
2020	478,875
	$	496,725

Our senior secured credit facility is secured by substantially all of our assets and a pledge of the equity interests in certain of our subsidiaries. The facility contains covenants that, among other things, govern our ability to create, incur or assume indebtedness and liens, to make acquisitions or investments, to pay dividends and to sell assets. The facility also requires us to maintain a consolidated total net leverage ratio of no more than 3.75:1.00 as of the last day of any fiscal quarter whenever usage of the Revolver (other than certain undrawn letters of credit) exceeds 25% of the Revolver commitment. As of June 30, 2016, we are in compliance with all covenants in accordance with our senior secured credit facility.

NOTE G—ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

Mine reclamation costs, or future remediation costs for inactive mines, are accrued based on management’s best estimate at the end of each period of the costs expected to be incurred at a site. Such cost estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care, maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates at inactive mines are reflected in earnings in the period an estimate is revised.

As of June 30, 2016, we had a liability of $12.7 million in other long-term obligations related to our asset retirement obligation. Changes in the asset retirement obligation (in thousands) during the six months ended June 30, 2016 are as follows:



	June 30, 2016
Beginning balance	$	12,254
Payments	—
Accretion	480
Additions and revisions of prior estimates	—
Ending balance	$	12,734

NOTE H - FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Cash Equivalents

Due to the short-term maturity, we believe our cash equivalent instruments at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 approximate their reported carrying values.

Short-Term Investments

In general, the fair value of our short-term investments is based on quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, or for identical assets or similar assets in markets in which there were fewer transactions (Level 2). Money market mutual funds are based on calculated net asset value and are reported in Level 1. Variable rate demand obligations underwritten and remarketed by a financial institution are priced at par value.

Long-Term Debt, Including Current Maturities

We believe that the fair values of our long-term debt, including current maturities, approximate their carrying values based on their effective interest rates compared to current market rates.

Derivative Instruments

The estimated fair value of our derivative assets (interest rate caps) are recorded at each reporting period and are based upon widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative contract. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. We also incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our nonperformance risk as well as that of the respective counterparty in the fair value measurements.

Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default of ourselves and our counterparties. However, as of June 30, 2016, we have assessed that the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions is not significant. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

In accordance with the fair value hierarchy, the following table presents the fair value as of June 30, 2016 of those assets that we measure at fair value on a recurring basis:



	Level 1		Level 2		Total
Interest rate derivatives	$	—	$	18	$	18

NOTE I - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Future Minimum Annual Commitments at June 30, 2016:



	Operating Leases		Minimum Purchase Commitments
2016	$	23,232	$	14,398
2017	48,687		18,205
2018	58,549		15,596
2019	52,466		12,363
2020	48,687		4,258
Thereafter	157,427		14,850
Total future lease and purchase commitments	$	389,048	$	79,670

Operating Leases

We are obligated under certain operating leases for railroad cars, office space, mining property, mining/processing equipment and transportation and other equipment. Certain operating lease agreements include options to purchase the equipment for fair market value at the end of the original lease term. In general, the above leases include renewal options and provide that we pay for all utilities, insurance, taxes and maintenance. Expense related to operating leases and rental agreements totaled approximately $12.2 million and $11.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $25.0 million and $21.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2016, we have no obligations under a capital lease.

Minimum Purchase Commitments

We enter into service agreements with our transload service providers and transportation service providers. Some of these agreements require us to purchase a minimum amount of services over a specific period of time. Any inability to meet these minimum contract requirements requires us to pay a shortfall fee, which is based on the difference between the minimum amount contracted for and the actual amount purchased.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

Our operating subsidiary, U.S. Silica Company (“U.S. Silica”), has been named as a defendant in various product liability claims alleging silica exposure causing silicosis. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, no new claims were brought against U.S. Silica. As of June 30, 2016, there were 74 active silica-related products liability claims pending in which U.S. Silica is a defendant. Although the outcomes of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, it is not reasonably possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations that exceeds the accrual amounts.

We have recorded estimated liabilities for these claims in other long-term obligations as well as estimated recoveries under the indemnity agreement and an estimate of future recoveries under insurance in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. As of both June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015 other non-current assets included $0.3 million for insurance for third-party products liability claims and other long-term obligations included $1.5 million in third-party products claims liability.

Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2015, we received an unfavorable ruling in an arbitration proceeding as a result of exiting a toll manufacturing contract. The amount of the ruling was approximately $7.6 million. The matter was settled and the settlement amount of $6.5 million was paid on June 9, 2015, which was included in selling, general and administrative expense in our Income Statement for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

NOTE J - INCOME TAXES

For interim period reporting, we record income taxes using an estimated annual effective tax rate based upon projected annual income, forecasted permanent tax differences, discrete items and statutory rates in states in which we operate. At the end of each interim period, we update the estimated annual effective tax rate, and if the estimated tax rate changes based on new information, we make a cumulative adjustment in the period. We record the tax effect of an unusual or infrequently occurring item in the interim period in which it occurs as a discrete item of tax. The effective tax rate was 44% and (13)% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Historically, our actual effective tax rates have differed from the statutory effective rate primarily due to the benefit received from statutory percentage depletion allowances. The deduction for statutory percentage depletion does not necessarily change proportionately to changes in income before income taxes.

NOTE K - PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

We maintain a single-employer noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering certain employees. Net pension benefit cost (in thousands) recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Service cost	$	3		$	324		$	291		$	647
Interest cost	13			1,203			1,248			2,406
Expected return on plan assets	(15		)	(1,375		)	(1,407		)	(2,749		)
Net amortization and deferral	7			666			489			1,333
Net pension benefit costs	$	8		$	818		$	621		$	1,637

In addition, we provide defined benefit post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits to some employees. Net periodic post-retirement benefit cost recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015			2016			2015
Service cost	$	44	$	44		$	89		$	88
Interest cost	306		277			613			554
Expected return on plan assets	—		(1		)	(1		)	(2		)
Special termination benefit	21		—			21			—
Net amortization and deferral	135		96			269			192
Net post-retirement costs	$	506	$	416		$	991		$	832

The weighted average discount rate used to determine the projected pension and post-retirement obligations was updated during the six months ended June 30, 2016, and was decreased from 4.5% at December 31, 2015 to 3.8% at June 30, 2016. We made no contributions to the qualified pension plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. We contributed $1.0 million to the qualified pension plan for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Total expected employer funding contributions during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 are $0 for the pension plan and $1.9 million for the post-retirement medical and life plan.

NOTE L - OBLIGATIONS UNDER GUARANTEES

We have indemnified Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (“Travelers”) against any loss Travelers may incur in the event that holders of surety bonds, issued on behalf of us by Travelers, execute the bonds. As of June 30, 2016, Travelers had $10.2 million in bonds outstanding for us. The majority of these bonds, $9.9 million, relate to reclamation requirements issued by various governmental authorities. Reclamation bonds remain outstanding until the mining area is reclaimed and the authority issues a formal release. The remaining bonds relate to such indefinite purposes as licenses, permits, and tax collection.

NOTE M - SEGMENT REPORTING

Our business is organized into two reportable segments, Oil & Gas Proppants and Industrial & Specialty Products, based on end markets. The reportable segments are consistent with how management views the markets that we serve and the financial information reviewed by the chief operating decision maker. We manage our Oil & Gas Proppants and Industrial & Specialty Products businesses as components of an enterprise for which separate information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance.

In the Oil & Gas Proppants segment, we serve the oil and gas recovery market by providing fracturing sand, or “frac sand,” which is pumped down oil and natural gas wells to prop open rock fissures and increase the flow rate of oil and natural gas from the wells.

The Industrial & Specialty Products segment consists of over 260 products and materials used in a variety of industries, including container glass, fiberglass, specialty glass, flat glass, building products, fillers and extenders, foundry products, chemicals, recreation products and filtration products.

An operating segment’s performance is primarily evaluated based on segment contribution margin, which excludes certain corporate costs not associated with the operations of the segment. These corporate costs are separately stated below and include costs that are related to functional areas such as operations management, corporate purchasing, accounting, treasury, information technology, legal and human resources. We believe that segment contribution margin, as defined above, is an appropriate measure for evaluating the operating performance of our segments. However, this measure should be considered in addition to, not a substitute for, or superior to, net income (loss) or other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The other accounting policies of each of the two reporting segments are the same as those in Note A - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of our Financial Statements.

The following table presents sales and segment contribution margin (in thousands) for the reporting segments and other operating results not allocated to the reported segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Sales:
Oil & Gas Proppants	$	64,926		$	90,855		$	138,791		$	239,607
Industrial & Specialty Products	52,068			56,656			100,713			111,862
Total Sales	116,994			147,511			239,504			351,469
Segment contribution margin:
Oil & Gas Proppants	(5,995		)	13,257			(5,144		)	65,451
Industrial & Specialty Products	21,486			19,531			38,380			34,987
Total segment contribution margin	15,491			32,788			33,236			100,438
Operating activities excluded from segment cost of goods sold	(1,204		)	(2,477		)	(3,190		)	(4,822		)
Selling, general and administrative	(14,585		)	(6,575		)	(30,088		)	(33,536		)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	(15,209		)	(13,695		)	(29,765		)	(26,938		)
Interest expense	(6,647		)	(6,928		)	(13,290		)	(13,764		)
Other income, net, including interest income	608			498			2,398			509
Income tax benefit	9,555			6,342			18,048			2,889
Net income (loss)	$	(11,991	)	$	9,953		$	(22,651	)	$	24,776

Asset information, including capital expenditures and depreciation, depletion, and amortization, by segment is not included in reports used by management in its monitoring of performance and, therefore, is not reported by segment. Goodwill of $68.6 million has been allocated to these segments with $47.9 million assigned to Oil & Gas Proppants and $20.7 million to Industrial & Specialty Products.

NOTE N - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 6, 2016, we paid a cash dividend of $0.0625 per share to common stockholders of record on June 15, 2016, which had been declared by our Board of Directors on May 5, 2016.

On July 15, 2016, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger pursuant to which we will acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of New Birmingham, Inc., a regional sand producer located near Tyler, Texas. The consideration includes 2.6 million shares of our common stock and approximately $111.1 million in cash and liabilities assumed, subject to customary adjustments at closing. The transaction is expected to close in August 2016, subject to receiving regulatory approvals.

On July 21, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0625 per share to common stockholders of record at the close of business on September 15, 2016, payable on October 4, 2016.

On August 1, 2016, we entered into a purchase agreement pursuant to which we will acquire all of the outstanding membership units of Sandbox Enterprises LLC, a provider of logistics solutions and technology for the transportation of proppant used in hydraulic fracturing in the oil and gas industry. The consideration includes 4.2 million shares of our common stock and approximately $75 million in cash and liabilities assumed, subject to customary adjustments at closing. The transaction is expected to close in August 2016, subject to receiving regulatory approvals.



ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as well as the Consolidated Financial Statements, the accompanying notes and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the "2015 Annual Report").

Overview

We are one of the largest domestic producers of commercial silica, a specialized mineral that is a critical input into a variety of attractive end markets. During our 116-year history, we have developed core competencies in mining, processing, logistics and materials science that enable us to produce and cost-effectively deliver over 260 products to customers across these markets. As of June 30, 2016, we operate 17 production facilities across the United States and own one of the largest frac sand processing plants in the United States. Including the purchase of reserves adjacent to our Ottawa, Illinois, facility in May 2016, we now control 436 million tons of reserves of commercial silica, 240 million tons of which can be processed to meet American Petroleum Institute (API) frac sand size specifications. Our operations are organized into two segments based on end markets served: (1) Oil & Gas Proppants and (2) Industrial & Specialty Products. Our segments are complementary because our ability to sell to a wide range of customers across end markets allows us to maximize recovery rates in our mining operations, optimize our asset utilization and reduce the cyclicality of our earnings.

Recent Trends and Outlook

Oil and gas proppants end market trends

Increased demand for frac sand between 2008 and 2014 was driven by the growth in the use of hydraulic fracturing as a means to extract hydrocarbons from shale formations. According to the 2014 Proppant Market Report, PropTester Inc., published February 2015, global frac sand consumption grew at a 51.2% compound annual growth rate from 2009 to 2014. This included 53.7% growth in frac sand demand from 2013 to 2014. We significantly expanded our sales efforts to the frac sand market in 2008 and experienced rapid growth in our sales associated with our oil and gas activities from 2008 until 2014.

However, declines in oil prices in 2015 have reduced oil and gas drilling and completion activity in North America. As of June 30, 2016, the U.S. land rig count had fallen over 70% from its peak in 2014. Demand for frac sand fell in conjunction with the rig count and activity levels, partially offset by higher proppant per well to optimize recovery and production rates. Frac sand pricing remained under pressure during the six months ended June 30, 2016. The table below summarizes some revenue metrics of our Oil & Gas Proppants segment for the three months ended June 30, 2016, March 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015. During the three months ended June 30, 2016 and three months ended March 31, 2016 both tons sold and average selling price decreased sequentially due to reduced demand from our customers.



Dollars in thousands except per ton data	Three Months Ended						Percentage Change for Three Months Ended
Dollars in thousands except per ton data	June 30,		March 31,		December 31,		June 30, 2016 vs. March 31, 2016		March 31, 2016 vs. December 31, 2015
Oil & Gas Proppants	2016		2016		2015		June 30, 2016 vs. March 31, 2016		March 31, 2016 vs. December 31, 2015
Sales	$	64,926	$	73,865	$	88,841	(12	)%	(17	)%
Tons Sold	1,333		1,411		1,553		(6	)%	(9	)%
Average Selling Price per Ton	$	48.71	$	52.35	$	57.21	(7	)%	(8	)%

A continued reduction in oil and gas drilling and completion activity may reduce frac sand demand further, which could result in us selling fewer tons, selling tons at lower prices, or both. If we sell less frac sand, or sell frac sand at lower prices, our revenue, net income, cash generated from operating activities, and liquidity would be adversely affected. We could evaluate further actions to reduce cost and improve liquidity. For instance, depending on market conditions, we may implement additional cost improvement projects or further reduce our capital spending for 2016 and beyond and may delay or cancel capital projects.

Additionally, due to impacts of reduced demand for our frac sand, we are engaged in ongoing discussions with our take-or-pay supply agreement customers regarding pricing and volume requirements under our existing contracts. While these discussions continue, in certain circumstances, we have provided contract customers with temporary

reductions to contract pricing in exchange for additional term and/or volume in order to preserve the value of these agreements. We may deliver sand at prices or at volumes below the requirements in our existing take-or-pay supply agreements. We expect these circumstances may continue for the remainder of 2016. For a discussion of customer credit risk, see the Credit Risk section in Part I, Item 3 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016 leading indicators suggested a possibility of stabilization or even an increase in North American oil and gas drilling and completion activity in the near future. We believe fluctuations in frac sand demand and price may occur as the market adjusts to changing supply and demand due to energy pricing fluctuations. We continue to expect long-term growth in oil and gas drilling in North American shale basins.

Oil and natural gas exploration and production companies' and oilfield service providers’ preferences and expectations have been evolving in recent years. A proppant vendor’s logistics capabilities have become an important differentiating factor when competing for business on both a spot and contract basis. Many of our customers increasingly seek convenient in-basin proppant delivery capability from their proppant supplier. We believe that, over time, proppant customers will prefer to consolidate their purchases across a smaller group of suppliers with robust logistics capabilities and a broad offering of high performance proppants.

Industrial and specialty products end market trends

Demand in the industrial and specialty products end markets is relatively stable and is primarily influenced by key macroeconomic drivers such as housing starts, light vehicle sales, repair and remodel activity and industrial production. The primary end markets served by our production used in Industrial & Specialty Products are foundry, building products, sports and recreation, glassmaking and filtration. We have been increasing our value-added product offerings in the industrial and specialty products end markets. These new higher margin product sales have increased our Industrial & Specialty Products segment's profitability.

Our Strategy

The key drivers of our growth strategy include:


•	Expand our Oil & Gas Proppants production capacity and product portfolio. We continue to consider and execute several initiatives to increase our frac sand production capacity and augment our proppant product portfolio.


•	While we made various initial investments or initial evaluations of new Greenfield sites in recent years, these expansion projects have been given lower priority due to the current frac sand market conditions. Our current focus for expanding production capacity is on maximizing existing production facility efficiencies.

•

In order to increase our resin coated product portfolio, during 2015, we announced the introduction of InnoProp^® Python RCS, a new high-performance resin coated proppant designed to increase the production of oil and gas wells in an economical and efficient manner. In early 2016, we introduced another new resin coated product, InnoProp^® PLT, which is a curable low-temperature product and can be used without an activator in oil and gas wells that have bottom-hole static temperatures down to 70°F.

•

Increase our presence and product offering in industrial and specialty products end markets. Our research and business development teams work in tandem with our customers to develop new products, which we expect will either increase our presence and market share in certain industrial and specialty products end markets or allow us to enter new markets. We manage a robust pipeline of new products in various stages of development. Some of these products have already come to market, resulting in a positive impact on our financial results. We continue to work toward offering more value-driven industrial and specialty products that will enhance the profitability of the business.

•

Optimize product mix and further develop value-added capabilities to maximize margins. We continue to actively manage our product mix at each of our plants to ensure we maximize our profit margins. This requires us to use our proprietary expertise in balancing key variables, such as mine geology, processing capacities, transportation availability, customer requirements and pricing. We expect to continue investing in ways to increase the value we provide to our customers by expanding our product offerings, improving our supply chain management, upgrading our information technology, and creating a world class customer service model.

•

Expand our supply chain network and leverage our logistics capabilities to meet our customers’ needs in each strategic oil and gas basin. We continue to expand our transload network to ensure product is available to meet the in-basin needs of our customers. This approach allows us to provide strong customer service and puts us in a position to take advantage of opportunistic spot market sales. Our plant sites are strategically located to provide access to key Class I railroads, which enables us to cost effectively send product to each of the strategic basins in North America. We can ship product by truck, barge and rail with an ability to connect to short-line railroads as

necessary to meet our customers’ evolving in-basin product needs. We believe that our supply chain network and logistics capabilities are a competitive advantage that enables us to provide superior service for our customers. For example, in 2015, we opened our Odessa, Texas unit train receiving transload facility, which was built in partnership with Union Pacific Railroad to support mainly the Permian market. We expect to continue to make strategic investments and develop partnerships with transload operators and transportation providers that will enhance our portfolio of supply chain services that we can provide to customers. As of June 30, 2016, we have storage capacity at 51 transloads located near all of the major shale basins in the United States.

•

Evaluate both Greenfield and Brownfield expansion opportunities and other acquisitions. We expect to continue to leverage our reputation, processing capabilities and infrastructure to increase production, as well as explore other opportunities to expand our reserve base. We may accomplish this by developing Greenfield projects, where we can capitalize on our technical knowledge of geology, mining and processing and our strong reputation within local communities. We are continuing to actively pursue acquisitions to grow by taking advantage of our asset footprint, our management’s experience with high-growth businesses, and our strong customer relationships. Our primary objective is to acquire assets with differing levels of frac sand quality that are complementary to our Oil & Gas Proppants segment, with a focus on mining, processing and logistics to further enhance our market presence. We prioritize acquisitions that provide opportunities to realize synergies (and, in some cases, the acquisition may be accretive assuming synergies), including entering new geographic and frac sand product markets, acquiring attractive customer contracts and improving operations. For instance, on July 15, 2016, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger pursuant to which we will acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of New Birmingham, Inc., a regional sand producer located near Tyler, Texas. The consideration includes 2.6 million shares of our common stock and approximately $111.1 million in cash and liabilities assumed, subject to customary adjustments at closing. The transaction is expected to close in August 2016, subject to receiving regulatory approvals. Additionally, on August 1, 2016, we entered into a purchase agreement pursuant to which we will acquire all of the outstanding membership units of Sandbox Enterprises LLC, a provider of logistics solutions and technology for the transportation of proppant used in hydraulic fracturing in the oil and gas industry. The consideration includes 4.2 million shares of our common stock and approximately $75 million in cash and liabilities assumed, subject to customary adjustments at closing. The transaction is expected to close in August 2016, subject to receiving regulatory approvals. We are in active discussions to acquire additional assets fitting this strategy, which, if completed, would be “significant” under Regulation S-X and could require additional sources of financing. There can be no assurance that we will reach a definitive agreement and complete any of these potential transactions. See the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of Part I of our 2015 Annual Report, including the risk factor entitled, “If we cannot successfully complete acquisitions or integrate acquired businesses, our growth may be limited and our financial condition may be adversely affected.”

•

Maintain financial strength and flexibility. We intend to maintain financial strength and flexibility to enable us to better manage through the oil and gas proppant industry downturn and pursue acquisitions and new growth opportunities as they arise. In March 2016, we completed a public offering of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock for total cash proceeds of approximately $186.2 million net of underwriting discounts and offering costs. As of June 30, 2016, we had $454.2 million of cash on hand and $46.7 million of availability under our Revolver. We intend to use a portion of this cash to complete our planned acquisition of New Birmingham, Inc and Sandbox Enterprises LLC.

How We Generate Our Sales

We derive our sales by mining and processing minerals that our customers purchase for various uses. Our sales are primarily a function of the price per ton and the number of tons sold. The price invoiced reflects product, transportation and additional services as applicable, such as storage and transloading the product from railcars to trucks for delivery to the customer site. We invoice the majority of our customers on a per shipment basis, although for some larger customers, we consolidate invoices weekly or monthly. Our five largest customers accounted for approximately 38% of total sales during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Sales to our largest customer, Halliburton Company, accounted for 13% of our total revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2016. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues.

We primarily sell our products under short-term price agreements or at prevailing market rates. For a number of customers, we sell under long-term, competitively-bid contracts. As of June 30, 2016, we have five take-or-pay supply agreements in the Oil & Gas Proppants segment with initial terms expiring between 2017 and 2019. These agreements define, among other commitments, the volume of product that our customers must purchase, the volume of product that we must provide and the price that we will charge and that our customers will pay for each product. Prices under these agreements are generally fixed and subject to upward adjustment in response to certain cost increases. Additionally, at the time the take-or-pay supply agreements were signed, some customers provided advance payments for future shipments. A percentage of these

advance payments is recognized as revenue with each ton of applicable product shipped to the customer. Collectively, sales to customers with take-or-pay supply agreements accounted for 20% and 32% of our total company revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Although sales under take-or-pay supply agreements may result in us realizing lower margins than we otherwise might during periods of high market prices, we believe such lower margins are offset by the benefits derived from the product mix and sales volume stability afforded by such supply agreements, which helps us lower market risk arising from adverse changes in spot prices and market conditions. Additionally, selling more tons under supply contracts also enables us to be more efficient from a production, supply chain and logistics standpoint. As discussed in Part I, Item 1A., "Risk Factors", of our 2015 Annual Report—"A large portion of our sales is generated by our top customers, and the loss of, or significant reduction in, purchases by our largest customers could adversely affect our operations,” these customers may not continue to purchase the same levels of product in the future due to a variety of reasons, contract requirements notwithstanding.

Historically we have not entered into long term take-or-pay contracts with our customers in the industrial and specialty products end markets because of the high cost to our customers of switching providers. With these customers, we often enter into price agreements which are typically negotiated annually.

The Costs of Conducting Our Business

The principal expenses involved in conducting our business are labor costs, electricity and drying fuel costs, maintenance and repair costs for our mining and processing equipment and facilities and transportation costs. Transportation and related costs include freight charges, fuel surcharges, transloading fees, switching fees, railcar lease costs, demurrage costs and storage fees. We believe the majority of our operating costs are relatively stable in price, but can vary significantly based on the volume of product produced. We benefit from owning the majority of the mineral deposits that we mine and having long-term mineral rights leases or supply agreements for our other primary sources of raw material, which limit royalty payments.

Additionally, we incur expenses related to our corporate operations, including costs for sales and marketing; research and development; and finance, legal, environmental, health and safety functions of our organization. These costs are principally driven by personnel expenses.

How We Evaluate Our Business

Our management team evaluates our business using a variety of financial and operational metrics. Our business is organized into two segments, Oil & Gas Proppants and Industrial & Specialty Products. We evaluate the performance of these segments based on their tons sold, average selling price and contribution margin earned. Additionally, we consider a number of factors in evaluating the performance of the business as a whole, including total tons sold, average selling price, segment contribution margin, and Adjusted EBITDA. We view these metrics as important factors in evaluating our profitability and review these measurements frequently to analyze trends and make decisions.

Segment Contribution Margin

Segment contribution margin, a non-GAAP measure, is a key metric that management uses to evaluate our operating performance and to determine resource allocation between segments. Segment contribution margin excludes certain corporate costs not associated with the operations of the segment. These unallocated costs include costs that are related to corporate functional areas such as operations management, corporate purchasing, accounting, treasury, information technology, legal and human resources.

Segment contribution margin is not a measure of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to measures derived in accordance with GAAP. For more details on the reconciliation of segment contribution margin to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, net income (loss), see Note M - Segment Reporting to our Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, is included in this report because it is a key metric used by management to assess our operating performance and by our lenders to evaluate our covenant compliance. Our target performance goals under our incentive compensation plan are tied, in part, to our Adjusted EBITDA. In addition, our Revolver contains a consolidated total net leverage ratio that we must meet as of the last day of any fiscal quarter whenever usage of the Revolver (other than certain undrawn letters of credit) exceeds 25% of the Revolver commitment, which is calculated based on our Adjusted EBITDA. Noncompliance with the financial ratio covenant contained in the Revolver could result in the acceleration of our obligations to repay all amounts outstanding under the Revolver and the Term Loan. Moreover, the Revolver and the Term

Loan contain covenants that restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability to make permitted acquisitions, incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments (including dividends) and retain excess cash flow based, in some cases, on our ability to meet leverage ratios calculated based on our Adjusted EBITDA.

Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of our financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance, cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash requirements such as interest payments, tax payments and debt service requirements. Adjusted EBITDA contains certain other limitations, including the failure to reflect our cash expenditures, cash requirements for working capital needs and cash costs to replace assets being depreciated and amortized, and excludes certain non-recurring charges. Management compensates for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and by using Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. Our measure of Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to Adjusted EBITDA.



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Net income (loss)	$	(11,991	)	$	9,953		$	(22,651	)	$	24,776
Total interest expense, net of interest income	6,150			6,537			12,520			13,477
Provision for taxes	(9,555		)	(6,342		)	(18,048		)	(2,889		)
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses	15,209			13,695			29,765			26,938
EBITDA	(187		)	23,843			1,586			62,302
Non-cash incentive compensation ⁽¹⁾	3,449			(2,179		)	5,355			(89		)
Post-employment expenses (excluding service costs) ⁽²⁾	199			868			964			1,735
Business development related expenses ⁽³⁾	861			(375		)	968			7,953
Other adjustments allowable under our existing credit agreement ⁽⁴⁾	1,051			1,286			1,752			2,826
Adjusted EBITDA	$	5,373		$	23,443		$	10,625		$	74,727




₍₁₎	Reflects equity-based compensation expense.
₍₂₎	Includes net pension cost and net post-retirement cost relating to pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations during the applicable period, but in each case excluding the service cost relating to benefits earned during such period. See Note K - Pension and Post-retirement Benefits to our Financial Statements in Part 1, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
₍₃₎	Reflects expenses related to business development activities in connection with our growth and expansion initiatives.
₍₄₎	Reflects miscellaneous adjustments permitted under our existing credit agreement, including such items as restructuring costs for actions that will provide future cost savings. Restructuring costs were $1.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and $3.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. The six months ended June 30, 2016 amount includes a gain on insurance settlement of $1.5 million received during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

Sales



All numbers in thousands except per ton data	Three Months Ended June 30,				Amount Change			Percent Change
	2016		2015		'16 vs. '15			'16 vs. '15
Sales:
Oil & Gas Proppants	$	64,926	$	90,855	$	(25,929	)	(29	)%
Industrial & Specialty Products	52,068		56,656		(4,588		)	(8	)%
Total Sales	$	116,994	$	147,511	$	(30,517	)	(21	)%
Tons:
Oil & Gas Proppants	1,333		1,224		109			9	%
Industrial & Specialty Products	904		1,034		(130		)	(13	)%
Total Tons	2,237		2,258		(21		)	(1	)%
Average Selling Price per Ton:
Oil & Gas Proppants	$	48.71	$	74.23	$	(25.52	)	(34	)%
Industrial & Specialty Products	57.60		54.79		2.81			5	%
Overall Average Selling Price per Ton:	$	52.30	$	65.33	$	(13.03	)	(20	)%

Total sales decreased 21% for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015, driven by a 1% decrease in total tons sold and a 20% decrease in overall average selling price. Tons sold in-basin represented 33% of total company tons sold for both the three months ended June 30, 2016 and the same period in 2015.

The decrease in total sales was primarily driven by Oil & Gas Proppants sales, which decreased 29%. Oil & Gas Proppants average selling price decreased 34% driven by a year over year decrease in demand for our frac sand from customers due to reduced drilling and completion activity. Tons sold for the three months ended June 30, 2016 increased 9% due to our market share gain efforts.

Industrial & Specialty Products sales decreased by 8% for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015. Tons sold decreased 13% driven by our strategic shift among customers and products. Average selling price increased 5%, which was primarily a result of new higher-margin product sales and price increases.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold decreased by $14.5 million, or 12%, to $102.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $117.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. As a percentage of sales, cost of goods sold increased to 88% for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 79% for the same period in 2015. These changes result from the main components of cost of goods sold as discussed below.

We incurred $52.2 million and $58.1 million of transportation and related costs for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. This decrease was due to fewer tons sold through transloads caused by lower demand for our frac sand at our transload sites. As a percentage of sales, transportation and related costs increased to 45% for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 39% for the same period in 2015 mainly due to a lower average selling price.

We incurred $16.8 million and $20.1 million of operating labor costs for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The $3.3 million decrease in labor costs incurred was primarily due to lower employee headcount and fewer tons sold. As a percentage of sales, operating labor costs represented 14% for both the three months ended June 30, 2016 and the same period in 2015.

We incurred $5.9 million and $6.5 million of electricity and drying fuel (principally natural gas) costs for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The $0.6 million decrease in electricity and drying fuel costs incurred was mainly driven by lower natural gas prices and fewer tons sold. As a percentage of sales, electricity and drying fuel costs increased to 5% for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 4% for the same period in 2015.

We incurred $7.9 million and $9.1 million of maintenance and repair costs for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in maintenance and repair costs incurred was mainly due to scheduled maintenance and

fewer tons sold. As a percentage of sales, maintenance and repair costs increased to 7% for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 6% for the same period in 2015.

Segment Contribution Margin

Oil & Gas Proppants contribution margin decreased by $19.3 million, or 145%, to $(6.0) million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $13.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, driven by a $25.9 million decrease in segment revenue, partially offset by lower segment cost of goods sold mainly due to lower transportation and related costs.

Industrial & Specialty Products contribution margin increased by $2.0 million, or 10%, to $21.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $19.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, driven by increased higher-margin products sales as a percentage of total sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $8.0 million, or 122%, to $14.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was due to the following factors:

•

Business development related expense increased by $1.2 million to $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $(0.4) million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to the settlement of an arbitration proceeding during the three months ended June 30, 2015, which caused a $1.1 million credit to our expense. See Note I - Commitments and Contingencies of our Financial Statements for more information about this arbitration ruling.


•	Compensation-related expense increased by $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015, driven by reduced 2015 incentive compensation and the valuation adjustments of equity-based compensation expense during three months ended June 30, 2015, partially offset by lower employee headcount in 2016.


•	Bad debt expense increased by $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015, mainly due to a recovery of a previously reserved receivable that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

In total, our selling, general and administrative costs represented approximately 12% and 4% of our sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization

Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased by $1.5 million, or 11%, to $15.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $13.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The year over year increase was mainly driven by our continued capital spending. Depreciation, depletion and amortization costs represented approximately 13% and 9% of our sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Operating Income (Loss)

Operating income decreased by $25.5 million, or 254%, to $(15.5) million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $10.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was due to a 21% decrease in sales, a 122% increase in selling, general and administrative expense and an 11% increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, partially offset by a 12% decrease in cost of goods sold.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased by $0.3 million, or 4%, to $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $6.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, mainly driven by decreases in debt principal and customer prepayment recorded as deferred revenue.

Provision for Income Taxes

The income tax benefit increased $3.2 million to $9.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $6.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was driven primarily by increased loss before income

taxes. The effective tax rate was 44% and (176)% for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See accompanying Note J - Income Taxes of our Financial Statements for more information.

Other income, net, including interest income

Other income was relatively flat at $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Net Income/Loss

Net loss was $12.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to a net income of $10.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The year over year decrease was due to the factors noted above.

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

Sales



All numbers in thousands except per ton data	Six Months Ended June 30,				Amount Change			Percent Change
	2016		2015		'16 vs. '15			'16 vs. '15
Sales:
Oil & Gas Proppants	$	138,791	$	239,607	$	(100,816	)	(42	)%
Industrial & Specialty Products	100,713		111,862		(11,149		)	(10	)%
Total Sales	$	239,504	$	351,469	$	(111,965	)	(32	)%
Tons:
Oil & Gas Proppants	2,744		2,912		(168		)	(6	)%
Industrial & Specialty Products	1,766		2,017		(251		)	(12	)%
Total Tons	4,510		4,929		(419		)	(9	)%
Average Selling Price per Ton:
Oil & Gas Proppants	$	50.58	$	82.28	$	(31.70	)	(39	)%
Industrial & Specialty Products	57.03		55.46		1.57			3	%
Overall Average Selling Price per Ton:	$	53.11	$	71.31	$	(18.20	)	(26	)%

Total sales decreased 32% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015, driven by a 26% decrease in overall average selling price and a 9% decrease in total tons sold. Tons sold in-basin represented 32% and 37% of total company tons sold for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The decrease in total sales was driven by Oil & Gas Proppants sales, which decreased 42%. Oil & Gas Proppants tons sold for the six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased 6% and average selling price decreased 39%. These decreases were driven by the year over year decrease in demand for our frac sand from customers due to reduced drilling and completion activity.

Industrial & Specialty Products sales decreased 10% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. Tons sold decreased 12%, driven by our strategic shift among customers and products. Average selling price increased 3%, driven new higher-margin product sales and price increases.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold decreased by $46.4 million, or 18%, to $209.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $255.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. As a percentage of sales, cost of goods sold increased to 87% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 73% for the same period in 2015. These changes result from the main components of cost of goods sold as discussed below.

We incurred $104.3 million and $131.1 million of transportation and related costs for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The $26.8 million decrease was mainly due to fewer tons sold through transloads caused by lower

demand for our frac sand at our transload sites. As a percentage of sales, transportation and related costs increased to 44% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 37% for the same period in 2015 mainly due to a decrease in average selling price.

We incurred $36.5 million and $41.4 million of operating labor costs for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The $4.9 million decrease in labor costs incurred was primarily due to lower employee headcount and fewer tons sold. As a percentage of sales, operating labor costs represented 15% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 12% for the same period in 2015.

We incurred $12.6 million and $14.7 million of electricity and drying fuel (principally natural gas) costs for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in electricity and drying fuel costs incurred was due to fewer tons sold and lower natural gas prices. As a percentage of sales, electricity and drying fuel costs represented 5% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 4% for the same period in 2015.

We incurred $16.0 million and $19.3 million of maintenance and repair costs for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in maintenance and repair costs incurred was due to scheduled maintenance and fewer tons sold. As a percentage of sales, maintenance and repair costs increased to 7% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 5% for the same period in 2015.

Segment Contribution Margin

Oil & Gas Proppants contribution margin decreased by $70.6 million, or 108%, to $(5.1) million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $65.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, driven by a 42% decrease in revenue partially offset by a 17% decrease in segment cost of goods sold.

Industrial & Specialty Products contribution margin increased by $3.4 million, or 10%, to $38.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $35.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, driven by increased higher margin products sales as a percentage of total sales and price increases.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $3.4 million, or 10%, to $30.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $33.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to the following factors:

•

Business development related expense decreased by $7.0 million to $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $8.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. This decrease is mainly due to a $6.5 million settlement of an unfavorable arbitration ruling during the six months ended June 30, 2015. See Note I - Commitments and Contingencies of our Financial Statements for more information about this arbitration ruling.


•	Compensation related expense increased by $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 2015, primarily due to reduced 2015 incentive compensation and the valuation adjustments of equity-based compensation expense happened during three months ended June 30, 2015, partially offset by lower employee headcount in 2016.


•	Bad debt expense increased by $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015, mainly due to a recovery of a previously reserved receivable occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

In total, our selling, general and administrative costs represented approximately 13% and 10% of our sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization

Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased by $2.8 million, or 10%, to $29.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $26.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The year over year increase was driven by the addition of our Utica, Illinois plant, Odessa, Texas transload facility and other capital spending. Depreciation, depletion and amortization costs represented approximately 12% and 8% of our sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Operating Income (Loss)

Operating income decreased by $64.9 million, or 185%, to a $29.8 million operating loss for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $35.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was due to a 32% decrease in sales and a 10% increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, partially offset by a 18% decrease in cost of goods sold and a 10% decrease in selling, general and administrative expense.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased by $0.5 million, or 3%, to $13.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $13.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, mainly driven by decreases in debt principal and customer prepayment recorded as deferred revenue.

Provision for Income Taxes

The income tax benefit increased $15.2 million to $18.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was driven primarily by increased loss before income taxes. The effective tax rate was 44% and (13)% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See accompanying Note J - Income Taxes of our Financial Statements for more information.

Other income, net, including interest income

Other income was $2.4 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase was mainly due to a gain of $1.5 million on insurance settlements that we received during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Net Income (Loss)

Net loss was $22.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to a net income of $24.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The year over year decrease was due to the factors noted above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our principal liquidity requirements have historically been to service our debt, to meet our working capital, capital expenditure and mine development expenditure needs, to return cash to our stockholders, and to finance acquisitions. We have historically met our liquidity and capital investment needs with funds generated through operations. We have historically funded our acquisitions through cash on hand or borrowings under our credit facilities and equity issuances. Our working capital is the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities and is a measure of our ability to pay our liabilities as they become due. In March 2016, we completed a public offering of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock for total cash proceeds of approximately $186.2 million net of underwriting discounts and offering costs. As of June 30, 2016, our working capital was $513.9 million and we had $46.7 million of availability under the Revolver.

We believe that cash generated through operations and our financing arrangements will be sufficient to meet working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures, scheduled debt payments and any dividends declared for at least the next 12 months.

Management and our Board remain committed to evaluating additional ways of creating shareholder value. Any determination to pay dividends and other distributions in cash, stock, or property in the future will be at the discretion of our Board and will be dependent on then-existing conditions, including our business conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital requirements, contractual restrictions including restrictive covenants contained in debt agreements, and other factors. Additionally, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock may be limited by restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions to us, including restrictions under the terms of the agreements governing our indebtedness.

Cash Flow Analysis

A summary of operating, investing and financing activities (in thousands) is shown in the following table:



	Six Months Ended June 30,						Percent Change
	2016			2015			’16 vs. ‘15
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	1,321		$	38,457		(97	)%
Investing activities	(1,450		)	(22,458		)	(94	)%
Financing activities	177,260			(31,408		)	(664	)%

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Operating activities consist primarily of net income adjusted for certain non-cash and working capital items. Adjustments to net income for non-cash items include depreciation, depletion and amortization, deferred revenue, deferred income taxes, equity-based compensation and bad debt provision. In addition, operating cash flows include the effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities, principally accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets, income taxes payable and receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $38.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. This $37.1 million decrease in cash provided by operations was the result of a $47.4 million decrease in net income and the impact of the other components of operating activities.

Net Cash Provided Used in Investing Activities

Investing activities consist primarily of capital expenditures for growth and maintenance and proceeds from the sale and maturity of short-term investments.

Net cash used in investing activities was $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This was due to capital expenditures of $23.4 million being partially offset by $21.9 million in proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments. Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were primarily for a purchase of reserves adjacent to our Ottawa, Illinois, facility, engineering, procurement and construction of our growth projects and other maintenance and cost improvement capital projects.

Net cash used in investing activities was $22.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2015, which totaled $27.1 million, were primarily for the engineering, procurement and construction of our Greenfield raw sand plant near Fairchild, Wisconsin, an expansion project at our Pacific, Missouri facility and other maintenance capital projects.

Subject to our continuing evaluation of market conditions, we anticipate that our capital expenditures in 2016, including the purchase of reserves adjacent to our Ottawa, Illinois, facility, will be in a range of $28 million to $33 million, which is primarily associated with growth, maintenance and cost improvement capital projects. We expect to fund our capital expenditures through cash on our balance sheet, cash generated from our operations and cash generated from financing activities.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

Financing activities consist primarily of equity issuances, capital contributions, dividend payments, borrowings and repayments related to the Revolver and Term Loan, as well as fees and expenses paid in connection with our credit facilities, and advance payments from our customers.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $177.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, driven by $200.0 million of common stock issuances and $1.3 million of proceeds from options exercised, both of which were partially offset by $13.8 million of common stock issuance costs, $6.7 million of dividends paid, $2.6 million of long-term debt payments, and $1.0 million of tax payments related to shares withheld for vested restricted stock.

Net cash used in financing activities was $31.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015, driven by $15.3 million of common stock repurchases, $13.4 million of dividends paid, and $2.6 million of long-term debt payments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, sales, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations

There have been no significant changes outside the ordinary course of business to our “Contractual Obligations” table in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our 2015 Annual Report. For more details on future minimum annual commitments under such operating leases, please see accompanying Note I - Commitments and Contingencies to our Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, hazardous materials, air and water emissions, environmental contamination and reclamation and the protection of the environment and natural resources. We have made, and expect to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the full amount of such future expenditures. As of June 30, 2016, we had $12.7 million accrued for future reclamation costs, as compared to $12.3 million as of December 31, 2015.

We discuss certain environmental matters relating to our various production and other facilities, certain regulatory requirements relating to human exposure to crystalline silica and our mining activity and how such matters may affect our business in the future under Item 1, “Business,” Item 1A, “Risk Factors” Item 3, “Legal Proceedings”, and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Environmental Matters” in our 2015 Annual Report.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe that the reported amounts would be materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on experience and on various other

assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies, including certain critical accounting policies, are disclosed in our 2015 Annual Report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

New accounting guidance that we have recently adopted, as well as accounting guidance that has been recently issued but not yet adopted by us, are included in Note A - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Availability of Reports; Website Access; Other Information

Our internet address is http://www.ussilica.com. Through “Investor Relations”—“SEC Filings” on our home page, we make available free of charge our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our proxy statements, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5 and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our reports filed with the SEC are also made available to read and copy at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information about the Public Reference Room may be obtained by contacting the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Reports filed with the SEC are also made available on its website at www.sec.gov.

Copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee charters, the Code of Conduct for our Board of Directors and Code of Conduct and Ethics for U.S. Silica employees (including the chief executive officer, chief financial officer and corporate controller) can also be found on our website. Any amendments or waivers to the Code of Conduct and Ethics applicable to the chief executive officer, chief financial officer and corporate controller can also be found in the “Investor Relations” section of the U.S. Silica website. Stockholders may also request a free copy of these documents from: U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc., attn.: Investor Relations, 8490 Progress Drive, Suite 300, Frederick, Maryland 21701 or IR@ussilica.com.



ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

We are exposed to certain market risks, which exist as a part of our ongoing business operations. Such risks arise from adverse changes in market rates, prices and conditions. We address such market risks as discussed in "How We Generate Our Sales" in Item 2 of this Form 10-Q, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk arising from adverse changes in interest rates. As of June 30, 2016, we have $496.7 million of debt outstanding under our senior credit facility. Assuming no change in the amount outstanding, and LIBOR is greater than the 1.0% minimum base rate on the Term Loan, a hypothetical increase or decrease in interest rates by 1.0% would have changed our interest expense by $3.2 million per year.

We use interest rate derivatives in the normal course of our business to manage both our interest cost and the risks associated with changing interest rates. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. The following table summarizes the fair value of our derivative instruments (in thousands) at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.



	June 30, 2016						December 31, 2015
	Maturity Date	Contract/Notional Amount	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Maturity Date	Contract/Notional Amount	Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Interest rate cap agreement⁽¹⁾	2019	$249 million	$	18	$	18	2016	$252 million	$	—	$	—




⁽¹⁾	Agreements limit the LIBOR floating interest rate base to 4%.

Credit Risk

We are subject to risks of loss resulting from nonpayment or nonperformance by our customers. We examine the creditworthiness of third-party customers to whom we extend credit and manage our exposure to credit risk through credit analysis, credit approval, credit limits and monitoring procedures, and for certain transactions, we may request letters of credit, prepayments or guarantees, although collateral is generally not required.

Despite enhancing our examination of our customers' credit worthiness, we may still experience delays or failures in customer payments. Some of our customers have reported experiencing financial difficulties. With respect to customers that may file for bankruptcy protection, we may not be able to collect sums owed to us by these customers and we also may be required to refund pre-petition amounts paid to us during the preference period (typically 90 days) prior to the bankruptcy filing.



ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2016. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2016, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION



ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In addition to the matter described below, we are subject to various legal proceedings, claims, and governmental inspections, audits or investigations arising out of our business which cover matters such as general commercial, governmental regulations, antitrust and trade regulations, product liability, environmental, intellectual property, employment and other actions. Although the outcomes of these routine claims cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Prolonged inhalation of excessive levels of respirable crystalline silica dust can result in silicosis, a disease of the lungs. Breathing large amounts of respirable silica dust over time may injure a person’s lungs by causing scar tissue to form. Crystalline silica in the form of quartz is a basic component of soil, sand, granite and most other types of rock. Cutting, breaking, crushing, drilling, grinding and abrasive blasting of or with crystalline silica containing materials can produce fine silica dust, the inhalation of which may cause silicosis, lung cancer and possibly other diseases including immune system disorders such as scleroderma. Sources of exposure to respirable crystalline silica dust include sandblasting, foundry manufacturing, crushing and drilling of rock, masonry and concrete work, mining and tunneling, and cement and asphalt pavement manufacturing.

Since at least 1975, we and/or our predecessors have been named as a defendant, usually among many defendants, in numerous lawsuits brought by or on behalf of current or former employees of our customers alleging damages caused by silica exposure. Prior to 2001, the number of silicosis lawsuits filed annually against the commercial silica industry remained relatively stable and was generally below 100, but between 2001 and 2004 the number of silicosis lawsuits filed against the commercial silica industry substantially increased. This increase led to greater scrutiny of the nature of the claims filed, and in June 2005 the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued an opinion in the former federal silica multi-district litigation remanding almost all of the 10,000 cases then pending in the multi-district litigation back to the state courts from which they originated for further review and medical qualification, leading to a number of silicosis case dismissals across the United States. In conjunction with this and other favorable court rulings establishing “sophisticated user” and “no duty to warn” defenses for silica producers, several states, including Texas, Ohio and Florida, have passed medical criteria legislation that requires proof of actual impairment before a lawsuit can be filed.

As a result of the above developments, the filing rate of new claims against us over the past three years has decreased to below pre-2001 levels, and we were named as a defendant in three, one and zero new silicosis cases filed in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, no additional claims were brought against us. As of June 30, 2016, there are a total of approximately 74 active silica-related products liability claims pending in which we were a defendant and approximately 165 inactive claims. Almost all of the claims pending against us arise out of the alleged use of our silica products in foundries or as an abrasive blast media, and involve various other defendants. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2012, we had insurance policies for both our predecessors that covered certain claims for alleged silica exposure for periods prior to certain dates in 1985 and 1986 (with respect to certain insurance). As a result of a settlement with a former owner of ours and its insurers in the fourth quarter of 2012, some of these policies are no longer available to us, and we will not seek reimbursement for any defense costs or claim payments from these policies. Other insurance policies, however, continue to remain available to us and will continue to make such payments on our behalf.

The silica-related litigation brought against us to date has not resulted in material liability to us. However, we continue to have silica-related products liability claims filed against us, including claims that allege silica exposure for periods for which we do not have insurance coverage. Any such pending or future claims or inadequacies of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation or results of operations. For more information regarding silica-related litigation, see Part I, Item 1A of our 2015 Annual Report “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Silica-related health issues and litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation or results of operations.”



ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

As of June 30, 2016, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of Part I in our 2015 Annual Report.



ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Share Repurchase Program

The following table presents the total number of shares of our common stock that we purchased during the second quarter of 2016, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that we purchased as part of our publicly announced repurchase program, and the approximate dollar value of shares that still could have been purchased at the end of the applicable fiscal period pursuant to our June 2012 share repurchase program:



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program⁽¹⁾	Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program⁽¹⁾
April 2016	—		$	—	—
May 2016	5,326	⁽²⁾	$	24.56	—
June 2016	11,250	⁽²⁾	$	29.36	—
Total	16,576		$	26.96	—	$	33,173,725




₍₁₎	A program covering the repurchase of up to $25.0 million of our common stock was initially announced in June 2012 and was increased to $50.0 million in December 2014. This program expires on December 11, 2016.
₍₂₎	Represents shares withheld by U.S. Silica to pay taxes due upon the vesting of employee restricted stock and restricted stock units.

Subsequent to June 30, 2016, we have not repurchased any shares of our common stock.

For more details on the stock repurchase program, see Note B - Capital Structure and Accumulated Comprehensive Income to our Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.



ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.



ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Safety is one of our core values, and we strive for excellence in the achievement of a workplace free of injuries and occupational illnesses. Our health and safety leadership team has developed comprehensive safety policies and standards, which include detailed standards and procedures for safe production, addressing topics such as employee training, risk management, workplace inspection, emergency response, accident investigation and program auditing. We place special emphasis on the importance of continuous improvement in occupational health, personal injury avoidance and prevention, emergency preparedness, and property damage elimination. In addition to strong leadership and involvement from all levels of the organization, these programs and procedures form the cornerstone of our safety initiatives, ensuring that employees are provided a safe and healthy environment and are intended as a means to reduce workplace accidents, incidents and losses, comply with all mining-related regulations and provide support for both regulators and the industry to improve mine safety. While we want to have productive operations in full regulatory compliance, we know it is equally essential that we motivate and train our people to think, practice and feel a personal responsibility for health and safety on and off the job.

All of our production facilities, with the exception of our resin-coated sand facility, are classified as mines and are subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). MSHA inspects our mines on a regular basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. Following passage of The Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006, MSHA significantly increased the numbers of citations and orders charged against mining operations. The dollar penalties assessed for citations issued has also increased in recent years. Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.104) is included in Exhibit 95.1 to this Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q.



ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “can have,” “likely” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. For example, all statements we make relating to our estimated and projected costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates and financial results, our plans and objectives for future operations, growth or initiatives, strategies or the expected outcome or impact of pending or threatened litigation are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expected, including:


•	fluctuations in demand for commercial silica;


•	the cyclical nature of our customers’ businesses;


•	operating risks that are beyond our control, such as changes in the price and availability of transportation, natural gas or electricity; unusual or unexpected geological formations or pressures; cave-ins, pit wall failures or rock falls; or unanticipated ground, grade or water conditions;


•	our dependence on three of our plants for a significant portion of our sales;


•	the level of activity in the natural gas and oil industries;


•	decreased demand for frac sand or the development of either effective alternative proppants or new processes to replace hydraulic fracturing;


•	federal, state and local legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing and the potential for related regulatory action or litigation affecting our customers’ operations;


•	our rights and ability to mine our properties and our renewal or receipt of the required permits and approvals from governmental authorities and other third parties;


•	our ability to implement our capacity expansion plans within our current timetable and budget and our ability to secure demand for our increased production capacity, and the actual operating costs once we have completed the capacity expansion;


•	our ability to succeed in competitive markets;


•	loss of, or reduction in, business from our largest customers;


•	increasing costs or a lack of dependability or availability of transportation services and transload network access infrastructure;


•	increases in the prices of, or interruptions in the supply of, natural gas and electricity, or any other energy sources;


•	increases in the price of diesel fuel;


•	diminished access to water;


•	our ability to successfully complete acquisitions or integrate acquired businesses;


•	our ability to make capital expenditures to maintain, develop and increase our asset base and our ability to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms;


•	our substantial indebtedness and pension obligations;


•	restrictions imposed by our indebtedness on our current and future operations;


•	contractual obligations that require us to deliver minimum amounts of frac sand or purchase minimum amounts of services;


•	the accuracy of our estimates of mineral reserves and resource deposits;


•	a shortage of skilled labor and rising costs in the mining industry;


•	our ability to attract and retain key personnel;


•	our ability to maintain satisfactory labor relations;


•	our reliance on trade secrets and contractual restrictions, rather than patents, to protect our proprietary rights;


•	our significant unfunded pension obligations and post-retirement health care liabilities;


•	our ability to maintain effective quality control systems at our mining, processing and production facilities;


•	seasonal and severe weather conditions;


•	fluctuations in our sales and results of operations due to seasonality and other factors;


•	interruptions or failures in our information technology systems;


•	the impact of a terrorist attack or armed conflict;


•	extensive and evolving environmental, mining, health and safety, licensing, reclamation and other regulation (and changes in their enforcement or interpretation);


•	silica-related health issues and corresponding litigation;


•	our ability to acquire, maintain or renew financial assurances related to the reclamation and restoration of mining property; and


•	other factors included and disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2015 Annual Report.

We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and forecasts, which are based on many detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, or cautionary statements, are disclosed under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2015 Annual Report. All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements as well as other cautionary statements that are made from time to time in our other filings with the SEC, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and public communications. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the context of these risks and uncertainties.

We caution you that the important factors referenced above may not contain all of the factors that are important to you. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will realize the results or developments we expect or anticipate or, even if substantially realized, that they will result in the consequences or affect us or our operations in the way we expect. The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.



ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS

The information called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibit Index included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 3rd day of August, 2016.



	U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.

	/s/ DONALD A. MERRIL
	Name:		Donald A. Merril
	Title:		Chief Financial Officer

S-1

EXHIBIT INDEX



		Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number	Description	Form	File No.	Exhibit	Filing Date
3.1	Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc., effective January 31, 2012.	8-K	001-35416	3.1	February 6, 2012
3.2	Certificate of Change of Registered Agent and/or Registered Office	8-K	001-35416	3.1	May 11, 2015
3.3	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc., effective January 31, 2012.	8-K	001-35416	3.2	February 6, 2012
4.1	Specimen Common Stock Certificate.	S-1/A	333-175636	4.1	December 7, 2011
31.1*	Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification by Bryan A. Shinn, Chief Executive Officer.
31.2*	Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification by Donald A. Merril, Chief Financial Officer.
32.1*	Section 1350 Certification by Bryan A. Shinn, Chief Executive Officer.
32.2*	Section 1350 Certification by Donald A. Merril, Chief Financial Officer.
95.1*	Mine Safety Disclosure
99.1*	Consent of PropTester, Inc.
101*	101.INS XBRL Instance
	101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
	101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation
	101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels
	101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation
	101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition




*	Filed herewith

We will furnish any of our shareowners a copy of any of the above Exhibits not included herein upon the written request of such shareowner and the payment to U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. of the reasonable expenses incurred in furnishing such copy or copies.

E-1

Exhibit

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bryan A. Shinn, certify that:



1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2016;



2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



	b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



	c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



	d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 3, 2016



	/s/ BRYAN A. SHINN
	Name: Bryan A. Shinn
	Title: Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Donald A. Merril, certify that:



1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2016;



2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



	b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



	c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



	d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 3, 2016



	/s/ DONALD A. MERRIL
	Name: Donald A. Merril
	Title: Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit

Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Bryan A. Shinn, Chief Executive Officer, U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



	i.	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



	ii.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 3, 2016



	/s/ BRYAN A. SHINN
	Name: Bryan A. Shinn
	Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.

Exhibit

Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Donald A. Merril, Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



	i.	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



	ii.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 3, 2016



	/s/ DONALD A. MERRIL
	Name: Donald A. Merril
	Title: Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit

Exhibit 95.1

Mine Safety Disclosure

The following disclosures are provided pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, which requires certain disclosures by companies required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that operate mines regulated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”).

Mine Safety Information. Whenever the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) believes a violation of the Mine Act, any health or safety standard or any regulation has occurred, it may issue a citation which describes the alleged violation and fixes a time within which the U.S. mining operator must abate the alleged violation. In some situations, such as when MSHA believes that conditions pose a hazard to miners, MSHA may issue an order removing miners from the area of the mine affected by the condition until the alleged hazards are corrected. When MSHA issues a citation or order, it generally proposes a civil penalty, or fine, as a result of the alleged violation, that the operator is ordered to pay. Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed. The number of citations, orders and proposed assessments vary depending on the size and type (underground or surface) of the mine as well as by the MSHA inspector(s) assigned.

Mine Safety Data. The following provides additional information about references used in the table below to describe the categories of violations, orders or citations issued by MSHA under the Mine Act:


•	Section 104 S&S Citations: Citations received from MSHA under section 104 of the Mine Act for violations of mandatory health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to the cause and effect of a mine safety or health hazard.


•	Section 104(b) Orders: Orders issued by MSHA under section 104(b) of the Mine Act, which represents a failure to abate a citation under section 104(a) within the period of time prescribed by MSHA. This results in an order of immediate withdrawal from the area of the mine affected by the condition until MSHA determines that the violation has been abated.


•	Section 104(d) Citations and Orders: Citations and orders issued by MSHA under section 104(d) of the Mine Act for unwarrantable failure to comply with mandatory health or safety standards.


•	Section 110(b)(2) Violations: Flagrant violations issued by MSHA under section 110(b)(2) of the Mine Act.


•	Section 107(a) Orders: Orders issued by MSHA under section 107(a) of the Mine Act for situations in which MSHA determined an “imminent danger” (as defined by MSHA) existed.

The following table details the violations, citations and orders issued to us by MSHA during the quarter ended June 30, 2016:



Mine⁽¹⁾	Section 104 S&S Citations (#)	Section 104(b) Orders (#)	Section 104(d) Citations and Orders (#)	Section 110(b)(2) Violations (#)	Section 107(a) Orders (#)	Proposed Assessments⁽²⁾ ($, amounts in dollars)		Mining Related Fatalities (#)
Ottawa, IL	2	—	—	—	—	$	7,695	—
Mill Creek, OK	—	—	—	—	—	100		—
Pacific, MO	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Berkeley Springs, WV	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Mapleton Depot, PA	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Kosse, TX	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Mauricetown, NJ	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Columbia, SC	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Montpelier, VA	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Rockwood, MI	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Jackson, TN	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Dubberly, LA	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Hurtsboro, AL	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Sparta, WI	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Voca, TX	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Peru, IL	—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Utica, IL	—	—	—	—	—	—		—

(1)

The definition of mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting minerals, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and minerals preparation facilities. Unless otherwise indicated, any of these other items associated with a single mine have been aggregated in the totals for that mine. MSHA assigns an identification number to each mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation facilities. We are providing the information in the table by mine rather than MSHA identification number because that is how we manage and operate our mining business and we believe this presentation will be more useful to investors than providing information based on MSHA identification numbers.


(2)	Represents the total dollar value of proposed assessments from MSHA under the Mine Act relating to any type of citation or order issued during the quarter ended June 30, 2016.

Pattern or Potential Pattern of Violations. During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, none of the mines operated by us received written notice from MSHA of (a) a pattern of violations of mandatory health or safety standards that are of such nature as could have significantly and substantially contributed to the cause and effect of mine health or safety hazards under section 104(e) of the Mine Act or (b) the potential to have such a pattern.

Pending Legal Actions. There were 77 legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the Commission) as of June 30, 2016, each of which is a contest proceeding filed by us to challenge a citation or order issued by MSHA under the Mine Act and includes 29 contests challenging Section 104 S&S citations. During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, one legal action was instituted and 18 legal actions were resolved. The Commission is an independent adjudicative agency established by the Mine Act that provides administrative trial and appellate review of legal disputes arising under the Mine Act.

Exhibit

Exhibit 99.1

CONSENT OF PROPTESTER, INC.

We hereby consent to the references to our company’s name in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2016 (the “Quarterly Report”) of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and the quotation by the Company in the Quarterly Report from 2014 Proppant Market Report, published February 2015. We also hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report.



PROPTESTER, INC.

By:	/s/ Richard A. Derbawka
	Name:	Richard A. Derbawka
	Title:	CFO/COO

August 3, 2016